|
Post by sozocaps on May 26, 2016 10:43:51 GMT -6
You should come out with your own line of boutique capacitors...$1000 apiece. Or better yet... Digital Capacitor Modeling... { with a yearly subscription mandatory }
|
|
|
Post by kilroyrock on May 26, 2016 10:49:53 GMT -6
I have a digital capacitor tester/meter plugin for sale
|
|
|
Post by popmann on May 26, 2016 11:03:20 GMT -6
Did someone say Snake Oil audio is wanted?
|
|
|
Post by svart on May 26, 2016 11:10:16 GMT -6
Uhm.. The internet doesn't convey sarcasm well, so I have to ask.. Sarcasm? "Positive electrons" are called Positrons. They are only created by radioactive decay and high energy photons (AKA: Gamma rays) hitting various materials. Anyway, that's not going to happen in a cable. Diodes create a directional current, which in the case of a sine wave (which has both positive-going and negative-going currents, would rectify the waveform into only positive or negative halves. The result is extreme second-order distortion. The sound equivalent would sound like a ring modulator and distortion pedal combined. So as I mentioned before, there is NO such thing as directional cable. But Arrows loo so kewl on cables ! I really want a cable full of positrons. The radiation sickness and cancer would show everyone that I don't compromise and use only the best cables.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on May 26, 2016 11:28:26 GMT -6
The UAD 1176 are pretty spectacular. The Softube Summit Grand Channel (or UAD's Summit TLA100A) )has also been blowing my mind for digital, lately. I'm also using the UAD SSL E Channel a lot.
One geeky audiophile thing I just did is set my Windows Audio Properties to 24 bit 196 kHz for playback with foobar2000 on my Tascam UH-7000 DAC. I swear to god everything sounds smoother on the top and way more detailed, like I can hear deeper into specific mix elements, and there is more space. I think Windows is probably upsampling all of my lower res audio to 192. Also I have heard it said that different DAC chips have different qualities at different sample rates. Maybe someone that knows more than me could explain this.
Thanks to popmann for helping me figure this out.
|
|
|
Post by plinker on May 26, 2016 12:43:02 GMT -6
Regarding the "directional" audio cables: I wonder if they are putting a capacitor in there that acts as a HPF -- making the audio sound more hi-fi/bright, and also causing the cable to have a directional flow??
|
|
|
Post by plinker on May 26, 2016 12:51:34 GMT -6
The UAD 1176 are pretty spectacular. The Softube Summit Grand Channel (or UAD's Summit TLA100A) )has also been blowing my mind for digital, lately. I'm also using the UAD SSL E Channel a lot. One geeky audiophile thing I just did is set my Windows Audio Properties to 24 bit 196 kHz for playback with foobar2000 on my Tascam UH-7000 DAC. I swear to god everything sounds smoother on the top and way more detailed, like I can hear deeper into specific mix elements, and there is more space. I think Windows is probably upsampling all of my lower res audio to 192. Also I have heard it said that different DAC chips have different qualities at different sample rates. Maybe someone that knows more than me could explain this. Thanks to popmann for helping me figure this out. My Metric Halo 2882 sounds remarkably different at single vs double rates. Single = thicker, and closed-in. Double = thinner, and more open
|
|
|
Post by kilroyrock on May 26, 2016 13:11:04 GMT -6
But Arrows loo so kewl on cables ! I really want a cable full of positrons. The radiation sickness and cancer would show everyone that I don't compromise and use only the best cables.
We in the biz call that "analog warmth"
|
|
|
Post by svart on May 26, 2016 13:22:04 GMT -6
Regarding the "directional" audio cables: I wonder if they are putting a capacitor in there that acts as a HPF -- making the audio sound more hi-fi/bright, and also causing the cable to have a directional flow?? Caps don't have directional flow. AC (bi-directional current) will flow through the cap without being impeded. That's why they use them as DC blockers in audio paths.
|
|
|
Post by rowmat on May 26, 2016 14:47:38 GMT -6
Directional cables imply they affect the flow of positive electrons differently to negative electrons. Could it be these cables contain diodes to block negative electrons and just let the positive electrons pass? We all know positive electrons are far more sonically pleasing than those nasty, horrible negative electrons don't we! Uhm.. The internet doesn't convey sarcasm well, so I have to ask.. Sarcasm? "Positive electrons" are called Positrons. They are only created by radioactive decay and high energy photons (AKA: Gamma rays) hitting various materials. Anyway, that's not going to happen in a cable. Diodes create a directional current, which in the case of a sine wave (which has both positive-going and negative-going currents, would rectify the waveform into only positive or negative halves. The result is extreme second-order distortion. The sound equivalent would sound like a ring modulator and distortion pedal combined. So as I mentioned before, there is NO such thing as directional cable. Sarcasm? Me? Just to prove the point I actually tried out a directional cable yesterday but deliberately connected it back the front. Well you could have knocked me over with a feather. The damn music played in reverse!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2016 5:11:33 GMT -6
The UAD 1176 are pretty spectacular. The Softube Summit Grand Channel (or UAD's Summit TLA100A) )has also been blowing my mind for digital, lately. I'm also using the UAD SSL E Channel a lot. One geeky audiophile thing I just did is set my Windows Audio Properties to 24 bit 196 kHz for playback with foobar2000 on my Tascam UH-7000 DAC. I swear to god everything sounds smoother on the top and way more detailed, like I can hear deeper into specific mix elements, and there is more space. I think Windows is probably upsampling all of my lower res audio to 192. Also I have heard it said that different DAC chips have different qualities at different sample rates. Maybe someone that knows more than me could explain this. Thanks to popmann for helping me figure this out. I strongly guess this has more likely to do with clocking quality, if upsampled sounds better than original sample rate. Same is happening with the Behringer SRC2496 btw., much better when using the built in SRC upsampling to 96kHz. It is unlikely to be that the chips are "tuned" to do high sample rates better, although i bet when testing chip designs, the ones that sound best at 96kHz and 192kHz in the reference design might be preferred, at least for those designed for the pro market - it would look very bad if low sample rates sound better, but much better, if the marketing guys can say "This is 44.1kHz, and now 96kHz - you hear the difference?" What if you tell folks, that with proper clocking and chip design, 48kHz should just sound as good as double or quad speed sample rates? People might be tempted to stay at single speed sample rate. "Thank god" this did not happen. Everyone made a pretty good job at making 96kHz sounding "better". It shouldn't matter, if you do everything alright on the technical side? (And no - you don't have a bat's ear. If you say so, i don't believe you... :-D ).
|
|
|
Post by Ward on May 27, 2016 6:01:00 GMT -6
You people are using the B WORD AGAIN!!!! Stop it, or I'll report you to a moderator for swearing.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on May 27, 2016 8:35:55 GMT -6
Man, I really need a new computer and a new Apollo. I can't record at 96 for lack of engine power, and I can't use all my UAD plugs properly because I only have a DUO. I'd probably use UAD's 1176's more often, but I use the CLA 76 as a substitute. It works well, but I haven't compared it to the UAD version lately.
I thought the skinny was some plugins sound better at 96, or something like that..
|
|
|
Post by javamad on May 27, 2016 10:12:58 GMT -6
As for the power supply cables, I don't have a strong opinion on that cause I have really no experience with that world. But I am very curious about your feelings on the matter. I know you've talked about outlets and power cables before. What is it you believe they are doing? Not being sarcastic at all, I'm genuinely interested. I do a good bit of residential wiring in my work. There are hundreds of feet of 12 or 14 ga copper running around in our walls. Junction boxes, wire nuts, terminals, all over the place. And that's to say nothing of the dozens or hundreds of miles of wire carrying the voltage to your residential drop in the first place. I'm seriously curious as to what is alleged to be happening in the outlet and/or last 4 feet of wire that is improving the audio? Hi, I have worked in electrics and I know a but about power supply, voltages, alternating current, etc. First we have to understand that an alternating current supplies a sine wave of voltage to the power supply. Oscillating at 50(Europe) or 60(US) Hz. The power supply of any device takes that and converts is to direct current at constant voltage. How constant will depend on the power supply quality and the cleanness of the incoming current waves. Just like audio, any fluctuations create noise. That will have it's effect downstream, in the behavior of the electronics of the device. My supposition is that if a particular cable "works" i.e. improves or changes a sound, it's because of one of two things: 1.it is better shielding the different cores of the cable from magnetic interference of the other cores or general magnetic interference in the location. That magnetic interference would be generating out of sync currents and voltages that would create "noise" or slight instability in the alternating current to the power supply. 2. By having a different composition it is changing the capacitance of the cable and thereby giving a cleaner, more stable alternating current to the power supply. So, yes I can conceive that this type of product affects the sound. But no I'm not interested in paying for it because unless everybody who is listening has it .. people will still hear differently to me in my studio/listening room. What I am ABSOLUTELY sure about is that no cable will ever improve (or worsen) a song :-)
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on May 27, 2016 10:55:56 GMT -6
My supposition is that if a particular cable "works" i.e. improves or changes a sound, it's because of one of two things: 1.it is better shielding the different cores of the cable from magnetic interference of the other cores or general magnetic interference in the location. That magnetic interference would be generating out of sync currents and voltages that would create "noise" or slight instability in the alternating current to the power supply. 2. By having a different composition it is changing the capacitance of the cable and thereby giving a cleaner, more stable alternating current to the power supply. So, yes I can conceive that this type of product affects the sound. But no I'm not interested in paying for it because unless everybody who is listening has it .. people will still hear differently to me in my studio/listening room. What I am ABSOLUTELY sure about is that no cable will ever improve (or worsen) a song :-) 1. Power cables are not shielded. 2. I thought it was the filter caps inside the power supply whose job it was to filter out noise, not the mains cable. 3. Great point, I think it's more of a psychological comfort for the engineer or operator. Some guy might indeed actually perform better due to some placebo comfort of having the best cabling in town. The same way a singer would feel more comfortable facing a large, blingy side-address condenser microphone, rather than having a pencil mic pointing them in the face like a finger. It's not an electrical effect, per se, but more of a human performance one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2016 11:46:40 GMT -6
Oh yes, we have been into power cables before. And from my point of (yes, a bit scientific and less religious or esoteric) view, there are 3 points to consider. 1. If you improve the last 2 meters to your gear with expensive high end power cable ... what do you intend to do with the rest of the cabling in the house down to the circle breaker panel (and beyond)? It is like the chain which is just as weak as it's weakest part. Brings me to 2. The weakest point of cabling is always the connection. So there we are at power outlets. Use the ones, your local hospital uses for the intensive care rooms and you are set. Most reliable connection and i doubt any other product can do it better in a way you could measure or hear. And - they are very reasonably priced. 3. Transformers.... Hmmmm. Expensive. I would absolutely choose to use industry power filters. Very affordable, and they do what you want - filter nasty stuff out. IMO the same what the transformers do effectively - for a fraction of the price. That's about it. And yes, the PSUs of your devices are supposed to filter out all nasty stuff. In an ideal world. To a certain degree. Try your device in the same room/circuit as an old washing machine. Additionally use a chinese hairdryer. Also run an old computer and an old LCD in the circuit. You get the picture... See if the PSU of every piece of your equipment does this job to your full satisfaction under these conditions. Yes? OK, go on, no additional filter needed at any point. Cool equipment. :-D
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on May 27, 2016 12:30:12 GMT -6
Think about a water filter, it's at the end of a long pipeline, can't change what came before it, but has it's uses, no? Good things can happen after the outlet, regardless of how it got there. Of course it might not make a huge difference in some cases, but in others, it might.
I too agree that changing outlets is important. I've done it in such a way that 10 years ago I was easily able to compare my stereo system from the same source, but one had a new outlet. It was undeniably better. I used a $24 PS Audio outlet. It's probably something like a tweaked hospital grade outlet you mentioned smallbutfine. It really made a system wide difference, gave me peace of mind too, and only $24 at the time..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2016 14:21:37 GMT -6
Martin, i know we were into the discussion before, but now you really brought a perfect analogy with the water filter. Yes, you are so right. Of course there is such a filter. It is in the PSU. The PSU is your filter, that comes after the outlet. The power cable absolutely is not acting as a filter at all. In best case it does not introduce new issues to the power line, but it filters nothing out what's already there. This is totally up to the PSU or additional filter devices. You can put ferrite filters *around* the cable. But the cable itself is not even shielded (at least i am not aware somebody did that...). It has to transport the power and that's it. The outlet can only be improved, because the connection *can* cause trouble. It just gives a tighter grip and that's already it... As always, you know i just try to explain my point again, maybe a little different ... and because it is *the* topic of the thread. Where is the line between snake oil or not.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,967
|
Post by ericn on May 27, 2016 14:32:36 GMT -6
I'm going to Add Hospital Grade Outlet to the list of audio snake oil! Do any of you know the real difference between a real hospital grade outlet and a generic outlet? A Real Hospital grade outlet is set up so there is no way you can force the positive or neutral to connect before ground and produce an arc in an invirorment where explosive gasses maybe present! The $30+ outlets you see should be called audiophile. You want a better connection ? Use a nice 30 amp twist lock !
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on May 27, 2016 14:57:40 GMT -6
Well, I believe there are some manufactured to much higher quality levels than "hospital grade". The metals are purer, contacts stronger, and some other aspects that are over my head. But I tell you, you should just try one and listen for yourself. it'll cost $50. If you don't hear a definite improvement either you have bad hearing or your outlets are already very very good. www.psaudio.com/products/power-port-premier/The thing is, I've tried these and A-B'd them, and I wouldn't even think of having a critical listening system that's just plugged into the old outlet that came with my apartment. These things work.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,967
|
Post by ericn on May 27, 2016 15:15:22 GMT -6
Well, I believe there are some manufactured to much higher quality levels than "hospital grade". The metals are purer, contacts stronger, and some other aspects that are over my head. But I tell you, you should just try one and listen for yourself. it'll cost $50. If you don't hear a definite improvement either you have bad hearing or your outlets are already very very good. www.psaudio.com/products/power-port-premier/The thing is, I've tried these and A-B'd them, and I wouldn't even think of having a critical listening system that's just plugged into the old outlet that came with my apartment. These things work. I Have seen and used the PS Audio in discussions with Paul even he said he admired the large Twist locks I used in Madison, but they were nonstandard.
|
|
|
Post by rowmat on May 27, 2016 15:18:49 GMT -6
My supposition is that if a particular cable "works" i.e. improves or changes a sound, it's because of one of two things: 1.it is better shielding the different cores of the cable from magnetic interference of the other cores or general magnetic interference in the location. That magnetic interference would be generating out of sync currents and voltages that would create "noise" or slight instability in the alternating current to the power supply. 2. By having a different composition it is changing the capacitance of the cable and thereby giving a cleaner, more stable alternating current to the power supply. So, yes I can conceive that this type of product affects the sound. But no I'm not interested in paying for it because unless everybody who is listening has it .. people will still hear differently to me in my studio/listening room. What I am ABSOLUTELY sure about is that no cable will ever improve (or worsen) a song :-) 1. Power cables are not shielded. 2. I thought it was the filter caps inside the power supply whose job it was to filter out noise, not the mains cable. 3. Great point, I think it's more of a psychological comfort for the engineer or operator. Some guy might indeed actually perform better due to some placebo comfort of having the best cabling in town. The same way a singer would feel more comfortable facing a large, blingy side-address condenser microphone, rather than having a pencil mic pointing them in the face like a finger. It's not an electrical effect, per se, but more of a human performance one. Correct. Rectification and filtering occurs within the power supply itself. All the unshielded, unfiltered power cable does is provide a few feet of AC connectivity between the wall socket and the unit being powered. Whether or not the power cable is made from Kryptonite or some other kind of unobtanium is immaterial. It is simply supplying AC mains at 50 or 60hz to the power supply which is completely altered by the rectifier and filter capacitors in the supply. If you pay more than $10 for a power cord the only people who are benefiting are those taking your money. A proviso is the cable must be able to supply adequate current so high power amplifiers such as used in PA systems need properly rated power cables to ensure there is minimum voltage drop especially with very long power cables.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,967
|
Post by ericn on May 27, 2016 15:24:57 GMT -6
I always laugh when I see crapy 10 AMP IEC inlets on high power Amps and most are $3.00 inlets want to make that $500 cable sound really good? Skip the IEC and hardwirie it!
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on May 27, 2016 15:30:36 GMT -6
Does anyone think a ferrite bead on a power cable would help with the noise floor in audio equipment?
I notice Seventh Circle Audio shipped me an IEC power cable with a ferrite bead. I think it's the only one I have like that.
When Tape Op reviewed the SCA A12 preamp, and compared it to the API 512/312, they said something like, "the main thing we liked about it was...less noise."
If you take a look at the SCA schematics the designer has a lot of complex circuitry designed to lower the noise floor. So clearly that is a design goal. I just wonder how much the ferrite bead might help in that area.
|
|
|
Post by rowmat on May 27, 2016 15:44:33 GMT -6
Does anyone think a ferrite bead on a power cable would help with the noise floor in audio equipment? I notice Seventh Circle Audio shipped me an IEC power cable with a ferrite bead. I think it's the only one I have like that. When Tape Op reviewed the SCA A12 preamp, and compared it to the API 512/312, they said something like, "the main thing we liked about it was...less noise." If you take a look at the SCA schematics the designer has a lot of complex circuitry designed to lower the noise floor. So clearly that is a design goal. I just wonder how much the ferrite bead might help in that area. In this case the ferrite bead is probably designed to reduce the high frequency noise coming back out of the switchmode power supply in the SCA rack and getting into the mains circuit. I have an SCA rack (the later black version) and several preamps. IMO the internal switchmode power supply is the weakest part of the design. I discovered I get more noise from an N72 mounted next to the power supply (slot 8) than if it is mounted further away. I'm about to remove the supply from the rack and remotely mount it in a box. I'm not a big fan of switchmode supplies for audio especially in close proximity to mic preamps. I may even build a remote linear power supply and get rid of the switchmode supply altogether.
|
|