|
Post by ragan on Sept 4, 2021 10:09:14 GMT -6
I’d say if you want to get into the Apollo ecosystem and use the DSP while tracking and you’re interested in Luna, then yeah, go for it.
If you’re just talking about using plugins for mixing, man, it’s a tough sell to tie yourself to that very expensive DSP and the inherent latency it involves. UAD plugins are great, but IMO they’re not better than the top tier native stuff.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Sept 4, 2021 10:11:54 GMT -6
UAD plugins are pretty good. But not better than the best native options out there.
To me it comes down to how much I want to run my plugins in a DSP solution.
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Sept 4, 2021 10:22:07 GMT -6
I wish had the time (or the initiative for that matter) to do two mixes of the same song… one all UAD plugs wherever I use plugs and one without. I have enough of each to do whatever but, I am not that motivated. Lol
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Sept 4, 2021 10:31:11 GMT -6
I wish had the time (or the initiative for that matter) to do two mixes of the same song… one all UAD plugs wherever I use plugs and one without. I have enough of each to do whatever but, I am not that motivated. Lol I'm kind of with tkaitkai on this one. I just use whatever is convenient and works, like the UAD 1176, even though it may not be the best plugin I have. At some point you have to put the salt in the turkey and put it out on the table and not talk about what kind of salt you bought. Haha. That is a pretty elaborate metaphor even for me.
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Sept 4, 2021 10:39:00 GMT -6
But then you are running a total system as expensive as UAD. If I have a large mix going and later in the game decide I need to punch something in, what's helping more? Using the DSP, or turning off a bunch of native plugs or figuring out what to freeze? The DSP has me worrying much less in that situation.
Not at all .... an old 8 core mac pro is about 400 bucks and the Vienna software in sale is about 130 bucks. And I can run way more plugs on that old mac pro than on an apollo etc.... I am free, I am not bound to the mercy of UAD plug ins.
BTW: The Vienna session is locked to my DAW session, nothing to worry about in any second.
You're presuming anyone can find that kind of deal, be able to set up the OS to work with current software setups, etc. It might have worked out for you, but it's not an off the shelf solution and still cost you hundreds to run native.
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Sept 4, 2021 10:40:18 GMT -6
I wish had the time (or the initiative for that matter) to do two mixes of the same song… one all UAD plugs wherever I use plugs and one without. I have enough of each to do whatever but, I am not that motivated. Lol I'm kind of with tkaitkai on this one. I just use whatever is convenient and works, like the UAD 1176, even though it may not be the best plugin I have. At some point you have to put the salt in the turkey and put it out on the table and not talk about what kind of salt you bought. Haha. That is a pretty elaborate metaphor even for me. Oh I agree, since I feed my two buss with and mix into a Silver Bullet with the AS buss comp on it, I have been hitting my sub mixes with the UAD SSL G legacy and most recent comp as well. It works. I decided a while back to not worry about what “coulda/shoulda” been. I am gonna use what is easier for me to get what I want.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Sept 4, 2021 10:46:08 GMT -6
I keep buying plugins for like $40 because they’re recommended on here and they turn out to be real and viable tools. That fuse LA4A is the latest. Plugin Alliance stuff too.
Tools good enough that I can’t imagine paying UAD prices.
But, I totally see John’s point about stabilizing a mix with multiple VIs.
Me, I just print/import/commit my SD3 tracks and soft synths because I like to use clip gain and grid mode for mixing and arranging.
But I get it.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Sept 4, 2021 11:53:15 GMT -6
Not at all .... an old 8 core mac pro is about 400 bucks and the Vienna software in sale is about 130 bucks. And I can run way more plugs on that old mac pro than on an apollo etc.... I am free, I am not bound to the mercy of UAD plug ins.
BTW: The Vienna session is locked to my DAW session, nothing to worry about in any second.
You're presuming anyone can find that kind of deal, be able to set up the OS to work with current software setups, etc. It might have worked out for you, but it's not an off the shelf solution and still cost you hundreds to run native.
Everyone who is into audio-technique can set this up, once it runs you totally forget about it. Much cheaper compared to all the UAD hardware and plug ins.
But to each his own, I just wanted to show there are solutions for those who don't want to spend big bucks. There is also a free open source server solution which I forgot the name, so the investment would be minimal, you need some decent PC or Mac to make it happen.
|
|
|
Post by drsax on Sept 4, 2021 12:02:25 GMT -6
The UAD plugs/ecosystem is a big plus for me. The workflow/DSP is outstanding and a big time saver for me. It does come at a price though. But still, compared to years past, it’s pretty cost effective. I like having my core plugins in a single install and not scattered amongs a ton of different installs/accounts/authorizations which can be a headache at times. That said, there are lots of great plugs out there for less. I do love my UAD plugs though, and most importantly, I know them well, which saves me time when I’m working.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,091
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Sept 4, 2021 19:02:12 GMT -6
Jes,
I don’t disagree with you generally, but my understanding was that uad-2, an improvement, that could not run on the UAD-1 system.
So, to improve platform performance UA launched uad-2 and offered UAD-1 financial subsidies to transition: seems like a good business model to me ?
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Sept 4, 2021 19:49:19 GMT -6
I love the Apollo x8 and the plugs I have. I came from a console and a large assortment of top quality and classic hardware. I perceive no sonic penalty and the workflow is way better. It’s cheaper than the equivalent set up inhardware. I sold all mine nearly, and banked the cash.
I have owned many different setups this is as good as any
Cheers
Wiz
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Sept 5, 2021 5:28:24 GMT -6
For track EQ and bus EQ and compression then my answer is NO.
I use native for track EQ like DMG and Fabfilter. Bus EQ and compression for me is best with hardware.
But for mix reverb, delay and compression then nothing comes close to UAD plugs (save for Relab, Eventide and Soundtoys)
I just find UAD’s Cooper Time Cube. EMT 250, Roland Tape delay, 244 reverb, 1176 and LA2A mk2 comps to be unique and class leading plus a few other unique plug-ins they do.
So my answer is YES but a selective yes.
|
|
|
Post by skav on Sept 6, 2021 12:09:04 GMT -6
Thank you all for your thoughts and opinions! Even though I ordered a Octo USB /w Custom 3 bundle (cancelled), I managed to find a couple of EQ plugins from Noiseash which filled a void for me. A Pultec and a Neve EQ /w drive. Still missing a LA2A type compressor though. Will be looking at the Softube Tube-Tech cl1b and Softube Summit Audio TLA100 compressor plugins. Other LA2A-style compressor recommendations is most welcomed!
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Sept 6, 2021 12:21:11 GMT -6
Probably smart to target Softube, they don't ever seem to fall completely flat.
It seems that the Overloud compressors would be worth looking into. You get the 2A and the 3A in a bundle.
Also the Brainworx Opto is just dandy, and not hard to get cheap.
I really like the Black Rooster VLA-3A. They do the 2A and the 1176 also but I haven't tried those. But the 3A is slick.
You could also get the Empirical Labs Arousor which has an Opto mode that sounds good. As well as being just a Distressor in the box.
And if you're a traditionalist you could just grab Waves CLA or Slate, I tend to go for the more esoteric options.
People are going to recommend Fuse optical plugins I haven't tried them yet. But the hype is real. I use their guitar pedals.
|
|
|
Post by skav on Sept 6, 2021 13:24:43 GMT -6
Speaking of LA2A plugins, I liked this video.
He compares a Universal Audio reissue LA2A to 10 emulations, including Waves, Black Rooster, Overloud, Slate, T-Racks, UAD
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2021 13:30:53 GMT -6
Thank you all for your thoughts and opinions! Even though I ordered a Octo USB /w Custom 3 bundle (cancelled), I managed to find a couple of EQ plugins from Noiseash which filled a void for me. A Pultec and a Neve EQ /w drive. Still missing a LA2A type compressor though. Will be looking at the Softube Tube-Tech cl1b and Softube Summit Audio TLA100 compressor plugins. Other LA2A-style compressor recommendations is most welcomed! Vibe: Fuse VCL-4, Goodhertz Tupe compressor section, Overloud Comp LA, Variety of Sound Nasty VLA, Molot GE opto preset. Clean: Kotelnikov GE with inertia on, Waves Renaissance compressor opto preset. That 90s Russian kid was grooving.
|
|
|
Post by subspace on Sept 6, 2021 14:00:46 GMT -6
Thank you all for your thoughts and opinions! Even though I ordered a Octo USB /w Custom 3 bundle (cancelled), I managed to find a couple of EQ plugins from Noiseash which filled a void for me. A Pultec and a Neve EQ /w drive. Still missing a LA2A type compressor though. Will be looking at the Softube Tube-Tech cl1b and Softube Summit Audio TLA100 compressor plugins. Other LA2A-style compressor recommendations is most welcomed! I picked up the Summit bundle for $95 in March and just upgraded it to Volume 5. Have the Tube-Tech Collection as well, both great optos and some nice Pultec-ish EQs in there as well.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Sept 6, 2021 18:03:18 GMT -6
For Optos, my choices besides UAD LA2A are Fuse VCL4, Bx_Opto and Softube TLA100
Fuse VCL4 and Bx_Opto have a similar action, but while the Bx_Opto is more open and transparent, VCL4 is a bit dark and smoother, in a great way, btw.
|
|
|
Post by ab101 on Sept 6, 2021 18:39:11 GMT -6
The UAD Fairchild is no slouch.
|
|
|
Post by skav on Sept 7, 2021 3:27:47 GMT -6
Oversampling!
Quite recently I have become increasingly aware of the great sonic benefit to oversampling. This ofcourse cost more processing power, meaning less capacity for plugins in a mix.
I was interested to see if UAD use oversampling in their plugins. A little googling tells me They indeed do. To me this is a BIG plus and makes me consider trying them out. Not only for this sonic benefit, but also for the ability to not drain my internal CPU power to the death bed every time.
Thoughts on this?
There is also a claim that NOT ALL uad plugins oversample. Which don't?
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Sept 7, 2021 4:52:43 GMT -6
Thank you all for your thoughts and opinions! Even though I ordered a Octo USB /w Custom 3 bundle (cancelled), I managed to find a couple of EQ plugins from Noiseash which filled a void for me. A Pultec and a Neve EQ /w drive. Still missing a LA2A type compressor though. Will be looking at the Softube Tube-Tech cl1b and Softube Summit Audio TLA100 compressor plugins. Other LA2A-style compressor recommendations is most welcomed! Aside from your GIF at the bottom of your post making me feel sea sick (honest)! I thought I'd offer some advice. If you want to diminish the difference between all these "cartoon" software plugin compressors my experience has been to track with quality hardware compressors when you're recording your tracks that way when you come to mix you'll get more action out of your plugins - same goes for EQ but to a lesser degree. Get the magic sauce at the source :-)
|
|
|
Post by skav on Sept 7, 2021 5:38:33 GMT -6
Oversampling! Quite recently I have become increasingly aware of the great sonic benefit to oversampling. This ofcourse cost more processing power, meaning less capacity for plugins in a mix. I was interested to see if UAD use oversampling in their plugins. A little googling tells me They indeed do. To me this is a BIG plus and makes me consider trying them out. Not only for this sonic benefit, but also for the ability to not drain my internal CPU power to the death bed every time. Thoughts on this? There is also a claim that NOT ALL uad plugins oversample. Which don't? For those interested in the answer to "Which UAD plugins have oversampling and who does not?" Look at the attached images in this post for a full list from the UAD plugin manual (page 844 >)
Look, I'm not saying those plugins with no aliasing filtering sounds bad. As I understand it, aliasing is only a factor when a plugin is programmed to cause harmonics/distortion/saturation. Feel free to chime in.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2021 6:05:24 GMT -6
Oversampling! Quite recently I have become increasingly aware of the great sonic benefit to oversampling. This ofcourse cost more processing power, meaning less capacity for plugins in a mix. I was interested to see if UAD use oversampling in their plugins. A little googling tells me They indeed do. To me this is a BIG plus and makes me consider trying them out. Not only for this sonic benefit, but also for the ability to not drain my internal CPU power to the death bed every time. Thoughts on this? There is also a claim that NOT ALL uad plugins oversample. Which don't? They usually oversample to 176.4 or 192 kHz but that’s not enough to antialias fast attack rates. The best behaving digital compressors from Crane Song and Tokyo Dawn are running parts of the sidechain at 800 hz something kHz. That would be a lot of dsp chips.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2021 6:15:54 GMT -6
Thank you all for your thoughts and opinions! Even though I ordered a Octo USB /w Custom 3 bundle (cancelled), I managed to find a couple of EQ plugins from Noiseash which filled a void for me. A Pultec and a Neve EQ /w drive. Still missing a LA2A type compressor though. Will be looking at the Softube Tube-Tech cl1b and Softube Summit Audio TLA100 compressor plugins. Other LA2A-style compressor recommendations is most welcomed! Aside from your GIF at the bottom of your post making me feel sea sick (honest)! I thought I'd offer some advice. If you want to diminish the difference between all these "cartoon" software plugin compressors my experience has been to track with quality hardware compressors when you're recording your tracks that way when you come to mix you'll get more action out of your plugins - same goes for EQ but to a lesser degree. Get the magic sauce at the source :-) My theory is that a lot of the mid period UAD, Slate, Waves, Variety of Sound plugs were coming out at the heyday of the movement to have stuff like the Distressor and ART VLA type starved plate tube gear all over every record. The early plugin emulations don’t model a lot of distortion. The mid period ones go all out. So the plugins couldn’t just sound like in spec or new analog units. They had to model units that were trying to minimize distortion to compete with modern intentionally distorted hardware and they couldn’t model the action 100% of the hardware due to cpu and dsp power so they went with COLOR. You can get some insane unintentionally plastic day glow sounds out of abusing UAD plugs that mostly sound more like something like Brainworx Black Box.
|
|
|
Post by Drew @ UA on Sept 7, 2021 9:38:34 GMT -6
YOUR opinion on why it's a good OR a bad idea to get into the UAD plugin ecosystem in 2021? Ja? Nei? Please share your thoughts! I have been thinking about it, but am very hesitant as I think I have what I need already, but at the same time curious. I have never tried the products myself. Hi skav, Happy to answer any specific questions you might have. Quote this post with them.
|
|