|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 19, 2018 11:58:18 GMT -6
there are a ton of different things it could be I guess. I've tried all kind of compression - HW and SW - But shouldn't I be able to plug into a nice preamp DI and immediately get a good tone? Point being, it's not the pre I don't think. Maybe it's just my playing...but I'm so tired of getting a spongey, non-percussive sounding tone. I'm trying to get a more percussive attack...
Wonder if it's my cheap bass? Squier Classic Vibe (Fiesta red one) Although, I've heard a lot of people say they have the same thing and they think it's great. I'm a guitar player, but have been playing with finger(s) because that's what real players do. I'm good enough to fake it for my songs, but I feel like sometimes the bass is somewhat of an undefined mess.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Dec 19, 2018 12:09:03 GMT -6
Well, this is a post thing, but a lot of the bass I get on tracks isn't bold and ballzy.... But just get this plugin and dial a shit load until it barely breaks up...... The JST Clip. That plugin can be used on any damn thing and it'll make it sound better, try it.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 19, 2018 12:16:32 GMT -6
Isn't that basically just distortion?
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Dec 19, 2018 12:22:03 GMT -6
Try different strings, it can have a dramatic effect on your sound.
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Dec 19, 2018 12:34:18 GMT -6
If you're looking for more percussive attack, definitely try a pick first and foremost (if you haven't already). Different kinds of picks: material, thickness, etc. It's the cheapest experiment. Lots of pros play with picks. Next stop would be strings: round wound are a lot brighter than flat wound, obviously. What are you using now?
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Dec 19, 2018 12:48:56 GMT -6
Isn't that basically just distortion? Eh, you'd have to try it. It does more than just that, it gives pretty much anything you put it on balls. Try it.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Dec 19, 2018 12:50:48 GMT -6
I find a decent DI sound the hardest thing to get, and almost always have an amp in the picture too unless it's 1) me playing it, or 2) I know the source is gonna sound good ahead of time.
So many basses don't sound right through a DI for a lot of reasons, and so many players don't have their technique in the right space for that level of scrutiny.
Between instrument setup and technique, I see a majority that need an immediate HPF to get rid of thump noise (right down to DC) below any actual notes, and the energy there is frequently greater than the note energy, so it sucks up all the power in the amplification and largely defines the result, even though it may not be audibly apparent. You definitely do dynamics damage if you compress before a HPF with that junk in there.
I get the best stuff out of finger playing with flats on one bass and round wounds on another, it all depends, and I've not used a pick in a rock context in 25 years, I can barely hold one. Listen to the transition in Entwhistle's tone when he moved from pick to fingers, same for so many guys, they kinda got better and more responsive sounds. If I moved to a pick for a reason, I'd be starting with flats on the bass so I could crank more smooth harmonically rich treble.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Dec 19, 2018 13:00:17 GMT -6
Isn't that basically just distortion? I'm not Jerome, but I often find some kind of subtle distortion/harmonic enhancement blended in can help add perceived volume/more aggressive mids without overpowering the relationship with the bass drum. Often that's the job of the amp sound captured. Of course, every mix/song is different.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Dec 19, 2018 13:03:42 GMT -6
I wouldn't say that using my REDDI created a spongy sound- which I take to mean that when the note is plucked there is a kind of compression-, but when I bought the UAD Ampeg B-15 plugin I got much more of a percussive bass sound. When I think of percussive, I think of popping and slapping which to me is more mid range frequencies than low end frequencies. I would mix the two together, one for the tube bottom and one for the percussive.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Dec 19, 2018 13:20:54 GMT -6
Try some pedals out too. A little drive and a boost in the mids will get growl / bite. The bass itself matters a lot too. Pickups, where you’re physically playing the string, how old the strings are, the setup...
|
|
|
Post by svart on Dec 19, 2018 13:26:10 GMT -6
Distortion. Some call it saturation, but what you need are the mid-frequency harmonics to define the sound. Some people get it from pushing an amp. some get it from DI, some mix both.
I got some raw tracks from a major mix guy a while ago and I was aghast at how mid-range heavy the bass tone was when solo'd.. And conversely how little low end was actually present in the bass guitar track. It sounded super fat and heavy and defined in the mix, but solo'd it was a twangy mess of mids and highs with some distortion with very little bass below maybe 100hz.
And yet I just couldn't believe how great it sounded in a mix based on the solo'd track. I'm talking midrange had to be 6-10dB hotter than the bass frequencies, if not more. I was also surprised at how much distortion was on the track and yet that gritty sound disappeared in the mix as well.
I think the thing that fools a lot of folks with bass is that they expect it to be nothing but low frequencies, but then it just becomes a muddy lump in the mix under all the other stuff that has midrange to define it and they tend to keep pushing the low end expecting for it to finally show up in the mix at some point. They end up cutting the lows from everything else and the mix ends up strangely thin sounding even with tons of bass guitar pumping away.
Personally I've started getting a straight DI sound, then going back and reamping through a Sansamp with some medium saturation/distortion, and then again through a pushed Ampeg SVT for the low grunt. Blending these two can give you a good tone, but watch those lows.
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Dec 19, 2018 13:46:10 GMT -6
Run it through your kemper with an ampeg profile? I thought you got another kemper? Maybe? I use a Burl B1d preamp into any choice of compression and it’s fine. The bass does make a big difference in tone, but we all know that. An amp and DI Combination is the best way to go. I would pick up a small bass combo amp and re-amp with your kemper. I actually used the ampeg UAD plugin with great results.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Dec 19, 2018 13:51:21 GMT -6
Distortion. Some call it saturation, but what you need are the mid-frequency harmonics to define the sound. Some people get it from pushing an amp. some get it from DI, some mix both. I got some raw tracks from a major mix guy a while ago and I was aghast at how mid-range heavy the bass tone was when solo'd.. And conversely how little low end was actually present in the bass guitar track. It sounded super fat and heavy and defined in the mix, but solo'd it was a twangy mess of mids and highs with some distortion with very little bass below maybe 100hz. And yet I just couldn't believe how great it sounded in a mix based on the solo'd track. I'm talking midrange had to be 6-10dB hotter than the bass frequencies, if not more. I was also surprised at how much distortion was on the track and yet that gritty sound disappeared in the mix as well. I think the thing that fools a lot of folks with bass is that they expect it to be nothing but low frequencies, but then it just becomes a muddy lump in the mix under all the other stuff that has midrange to define it and they tend to keep pushing the low end expecting for it to finally show up in the mix at some point. They end up cutting the lows from everything else and the mix ends up strangely thin sounding even with tons of bass guitar pumping away. Personally I've started getting a straight DI sound, then going back and reamping through a Sansamp with some medium saturation/distortion, and then again through a pushed Ampeg SVT for the low grunt. Blending these two can give you a good tone, but watch those lows. This is a very very good post. It's impossible for me to solo the bass and do treatment and expect it to cut the mix and create a foundation with the kick. I have to start with EQ, which most of the time I'm led to boost 8 or 10db of 800hz and I always seem to HPF to the lowest octave note of the root and it would surprise a lot to know it cuts what you'd think is the sub but when it's in the mix it just doesn't work that way, then I use the JST and I find I dial so much in that it's just shy of fuzzy, then finally the compression which usually peaks around 7db. When I'm done if I solo the bass it's pretty much exactly as you've said..... full of mids, loads of overdrive and rolled off much higher than some would think, yet when it's in the mix it's punch, full and plays nice with the kick. Resist hitting the solo button when you dial in the bass and kick. Get the whole mix going and HPF and over drive it until your mix starts jumping out of the speakers with dynamics. If you don't all you'll end up with is a flat up against the wall sounding mix and it's because all the bandwidth most speakers can handle is eaten up by all those sub freq's.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Dec 19, 2018 13:56:55 GMT -6
Also I forgot to mention, do yourself a favor and grab the BX sub synth plug. Do a mult of the bass and dial in harmonics that when the lowest octave note is hit, the BX plugin makes a grind around the 200hz-300hz region. Blend that in with your bass track and it'll knock your hat off. I think it sounds great, kind of let's you get a nice big full bass tone with some mojo.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Dec 19, 2018 14:01:52 GMT -6
Took me way too long to figure this out: 1073 low shelf boosted + 100%, ram that HOT into a summing buss or some other clipping thing. Then subtract with another lowshelf - 100% and maybe high pass. I’ll then work on a good midrange sound then later gently add the lows back in as needed.. It makes the lows super solid and heavy, like real life, and gives some overtones to the mids and higher regions. Doesn’t work for everything, but it’s always worth a quick try.
You also can do something similar with the mids and high shelf. re-record a couple passes and get some gritty clipped versions that you can blend in.
Also my friend has Axe FX and two Wal basses. If anyone needs that sound. Wals sound awesome because the wood, the setup, the quality.. but also the onboard active electronics are styled after a good console EQ.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Dec 19, 2018 14:17:20 GMT -6
Distortion. Some call it saturation, but what you need are the mid-frequency harmonics to define the sound. Some people get it from pushing an amp. some get it from DI, some mix both. I got some raw tracks from a major mix guy a while ago and I was aghast at how mid-range heavy the bass tone was when solo'd.. And conversely how little low end was actually present in the bass guitar track. It sounded super fat and heavy and defined in the mix, but solo'd it was a twangy mess of mids and highs with some distortion with very little bass below maybe 100hz. And yet I just couldn't believe how great it sounded in a mix based on the solo'd track. I'm talking midrange had to be 6-10dB hotter than the bass frequencies, if not more. I was also surprised at how much distortion was on the track and yet that gritty sound disappeared in the mix as well. I think the thing that fools a lot of folks with bass is that they expect it to be nothing but low frequencies, but then it just becomes a muddy lump in the mix under all the other stuff that has midrange to define it and they tend to keep pushing the low end expecting for it to finally show up in the mix at some point. They end up cutting the lows from everything else and the mix ends up strangely thin sounding even with tons of bass guitar pumping away. Personally I've started getting a straight DI sound, then going back and reamping through a Sansamp with some medium saturation/distortion, and then again through a pushed Ampeg SVT for the low grunt. Blending these two can give you a good tone, but watch those lows. This is a very very good post. It's impossible for me to solo the bass and do treatment and expect it to cut the mix and create a foundation with the kick. I have to start with EQ, which most of the time I'm led to boost 8 or 10db of 800hz and I always seem to HPF to the lowest octave note of the root and it would surprise a lot to know it cuts what you'd think is the sub but when it's in the mix it just doesn't work that way, then I use the JST and I find I dial so much in that it's just shy of fuzzy, then finally the compression which usually peaks around 7db. When I'm done if I solo the bass it's pretty much exactly as you've said..... full of mids, loads of overdrive and rolled off much higher than some would think, yet when it's in the mix it's punch, full and plays nice with the kick. Resist hitting the solo button when you dial in the bass and kick. Get the whole mix going and HPF and over drive it until your mix starts jumping out of the speakers with dynamics. If you don't all you'll end up with is a flat up against the wall sounding mix and it's because all the bandwidth most speakers can handle is eaten up by all those sub freq's. Couldn't agree more. Once I heard this guy's mix and was able to play around with the tracks, my world changed. My perception of what the pieces of a mix *should* sound like shattered and now I try not to solo anything at all. It also changed the way I hear mixes as well as what I notice when I watch something like a Mix with the Masters video. I was trying to pick apart the techniques, but could never figure out exactly what they were doing, even though they were explaining it. It turns out they were just twisting knobs until it sounded good and using fancy descriptions of doing so. Working fast, trusting your knowledge and your ears. Nothing magical, and certainly not secret techniques. They just knew how to get things to work in the mix by tweaking the parts. I also noticed they rarely solo stuff, and when they do it's usually quickly to check specific things, not to carve sounds. One more thing I've learned is the word "envelope". The envelope of the sound matters just as much as the frequencies. Too much time is spent trying to squeeze the EQ daylights out of tracks to get them to fit, but I've noticed that the attack of a sound might make it much more intelligible than adding a ton of EQ. To that end I also noticed this guys tracks had huge amounts of compression on the bass, something like 15-20dB of GR during some sections, but the levels were automated to "jump" and really push the compressor(s) at certain points to make the track feel like it was about to come through the speakers.. But I also noticed that the tracks pumped wildly with slow compression when solo'd while in the mix they sounded very punchy but not overly pumpy..
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 19, 2018 14:30:46 GMT -6
Most of this is mixing tips...but I guess I’m really looking for answers starting with the source. I have been tracking through the UAD B15 and it’s probably my favorite. Also have the Kemper with a bunch of different profiles...but I’m still not getting the punch that I want. I usually find myself using a resonant curve with bass starting pretty high up...I’m always adding mids in my bass...but I do need to try boosting some of the harmonics in the 200-400 range. I also need to pay for a damn setup.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Dec 19, 2018 14:33:09 GMT -6
Yeah get some distortion on that thing!
However, I would use a compressor for this. One of the things I think that people don't realize compressors are good at it adding distortion. An 1176 is perfect for this. Its all in the attack and release times. 8 or 20 ratio..or ABI mode. Then mess with the release time, you'll get some killer distortion. Plugins do this okay ish..not great. A good hardware unit does it really well.
You don't need to crush it either.
And as mentioned, the 500-3.5k area on a bass is super impactful. I tend to think of bass as another guitar part thats just extending the other guitars range a bit. Then getting the marriage of Kick and Bass together makes it sound awesome.
Also Im a firm believer that you need a good instrument. I can't comment on what is good or bad, but cheap won't do it.
Put good shit in, get good shit out.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Dec 19, 2018 14:34:50 GMT -6
Most of this is mixing tips...but I guess I’m really looking for answers starting with the source. I have been tracking through the UAD B15 and it’s probably my favorite. Also have the Kemper with a bunch of different profiles...but I’m still not getting the punch that I want. I usually find myself using a resonant curve with bass starting pretty high up...I’m always adding mids in my bass...but I do need to try boosting some of the harmonics in the 200-400 range. I also need to pay for a damn setup. I guess what we're trying to say is the punch is a result of the mix process. Creating rounded attacks through copious amounts of slow compression and the right harmonic content to add definition.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Dec 19, 2018 14:39:13 GMT -6
You still have an FC526? That gets the envelope there pretty fast for me.
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Dec 19, 2018 15:09:12 GMT -6
I have a lot of luck duplicating the track and inserting a (gasp) sansamp plug on there. Pull down the lows, boost the highs and tweak the knobs until it pokes in a gross way. Then just blend a little of that in there.
Hearing Paul’s bass tracks solo’d on Beatles songs changed my entire perspective on how to get a bass to sit right. Hit up YouTube and check some of them out. They sound pretty damn gnarly in solo but totally different in the context of the songs.
|
|
|
Post by reddirt on Dec 19, 2018 15:09:27 GMT -6
Before you even get into the recording side John, what do you actally sound like through a good amp? It's stating the obvious but most of your sound is in your fingers - how you play. James Jamerson played with one finger but had touch for days. It's difficult to get that clarity if it's not being made at the source. Many all rounders think of bass as 'no worries it's not that hard' but balk at the hurdle you are discussing. You may need to start aside some daily practice to get the relaxed strength in your fingers. Also , picks can be very good- McCartney used them - Penny Lane anyone?; I know of a guy who used felt picks dipped in some kind of resin to make them harder but not too hard. Go well, Cheers, Ross
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Dec 19, 2018 15:22:15 GMT -6
Most of this is mixing tips...but I guess I’m really looking for answers starting with the source. I have been tracking through the UAD B15 and it’s probably my favorite. Also have the Kemper with a bunch of different profiles...but I’m still not getting the punch that I want. I usually find myself using a resonant curve with bass starting pretty high up...I’m always adding mids in my bass...but I do need to try boosting some of the harmonics in the 200-400 range. I also need to pay for a damn setup. Well that's kind of the thing..... On sessions I get that are cut in the best of the best rooms with the best of the best players and a top producer, the bass I get is pretty bland. On rare occasions I may get a DI and Amp, but, most of the time, like 99% of the time it's a DI. They just make sure it's pretty flat and no notes are poking etc. I see it as my job to get it to pop and have mojo.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Dec 19, 2018 15:27:11 GMT -6
Johnkenn I do have a magic box here though..... If you'll post a bass track I'll run it through it and repost. No EQ, no compression, just simply using it as an insert. I'd love for people to try and guess what it is.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Dec 19, 2018 16:07:16 GMT -6
Maybe try playing through a guitar amp, blended with DI for low end.
Miking up a real amp in the room can sound very different for bass.
Most of my bass amp microphone recordings have a lot more body, size, and punch than my DI recordings. They take up a lot more space in the mix, before mixing.
|
|