|
Post by gfunny72 on Dec 4, 2021 18:36:42 GMT -6
One of the reasons for going with hdx is the supposed bulletproof latency management, this is worse than studioone which I was using. I hope it’s some silly thing that I’m overlooking The only way to correct it would be to enter negative ms in the hardware insert - which protools does not allow. The rendered audio is BEFORE the original audio not after Apologies for not reading the whole thread but did you manually calc the roundtrip latency (at the buffer you're working at, it changes with the buffer size) with like a printed audio click track and then enter that (in ms) in the hardware insert delay comp settings?
|
|
|
Post by gfunny72 on Dec 4, 2021 18:35:01 GMT -6
The only way to correct it would be to enter negative ms in the hardware insert - which protools does not allow. The rendered audio is BEFORE the original audio not after Apologies for not reading the whole thread but did you manually calc the roundtrip latency (at the buffer you're working at, it changes with the buffer size) with like a printed audio click track and then enter that (in ms) in the hardware insert delay comp settings?
|
|
|
Post by gfunny72 on Dec 4, 2021 14:36:15 GMT -6
I think you're technically supposed to. I don't know how PT calculates ADC, but I don't think it's technically accurate for non-Avid interfaces. You could always try the click test and see if it's accurate, or by how much it's off. Yeah - the weird thing is (at least the last time I tried) it records it ahead of the source track. So weird. John I get the exact same thing on Pro Tools HDX with BurlB80 mothership - it is rendering the audio before the originating audio that feeds the hardware insert. Did you solve this problem? I have delay compensation on
|
|
|
Post by gfunny72 on Jul 22, 2013 10:35:27 GMT -6
When is the Heider going to be available to purchase? I keep checking RackNRoll website but I don't see any information on it.
|
|