ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,086
|
Post by ericn on Jun 28, 2016 7:40:22 GMT -6
U.S. Healthcare is a series of contradictions, we don't want socializes or single payer system yet the federal government pays for 60% of the population that has coverage coverage and in reality subsidizes far more of the health care than that! Can't cover the poor, but hey through government and write offs we pay the highest rates for care of those who don't have coverage! We need to control health care costs but health care is the major area of growth in our economy and jobs, we don't have enough nurses or skilled allied health staff so how do you contain costs. In the good old days hospitals were about Religious and local governments carding for society not profits, government pays most of the bills but shouldn't have a say ! Everybody is chasing the same buck and is surprised that in the end the get 25 cents, buissness is about finding a niche not market share! Example of the stupidity , Houston TX fourth largest market 2 level one trama Centers are within a block of each other in the Giant med center complex, that flooded during tropical storm Allison the only other on an Island that flooded during Ike !
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Jun 28, 2016 14:50:26 GMT -6
BUT, Britain existed before the EU...and it seems that the EU needed Britain much more than Britain needed the EU. BUT - UK pulling out could destabilize the entire of Europe - that's not good for anyone. We will have to see. In a globalized world I have big doubts GB is still so attractive for investments.... Its like Obama said even the USA will first do businnes with the EU and than maybe - one day - with the BRITS. GB is soory, was attractive to China for example becasue they are the wing to the EU. Now they are no wing anymore....
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Jun 28, 2016 15:50:14 GMT -6
Reality is that if you are in the hospital for much over a week, you are declared disabled and put on Medicare no matter if you like it or not. The whole thing is a scam. It was all handed off to Wall Street after the Reagan Administration refused to fund the testing of transfusion blood for AIDS. Yet another case of socialism for corporations created by phony conservatives.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,086
|
Post by ericn on Jun 28, 2016 16:05:02 GMT -6
Reality is that if you are in the hospital for much over a week, you are declared disabled and put on Medicare no matter if you like it or not. The whole thing is a scam. It was all handed off to Wall Street after the Reagan Administration refused to fund the testing of transfusion blood for AIDS. Yet another case of socialism for corporations created by phony conservatives. Only because the hospital is very proactive in makeing sure they some how get paid ! Hospitals sign more people up for all the various programs because people on their own are very lazy and they have bills to pay!
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Jun 28, 2016 16:56:47 GMT -6
The hospitals and Blue Cross/Blue Shield used to be non-profits before the AIDS crisis.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 28, 2016 17:19:50 GMT -6
I seem to remember a "no politics" rule
|
|
|
Post by NoFilterChuck on Jun 28, 2016 20:50:35 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2016 21:26:24 GMT -6
Mhmm, i guess the original topic was Brexit... Thousands of people have protested against Brexit on the streets, screaming "EU, EU, EU"... A thought about the referendum, and why direct democracy that only needs more than 50% of the votes to make a decision is not always a good idea: If you have to make a very serious decision that will change your whole life into a new direction for the future... ...would you do it, if you are so unsure, that you only have 2% more on the positive side? Most people i know need definitely more to make a positive decision, especially if deciding on very important topics. Undeniably you can't ignore a minority of 48% in a modern democracy. If there is no way for a sophisticated compromise, in some if not most or all cases it is clever to wait with a positive decision until you get clearly better arguments on the pro side. That's why the referendum had the worst timing ever and undoubtfully will divide the people of UK in a way it never had been before and with unforseeable consequences. My 0.02 Euro.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jun 28, 2016 22:14:17 GMT -6
I don't know if this is politics John, but I will say for those who feel that democracy is outmoded, unfair, dumb, or antiquated, and that it's resulting Brexit decision is catastrophic -- that the alternatives are what the powers that be want us to embrace and are ultimately far worse. The nanny state wants us to lull to sleep and let them take control of everything so that we don't hurt ourselves. Welcome to the Matrix......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2016 1:03:56 GMT -6
Democracy is not outmoded at all. Direct democracy based on referendae IMHO is. E.g. Switzerland, the land with most probably the most direct democracy in existence. Women have the right to vote there. Seems no biggie, right? They have it since - uhm - 1971. Pretty late for a modern country, right? That's when men have direct democracy. You think women got full rights then, right? Wrong. Women still could not vote in many regions, each Kanton (region) had the seperate right for referendae on another level of direct democracy. And the last Kanton gave women the right to vote in 1990 after long juristic fights - AGAINST the voting of the men in this Kanton. Oh, if you call this modern or clever or fair. ok. But this kind of politics and decisions is what you have to expect in direct democracy. I call a system that makes such things possible like making politics against the will of a huge part of it's people ignorant on a major level, irrational and unpredictable by design and therefore less than optimal for the people. Sure, a subjective opinion.... Between direct democracy and a 2-party system there are many different types of democracy ... we do not fear democracy here in Europe. Not at all...
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Jun 29, 2016 8:34:25 GMT -6
I'd say its more like the medical profession got greedy and shot themselves in the foot. Prior to Medicare and Medicaid, all doctors, hospitals and health insurance operated on a sliding fee scale depending on the patient's income. After those programs began, everything shot up to the highest rate increasing doctors' income dramatically. Today we have a shortage of general practice doctors because specialties pay more and the AMA won't certify more medical schools. On the other hand in Sweden doctors get paid the same as schoolteachers and medical school is free. Swedes are cheap. Their socialism isn't about caring for the poor in the slightest. Many Americans are so greedy that they project that it must be all about freeloading.
|
|
|
Post by kevinnyc on Jun 29, 2016 9:28:55 GMT -6
There are no waiting lists here, unless you are unfortunate to be a veteran using the VA system, another failed big government health care system. Did you know there is a emergency room overcrowding problem. So, perhaps the wealthy can see their cancer specialists without waiting, but rich or poor if you go to the Emergency Room at the wrong time you may die due to overcrowding. Secondly, nobody has mentioned that despite almost a trillion dollars in a hundred years of taxpayer subsidies to the pharmaceutical industry, our biggest sector of pharmaceutical cost and usage - Medicare- is prohibited by law to negotiate better prices. After subsidizing pharmaceutical companies to develop the drugs, why should we Americans also pay more than other counties to buy them? Why? For one reason only. In placing the interests of private profits above the well being of the citizenry Republicans have blocked every attempt to negotiate the same bulk pricing that EVERY other country enjoys. As a result we pay 100's of percentage points higher than anyone else and lots of people have to decide if they'd rather have dinner or their meds...so much for American exceptionalism.
|
|
|
Post by keymod on Jun 29, 2016 9:50:02 GMT -6
I had an interesting situation the other night at dinner before going to the Kansas concert at Ridgefield Playhouse here in Connecticut. ( hope to see Donr there in September ) It was myself, a blue-collar tradesman struggling with ever-increasing insurance costs. Second, my childhood friend who became a very successful Pulmonary Specialist who laughs all the way to the bank while complaining of ever-increasing insurance regulations.Third was his Insurance Agent friend who was complaining about being unable to make a decent living anymore due to the ACA. I wish we had had more time to get involved in a deeper discussion about the subject. Meanwhile, I was sipping tap water while they were ordering $160.00 bottles of wine.
|
|
|
Post by kevinnyc on Jun 29, 2016 10:36:31 GMT -6
I can relate...I have a small business with a doc. One thing became very clear early on in our partnership.....his definition of "broke" is a lot different than mine....
And my big wig insurance industry buddy of mine likes to weep about how small the margins are and how risky and difficult it is to make money....when I ask him if maybe the half billion dollars paid to the CEO of a large healthcare company over 5 years is the kind of thing that can eat into one's margins and quarterly earnings statements....he doesn't have a response that satisfies me...
Insurance is the only business I know of that doesn't lose money...if they have to take a temporary loss they make up for it with increased premiums while retaining all the cream they expect...
Btw my doctor friends don't complain to me about government regulations....it's always about shenanigans with the insurers, who seem more than happy to jerk around the docs and leave them holding the bag...
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jun 29, 2016 11:20:20 GMT -6
Did you know there is a emergency room overcrowding problem. So, perhaps the wealthy can see their cancer specialists without waiting, but rich or poor if you go to the Emergency Room at the wrong time you may die due to overcrowding. Secondly, nobody has mentioned that despite almost a trillion dollars in a hundred years of taxpayer subsidies to the pharmaceutical industry, our biggest sector of pharmaceutical cost and usage - Medicare- is prohibited by law to negotiate better prices. After subsidizing pharmaceutical companies to develop the drugs, why should we Americans also pay more than other counties to buy them? Why? For one reason only. In placing the interests of private profits above the well being of the citizenry Republicans have blocked every attempt to negotiate the same bulk pricing that EVERY other country enjoys. As a result we pay 100's of percentage points higher than anyone else and lots of people have to decide if they'd rather have dinner or their meds...so much for American exceptionalism. Republicans? Really? The democrats have no responsibility in this? LOL So much for no politics. This threads gonna close fast I think.....
|
|
|
Post by kevinnyc on Jun 29, 2016 11:31:02 GMT -6
I'm sorry to ruffle your feathers Bill but should you be so inclined to peruse the legislative record on the topic you might be dissapointed to find out that what I wrote is simply fact.
|
|
|
Post by kevinnyc on Jun 29, 2016 11:35:36 GMT -6
I'd also be extremely happy to be shown I'm in error...Do you have a credible answer as to why we are the only nation that pays 100's of % more for our medications?
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Jun 29, 2016 11:39:08 GMT -6
My favourite thing about talking politics on the internet is every conversation turns into "America, America, America"
Anyone want to talk about Corbyn losing his shadow cabinet? Or how it seems Corbyn was probably a Lexiter? Or the prospects of a Frexit since the FN are much more likely to get in on the back of a Brexit?
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jun 29, 2016 12:38:48 GMT -6
I'm sorry to ruffle your feathers Bill but should you be so inclined to peruse the legislative record on the topic you might be dissapointed to find out that what I wrote is simply fact. No ruffled feathers here. But you are extremely naive if you think this is a republican only problem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2016 13:11:03 GMT -6
"Madame Frexit" Marine LePen from extreme right wing Front National sees her chance now. But while over 60% of the french think critical about the EU, only 33% want Frexit, 45% explicitly don't, as of most recent surveys. As long as Hollande is president, a referendum about a Frexit is not happening. He plans the EU relaunch with Merkel. That said, his planned reformation of labour rights, that is modelled after Germany's Agenda 2010 brought the broad left wing and the 10,000s of workers on the streets for weeks, with civil war like happenings, including fights with the police forces, flying molotov cocktails etc.. I guess Brexit and the EU future is now on top of the list in France. Hollande and Merkel might have to make some compromises with the left wing for a *more* social new EU to get the thing running with a broader legitimation from the people, esp. in France, but the german Linke (left party) also sees a chance for changes *inside* the EU now. UK and France often were shoulder on shoulder in more conservative decisions, in questions of participation in military operation, and similar - often against the german more holding back position. Also France loses a huge business partner with brexit, at least business with UK will be much, much weaker now. The french will make Brexit hard for UK. No mild compromises. They will be consequently act as hardliner EU country and won't make any gift to UK when they leave. This is not only necessary to show other EU countries how painful an "exit" from EU is, but also as a sign for the Frexit-forces esp. from the right wing in their own country. Frexit has no majority now and shall not have it in future, so Hollande will try everything to harden this position. There is a chance of a -exit domnino effect, Germany knows this, but for now, Germany and France are now the leading forces to get the EU running. Despite all criticisms in France, despite the fear that Germany will be a more dominant force in the EU, France is a strong partner in alliance with Germany still, on many levels and most probably for the future as well. Italy's president Renzi also signalized his pro-EU position officially, when the leaders of these 3 founder countries met in Berlin (which are also the 3 countries with the highest population of EU). Things will undoubtly change however in Europe - on a major level. EU will show it's strength now and concentrate on stability, inside, and - on the outer boarders, maybe even with a new kind of military strength to keep or ensure more stability in the surrounding areas, as is the mediterranean area, Northern Africa and the Middle East region. It stays exciting, for us central europeans most likely more than for our american friends..... ;-) It is a europe-wide new situation to deal with, with unknown outcome, but most likely major changes in politics, affecting all europeans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2016 13:31:20 GMT -6
France may also take back their efforts to keep UK free from illegal immigrants. France has a huge, uncounted number of immigrants and refugees, that live in provisoric camps around major cities, and until now, France did everything possible to keep them on the continent. They did everything to keep them from the euro tunnel to UK and tried to keep them from crossing the canal. This was a huge task, there is a large amount of refugees camping around Calais in the so-called "jungle", waiting for a chance to get to the UK, for a long time now. There is no reason France should stay with it's politics to keep them from UK, no matter the costs, since things now changed. There is a chance that one argument, the illegal immigrant question, will now turn against the pro-Brexit league. That they ironically reach the opposite of what they wanted: much more illegal immigration instead lowering the number of refugees and immigrants... Brexit most probably will become UKs worst nightmare....
|
|
|
Post by ChaseUTB on Jun 29, 2016 14:35:47 GMT -6
I seem to remember a "no politics" rule I sincerely apologize please feel free to delete my rant or posts, I did not mean to start a healthcare discussion. My apologies
|
|
|
Post by ChaseUTB on Jun 29, 2016 15:01:09 GMT -6
I seem to remember a "no politics" rule I sincerely apologize please feel free to delete my rant or posts, I did not mean to start a healthcare discussion. My apologies
|
|