|
Post by tasteliketape on Dec 21, 2023 13:20:04 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by teejay on Dec 21, 2023 13:51:06 GMT -6
I've had my CA-70S for almost three years and with the caveat that I have yet to hear this plugin, I'll just say I have serious doubts. While I believe plugins can do some unique and great things, in my experience they fall short when trying to exactly emulate the sound of physical tubes and transformers in an existing hardware unit. I believe Josh has proved that in a shootout more than once (e.g. Manley Voxbox). Three of the best to evaluate the software claims would be bricejchandler, thehightenor, and drbill
|
|
|
Post by bricejchandler on Dec 21, 2023 14:45:01 GMT -6
I’ll Be interested to try it out. I won’t be home for at least a month and a half so any shootout on my end will have to wait!
The sound demos sound pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by andersmv on Dec 21, 2023 16:01:56 GMT -6
Played with the plug-in for a few minutes, sounds “right” to me initially. I’ll definitely be messing around with it next to my hardware pair at some point, I think I’ve got the ok from TapeOp to do a review. The coolest thing is having the high and low pass filters available before the input stage and after the output stage. I spent a minute flipping the low end to +4 and using a high pass at the beginning, really great sounding result flipping the bypass on and off. I’m really excited to mess with it more!
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Dec 21, 2023 17:19:17 GMT -6
Well, people do pass mixes through the Coils (I don’t personally) so I guess an emulation would be yet another flavour of digital saturation.
The magic of the CA-70 for me personally is dialling in the gain - o/p relationship and the negative feedback and driving your favourite ribbon and LDC mics.
Then hitting a tube comp and then hitting your A/D.
That’s something very different to essentially a saturation plugin post recording ime.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Dec 21, 2023 19:13:55 GMT -6
Well, people do pass mixes through the Coils (I don’t personally) so I guess an emulation would be yet another flavour of digital saturation. The magic of the CA-70 for me personally is dialling in the gain - o/p relationship and the negative feedback and driving your favourite ribbon and LDC mics. Then hitting a tube comp and then hitting your A/D. That’s something very different to essentially a saturation plugin post recording ime. Agreed. Not interested really. Plus, for me, the CA70 is kind of a specialty mic pre. It's AWESOME for what it does, but I do not want it everywhere. I know.....heresy.
|
|
|
Post by poppaflavor on Dec 21, 2023 20:14:52 GMT -6
Played with the plug-in for a few minutes, sounds “right” to me initially. I’ll definitely be messing around with it next to my hardware pair at some point, I think I’ve got the ok from TapeOp to do a review. The coolest thing is having the high and low pass filters available before the input stage and after the output stage. I spent a minute flipping the low end to +4 and using a high pass at the beginning, really great sounding result flipping the bypass on and off. I’m really excited to mess with it more! When processing outboard via the Line in I have been shaping the low end before the CA70S with the Audio Merge King Tubby Big Knob HPF inductor filter. Also have tried the Westfinga 9069 inductor (which has a resonance pot). Both are a pretty steep 3rd order so like 70 hz (maybe 150) is perfect. So to me the HPF function in a CA70S plugin makes lots of sense. Even after the output stage since then I could get jiggy with that +4 Low like you describe. But how do you use the low pass filter (and what do you set it to)? Is it to counteract extra sizzle when the neg FB knob is fully CCW off?
|
|
|
Post by paulcheeba on Dec 21, 2023 22:07:34 GMT -6
Nope. Not now, not ever. It’s about tubes and transformers. Great advertising for the Incredible Coil. Make the plug in owners full of FOMO.
|
|
|
Post by andersmv on Dec 21, 2023 22:51:08 GMT -6
Played with the plug-in for a few minutes, sounds “right” to me initially. I’ll definitely be messing around with it next to my hardware pair at some point, I think I’ve got the ok from TapeOp to do a review. The coolest thing is having the high and low pass filters available before the input stage and after the output stage. I spent a minute flipping the low end to +4 and using a high pass at the beginning, really great sounding result flipping the bypass on and off. I’m really excited to mess with it more! When processing outboard via the Line in I have been shaping the low end before the CA70S with the Audio Merge King Tubby Big Knob HPF inductor filter. Also have tried the Westfinga 9069 inductor (which has a resonance pot). Both are a pretty steep 3rd order so like 70 hz (maybe 150) is perfect. So to me the HPF function in a CA70S plugin makes lots of sense. Even after the output stage since then I could get jiggy with that +4 Low like you describe. But how do you use the low pass filter (and what do you set it to)? Is it to counteract extra sizzle when the neg FB knob is fully CCW off? I’m not going to complain about an extra feature being there, but I can’t ever imagine needing to use a low pass filter with the CA-70 😂. It’s like the king of smooth top end, everything comes out sounding warmer.
|
|
|
Post by poppaflavor on Dec 22, 2023 5:29:04 GMT -6
I’m not going to complain about an extra feature being there, but I can’t ever imagine needing to use a low pass filter with the CA-70 😂. It’s like the king of smooth top end, everything comes out sounding warmer. Hah! Yes, totally agree. That's why I was a bit puzzled by the LPF. :-D
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Dec 22, 2023 5:37:59 GMT -6
I’m not going to complain about an extra feature being there, but I can’t ever imagine needing to use a low pass filter with the CA-70 😂. It’s like the king of smooth top end, everything comes out sounding warmer. Hah! Yes, totally agree. That's why I was a bit puzzled by the LPF. :-D Well it’s just a bunch of 0’s and 1’s. Developers can’t resist adding more features (relevant or not!) Aside from the “jumping on the band wagon element” how many more versions of “digital” hair does a plugin folder need! I can actually see this plugin helping Coil Audio sales (not that I think they need any help!) Buy this and you might find yourself thinking …. “wow if I had a real one I could actually pre-amplify a microphone” …. how crazy would that be
|
|
|
Post by poppaflavor on Dec 22, 2023 6:01:36 GMT -6
I can actually see this plugin helping Coil Audio sales (not that I think they need any help!)Buy this and you might find yourself thinking “wow if I had a real one I could actually pre-amplify a microphone” …. how crazy would that be Well, shamelessly and somewhat selfishly I was kind of hoping that the plug-in will devalue the hardware or at least reduce demand. Then I could get myself a CA286S :-) I'm pretty sure that won't happen though (the reduced demand that is, the CA286S is definitely in my future someday). But yeah, you're right. At least that logic worked for me and the Chandler Germanium Comp. A little bit different than the preamp example you gave but I had the Germ Comp plug in for a few years and always lusted after the hardware. Finally picked up one HW unit and it's all I'd hoped it would be. I haven't heard the CA70s plug-in yet, but I imagine that most folks using it are going to immediately want the hardware.
|
|
|
Post by plinker on Dec 22, 2023 6:47:57 GMT -6
I think the feature question we’re all asking ourselves is…
“Will it have onboard p48?”
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Dec 22, 2023 9:04:19 GMT -6
I think the feature question we’re all asking ourselves is… “Will it have onboard p48?” lol
|
|
|
Post by andersmv on Dec 22, 2023 9:16:24 GMT -6
Is the phase switching doing something weird for anyone else? I forgot to mention it, I flipped it quickly yesterday and there was a weird, audible difference. Something was off, but wouln’t have time to mess with it again for a while.
|
|
|
Post by Darren Boling on Dec 22, 2023 9:29:36 GMT -6
I've been testing it, I dig it. I'll fire up my SA-70 clone and do some A/B's out of curiosity but my clone is a hair brighter than the CA-70 so for the group it'll be more interesting when others do their tests. I will say at the beginning of the year I wouldn't have expected a Silver Bullet, Michelangelo and now CA-70 plugin to come out. Making me lazy and not firing up the outboard.
|
|
|
Post by poppaflavor on Dec 22, 2023 10:25:46 GMT -6
I'm curious how the plug-in might deliver the interactivity of CA70S + Mic. From what I understand Coil indicated a specific design choice of really low input impedance to achieve maximum power transfer. Rather than the more (modern) typical maximum voltage transfer that would happen with a Pre that has a high input Z (like some Neve or AEA Pres do). Actually, from my rudimentary understanding the exceptionally low input impedance on the CA70S would favor current transfer and result in a power mismatch for mics that have relatively high output impedances (my SA87T is 200 ohm output Z for example). And with the CA70S input transfo being (it looks like from the label) 1:400 (150:60000, similar to a Triad A10-J or AA12-J not center tapped) that is a wicked low reflected impedance to the mic. Anywho, I'll bet we find that the plug-in can do pretty good at the saturation and perhaps negative feedback aspects but is not going to allow for the extreme interactivity of the circuit and Mic. So far trying a few different Mics withe CA-70S the interactivity is really special. Also... is a CA286S pluggo coming soon? Hopefully so! Curious how they might differ. Is the phase switching doing something weird for anyone else? I forgot to mention it, I flipped it quickly yesterday and there was a weird, audible difference. Something was off, but wouln’t have time to mess with it again for a while. Interesting. I note a pretty sizeable difference for the HW CA70S polarity switch with piano, synth and vocals but less so for driven guitar off a cabinet or percussion. I tried to peek at the waveforms and kinda convinced myself that the keys and vocals were less symmetrical and that might account for the differenc when flicking the polarity switch (not sure technically, but maybe the crappy acoustics here also contribute to asymmetry). After noting this I try to use the CA70S polarity switch like a responsiveness factor kinda thing cause boomy low end stuff seems to have more asymmetry. But not sure how that translates to the plugin.
|
|
|
Post by andersmv on Dec 22, 2023 11:40:48 GMT -6
My hardware better not be doing anything other than flipping the phase 😂. Interesting… I’ve only done multi mic drums with my Coils once so far, can’t remember if I needed to use phase. Other than that, I don’t think I’ve touched it on the hardware so I couldn’t tell you if I’ve heard a difference on there as well.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Dec 22, 2023 11:53:39 GMT -6
From what I understand Coil indicated a specific design choice of really low input impedance to achieve maximum power transfer. Rather than the more (modern) typical maximum voltage transfer that would happen with a Pre that has a high input Z (like some Neve or AEA Pres do). Not true. It's a standard unloaded tube grid approach, the Ω spec is the source Z, the preamp is much higher Ω. An original Gates SA-70 with the UTC transformers measures well over 5KΩ mid-band. You'd have to wind a kind of crappy input transformer to force extra low input Ω with a circuit like this.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Dec 22, 2023 12:31:02 GMT -6
Ad copy niggle - "1930's to 1950's" - it's 1948 (drawing date is 11/47) to 1953 or 1954, not in the 1955 catalogs. Not much of anything had NFB in the 1930's. FWIW, librarians!
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 22, 2023 12:34:47 GMT -6
I think the feature question we’re all asking ourselves is… “Will it have onboard p48?” lol You need an avatar. I’ve got one in mind if you want me to do it.
|
|
|
Post by poppaflavor on Dec 22, 2023 12:36:09 GMT -6
From what I understand Coil indicated a specific design choice of really low input impedance to achieve maximum power transfer. Rather than the more (modern) typical maximum voltage transfer that would happen with a Pre that has a high input Z (like some Neve or AEA Pres do). Not true. It's a standard unloaded tube grid approach, the Ω spec is the source Z, the preamp is much higher Ω. An original Gates SA-70 with the UTC transformers measures well over 5KΩ mid-band. You'd have to wind a kind of crappy input transformer to force extra low input Ω with a circuit like this. Thank you for the correction. Especially thanks for "Ω spec is the source Z", which is exactly where I went horribly awry. I also had some timely context and insight from from Coil which indicated exactly as you said. I was going off the turns ratio squared and tried to backtrack from listed impedances. So (as usual) I've grossly simplified things to the point of being inaccurate. Still learning.
|
|
|
Post by veggieryan on Dec 22, 2023 12:52:34 GMT -6
I find the CA70 design discussion to be fascinating. Whatever it's doing, it's doing very well to my ear. Never have I heard a tone as sweet, pure and "sounds like a record" as my Stager SR3 directly into the Coil preamp. Lately I have been doing Stager SR3 into CA-286 into CA-70 line in for my vocals. What a tone. No plugin can emulate that portion since by the time its in the computer its already too late... the damage has already been done by inferior mic preamps if real Coil Audio tone is what you are seeking. Really takes the phrase "takes EQ well" to a whole new level. Extreme boosts on my LilFreq EQ have never sounded better. It must be something about those transformers after reading all the drama that went into making sure the new supplier was up to snuff. Glad they took care of it because I can't imagine life without my Coils.
|
|
|
Post by poppaflavor on Dec 22, 2023 13:06:11 GMT -6
My hardware better not be doing anything other than flipping the phase 😂. Interesting… I’ve only done multi mic drums with my Coils once so far, can’t remember if I needed to use phase. Other than that, I don’t think I’ve touched it on the hardware so I couldn’t tell you if I’ve heard a difference on there as well. Sorry, didn't mean to imply it did anything other than flip the phase. But there are certainly differences in tone and response for some sources on polarity switch for me. I think it is mostly the stuff like keys and vocals which (in retrospect) look asymmetrical by the waveform. I thought that since the phase switch was at the outset of the signal flow it might impact the responsive level hitting the circuit and thus the limiting/saturation since (gross generalization alert) tubes tend to clip asymmetrically depending on the circuit. So like if the limiting and saturation was happening at the tubes perhaps it may be impacted to a degree by the polarity switch on an driven asymmetric waveform.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Dec 22, 2023 13:43:28 GMT -6
You need an avatar. I’ve got one in mind if you want me to do it. John if I put a photo of me up instead of your generic avatar the only thing that would change is .... you'd see eyebrows I'm happy for you to give me an avatar .... as long as it's not really silly or mean
|
|