|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 14, 2018 10:53:24 GMT -6
Don't know if it's going to work like that or not. If the Symphony is the interface (connected via Thunderbolt), then I don't think you can also have the Apollo connected via thunderbolt at the same time, which is what you need in order for Console to work. I wasn't able to get it to work when I ran my Apollo into my Symphony. Maybe if you had two thunderbolt ports on a Mac, but it didn't work when I daisy chained. Besides, $750 is still waay too much to pay just to run UAD plugins while tracking. On a mac, why can't you have an aggregate device and slave one to the other ?
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Feb 14, 2018 14:44:45 GMT -6
For those wanting the Apollo workflow, and the Symphony ADDA, unless you’re needing lots of channels, I would think the symphony in standalone mode via the Apollo ADAT connection would be a great solution. IMO paying less than a grand for a great workflow is well worth it. With a larger I/O configuration though it wouldn’t be worth it. I tried this with my Apollo and it still didn't sound as good as just using my Apogee stand alone, even using the Apogee clock.
|
|