Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2024 18:46:16 GMT -6
What you're being asked to do is some creative production. Exactly and the rest, to extend on my point from what I've seen you need to be an arranger, producer, mixing engineer and mastering engineer all rolled into one. There's not much else one can do when a synth has been layered multiple times, harmonically distorted, gone through a transient designer, EQ'd to the moon, manipulated at the M/S side, warped, short delay'd and verb blended, added to a clipper, been through a limiter and whatever else. Some of these plugin chains from pretty experienced names in this genre had 20 - 40 plugs on a single channel, that doesn't really leave much in terms of mastering etc.
The most annoying thing about this is sometimes I've gone through the process then really disliked the original sample that sounded okay in the beginning, when you track through a chain with a decent mic with some minimal eq / comp you know exactly where you stand. With this it's a lot of messing around, the songs might appear simple but it's lean and overproduced to the hills.
An interesting genre for sure but very different and if this wasn't a spare time thing I'd charge tripple (per hour) to do this.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 1, 2024 18:49:48 GMT -6
To use ericn term of low end clients, in 15 years there really are only two types: 1: Those who are incredibly grateful for your time and contributions and will give you zero notes because they know that the music they've made is really just for themselves and to share with a few friends and family. If they are nice people I don't mind doing these projects, knowing full well no one is going to hear it and I'm not going to share with anyone either. 2: Those with unrealistic views of their own talent that think they are better than they are, and will never be satisfied and don't understand why their record doesn't sound like Bruce Springsteen or something because in their mind they are equally talented. These projects are incredibly difficult mentally and are often soul crushing, because you begin doubting yourself and you're stuck trying to turn chicken shit into chicken salad and no matter how hard you work on it it's still chicken shit and no one wants to consume chicken shit. So, ultimately it was not worth your time, no one is going to hear and they few that do aren't going enjoy it anyway. That's harsh, but true, and when you come across these projects it's best just to say "I'm not the person for the job" Also, if it's someone you don't know, definitely listen to it first before taking the gig. Last advice...if the client is the singer and songwriter, just turn his vocal up a couple dB louder than you think it should be and they might be happy. Because really the only thing they want to hear are themselves. I have one guy that has been a steady client for several years. I bet I've tracked, produced, mixed and mastered nearly 50 songs for him. And he's soooo grateful and rarely has any requests. It makes me go out of my way in every aspect for him and the results are awesome. I feel freedom to take chances and he trusts me. I probably do everything better with him because I WANT to please him. He sent a friend of his my way and I've been doing the same for him over the past 2-3 years. His friend "was a writer up in Nashville in the 80s and early 90s..." He knows just enough to be a pain in the ass. It's not ever really about the mixing - more about vocal performance or he didn't like the way the bass player played (eyeroll emoji - oh you mean the guy that played bass on 6 songs currently on the charts?) Anyway - he's fine and we've hit our stride...but holy shit, people need to say less, listen more and trust that I want this to sound as amazing as it can - hell my name's on it. When I first started going in with session players 20 plus years ago, I was totally intimidated - but I didn't want them to know that. So I talked - out of my ass. Like I knew things. But I didn't know things. If I had shut the **** up, I would have gotten a much better product. I now jokingly say that my production style is to shut the **** up. Let talented people make you look better. Seriously, it's actually a really good analogy for the mixer/client relationship. You hired me. Don't micro-manage me and you very well might get something better than you could have imagined. And I'm going to want to perform better for you if you give me some leeway and don't explain how compression works in an email. Sorry - I'm completely babbling as I watch the MI/BAMA game...but my experience is that when session guys see you and go "oh hell yeah!" They know it's going to be laid back and they get to be creative instead of some 20 year old saying, "Man, I was thinking more blue and this feels more green." It's deflating.
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Jan 1, 2024 19:11:15 GMT -6
Sounds like this guy either doesn’t really know what he wants, doesn’t know how to communicate what he wants, or both.
Ask for a reference track and spend some time with him identifying the things he likes about it and the things he doesn’t. (If you haven’t already).
If this is pop music then there are really no standards for how things should sound. Mostly everything is VI’s, samples etc so there’s no real benchmark for how any given source should sound. It’s not like an acoustic guitar, or piano etc where you can, somewhat, objectively say what sounds good or bad. This makes it really challenging, and unfortunately yes you need to be producer as well as AE for it to work.
Also, as others have said, mixing for more pop genres is very much about sample layering/replacing, blending reverbs and delays, sidechain compression, lots of distortion etc. It’s very different from mixing a more organic genre.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 1, 2024 19:22:50 GMT -6
The expectations of low end clients are always exponentially harder to please. You have to set the correct expectations from the get go, if you can’t get it to where your both happy in an economically reasonable period of time you tell the client “ well you should probably look elsewhere” l, return the fee. Nobody likes walking a unhappy client to the door, but better you do it before you both have invested to much time and effort and are in the exact same place. THIS ^^^^^^^ time 100,000,000,000!!!!!!!!!!! Quite often amateurs (not all) just don't "get it". They have minimal experience, and high expectations placed on them by family, friends, etc.. Then they have no idea why their music sucks. It's a loosing battle with someone who is unreasonable and whose expectations do not match up with their music.
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Jan 1, 2024 19:24:43 GMT -6
I’m just opening up the conversation because maybe one of you guys has a better approach than I do… I’ve mixed a bunch of stuff for a guy overseas…he obviously liked what I’ve done because he keeps coming back. Apparently he recommended me to a friend who I attempted to mix something for…(this was my Cubase 13 disaster/crash/had-to-remix). He’s said to me multiple times, “I want it to sound more professional.” This is a home project. Fake strings, fake drums, fake guitar, fake boys choir…well, fake everything besides the vocals. I’ve found - and tell me if I’m wrong on this - there’s only so much that can be improved when you are working with canned sounds. The drums are clips of different “big boom” cinematic type stuff. The piano is his fake piano sound (sounds fine)… I’ve definitely made everything sound objectively better, but “this is still not what I had in mind.” This was after I sent him my take, he didn’t like it and so he then wanted me to “just make my (his) mix sound more professional.” So, he sent a mix and I followed his lead. Still not to his liking. So at this point, I’ve spent waaaaaay more time on it than it’s worth. I thought it would be fun to have him send his Cubase mix and I’d try it in the new C13. As you might have seen, I took about 5 hours playing around in Cubase - just learning stuff as I went. Really good practice in a daw I haven’t used in a long time. Then at the end of that five hours, it crashes at the end of the bounce and I lost everything. (Didn’t realize auto save was disabled.) So then I remixed the next day - only took about an hour because I had a save from about a quarter of the way through. Sent and “not what he had in mind.” This is obviously setting me up for failure, so I’m just not going to put anymore time into it. I don’t think I’m awful - I just think this is just a case of him having some crazy expectations. I replied back that at this point I just don’t know what else to do, so I’ll take this as a loss and he can find someone that can give him what he’s looking for. Mostly because I’m just not willing to put any more time into this. It’s not going to get better, just different. Life’s too short. How do you guys handle situations like this? In the past I would have suffered through it…but it’s just not worth it IMO. Fire the client.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 1, 2024 19:25:58 GMT -6
You can usually suss these types out quickly. And when they have been identified, jettison them asap. Tell him/them "you can't polish a turd" and leave it right there. Now, Bill...lol You LOL, but you KNOW I'm right. There is no future with someone whose expectations do not reside in the same universe as their talent / music / recordings. Actually, there IS a future, and it's often described as hell, paranoia, and self loathing. If you are gentle and patient, and they have reasonable expectations and trust you - then there can be a future. But it didn't sound like that was your situation. I wish you the best of luck!!
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 1, 2024 19:31:59 GMT -6
To use ericn term of low end clients, in 15 years there really are only two types: 1: Those who are incredibly grateful for your time and contributions and will give you zero notes because they know that the music they've made is really just for themselves and to share with a few friends and family. If they are nice people I don't mind doing these projects, knowing full well no one is going to hear it and I'm not going to share with anyone either. 2: Those with unrealistic views of their own talent that think they are better than they are, and will never be satisfied and don't understand why their record doesn't sound like Bruce Springsteen or something because in their mind they are equally talented. These projects are incredibly difficult mentally and are often soul crushing, because you begin doubting yourself and you're stuck trying to turn chicken shit into chicken salad and no matter how hard you work on it it's still chicken shit and no one wants to consume chicken shit. So, ultimately it was not worth your time, no one is going to hear and they few that do aren't going enjoy it anyway. That's harsh, but true, and when you come across these projects it's best just to say "I'm not the person for the job" Also, if it's someone you don't know, definitely listen to it first before taking the gig. Last advice...if the client is the singer and songwriter, just turn his vocal up a couple dB louder than you think it should be and they might be happy. Because really the only thing they want to hear are themselves. ^^^^^^^^. Also great advice. The type 2 client will turn your life upside down, and make you hate music overall and rethink your career choices...
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,098
|
Post by ericn on Jan 1, 2024 19:34:13 GMT -6
This is why I left the world of low end mixer, you end up being low dollar producer for little or no extra $$. Everybody is cool till the talk of how much it’s going to cost to get it to where they want. You hear a lot of “ but my friend thought the tracks were great” awesome then if he has the ability to judge how they would work in a mix why isn’t he mixing it? The biggest problem is the friends don’t want to damage the relationship by being truthful and nobody wants the big shot pro to tell them they suck. Yeah - I used to want projects where I could replace sounds and "show them how much better I could make it sound!" But I've come to realize that's just borrowing trouble. I'm not getting paid to help you construct the song...sorry. I've also found that a lot of lower priced clients don't like delay on a vocal lol. I've taken the time to add in cool vocal delays before - more than one delay for 1/4, 1/ etc. and every single one of them were like "what's the repeating echo thing?" So I don't do anything they don't ask for now. Now - I do a little of lining up and phase, etc. Quantize and move audio around if needed...but this is a business and I have to be efficient with my time. The problem with working in the arts is everyone wants some good old capitalist money for their work, but somehow forgets that everyone else involved is in the same boat. We all have to eat, we all are worth something, you want professional work? You’re going to pay for it. I feel for you and as much as I’m jealous of your song writing chops, in situations like this I’m not, I have the out when it comes to reworking a song it’s self “ I’m not a song writer or player”😁
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Jan 1, 2024 19:41:01 GMT -6
I should post a clip of the drums...might bring things into perspective. See if you can get permission to post the session here and we'll have a RGO Turd Polishing Mix Contest! 🤣 Josh is braver than me. Of course this was the first thing I thought. Waaaayyy back!
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 1, 2024 19:47:54 GMT -6
Sounds like this guy either doesn’t really know what he wants, doesn’t know how to communicate what he wants, or both. Ask for a reference track and spend some time with him identifying the things he likes about it and the things he doesn’t. (If you haven’t already). If this is pop music then there are really no standards for how things should sound. Mostly everything is VI’s, samples etc so there’s no real benchmark for how any given source should sound. It’s not like an acoustic guitar, or piano etc where you can, somewhat, objectively say what sounds good or bad. This makes it really challenging, and unfortunately yes you need to be producer as well as AE for it to work. Also, as others have said, mixing for more pop genres is very much about sample layering/replacing, blending reverbs and delays, sidechain compression, lots of distortion etc. It’s very different from mixing a more organic genre. I hear what you’re saying…but this is a budget mix. Not doing all that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2024 20:06:26 GMT -6
I'm going to take a different stance here. I've been through this before. Stop trying to improve the source tracks. Even replacing a few sounds with superior virtual instruments, if you have them, will yield a minimal improvement. Get the tracks to play together by using EQ and compression, but don't try to shape the tracks into something they're not. And then, here's the important part. Automate the hell out of it. Make sure to bring out to the front what's good about each section. Magnify whatever emotion the song is trying to evoke. With bad source material, you will be automating more than usual. However, accepting that you can't do much for the sound itself is primordial. It's also liberating. Good mixes that sound shitty are a thing. As for what to do communication-wise with this artist, you have to set the right expectations before moving another fader. Once you are done, take the mix through something like the Silver Bullet. A pair of Highland Dynamics BG2 units with no compression (available on Access Analog) add a lot of mojo, soften rogue transients, and are ideal for this kind of salvage work. Oh - and that's a shit load of work for a cheap ass mix The cheapest clients are the ones who need the most automation. I only need to do it on guitars and basses now to ride up notes. the complex two detector compressors save my ass. Otherwise, MDWDRC2 on guitars and whisper to scream vocalists, Molot on basses and wimpy drums, Drum Leveler on drums, Oxford Dynamics on normal vocals, Kotelnikov GE on busses to even out their scrappy performances. Weiss DS-1 can be used if they want to sound digital but I need to buy that one. Pro Audio DSP DSM is amazing at taking the edge off. Molot GE sometimes to de-wimp stuff, go on basses and two bus. Presswerk if I need something crazy and don't care about phase. If anything is fake, I process it to hell and don't care. If anything interesting happens, I'll fader ride it up. I hate when I get a million different little tracks that don't do anything for the song and they want to pay 100 bucks for a mix. Like... they get what I can do in a few hours.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 1, 2024 20:11:16 GMT -6
Oh - and that's a shit load of work for a cheap ass mix The cheapest clients are the ones who need the most automation. I only need to do it on guitars and basses now to ride up notes. the complex two detector compressors save my ass. Otherwise, MDWDRC2 on guitars and whisper to scream vocalists, Molot on basses and wimpy drums, Drum Leveler on drums, Oxford Dynamics on normal vocals, Kotelnikov GE on busses to even out their scrappy performances. Weiss DS-1 can be used if they want to sound digital but I need to buy that one. Pro Audio DSP DSM is amazing at taking the edge off. Molot GE sometimes to de-wimp stuff, go on basses and two bus. Presswerk if I need something crazy and don't care about phase. If anything is fake, I process it to hell and don't care. If anything interesting happens, I'll fader ride it up. I hate when I get a million different little tracks that don't do anything for the song and they want to pay 100 bucks for a mix. Like... they get what I can do in a few hours. Dan, the question wasn’t “how do I mix this,” it was “what would you do if you did all your automation and distortion and they said it wasn’t what they had in mind.” Are you willing to chase that dragon for that amount of money?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2024 20:14:36 GMT -6
To use ericn term of low end clients, in 15 years there really are only two types: 1: Those who are incredibly grateful for your time and contributions and will give you zero notes because they know that the music they've made is really just for themselves and to share with a few friends and family. If they are nice people I don't mind doing these projects, knowing full well no one is going to hear it and I'm not going to share with anyone either. 2: Those with unrealistic views of their own talent that think they are better than they are, and will never be satisfied and don't understand why their record doesn't sound like Bruce Springsteen or something because in their mind they are equally talented. These projects are incredibly difficult mentally and are often soul crushing, because you begin doubting yourself and you're stuck trying to turn chicken shit into chicken salad and no matter how hard you work on it it's still chicken shit and no one wants to consume chicken shit. So, ultimately it was not worth your time, no one is going to hear and they few that do aren't going enjoy it anyway. That's harsh, but true, and when you come across these projects it's best just to say "I'm not the person for the job" Also, if it's someone you don't know, definitely listen to it first before taking the gig. Last advice...if the client is the singer and songwriter, just turn his vocal up a couple dB louder than you think it should be and they might be happy. Because really the only thing they want to hear are themselves. I have one guy that has been a steady client for several years. I bet I've tracked, produced, mixed and mastered nearly 50 songs for him. And he's soooo grateful and rarely has any requests. It makes me go out of my way in every aspect for him and the results are awesome. I feel freedom to take chances and he trusts me. I probably do everything better with him because I WANT to please him. He sent a friend of his my way and I've been doing the same for him over the past 2-3 years. His friend "was a writer up in Nashville in the 80s and early 90s..." He knows just enough to be a pain in the ass. It's not ever really about the mixing - more about vocal performance or he didn't like the way the bass player played (eyeroll emoji - oh you mean the guy that played bass on 6 songs currently on the charts?) Anyway - he's fine and we've hit our stride...but holy shit, people need to say less, listen more and trust that I want this to sound as amazing as it can - hell my name's on it. When I first started going in with session players 20 plus years ago, I was totally intimidated - but I didn't want them to know that. So I talked - out of my ass. Like I knew things. But I didn't know things. If I had shut the **** up, I would have gotten a much better product. I now jokingly say that my production style is to shut the **** up. Let talented people make you look better. Seriously, it's actually a really good analogy for the mixer/client relationship. You hired me. Don't micro-manage me and you very well might get something better than you could have imagined. And I'm going to want to perform better for you if you give me some leeway and don't explain how compression works in an email. Sorry - I'm completely babbling as I watch the MI/BAMA game...but my experience is that when session guys see you and go "oh hell yeah!" They know it's going to be laid back and they get to be creative instead of some 20 year old saying, "Man, I was thinking more blue and this feels more green." It's deflating. I dealt with that last year. I moved heaven and earth to make a client's guitar and bass performance audible only to be hit for requests for countless revisions for vocals butchered on the way in that didn't matter at all in the genre. the client chose to go with the unmixed rough for one track where you cannot hear what's going on. And this record sold a fair amount for what it was
Meanwhile an electronic master I did where the production had no errors and needed no eq, all it needed was 40 hz and air band filter for low end garbage and synth high end followed by the tdr high frequency limiter for the hats, sold under 5 copies.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 1, 2024 20:18:25 GMT -6
I have one guy that has been a steady client for several years. I bet I've tracked, produced, mixed and mastered nearly 50 songs for him. And he's soooo grateful and rarely has any requests. It makes me go out of my way in every aspect for him and the results are awesome. I feel freedom to take chances and he trusts me. I probably do everything better with him because I WANT to please him. He sent a friend of his my way and I've been doing the same for him over the past 2-3 years. His friend "was a writer up in Nashville in the 80s and early 90s..." He knows just enough to be a pain in the ass. It's not ever really about the mixing - more about vocal performance or he didn't like the way the bass player played (eyeroll emoji - oh you mean the guy that played bass on 6 songs currently on the charts?) Anyway - he's fine and we've hit our stride...but holy shit, people need to say less, listen more and trust that I want this to sound as amazing as it can - hell my name's on it. When I first started going in with session players 20 plus years ago, I was totally intimidated - but I didn't want them to know that. So I talked - out of my ass. Like I knew things. But I didn't know things. If I had shut the **** up, I would have gotten a much better product. I now jokingly say that my production style is to shut the **** up. Let talented people make you look better. Seriously, it's actually a really good analogy for the mixer/client relationship. You hired me. Don't micro-manage me and you very well might get something better than you could have imagined. And I'm going to want to perform better for you if you give me some leeway and don't explain how compression works in an email. Sorry - I'm completely babbling as I watch the MI/BAMA game...but my experience is that when session guys see you and go "oh hell yeah!" They know it's going to be laid back and they get to be creative instead of some 20 year old saying, "Man, I was thinking more blue and this feels more green." It's deflating. I dealt with that last year. I moved heaven and earth to make a client's guitar and bass performance audible only to be hit for requests for countless revisions for vocals butchered on the way in that didn't matter at all in the genre. the client chose to go with the unmixed rough for one track where you cannot hear what's going on. And this record sold a fair amount for what it was
Meanwhile an electronic master I did where the production had no errors and needed no eq, all it needed was 40 hz and air band filter for low end garbage and synth high end followed by the tdr high frequency limiter for the hats, sold under 5 copies.
It’s almost like it’s the song that matters…who knew
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2024 20:22:20 GMT -6
The cheapest clients are the ones who need the most automation. I only need to do it on guitars and basses now to ride up notes. the complex two detector compressors save my ass. Otherwise, MDWDRC2 on guitars and whisper to scream vocalists, Molot on basses and wimpy drums, Drum Leveler on drums, Oxford Dynamics on normal vocals, Kotelnikov GE on busses to even out their scrappy performances. Weiss DS-1 can be used if they want to sound digital but I need to buy that one. Pro Audio DSP DSM is amazing at taking the edge off. Molot GE sometimes to de-wimp stuff, go on basses and two bus. Presswerk if I need something crazy and don't care about phase. If anything is fake, I process it to hell and don't care. If anything interesting happens, I'll fader ride it up. I hate when I get a million different little tracks that don't do anything for the song and they want to pay 100 bucks for a mix. Like... they get what I can do in a few hours. Dan, the question wasn’t “how do I mix this,” it was “what would you do if you did all your automation and distortion and they said it wasn’t what they had in mind.” Are you willing to chase that dragon for that amount of money? John, I have no idea. Payment upfront and deep discussions about what they want beforehand is the only way. They sound like they want the soul of their music saved in a new religion rather than to just have it sound cool. All DI stuff I can usually make sound cool but I will send them some tones, ask if they like them, ask if they like their drum samples, and if not ask for a midi. It might add a little back and forth but saves time. If he doesn't like his own samples, that's a deeper issue and he really needs a producer and an arranger. If I have to swap out samples, I charge a lot more. There is no bargain basement deal possible.
I usually ask for references and get some distorted garbage that's more distorted than the roughs. The last one was L2 on everything era metal so I could pretty much do anything as long as it was fuzzy, small, and scooped.
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Jan 1, 2024 20:23:41 GMT -6
Sounds like this guy either doesn’t really know what he wants, doesn’t know how to communicate what he wants, or both. Ask for a reference track and spend some time with him identifying the things he likes about it and the things he doesn’t. (If you haven’t already). If this is pop music then there are really no standards for how things should sound. Mostly everything is VI’s, samples etc so there’s no real benchmark for how any given source should sound. It’s not like an acoustic guitar, or piano etc where you can, somewhat, objectively say what sounds good or bad. This makes it really challenging, and unfortunately yes you need to be producer as well as AE for it to work. Also, as others have said, mixing for more pop genres is very much about sample layering/replacing, blending reverbs and delays, sidechain compression, lots of distortion etc. It’s very different from mixing a more organic genre. I hear what you’re saying…but this is a budget mix. Not doing all that. I hear ya, there’s got to be a limit and your time is valuable. It’s rough sometimes but the power of saying “No” is real. A few months ago I had what was basically a free day in a commercial studio, (finished a project early and the day was already paid for). So I advertised a “deal”, come in and play a song live, acoustic and singing, and I’ll track and mix a song super cheap for you. Well, that turned into a nightmare fast. Had a guy hit me up asking about it, music was ok-ish but super mediocre, boring, and amateur. Not horrible, but nothing enjoyable about it. Not trying to be mean, but his songs were what you might expect from a 16 y.o. Two years into learning guitar and how to sing. Anyway, he quickly starts asking for more…it goes from just acoustic and singing (all live, no overdubs), to adding a drum machine, then to to bringing in a real drummer, having me play bass on it etc etc etc. No mind you this took place over like 4 phone calls, each time time it becoming more and more clear that he was a huge pain in the ass…so I told him politely that that was more then I offered but I’d be happy to quote him for full production for an album (did I mention he wanted to record 12 songs at this point?). I had to think long and hard…how much money would it take for me to not hate myself for recording this album? How much money would it take for me to sacrifice the time I’d otherwise spend with my wife and daughter? Well the number was north of $12k, not including mastering or the musician fees. All in, I quoted him like $20k lol. Needless to say he declined lol. After that he came back and told me he’d like to just take me up on the original offer, one song played live etc…I finally just had to say sorry, the session is already booked. Saying “no” never felt so good.
|
|
|
Post by andersmv on Jan 1, 2024 20:41:08 GMT -6
I've tried to set ultimatums and "rules" over the year and have failed miserably. I kind of take things on a case by case basis now. It's rarer these days for me to do work for new clients. It's mostly people I at least know or have been recommended by other people I've worked with for a while. I'll give two examples of situations I dealt with last month.
First one was someone I went to college with, does mostly music lessons now but has been trying to record some of their students to help them with the writing process. They send me things to mix occasionally, some of them are really strait forward and easy, a few have been on the verge of being frustrating with the number of annoying back and forths and mix notes. Bigger picture, they're all great people, recognize that they're new to the whole recroding/production thing and want to get better. They're aware of their "shortcomings", and I think a lot of the time where things get annoying and frustrating for me, are just those people trying to take this seriously and get better. Most of the issues are purely communication issues, they're new to this and don't know how to articulate some pretty simple concepts sometimes. I try to be patient and remember this, because they're all good people and it's coming from a good place. We're all learning, and I'll continue to try my best to be patient with them because they deserve it and are worth it.
I don't mind those kinds of clients, I'll put in the extra time. The second situation was a repeat client that I had mixed a group of four songs for a long time ago. That first go was incredibly frustrating, they were difficult but I begrudgingly got through it. They apologized profusely after that and I chalked it up to a learning experience and thought we would communicate better the next time. The next time came last month, they sent me two more things to mix that were incredibly simple and strait forward. There were lots of timing and instrument tuning issues, and I asked about that stuff as soon as I opened up the session, as I was already giving them a massive mix discount and wanted to be strait forward by saying "if you want me to fix any of that, I'm going to charge my full mix rate because it's going to be a lot of work". They said they weren't worried about it, so I did the mixes. They got them, first email back basically says "wow, what's going on with the tuning on the guitars and vocals? Can you go back through and fix all of that". At that point, I realized I had screwed up and should have passed on the work because I knew which way this was about to go... I reiterated that I was going to charge the full mix rate if I needed to go through and "try" to fix that stuff (timing issues could have been fixed with some elastic time tweaks and copy/pastes from other sections of the song, but none of it was on a metronome. Pitch issues weren't going to be able to be fixed in this genera when you're singing out of tune to an out of tune guitar). Next email back to me basically said "but we're SO close, can't you just go back through and do a few tweaks?". I politely declined and said I was sorry, but I was going to have to pass on the project due to time constrictions.
It just wans't worth the fight to me for the second situation. I'm a pretty good judge of people at this point and in my gut know what to expect when things start to go into motion. I don't follow my gut enough, but that's another story, lol... Most clients are going to be difficult at some point on every project. I've gotten better over the years at talking a lot before we even agree to things about establishing what everyones roles are and what people expect of each other. I'm starting to ramble, but what I'm getting at is: You have to decided what you want out of every project and what you're willing to put up with. A lot of the people I work with are worth the extra stress because as annoying and frustrating as it can be, it's a bi-product of passion. I'll fight through the passionate bullshit every time, it's worth it and the clients will respect you more for it. On the other hand, some people are just assholes and will take advantage of every little thing they can. It's not hard to pick up on that energy, even remotely though emails. Your guts going to let you know when that kind of crap starts to creep in. I don't know what your "why" is for this particular project or what you're wanting to get out of it. Regardless, you need to force the client to start communicating better and give you more specifics if you're going to move forward.
Based off what you've said, my gut is giving me red flags. I would have politely told them "sorry, but I'm going to have to pass on this project". I had a top tier mastering engineer do this to me a couple of years back when I was being too annoying with my note on my mixes. It really pissed me off, but it was a learning experience on how to gracefully and professional deal with an avoided shit storm. He masters for some of the biggest artists in the world and could tell, just from a short email after his first master pass, that I was going to be annoying and take up a lot of his time (and to be fair, I probably was). I wasn't worth the extra time that he probably didn't have, and gave me my money back and moved on while keeping it professional. Again, learning experience.
I would write them a short and polite email, and give them their money back. Doesn't sound like the kind of person that's worth it, as they're always going to be pissy and negative.
|
|
|
Post by spindrift on Jan 1, 2024 20:50:08 GMT -6
Sean and Dr. Bill and Eric are 100% right. Drop that client ASAP John.
I always listen to a demo/rough before taking any mix or tracking job on. Life is too damned short to work on bullshit. I’ve polished enough turds for difficult clients in my day to sniff them out VERY quickly. They can go find some more inexperienced engineer who is willing to fall on his/her sword for their awful vanity project.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,098
|
Post by ericn on Jan 1, 2024 20:52:48 GMT -6
While you’re not dealing with it here one of the worst situations as a mixer is when someone sends you great tracks, tracks that when taken on their own but just don’t fit together. It’s like they created different parts in complete isolation, that central lesson of tracking, mix it as you go. I have never been against experimenting in the studio, but I can’t tell you how often I have gotten tracks where I can’t help but think I’ve gotten pieces of different songs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2024 21:09:54 GMT -6
Hmm, this is a very interesting topic to me because I'm venturing into this sort of genre whilst being a contradictory knowledgeable yet at the same time completely clueless. I've done some mixing / mastering work in this genre but firstly that was years back and I've slept since then plus I was lucky to work with a group who knew what they were doing so it was mainly spit shine & polish.
Myself however, I haven't sung on a track in well over a decade (but practice every day), I've forgotten most things about synths and I am dreading it a bit. Especially in a genre that's really all about perfection and if it's not great then you shouldn't really bother. Also quite a bit of this type of music creation is more about what the masses want if you get my meaning. I'm open to somewhat harsh constructive criticism, whatever it takes sorta thing and I do very much understand at some point I'll need some help. The expectations, the needs, the cost and the approach for that is a difficult one though. We often talk about this from an engineering side but not really from the client side, which as someone who's going down that path I am, again finding this interesting.
I might just do rock & metal again LOL..
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 1, 2024 21:32:53 GMT -6
I've tried to set ultimatums and "rules" over the year and have failed miserably. I kind of take things on a case by case basis now. It's rarer these days for me to do work for new clients. It's mostly people I at least know or have been recommended by other people I've worked with for a while. I'll give two examples of situations I dealt with last month. First one was someone I went to college with, does mostly music lessons now but has been trying to record some of their students to help them with the writing process. They send me things to mix occasionally, some of them are really strait forward and easy, a few have been on the verge of being frustrating with the number of annoying back and forths and mix notes. Bigger picture, they're all great people, recognize that they're new to the whole recroding/production thing and want to get better. They're aware of their "shortcomings", and I think a lot of the time where things get annoying and frustrating for me, are just those people trying to take this seriously and get better. Most of the issues are purely communication issues, they're new to this and don't know how to articulate some pretty simple concepts sometimes. I try to be patient and remember this, because they're all good people and it's coming from a good place. We're all learning, and I'll continue to try my best to be patient with them because they deserve it and are worth it. I don't mind those kinds of clients, I'll put in the extra time. The second situation was a repeat client that I had mixed a group of four songs for a long time ago. That first go was incredibly frustrating, they were difficult but I begrudgingly got through it. They apologized profusely after that and I chalked it up to a learning experience and thought we would communicate better the next time. The next time came last month, they sent me two more things to mix that were incredibly simple and strait forward. There were lots of timing and instrument tuning issues, and I asked about that stuff as soon as I opened up the session, as I was already giving them a massive mix discount and wanted to be strait forward by saying "if you want me to fix any of that, I'm going to charge my full mix rate because it's going to be a lot of work". They said they weren't worried about it, so I did the mixes. They got them, first email back basically says "wow, what's going on with the tuning on the guitars and vocals? Can you go back through and fix all of that". At that point, I realized I had screwed up and should have passed on the work because I knew which way this was about to go... I reiterated that I was going to charge the full mix rate if I needed to go through and "try" to fix that stuff (timing issues could have been fixed with some elastic time tweaks and copy/pastes from other sections of the song, but none of it was on a metronome. Pitch issues weren't going to be able to be fixed in this genera when you're singing out of tune to an out of tune guitar). Next email back to me basically said "but we're SO close, can't you just go back through and do a few tweaks?". I politely declined and said I was sorry, but I was going to have to pass on the project due to time constrictions. It just wans't worth the fight to me for the second situation. I'm a pretty good judge of people at this point and in my gut know what to expect when things start to go into motion. I don't follow my gut enough, but that's another story, lol... Most clients are going to be difficult at some point on every project. I've gotten better over the years at talking a lot before we even agree to things about establishing what everyones roles are and what people expect of each other. I'm starting to ramble, but what I'm getting at is: You have to decided what you want out of every project and what you're willing to put up with. A lot of the people I work with are worth the extra stress because as annoying and frustrating as it can be, it's a bi-product of passion. I'll fight through the passionate bullshit every time, it's worth it and the clients will respect you more for it. On the other hand, some people are just assholes and will take advantage of every little thing they can. It's not hard to pick up on that energy, even remotely though emails. Your guts going to let you know when that kind of crap starts to creep in. I don't know what your "why" is for this particular project or what you're wanting to get out of it. Regardless, you need to force the client to start communicating better and give you more specifics if you're going to move forward. Based off what you've said, my gut is giving me red flags. I would have politely told them "sorry, but I'm going to have to pass on this project". I had a top tier mastering engineer do this to me a couple of years back when I was being too annoying with my note on my mixes. It really pissed me off, but it was a learning experience on how to gracefully and professional deal with an avoided shit storm. He masters for some of the biggest artists in the world and could tell, just from a short email after his first master pass, that I was going to be annoying and take up a lot of his time (and to be fair, I probably was). I wasn't worth the extra time that he probably didn't have, and gave me my money back and moved on while keeping it professional. Again, learning experience. I would write them a short and polite email, and give them their money back. Doesn't sound like the kind of person that's worth it, as they're always going to be pissy and negative. Completely agree and relate to everything you wrote. The only reason I agreed to this was because I wanted to pickup Pianoteq 8 lol. But yeah - I’m to the point where I’d rather not deal with shit than to make a trivial amount of money. Plus, for my own sanity, I just don’t have the energy to deal with demanding clients that aren’t paying enough to cover my mortgage for the month. I can save my anxiety for higher rollers. I’m in the same place with recurring clients…and this guy is very polite. I’ve had difficult inexperienced client many times where I worked myself into a panic because they were being ridiculous - then I told them straight up that they were crazy (not those words) and they backed down and were ultimately happy…but they were paying enough to try and save it.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 1, 2024 21:38:11 GMT -6
Sean and Dr. Bill and Eric are 100% right. Drop that client ASAP John. I always listen to a demo/rough before taking any mix or tracking job on. Life is too damned short to work on bullshit. I’ve polished enough turds for difficult clients in my day to sniff them out VERY quickly. They can go find some more inexperienced engineer who is willing to fall on his/her sword for their awful vanity project. Yeah totally agree - but I should reiterate that this guys has been very nice in our emails and was nice in our call…so my email to him was basically “OK - have to be honest - I’m at a loss. I’m not sure what your expectations were, but I think it’s dramatically better than the original mix. I’ll just take the loss and you can find someone that can give you what you’re looking for.” I think I mentioned that in the process I actually forgot to mention I needed the half up front (which believe me never happens) but did it anyway. So I don’t have any of his money and he only has my “not what he had in mind” mixes with 1khz beeps in it. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 1, 2024 21:40:29 GMT -6
Hmm, this is a very interesting topic to me because I'm venturing into this sort of genre whilst being a contradictory knowledgeable yet at the same time completely clueless. I've done some mixing / mastering work in this genre but firstly that was years back and I've slept since then plus I was lucky to work with a group who knew what they were doing so it was mainly spit shine & polish. Myself however, I haven't sung on a track in well over a decade (but practice every day), I've forgotten most things about synths and I am dreading it a bit. Especially in a genre that's really all about perfection and if it's not great then you shouldn't really bother. Also quite a bit of this type of music creation is more about what the masses want if you get my meaning. I'm open to somewhat harsh constructive criticism, whatever it takes sorta thing and I do very much understand at some point I'll need some help. The expectations, the needs, the cost and the approach for that is a difficult one though. We often talk about this from an engineering side but not really from the client side, which as someone who's going down that path I am, again finding this interesting. I might just do rock & metal again LOL.. What genre are you referring to?
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Jan 1, 2024 21:52:05 GMT -6
“Unfortunately, I’m afraid I’ll be unable to offer any service that will add value to your project. I wish you the best and hope you find somebody that shares your creative outlook and approach. Also, this shit sucks, do better in the future to make everybody’s lives around you easier. Have you considered Produce Manager?”
You can leave that last part out if you wish.
Of course I’m joking, but far too many folks think that because they own an interface and a guitar that they deserve to sound like the Beatles. They don’t. I don’t give credence to these folks. If they want help, they can pay for it. If they don’t want help and they want you to turn shit into sherbet, they need to pay more and they need to understand that fact.
Time is money. You’re fantastic at what you do John. Spend your time working on something that deserves your talent.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Jan 1, 2024 21:58:00 GMT -6
Like my Led Zep Tribute Band. Gonna use banjos and accordions. (Instead of Guitars/Keys)
|
|