|
Post by jeromemason on Feb 8, 2014 2:54:31 GMT -6
I'm noticing when I listen to the Country 100 that there seems to be a few things that are equal all across the board for almost every song I hear. I'm noticing the dynamics in the verses are really low, bass, vocal, drums (played lighter, maybe side sticking) and to me it sounds nice and full. A lot of bandwidth being used for instruments hard panned, and the kick definitely has that lower octave sub all the time. Also seems like the volume may be automated during the verses, or there may be a Verse Bass and an Chorus Bass track, each treated differently. What I noticed when the chorus comes in, an instant feeling of full, wide, not louder, just that the dynamics whether it's additional instruments being added or if those instruments are being automated to open the chorus up. Maybe the bass now is overdriven slightly to give it more presence to compete with what's been added in the chorus. Maybe the bass is a little louder when the chorus comes in. What I also notice during the chorus is that while it feels very full, there still feels like there is space in the stereo field. I'm noticing on my mixes that I'm getting the nice full sound on the chorus, but the problem is I'm also getting that sound in the verse. So if there are any pro's that hang around here, how is it that you're mixing these songs so they sound this way? Is it a matter of just more instruments being added when the chorus comes in? Are automating volumes in the chorus on instruments. Do you keep the center fairly clear of anything so that it allows the vocal to be massive and in your face through the whole song? Seems like a good discussion, and maybe some people can get something out of it. I know I'll be watching
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2014 13:27:35 GMT -6
you should post this question in the Pensado Students facebook group. a lot of those cats are pro mixers who work on that music.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Feb 8, 2014 13:51:54 GMT -6
you should post this question in the Pensado Students facebook group. a lot of those cats are pro mixers who work on that music. Well, I was trying to open discussion on this board , not a lot of action on it, seems like it needs some topics to discuss.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 8, 2014 14:10:49 GMT -6
you should post this question in the Pensado Students facebook group. a lot of those cats are pro mixers who work on that music. Well, I was trying to open discussion on this board , not a lot of action on it, seems like it needs some topics to discuss. Very interested in this sort of thing myself: what is done to the mix, and why.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 8, 2014 19:22:59 GMT -6
you should post this question in the Pensado Students facebook group. a lot of those cats are pro mixers who work on that music. Or not and keep it here. Jeesh...
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 8, 2014 19:24:31 GMT -6
From what I've seen at Pensado is that it's a lot of non-pros
|
|
|
Post by svart on Feb 8, 2014 22:33:34 GMT -6
I think noah shain said something in another thread about his mixes that was spot on. Dynamics isn't really what you think it is, it's what is perceived, and a lot of mixes these days *sound* dynamic but it's technically not dynamic if you were to look at the absolute difference in loudness-es in the mix. That's the pro aspect of it, to be able to make things loud and detailed but not suffer from the distortion and always-in-your-face sound we think of as "modern" mixes. Those have become the poster children for the "loudness wars" but they are the extreme example. Some of the other pros, I think Andy Wallace, describe starting their mixes with the absolute ballsiest sections of the song and getting those parts sounding right and moving backwards from there. I suppose if you work that way, then you've already made the hardest part of the mix fit together first and the rest is easy.
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Feb 8, 2014 22:45:32 GMT -6
I'm noticing when I listen to the Country 100 that there seems to be a few things that are equal all across the board for almost every song I hear. ...that you're lucky if you find 5 or 6db of dynamic range in any of them?
|
|
|
Post by lolo on Feb 8, 2014 22:59:21 GMT -6
Great topic
|
|
|
Post by noah shain on Feb 9, 2014 0:26:10 GMT -6
I personally automate just about every single element in a mix. Maybe not every single drum mic...but the drums for sure, the bass for sure, guitars, pads, vocals (duh), everything really. I often add some type of bigger sub element for choruses. Not with R-Bass or any of the plug ins that do the octave above but with a big fat pure-ish sine wave-ish synth. Really depends on the genre and the song. I feel like I have, MAX, 4 db to play with volume wise. Usually less so I have to create the perception of more dynamic change than is actually occurring (if dynamics equals volume, which is really only part of it).
CONTRAST is the word I use. Think of comic book art. The lightest colors are bordering the darkest colors. Contrast.
So what I try and do is create a big change if I want the chorus to pop. Not a volume change necessarily but a change in, well...colors.
I might keep the intro and first verse less bass heavy but balanced so you don't notice, then the chorus can get big on the bottom, let the second verse be a little bigger than the first and then thin out the pre chorus (for contrast) then drop that big bass on em again in the chorus. That's one of a million ways to do it, and one of a hundred ways you might do it in one song.
My point is I'm looking for contrast. That's a great way to manipulate perception. I want to compete with every other mix out there so I'm limited when it comes to volume changes. Listen to Brauer's mixes and watch em on a digital meter...big dynamic shifts but not a lot of volume change. That dude is the master!
My experience with large volume changes in my mixes is that they sound stupid after they get mastered. The loud sections end up sounding QUIETER than the quiet sections. The ME has got to use high pass filters to limit the way they do for pop or country or mainstream and that will castrate any mix if there are big volume jumps. That's my experience anyway.
I'm rambling but my point is contrast. Whatever you gotta do to get it.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Feb 9, 2014 7:07:30 GMT -6
From what I've seen at Pensado is that it's a lot of non-pros But they have all the Waves plugin cracks! I kid, I kid. A lot of them try hard, but I find the focus on dance/pop production over there a bit myopic. Talk about a rate race. As has been said, it's an illusion of dynamics. You're talking a mix that operates as a square wave - hard on, hard off. If you want some of the excitement those mixes have, use of the mute button can be a very good affect. Take something out for 4 bars, or hipass a drum break or whatever. When you bring it bag the affect is that the musical parts are more pronounced. It can be very tiresome, though, with those levels of compression. I've never heard people lie harder than Pensado's Place. ("Oh I usually just kiss the input of an 1176") and the synths sound like they're in a washing machine, brother please. I thought Mixerman and Tony Maserati were pretty cool guys, though, and seemed pretty honest.
|
|
|
Post by henge on Feb 9, 2014 8:29:06 GMT -6
Something that should be mentioned is arrangement as jazznoise suggests. Usually your choruses have more elements to kick it out. Bring it down in the verses by scaling back instumentation and vocals. I think that could be one part of what your perceiving.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Feb 9, 2014 10:26:37 GMT -6
Interesting, and funny too. Jazznoise hit it when he mentioned the fibbers on Pensado's Place, and they're all over the internet.
I've struggled with this myself. First, my drum programming skills suck. I use Superior drummer for my demos, although I now have the option of using Logic's "Drummer" too.. Once the musical parts are done, I go to the drums and automate. I've found a big part of the problem IS the digital drum samples themselves. No matter how I adjust the velocity, i'm still adjusting that same drum hit. Even with samples that have been made to change dynamically, it's still too big a difference between the harder hit and the softer. Let's say I'm at the second verse, I want the drums to sit back a little, the lyric come forward, leaving some room for the middle to lead to a crescendo last chorus. The drums simply will not bak down properly. I would love to work with a real drummer again, but it's impractical at this stage. I have som much to do, I don't know if I can ever spend enough time learning to work the drum parts better, so for ow, I live with the dynamics being too consistent.
I'll post a link with an example in a few minutes..
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Feb 9, 2014 11:06:07 GMT -6
What you are really talking about is the musical arrangement and the not mix or dynamics.
About all you can do is to swing the axe on elements in the verses if you can't change the arrangement to something that works better. The problem with automation is that it often only sounds right on the speakers used to create it. This is true of all genres. The point of buying a recording is to listen to it repeatedly without growing bored. That really demands that no two moments in the song ever be identical.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Feb 9, 2014 11:07:41 GMT -6
I've never been able to make Dropbox work, so I default to Soundcloud. let me know if this link works. It's not a final mix, but listen to the second verse as an example f what I was referring to above. I've noticed that certain things are highlighted when bouncing. First, tambourines and anything metal get louder, and the reverb seems overdone, whereas the when listening to the mix, it sounds fine. www.dropbox.com/s/9clf4v03aqk1dtn/The%20Kindness%20of%20Strangers%20-%20Nashville%20Mix.wav
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Feb 9, 2014 11:41:06 GMT -6
What you are really talking about is the musical arrangement and the not mix or dynamics. About all you can do is to swing the axe on elements in the verses if you can't change the arrangement to something that works better. The problem with automation is that it often only sounds right on the speakers used to create it. This is true of all genres. The point of buying a recording is to listen to it repeatedly without growing bored. That really demands that no two moments in the song ever be identical. That's what I'm really talking about yes. I know that in order to make the chorus open and sound like that, the arrangement of instruments has to change, the drums need to go to a more forward beat, and the bass needs to tighten and move. But what I wanted to try and get out of some people is what do you do if the arrangement isn't there, how are you changes things up? I've been sent mixes from Nashville that mix themselves, you just push the faders up and what comes out is just like what you hear on the radio 99% of the time, there's nothing really to it. But, sometimes I'll get an album and specifically the one i'm on right now, they are trying to make a demo session from Nashville into a highly produced sounding session. What am I to do? Well if I hand it back and it doesn't have that sound my excuses can be to blame them, or, I can ask those that know and have been in that situation how they deal with this, and hand them back something they get giddy over. Maybe they sell 25k albums and come back with the cash to get proper arrangement. So, I made this thread for my own personal gain , and I thought that if we could get some post's flowing it might help some people out that are dealing with these problems, it's pretty common, and you're 100% right, it's arrangement.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Feb 9, 2014 12:00:44 GMT -6
Yes, and no. If you call drum programming "arrangement", than you're right, but I've found what's missing on my tracks is often the dynamics of a real drummer. Still, that shouldn't make or break the song for publishing, I don't think.
Did the link to the mix I posted before work? I'm curious if you guys hear what I hear, the drummer just won't ease up on the 2nd verse, not matter how I edit velocity and automate.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Feb 9, 2014 12:07:06 GMT -6
Yes, and no. If you call drum programming "arrangement", than you're right, but I've found what's missing on my tracks is often the dynamics of a real drummer. Still, that shouldn't make or break the song for publishing, I don't think. You know I really like the Slate one. I just picked that up for like 39 bux or something really cheap like that. I used to program drums for demo songs, and if I wanted to get them real I would have to go over the velocities of every single hit, and change those up, sometimes adding that human thing that BFD has when I used it. I used to make my own rooms too and fiddle with that until it was close. But it's incredibly hard to do what you're doing, I hope I never have to go back to that land again, but I did buy that Slate SSD4 for this little demo a few weeks back and I thought it sounded really good.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2014 12:08:41 GMT -6
What you are really talking about is the musical arrangement and the not mix or dynamics. About all you can do is to swing the axe on elements in the verses if you can't change the arrangement to something that works better. The problem with automation is that it often only sounds right on the speakers used to create it. This is true of all genres. The point of buying a recording is to listen to it repeatedly without growing bored. That really demands that no two moments in the song ever be identical. That's what I'm really talking about yes. I know that in order to make the chorus open and sound like that, the arrangement of instruments has to change, the drums need to go to a more forward beat, and the bass needs to tighten and move. But what I wanted to try and get out of some people is what do you do if the arrangement isn't there, how are you changes things up? I've been sent mixes from Nashville that mix themselves, you just push the faders up and what comes out is just like what you hear on the radio 99% of the time, there's nothing really to it. But, sometimes I'll get an album and specifically the one i'm on right now, they are trying to make a demo session from Nashville into a highly produced sounding session. What am I to do? Well if I hand it back and it doesn't have that sound my excuses can be to blame them, or, I can ask those that know and have been in that situation how they deal with this, and hand them back something they get giddy over. Maybe they sell 25k albums and come back with the cash to get proper arrangement. So, I made this thread for my own personal gain , and I thought that if we could get some post's flowing it might help some people out that are dealing with these problems, it's pretty common, and you're 100% right, it's arrangement. It's the players too...
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Feb 9, 2014 12:11:01 GMT -6
I've done that, editing every velocity, humanizing, but it's still blah, it's partly my lack of will to become an expert drum programmer. Still, I do wish Superior Drummer had a choice of say.. 3 snares per loop, soft, middle and louder, instead of two per sample.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2014 12:15:07 GMT -6
I've never been able to make Dropbox work, so I default to Soundcloud. let me know if this link works. It's not a final mix, but listen to the second verse as an example f what I was referring to above. I've noticed that certain things are highlighted when bouncing. First, tambourines and anything metal get louder, and the reverb seems overdone, whereas the when listening to the mix, it sounds fine. www.dropbox.com/s/9clf4v03aqk1dtn/The%20Kindness%20of%20Strangers%20-%20Nashville%20Mix.wavHey Martin - yes - it worked...I think what you're missing is a really sensitive Pad controller. I had constant problems with programming until I bought a Korg PadKontrol. Lately, I've been programming drums myself - which I never did before because I never liked the results...but I've been getting great results from that thing. Since I'm not a drummer, cymbals and hihat sometimes confuse me...so I've gotten to where I'll find a groove that fits but kick and snare might not be perfect...Then I'll erase kick and snare and play them myself - keeping the real drummers cymbals... In this song, it's definitely the dynamics that don't sound like it's human. The Padkontrol would allow you to go in and replace the kick and snare with awesome results.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Feb 9, 2014 12:17:11 GMT -6
It only has two sample layers??? That's pretty weak man, that's your problem right there. I used to just make an instrument track in PT, do 4 bars of the groove of the basic pattern of the whole song. And then come back through and build my fills and put my ghost notes/side stick/fills/crahses/ whatever, it makes it quicker like that. Then after I had the track built I would come back through and do the velocity level's. But if you're only getting two velocity layers per sample that's not near enough to make things seem real.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2014 12:20:28 GMT -6
No - SD2 has way more than two velocity layers...
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Feb 9, 2014 12:40:21 GMT -6
Thanks John, jerome. I may be wrong in my description, but when I use Superior Drummer I hear the snare tone change twice in a four beat patter, loud, softer, loud softer. The problem is the "softer" is too soft, I want the louder tome to ease up 15%. but the tone to stay the same. The velocity change doesn't quite get it right.
John, I have the Axiom Pro 61 keyboard, and it has drum pads on it, but I've never gone near them. Anyone here ever tried those pads on the AxiomPro?
Maybe I'll look into that when I'm not so pressed for time.
|
|
|
Post by dandeurloo on Feb 9, 2014 12:51:51 GMT -6
Current country is pretty hard to listen to IMO. Most of it is set to STUN. That is in the songwriting, production, mixing and mastering. Even just a few years back I feel it was much better. So are you aiming for the current stun style country or something from a few years back. I honestly think they require 2 different kinds of treatment. BTW, both are very relevant and can sound good when done properly. Maybe give a reference track or two.
|
|