|
Post by Guitar on Feb 1, 2014 21:18:43 GMT -6
I'm too burnt out on this right now but check out the mics I just finished. Been working on them for two years, just got them well done. I am calling them the WEA 12, for Wiley Electrical Audio and 12 is the model number. I can type more about them later, or there's the purple site I've been typing on. And here's some RUFF, sick me one take sound examples of cover songs. click to listen to WEA 12s on Box.net
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Feb 1, 2014 21:37:14 GMT -6
Lets hear em!! Post up a sample. They look great.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Feb 1, 2014 21:47:11 GMT -6
What's inside brotha?? Spit it!
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Feb 1, 2014 22:17:23 GMT -6
Lets hear em!! Post up a sample. They look great. Check the first post, there's a little link right before the pictures. The files were too large for this message board, so you'll have to go through Box.net. I couldn't find a more convenient way to do it, that's just one extra click. There's a little player right on the Box.net screen you can listen on. TonyCamp-- They started as Apex 460s, and went through many revisions (almost past 251 and C24 but not quite, but those were cool sounds) and ended up very close to the vintage 1953 AKG C12 schematic. One of the most important revisions was modding the PSU to provide -1 Volt tube bias on pin 4 of the cable. That really kicked into "vintage C12" mode, or as close as I'll get. The transformer is a Peluso T14-1, which has a slightly higher turns ratio than the vintage specimen. The capsule is the Peluso CEK-12. When you adjust the high frequency just right, this capsule is very smooth and buttery or whatever, but, if you let the high end run free, it will just rip your head off and sound so thin. Too much dampening is not good either. Peluso is nuts in his love of brightness, but he is almost genius otherwise, if you can find ways around his brighter tendencies, which I have here and in my 2247 SE. The trick in this mic was to use a 100 pF cap like the ELA M251 to roll off some of the very top. This was the main deviation from the C12 schematic, but it made so much difference with the CEK-12, all the difference in the moon, actually. I used a silver mica cap, and I like the tone. Tube is a JAN GE 6072a, which is quite a bit beefier than the somewhat decent baseline $10 EH tube. Gotham tube mic cable, Neutrik connectors, polystyrene, polypropylene film, and Russian paper-in-oil caps (for the big cap), some Dale, Vishay, and Ohmite resistors (haha). I used your duct seal trick in the heads! Headbaskets are from Chunger, they really set the thing off, and I swear they sound good, too. Shockmounts are imported by a company called Acme I think, they weren't quite the right size and I had to modify them. I must say, I am absolutely sick of working on these mics and I am so pleased with how they are now, I can't wait to use them on a session, try them on overheads again (since the final tweaks), a female again, find a piano, etc. I also can't wait to tackle a 251-style build, hopefully with a little more quickness. I am even considering trying to sell a few, if anyone is interested.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Feb 1, 2014 22:27:44 GMT -6
Cool man, congrats, I'm very excited that someone else tried the duct seal, now two of us know how well it works lol
|
|
|
Post by watchtower on Feb 1, 2014 22:34:32 GMT -6
Are those Peluso T14/1 a copy of the Hiller T14 or the Haufe T14/1? I'm gonna have to ask John.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Feb 1, 2014 22:40:14 GMT -6
It's smaller like the Haufe and the AMI. Brian Fox told me he measured a 17:1 turns ratio that "doesn't load the tube at all"
let me just quote my email from Brian
"Oh ya the Peluso is an interesting animal. It actually has a 17:1 turns ratio, as I measured it. So it is not loading the tube at all. That's why it's so clean. You lose a 1.5 dB of level versus the AMI T14 if I recall but it is clean. And it has more iron that the Tabfunkenwerk version so the low end -3dB point is at 15Hz!"
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Feb 1, 2014 22:44:41 GMT -6
Lets hear em!! Post up a sample. They look great. Check the first post, there's a little link right before the pictures. The files were too large for this message board, so you'll have to go through Box.net. I couldn't find a more convenient way to do it, that's just one extra click. There's a little player right on the Box.net screen you can listen on. TonyCamp-- They started as Apex 460s, and went through many revisions (almost past 251 and C24 but not quite, but those were cool sounds) and ended up very close to the vintage 1953 AKG C12 schematic. One of the most important revisions was modding the PSU to provide -1 Volt tube bias on pin 4 of the cable. That really kicked into "vintage C12" mode, or as close as I'll get. The transformer is a Peluso T14-1, which has a slightly higher turns ratio than the vintage specimen. The capsule is the Peluso CEK-12. When you adjust the high frequency just right, this capsule is very smooth and buttery or whatever, but, if you let the high end run free, it will just rip your head off and sound so thin. Too much dampening is not good either. Peluso is nuts in his love of brightness, but he is almost genius otherwise, if you can find ways around his brighter tendencies, which I have here and in my 2247 SE. The trick in this mic was to use a 100 pF cap like the ELA M251 to roll off some of the very top. This was the main deviation from the C12 schematic, but it made so much difference with the CEK-12, all the difference in the moon, actually. I used a silver mica cap, and I like the tone. Tube is a JAN GE 6072a, which is quite a bit beefier than the somewhat decent baseline $10 EH tube. Gotham tube mic cable, Neutrik connectors, polystyrene, polypropylene film, and Russian paper-in-oil caps (for the big cap), some Dale, Vishay, and Ohmite resistors (haha). I used your duct seal trick in the heads! Headbaskets are from Chunger, they really set the thing off, and I swear they sound good, too. Shockmounts are imported by a company called Acme I think, they weren't quite the right size and I had to modify them. I must say, I am absolutely sick of working on these mics and I am so pleased with how they are now, I can't wait to use them on a session, try them on overheads again (since the final tweaks), a female again, find a piano, etc. I also can't wait to tackle a 251-style build, hopefully with a little more quickness. I am even considering trying to sell a few, if anyone is interested. How do you feel about Peluso's 251 model? And the VTB? I have both. I found his 251 to be really really nice, not really getting a sense of the high end deal you're talking about with that mic though. I've opened them both up, pretty simple designs. There are some things in there though that could be changed that might possibly improve the smoothness, like replacing the electrolytic's with Elna's. I love those caps, they're great, but the size's and value's are somewhat limited and sometimes you've got to be creative with making space if the cap has the same value but is larger. Cool C12 reps though, I'm thinking about doing one myself on the apex frame. I'd def go Peluso for the capsule, probably do a lot of the same as you did with changing up some values and cap/resistor choices.
|
|
|
Post by watchtower on Feb 1, 2014 22:51:00 GMT -6
Thanks for the info.
Seems a little odd though. I just read online that the Peluso is made by Tamura based on AKG documents (possibly old info), and I don't think the AKG trannies were ever 17:1. A T14/1 actually has a bass roll-off unlike the earlier T14. This is the transformer used in late C12s and ALL ELAMs.
I'm using the AMI T14 in my C12, but I'm looking for a T14/1 for a future ELAM 251E.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Feb 1, 2014 22:55:09 GMT -6
I haven't tried the 22 251, it sounds bright to me in demos, though. I don't know anything about the VTB.
My 2247 SE was "modern" sounding kind of bright, never harsh. I softened it up a bit with an old red NOS RCA tube. And also swapped the Xicons (don't like) for Vishay/BC Blue caps which I like better, just like you said. I do like the Elna Silmic II caps I have tried in other things. I liked opening up that mic, the work is really neat on the inside. One day I'm going to try a Thiersch Blueline M7 capsule...
The CEK-12 capsule itself was incredibly bright, I couldn't handle it, I had to dampen it a bit. You could apply the same technique to the 22 251 if you wanted to, probably. I haven't looked at that circuit.
The CEMC6 pair I had was a bit painfully bright, so I sold them. They did have some cool realness and detail to them though.
That's most of my Peluso experience to date.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Feb 1, 2014 23:20:11 GMT -6
I haven't tried the 22 251, it sounds bright to me in demos, though. I don't know anything about the VTB. My 2247 SE was "modern" sounding kind of bright, never harsh. I softened it up a bit with an old red NOS RCA tube. And also swapped the Xicons (don't like) for Vishay/BC Blue caps which I like better, just like you said. I do like the Elna Silmic II caps I have tried in other things. I liked opening up that mic, the work is really neat on the inside. One day I'm going to try a Thiersch Blueline M7 capsule... The CEK-12 capsule itself was incredibly bright, I couldn't handle it, I had to dampen it a bit. You could apply the same technique to the 22 251 if you wanted to, probably. I haven't looked at that circuit. The CEMC6 pair I had was a bit painfully bright, so I sold them. They did have some cool realness and detail to them though. That's most of my Peluso experience to date. Yeah..... the CEMC6's have that weird high end stingy thing going on. I'm not really sure where he was going with that design..... I've heard his 84 model is much better, but at the end of the day it's hard to beat an Oktava MC012 for the money. I was almost thinking about modding that mic, but I kind of dig the openness of them. I've heard the modded ones, it sort of flattens them out, kind of what an 84 does, but I don't know, something I love about the original Okatva. I may look at doing a cap swap on the VTB, it does have that brightness that's a tad too much. The VTB though, it does sound pretty, and good, almost like a c800g..... but lacks the smoothness on the top end.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 2, 2014 9:48:54 GMT -6
@sinsay...
I would love to hear what Shannon could do with a 2247LE...Isn't it an EF12 or EF14 or something? Then put one of Shannon's caps in...
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Feb 2, 2014 10:54:06 GMT -6
One of Shannon's magic caps or the Tim Campbell cap will blow ur mind in there. In my travels, I've discovered 1/2 the improvements come from the capsule, 1/2 from tranny, tube, psu and everything else. A great capsule is a piece of art, and definitely more than meets the eye imv.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 2, 2014 15:55:17 GMT -6
Shannon has kind of convinced me that the capsule is 75% of the sound - but the Miktek does seem to have a beefy AMI tranny in it already, so maybe that's why it's such a good starter mic. I'm gonna keep a look out for a used 2247 and see if I can get @sinsay to dead out match one of Blackbird's 47's...
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 2, 2014 15:55:47 GMT -6
BTW - good looking mics, Monkey...sorry to derail!
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Feb 2, 2014 16:06:58 GMT -6
Thanks! No it's good, I like this Peluso modifying idea, it's what I'm doing to mine. I like the general quality of discussion on this board, it seems higher than average, not a lot of low level beginner issues and whatever.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Feb 2, 2014 17:08:08 GMT -6
Shannon has kind of convinced me that the capsule is 75% of the sound - but the Miktek does seem to have a beefy AMI tranny in it already, so maybe that's why it's such a good starter mic. I'm gonna keep a look out for a used 2247 and see if I can get @sinsay to dead out match one of Blackbird's 47's... I'm convinced the quality of the PSU is critical to smooth S's and T's, and alleviates the dreaded lurchiness of bad tube mics
|
|
|
Post by watchtower on Feb 2, 2014 17:24:38 GMT -6
Well, Tube LDCs are essentially PSU modulators when you think about it.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 2, 2014 17:48:03 GMT -6
Interesting! Tell me more, Tony.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Feb 2, 2014 19:25:38 GMT -6
Interesting! Tell me more, Tony. My experience with PSU on cheap anything, is they just barely have enough to meet minimum voltage and current requirements, they usually suffer when pushed, and offer no headroom causing that lurchy strident thing.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Feb 3, 2014 8:11:31 GMT -6
Just add more low ESR bulk capacitance inside the mic. That'll stop the current starvation you talk about, Tony.
But then again, some people like the sound of tube compression, which is nothing more than current starvation inside the bottle itself..
Anyway, the PSU is one area that might need more bulk cap, but then people also run that through hella long 7 pin XLR cables to the mics which only act as resistance, nullifying a good deal of adding bulk cap to the PSU. This is why it's probably more important in the mic than in the PSU. It's the same principle that lead to the hatred of opamps. long thin power traces to opamps which lack adequate decoupling make current starvation the modus-operandi for most consumer audio gear and thus people have associated that sound with opamps.
Another good test is to hook up the mic and then jack the preamp up all the way.. Do you hear 120hz buzz? If not, then chances are you have plenty of bulk cap in the PSU. So now, you might just add some large ceramic or plastic caps in the mic in parallel with the bulk electrolytic caps for some theoretically faster current supplementation.
I have to do better, on this forum, at trying to dispel the notion that caps are some kind of super audio device. We are just moving charge around. Once you get to the point where charge-in and charge-out are almost equal, then you have sufficient capacitance and the "sound" of caps is negligible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2014 12:26:50 GMT -6
Great post, svart.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Feb 3, 2014 12:57:51 GMT -6
yes thank you!
|
|
|
Post by svart on Feb 3, 2014 13:09:16 GMT -6
Lets hear em!! Post up a sample. They look great. I also can't wait to tackle a 251-style build, hopefully with a little more quickness. The Apex 460 is already really close to the C12 and 251. Just swapping a couple wires and you are already mostly there. Reduce the 100nF output caps to 1nF(or remove them) and put in a 12AT7 or 12AY7 and put in an edge terminated capsule and you have a C12 clone. Add a couple more parts for a 251. No need to change transformers to expensive things. Changing the output caps fixes the transformer overshoot, and changing the capsule fixes the pre-hyped K67 capsule issue.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Feb 3, 2014 13:20:43 GMT -6
I also can't wait to tackle a 251-style build, hopefully with a little more quickness. The Apex 460 is already really close to the C12 and 251. Just swapping a couple wires and you are already mostly there. Reduce the 100nF output caps to 1nF(or remove them) and put in a 12AT7 or 12AY7 and put in an edge terminated capsule and you have a C12 clone. Add a couple more parts for a 251. No need to change transformers to expensive things. Changing the output caps fixes the transformer overshoot, and changing the capsule fixes the pre-hyped K67 capsule issue. I might try that for a friend that needs a cheaper price point microphone. But I went through all that in my 2 year process, and there's a lot more to it than that. There is some actual magic in the verbatim C12 circuit, the right tube, better transformer and capsule, etc. It's not just academic. I went the extra mile, and I was rewarded for it in the end. I don't know if I have really sensitive ears or what, but these little changes made huge differences in the response of the mics. PS - the stock mic is closer to a 251 or a C24 than a C12, due to the cathode bias of the preamp tube. Getting a "251" going should be simpler since I won't need to modify the power supply as much. But yes, the APEX 460 is the perfect base for a C12, C24, or 250/251 type of build due to the body and headbasket size, and the nearness of the stock circuit. Well, the 251 is a little bigger, I don't think there's a Chinese equivalent body style, yet.
|
|