|
Post by Quint on Aug 4, 2021 16:21:34 GMT -6
On a KM84, where in the circuit does the pad exist? If it's anywhere other than the very end of the circuit, it would seem that you may not get the same result using an inline pad like the Shure model you describe. The pad circuit in the KM84 is created with a capacitor (C2) and the capsules capacitance to create the negative feedback path to lower the signal. It would react very different than a simple pad on the output. Yes, this is what I was thinking. So it takes me back to my original question. How much am I gonna miss having the built in pad? Having never owned the real deal, I don't know if this would be a deal breaker for me or not. How many of you have used the pad on a KM84, and in what situations?
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Aug 4, 2021 16:29:48 GMT -6
Yes, this is what I was thinking. So it takes me back to my original question. How much am I gonna miss having the built in pad? Having never owned the real deal, I don't know if this would be a deal breaker for me or not. How many of you have used the pad on a KM84, and in what situations? I have never needed the pad. I use it mainly on acoustic instruments and the output is not hot to begin with. I don't think you'll be missing anything unless you plan on micing drums with it.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Aug 4, 2021 16:32:05 GMT -6
Yes, this is what I was thinking. So it takes me back to my original question. How much am I gonna miss having the built in pad? Having never owned the real deal, I don't know if this would be a deal breaker for me or not. How many of you have used the pad on a KM84, and in what situations? I have never needed the pad. I use it mainly on acoustic instruments and the output is not hot to begin with. I don't think you'll be missing anything unless you plan on micing drums with it. That's the thing. I might use them for that purpose.
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Aug 4, 2021 16:35:50 GMT -6
I’ve never engaged it on drums. Even with bashers when using it for hi hat and those awful ping rides (no offense to users of them 😁)
I’ve never used it on snare except for jazz dudes.
|
|
|
Post by plinker on Aug 4, 2021 17:02:42 GMT -6
Hmmmm....this appears to be a very popular thread!
|
|
|
Post by superwack on Aug 4, 2021 17:48:11 GMT -6
At the risk of asking a dumb question - why have you (Serrano) and Banzai for that matter, chosen to omit the pad when it affects the circuit and you are trying to make an accurate copy? Is it metalwork/switch cost and/or complexity or something else? Just curious.
|
|
|
Post by cserrano on Aug 4, 2021 20:25:17 GMT -6
I'm no expert on km84 cap/backplate design, but I seem to have read somewhere (maybe in this thread) about concentric rings and how they affect the sound. From the pics you posted, I'm seeing concentric rings. Can you speak on to what degree this particular aspect of your cap and backplate design matches that of the KM84? Thank you for your question. I can try to answer. (I definitely relate to your curiosity about the capsule design. ) By the way, the scrap pile of backplates in the photo you referenced is a collection of just some of the many different backplates that I experimented with. Here is a great article on this. recordinghacks.com/2013/01/10/dissecting-the-mxl-603s-capsule/While the Serrano 84 does not use anything from the mxl 603 capsule, many of the same principles translate. You can read in the article that "This particular backplate design was reportedly inspired by the Neumann KM84 backplate, which uses an innovative crossed slit design. The MXL backplate instead uses grooves in a concentric ring arrangement." While I don't agree that the backplate of the MXL603 gives the frequency response of Neumann's design, it can be done. You can use different physics to get a similar result, just like using different mathematic equations to get the same result. Using the same principles of the MXL603 backplate design, the Serrano 84 backplate uses spaces and holes (and other things) in a concentric ring arrangement to get to a similar result, to a greater or lesser degree, of Neumann's cross slit design. The most important goal here is with frequency response. The sound files I posted with the Serrano 84 and the Neumann KM84 should speak for themselves in regards to frequency response. I think it's very very close. I recorded acoustic guitar and vocals because of the richness and depth of the tones and frequencies. The sound comparison truly exposes the true sound/timber of the Serrano 84 and Neumann KM84. I think it can be misleading for example when someone posts sound comparisons like: "Listen to this KM84 vs my clone on acoustic guitar in this huge and busy mix of many instruments! I bet you can't tell which one it is!" In the files I posted the true frequency response is exposed. And based on them I think one might conclude that it would be very difficult to tell which one is which in a mix of multiple instruments. Warmly, Carlos
|
|
|
Post by cserrano on Aug 4, 2021 20:35:41 GMT -6
How much am I gonna miss having a pad? To answer this question about the lack of a -10db pad. The Serrano 84 is almost 5dB less than a completely serviced Neumann KM84 with new capsules. The difference then of the Serrano 84 and a fully functional Neumann KM84 with its -10dB pad engaged, would then be just 5dB greater. So will you miss the pad? I can't be entirely sure but I don't think you will. I don't think most people will. Whether you engaged the pad in a Neumann KM84 or not, the difference would always be only about 5dB in the Serrano 84.
|
|
|
Post by reddirt on Aug 4, 2021 23:02:09 GMT -6
IME the pad is necessary on an 84 on louder (not necessarily metal) snares FWIW Cheers, Roaa
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Aug 5, 2021 2:50:09 GMT -6
I don't recall ever using a pad on any SDC I've recorded with.
I would probably use one if I used the mic for snare or hi-hat. For overheads I've never had an issue where I couldn't correct the levels at the preamp or in the DAW input.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Aug 5, 2021 7:56:52 GMT -6
How much am I gonna miss having a pad? To answer this question about the lack of a -10db pad. The Serrano 84 is almost 5dB less than a completely serviced Neumann KM84 with new capsules. The difference then of the Serrano 84 and a fully functional Neumann KM84 with its -10dB pad engaged, would then be just 5dB greater. So will you miss the pad? I can't be entirely sure but I don't think you will. I don't think most people will. Whether you engaged the pad in a Neumann KM84 or not, the difference would always be only about 5dB in the Serrano 84. What was the reason for eliminating the pad? Keeping cost down?
|
|
|
Post by cserrano on Aug 5, 2021 10:23:39 GMT -6
Thank you for your question. Please excuse the length of this response but I want to give you a complete, nuanced answer. Keeping costs down? No, and yes: There hasn't been any decisions to cut costs down at the component level of the individual microphone. That is to say that all the parts, the capsule, the transformer, etc. are all at the highest level of premium. However, when it comes to metalwork companies, they will typically require a minimum quantity order of several thousands of units in order to lengthen the body to accommodate a pad. This is because the tooling and moulding has to be "rebuilt." Just to do a slight modification on a body would require a minimum quantity order over 10-20 times of that which I currently order. So these metalwork manufacturers mostly work with very large companies who have grown their business to the retail level. You can find their products at Guitar Center, MusiciansFriend, zZounds, etc. The drawback is that those large companies are required to have a distributor like RAD Distribution or else Guitar Center, MusiciansFriends and zZounds will not do business with them. And then to have a distributor like RAD, they might require 1/3 of the profit (though I don't know exactly their cut.) Doing this typically causes one of two scenarios; either the consumer price of the products will need to be significantly raised, or the products themselves will need to have compromises made and won't sound as good -- which is why companies like Black Lion Audio, Revive Audio, Signal Art Electronics, Oktavamod, etc. can then create a thriving business just by undoing and fixing the compromises through offering modifications that put in more premium components. A company like Neumann makes no compromises and their products are very expensive (however an argument could be made that their TLM line is their own way of compromising.) And I'm sure you can think of companies who's products are being modded all the time to sound better -- I won't mention them by name in order not to disparage them; but you get the idea. At the level of principle I don't think there is anything wrong with being in retail. But to do it without compromising with products requires a lot more capital and a lot more resources. Serrano Audio simply is not in the retail business and does not have a distributor. Serrano Audio also sells products in small batches. Going back to these metalwork manufacturers; only a few of them are willing to do OEM business with me if I use bodies/chassis that are readily available and don't require more tooling with extremely high minimum quantity orders. Because Serrano Audio operates on small scale, is not in retail with a distributor and uses readily available metalwork, the prices of our products can remain lower while also being at the at the highest level of premium. And thus modding them with more premium parts is not a thing. I wasn't able to find readily available OEM bodies, from a company WILLING to work with me, that only included an opening for a pad. Also, after building several prototypes without pads as well as some DIY kits without pads, I was extremely pleased and content without the pad. I have also not heard complaints from others who have built DIY KM84 kits about a lack of a pad. And what I mentioned in an earlier post about the Serrano 84 only having a 5dB difference with a Neumann KM84 with its pad engaged, I think it becomes even less necessary. Because of all these factors Serrano Audio is then able to make available the Serrano 84, with no compromises in sound quality or components, at this very affordable price. ... But you don't have a pad.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Aug 5, 2021 10:28:49 GMT -6
Got it. That makes sense. Thanks for the detailed reply.
|
|
|
Post by superwack on Aug 5, 2021 11:19:37 GMT -6
Yes thanks for the response. I know Warm said the same thing about making a body that the Neumann capsules would work with - and, clearly Warm IS in stores with a distributor so it’s got to be a massive increase in ordered quantity as I’d imagine they sell quite a few of their mics!
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Aug 5, 2021 11:24:02 GMT -6
Thank you cserrano for the plain spoken information, this stuff is internet gold to me. I'm a DIY'er always looking for clues about next steps beyond what I do now, so thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Aug 5, 2021 11:54:45 GMT -6
Yes thanks for the response. I know Warm said the same thing about making a body that the Neumann capsules would work with - and, clearly Warm IS in stores with a distributor so it’s got to be a massive increase in ordered quantity as I’d imagine they sell quite a few of their mics! Warm did manage to add the pad though, which makes we wonder where they're cutting corners. Given the $749 price for a pair of WA-84, which, in addition to what Serrano offers, Warm also provides two shock mounts and a hard case, so Warm must be cutting corners somewhere, especially when you consider the middle man markup. Economy of scale only goes so far, I would think. I'd trust Serrano to get it all right more than Warm, which is why I'm interested in the Serrano and not the Warm. But it still makes you wonder what's under the hood on the Warm stuff, when they purport to use quality parts. I'm guessing Warm cheaps out on the capsule.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Aug 5, 2021 12:02:35 GMT -6
I didn't like the Warm WA-84, personally, sent them back. Serrano is about 500% more up my alley just based on what I know without hearing them.
|
|
|
Post by cserrano on Aug 5, 2021 21:45:11 GMT -6
Pre-ordering is closed for now. Regular pricing will be announced soon.
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Aug 5, 2021 21:45:29 GMT -6
I'd trust Serrano to get it all right more than Warm, which is why I'm interested in the Serrano and not the Warm. But it still makes you wonder what's under the hood on the Warm stuff, when they purport to use quality parts. I'm guessing Warm cheaps out on the capsule. It's seems the internet consensus is Warm is using a 3U Audio capsule. I'd guess that they use a somewhat more affordable part on many of the components, even if those components come from industry leaders like Cinemag and Fairchild. And the mic isn't terrible, it just might not be to the performance that some people are wanting. It is interesting that the 3U Warbler 127 SDC comes not only with a -10db pad, but it also has a low cut and costs $255. That is with just the one capsule. I'm guessing the components aren't terribly different from a lot of other SDCs we discuss all the time. It's just a matter of design choices and if the quality control is there. I wonder how large of volume he's handling? The point being that someone who isn't selling in the big box stores found a way to do it. I'm sure 3U is a much larger enterprise than Mr. Serrano is at the moment, but still it can't be huge since most musicians have no clue about 3U.
|
|
|
Post by cserrano on Aug 5, 2021 22:33:49 GMT -6
I'd trust Serrano to get it all right more than Warm, which is why I'm interested in the Serrano and not the Warm. But it still makes you wonder what's under the hood on the Warm stuff, when they purport to use quality parts. I'm guessing Warm cheaps out on the capsule. It's seems the internet consensus is Warm is using a 3U Audio capsule. I'd guess that they use a somewhat more affordable part on many of the components, even if those components come from industry leaders like Cinemag and Fairchild. And the mic isn't terrible, it just might not be to the performance that some people are wanting. It is interesting that the 3U Warbler 127 SDC comes not only with a -10db pad, but it also has a low cut and costs $255. That is with just the one capsule. I'm guessing the components aren't terribly different from a lot of other SDCs we discuss all the time. It's just a matter of design choices and if the quality control is there. I wonder how large of volume he's handling? The point being that someone who isn't selling in the big box stores found a way to do it. I'm sure 3U is a much larger enterprise than Mr. Serrano is at the moment, but still it can't be huge since most musicians have no clue about 3U. 3U Audio is not a small company and they ARE a manufacturer. They do the metalwork themselves and for other companies. I've asked them to create samples on several occasions and received replies that they are too busy to work on those for me. They are fine with selling some of their already made parts though.
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Aug 5, 2021 23:07:16 GMT -6
I also love the fact that these are coming with omni capsules in addition to the cardioid. Really nice move, cserrano!
|
|
|
Post by superwack on Aug 6, 2021 11:41:00 GMT -6
Pre-ordering is closed for now. Regular pricing will be announced soon. Congrats but I admit I'm a bit sad I never got a response to my pre-order days ago... sigh
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Aug 6, 2021 15:51:22 GMT -6
Pre-ordering is closed for now. Regular pricing will be announced soon. Congrats but I admit I'm a bit sad I never got a response to my pre-order days ago... sigh @superwack , are you talking about a response here in the thread, a PM, or an email? I’ve always found cserrano to be super quick in his responses (like within a day), so I’m wondering if he just didn’t see your communication. I’d reach out to him again if I were you.
|
|
|
Post by cserrano on Aug 6, 2021 16:21:29 GMT -6
Pre-ordering is closed for now. Regular pricing will be announced soon. Congrats but I admit I'm a bit sad I never got a response to my pre-order days ago... sigh superwack I don't see a PM from you. I emailed back everyone that emailed me. If you emailed, please forward it to me. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by cserrano on Aug 6, 2021 16:27:18 GMT -6
I also love the fact that these are coming with omni capsules in addition to the cardioid. Really nice move, cserrano ! Thank you, Mark!
|
|