|
Post by jazznoise on Oct 17, 2013 12:11:40 GMT -6
Ireland is in the top 20? Jesus. God help the rest of the world.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2013 15:35:54 GMT -6
So, no one thought about just lowering the cost of all medical expenses?
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Oct 17, 2013 15:37:58 GMT -6
So, no one thought about just lowering the cost of all medical expenses? Yes, we the people think about that.. well the people that aren't apologists for a tyrannical government.
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Oct 17, 2013 15:42:35 GMT -6
again, no offense, show some documented proof of such a claim on any scale, there are always going to be completely indigent people, for a host of different reasons, and they should be looked after by their fellow decent citizens, we are a christian nation after all , at least until the A moral, faux christians demagogue enough power to set up their gas chambers....sigh but beside this, the ACA is NOT based on romneycare, it's based on the netherlands system, but i suppose you are entitled to believe what ever you want, and see what you want to see...It's the USWay these days, facts be damned! i'm on this side! If you want it to work like a European model, then cut the wages of all doctors by half, the cost of procedures by half, the cost of pharm's by more than half. You have to remember we're capitalist, we're not some socialist monarchy. There's too much greed here for something like this to work properly. And btw, how do I procure documents? Break into someones house and steal them? The cost of Mass health is very very low, ask anyone from Taxachusetts. $10-$20 a month is very common for health care, that's why premiums for everyone else keep going up!
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Oct 17, 2013 15:44:00 GMT -6
That's funny, Kiefer Sutherland said it works great! Still on a year waiting list for a hearing specialist, two years ago, people die waiting for care. I personally know a woman from Thunder Bay that blames your system for her fathers death. (Liver Failure) took them too long to get to him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2013 16:20:46 GMT -6
Still on a year waiting list for a hearing specialist, two years ago, people die waiting for care. I personally know a woman from Thunder Bay that blames your system for her fathers death. (Liver Failure) took them too long to get to him. It's great that all people get care here, it really is. I don't know anything about Obamacare and really don't pay attention to politics. There are some problems with Canadian healthcare, it is VERY expensive, doctors aren't loaded here but they earn a very good living. They're unionized and the system is far from efficient. There are people who abuse their bodies and then expect their neighbor's taxes to pay for the resulting problems. This is why cigarettes and booze are expensive out here because if you're going to wreck yourself you shouldn't be expecting your neighbor to pay for it. I'd like to see all drugs legalized and taxed for the purpose of having a more efficient healthcare system.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Oct 17, 2013 16:29:41 GMT -6
So, no one thought about just lowering the cost of all medical expenses? Yes, we the people think about that.. well the people that aren't apologists for a tyrannical government. Woah, bit of a strawman there. Accusations of statism are just a default argument for Libertarians when things don't work. And then when the market collapses on its own - "It wasn't free enough!". Problem is when you have private option patients you have market demand - private clinic paying better wages will take a public hospitals best workers. So the wages become artificially high due to an excess in demand for labor. This is compounded further by the fact that for profit drug companies do not have any regulation on their drug prices and have extremely long drug patents. While the IP side I respect to some extent, holding the cure for cancer at random so to speak is criminal. "Market distortion" in the form of price regulation would be perfectly fair to me.
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Oct 17, 2013 17:20:04 GMT -6
Yes, we the people think about that.. well the people that aren't apologists for a tyrannical government. Woah, bit of a strawman there. Accusations of statism are just a default argument for Libertarians when things don't work. And then when the market collapses on its own - "It wasn't free enough!". Problem is when you have private option patients you have market demand - private clinic paying better wages will take a public hospitals best workers. So the wages become artificially high due to an excess in demand for labor. This is compounded further by the fact that for profit drug companies do not have any regulation on their drug prices and have extremely long drug patents. While the IP side I respect to some extent, holding the cure for cancer at random so to speak is criminal. "Market distortion" in the form of price regulation would be perfectly fair to me. Who is in charge? It certainly isn't a Libertarian But it's certainly someone elses turn to try to make things work, the other parties might as well disband due to constant failure. I can't believe anyone votes for them :-)
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Oct 17, 2013 17:21:39 GMT -6
With that being said, I've put in my 2 cents in this discussion, talking politics with people you don't see eye to eye with just doesn't work. But good luck to everyone!
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 17, 2013 18:57:34 GMT -6
the people that aren't apologists for a tyrannical government. look out your window, there's a black helicopter watching you lol! smh.. ya lost me dude...
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Oct 17, 2013 19:38:05 GMT -6
Who is in charge? It certainly isn't a Libertarian But it's certainly someone elses turn to try to make things work, the other parties might as well disband due to constant failure. I can't believe anyone votes for them :-) Certainly not a socialist either. Again, these dichotomies don't do much. It's just one False Dilemma after another. I don't think anyone here is vouching Dem or GOP. But Tea-Party/general Libertarian politics are fundamentally flawed. As I've been hinting at, a gram of good policy outweighs a ton of noble idealism. These ideas of what freedom, egalitarianism and emancipation will be are fantasy. It's best to seek our objectives first, we can erect the statues later.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 17, 2013 20:43:50 GMT -6
Who is in charge? It certainly isn't a Libertarian But it's certainly someone elses turn to try to make things work, the other parties might as well disband due to constant failure. I can't believe anyone votes for them :-) But Tea-Party/general Libertarian politics are fundamentally flawed. the big flaw in the tea party, is the inability to accept empirical evidence into their belief system(the latest delusion was "not raising the debt ceiling will stabilize markets" ), we've seen the inability to back up claims with evidence here on this thread, do nothing to deter people from posting nonsense, that's why organizations like fox news exist, it's the perfect place to group verify your biases and belief system with like minded dilusionites, who gives a fuck all that you're completely FOS! everyone knows facts have a liberal bias right? (dilusionite is not a word, i just made it up, TM lol)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2013 14:01:41 GMT -6
There are some things i never understand from the outside... E.g. the fear of the american people they might become socialists or even communists when it comes to questions like public health insurance for everyone and the amount of government. Things that i do not get together. We were the brickwall against communism since WW2 and have a public health insurance by law since 1883 ... Where do you get the causality? Do we have a completely different math system? Many democratic countries have this and and it works already in other countries and i never heard any of them went socialistic because of this... Second, i do not get how less government should produce more wealth for a country and less corruption automatically. Just the last years we can see e.g. in Greece, that the more forced saving takes place (forced by the EU unfortunately), especially in government and also in the public health system, the worse their economic situation gets, as well as social injustices (and even corruption), like a downward spiral. It may be an extreme example, but that is exactly what happens there the last years...
Also freedom....for me, the freedom of a people is the freedom of the most disadvantaged groups of it, the least surveillance and the least fear of the individuals
Most of the time when i try to follow the inner-american discussion about these topics, i can hardly understand not only the nuances but also huge parts of the discussion and often enough really have to give up because i do not get it. It honestly is too far away from the world i live in....
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 20, 2013 15:08:44 GMT -6
Sorry I said I hate Libertarians. Now if you'd tackle my argument in relation to healthcare instead of talking about divering from the dichotomy - whilst still discussing the left and right - that'd be cool! Fiscally conservatism is not anti-statism. That's another strawman again, my friend. The Tea-Party movement and the broader Neo-Lib idealogy in America is a total falsity. It's the Rich leading the poor, telling them what to think and then basically waiting for them to have enough class traitors to just ignore the premise of democracy. Freedom is a means to an egalitarian society. Freedom for freedom's sake is a form of hedonism, and when people are too ignorant to even understand that there are both material and political requirements, they get really screwed. Believeme, that's what'll happen. Places like Dubai are pretty Libertarian and it's not a good look. I mean, it's so absurd at this point that no one in the US is even debating the cost of healthcare in relation to hospitals. It's almost always about the insurance. It's like a state driven to abstraction by Ayn Rand enthusiasts. Good Lord, where is the thumbs down...? What a crock of shit.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Oct 20, 2013 15:56:31 GMT -6
Good Lord, where is the thumbs down...? What a crock of shit. Again, by all means taking apart my argument instead of just reverting to insults would help me understand why being Libertarianism doesn't just apply to the "We support too many" mentality of the Middle Class and the "Finally, Freedom" hopes of the Working Class. Protip: It doesn't, it's an illusion created by the wealthy. Even the Libertarians I know in real life will admit that.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 20, 2013 17:14:48 GMT -6
Like Ramsey said, you aren't excused from the laws of basic math. Who's gonna pay for all this shit? We were $15 Trillion in debt and we decide to cover every American? And - OH, BTW - you don't have to be a US citizen to qualify for Obamacare.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Oct 20, 2013 17:33:19 GMT -6
There is no way you're every paying off the debt. Ever. You might as well do what the guys in charge do and pretty much ignore it.
But if you wanna cut cost you need a good income and smart savings. You can not save money by having loads of sick people in America. Much like math, you're not excused from the laws of biology. Sick people need more pay for their medical bills to under-perform the same task at a factory where everyone else is in the same perpetual cycle. This is why healthcare was introduced in the first place. The country will grind to a halt if there is no effective public option for the majority - as is happening now. Your prisons are a huge part of your most competitive manufacturing and funnily enough prisoners DO get healthcare.
So this costs money. No duh. But what can you do? Raise money by going after non-tax compliant citizens and companies? Yes. Wealth taxes? Yes. Reducing military spending? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 20, 2013 18:39:22 GMT -6
Like Ramsey said, you aren't excused from the laws of basic math. Who's gonna pay for all this shit? We were $15 Trillion in debt and we decide to cover every American? And - OH, BTW - you don't have to be a US citizen to qualify for Obamacare. I'm all for fair is fair, and i don't want to pull someone else's load, but lets get real here, back up what you say with some sort of link from a reliable source, facts matter. Ramsey's a hypocrite, and his math doesn't add up??? look at earlier posts with links for proof. We pay MORE as taxpayers and policy holders for the uninsured, and uh hum....you do Not qualify for the ACA if you are an illegal immigrant??? seriously, where do you come up with this stuff? Politifact calls your claim "pants on fire" www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2013/jul/09/chain-email/illegal-immigrants-are-covered-under-health-care-l/Who's gonna pay for it you asked, most of it's implementation is paid for by tax on the healthcare industry, and big pharma, they are fine with this, because they know they have 50,000,000 new paying customers, but that doesn't stop them from playing both sides, they still lobby politicians to favor things that make them more money and pay less taxes, it's a real unscrupulous game of self serving politics...as usual. The other thing that helps pay for it is, a shit ton of young healthy people paying into the system, the CBO shows a net reduction in the deficit in direct correlation with participation. It will ultimately save tax payers money, reduce the deficit, and take care of people. Most middle class families that make under $250,000 a year, will see a $4,000 cut in their health insurance premiums after tax credits. The ACA is a macro complex system, it's going to have some problems, but it is not beyond the richest and most powerful country on earth to get it done, medicare runs at a 1.3% overhead, that is PHENOMENALLY efficient system. We spend almost a trillion $ a year on the war machine, lets get everyone in the US covered at a reasonable cost ahead of health problems instead of 20x the cost when they end up in the ER with no insurance, burdening all the tax payers and policy holders, it just makes sense, simply because we all get sick and end up in the ER at some point in our lives. here's another big link with lots of info, notice the Cigna, Aetna, Humana links on the page looking to grab 50,000,000 new customers obamacarefacts.com/costof-obamacare.php
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 21, 2013 6:35:13 GMT -6
I never said illegal immigrants were covered, but YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A CITIZEN TO BE COVERED. You know how I know? Because I have been attempting to register since the day it came out - and I still haven't been successful - and that's what it says on the fucking site. I am the perfect example of the non-indigent, trying-to-work, wife has a job and we have to find a way to pay for myself and child kind of American citizen. I have yet to be able to finish my enrollment and check if my current insurance is cheaper because the fucking site doesn't work. And yes, I have a MAJOR problem with someone here on a legal visa, education permit, etc. (who hasn't been paying in to this pyramid scheme) to be able to be covered by the US government just like they were an American citizen. That means any Sheik or any North, Central or South American who has some catastrophic illness (e.g., transplant) can come in to the country, work for a six months, pay in a couple hundred bucks and be covered for a procedure that costs several hundred thousands. So, now, we're not only covering the American public with absolutely no collateral to back it up, we are now covering the world. Who's paying for it? The American people. WE DON'T TAKE IN ENOUGH MONEY TO RUN THE COUNTRY AS IT IS. NOW WE ARE GOING TO ADD THIS? What is it that you don't get? As for "Big Pharma" politely covering the difference, do you really think they're not going to pass that on to the users? Really? Government controlling the private sector is Fascism. This administration is waaaayyy more fascist than socialist. Here is a screenshot from the ACTUAL ENROLLMENT.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Oct 21, 2013 7:33:17 GMT -6
And yes, I have a MAJOR problem with someone here on a legal visa, education permit, etc. (who hasn't been paying in to this pyramid scheme) to be able to be covered by the US government just like they were an American citizen. That means any Sheik or any North, Central or South American who has some catastrophic illness (e.g., transplant) can come in to the country, work for a six months, pay in a couple hundred bucks and be covered for a procedure that costs several hundred thousands. So, now, we're not only covering the American public with absolutely no collateral to back it up, we are now covering the world. Who's paying for it? The American people. WE DON'T TAKE IN ENOUGH MONEY TO RUN THE COUNTRY AS IT IS. NOW WE ARE GOING TO ADD THIS? What is it that you don't get? You know this is absolutely standard practice in the rest of the world and why people coming on Work Visas etc. have to do a bill of health. In Japan you'd have to prove you're TB free and do some X-Ray's just to get considered for a work visa. But if you break your leg on the street they don't leave you die like a dog because you're a "Sheik" or because the working-class have in their ranks some alarmist racists. And believe it or not the rest of the world isn't broke from this practice because most people with chronic illness in the 3rd world can't fake being healthy or afford to get here. They die in a cargo container or just stay at home and die there. Nothing complicated I'm afraid. But by all means blame all the darkies instead of blaming massive companies with an agenda to maximize profit by lobbying the government, propagandizing the workers and selling everything at as high a price as they can get away with. But you haven't mentioned that. Because all the radio guys talk about is how bad Obama is and how the markets should do what they want and a free market will save America. But it's a very select definition of "Free" and by definition it's a total scam. It means corporate personhood completely outstrips the private person in terms of economic freedom, political power, avoiding accountability. Because to hold a body to account is governance - and that's facist obviously. I mean a company should be able to fire people who start a Union, but obviously if some other body comes down on a company for Union busting that's Facist Market Distortion of Muh Freedoms right? I get that you're sick of waiting for effective healthcare. My dad's going for another string of tests and he's been refused a Medical Card (Free doctor visits) so we're taking the costs on the chin again. Worked all his life, too. But that doesn't mean we should go down and through Sikhs (Seriously, John, they're not even a country.) out of hospital beds because I've got a beehive full of righteous indignation in my belly. That's the definition of retarded. The worst off get helped first.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2013 9:36:24 GMT -6
Government controlling the private sector is Fascism. This administration is waaaayyy more fascist than socialist. Strong words. I hope you look up the word Fascism again. I do not believe that you really meant what you wrote.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 21, 2013 9:43:06 GMT -6
LEGAL immigrants can BUY insurance just like anyone else, i don't understand why anyone would have an issue with that??? If they want to get some procedure on the cheap, they'll get it in europe, where the health outcomes are PROVABLY better. The website having problems up front doesn't surprise me either, it was overwhelmed, and they dropped the ball on that for sure. Insurance company's big pharma, and the rest are going to make MORE $ than ever, the insurance co ops are going to be what drives costs down for You and I. It's basically the principle of quantity discount. Be patient, and give it a chance, The ACA, saves money in the end according to the CBO, which is pretty accurate barring unforeseen wars and cataclysmic financial crisis's, the current healthcare system is untenable, and is breaking the back of the middle class, and overall economy. My bet, you will end up liking it, and comon JK, givem a chance to smooth it out, again, medicare runs at 1.3% overhead!! that is way better than massively efficient, and remember, no matter what righty says, Obama is NOT trying to destroy america, neither was GWB
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 21, 2013 9:47:20 GMT -6
Government controlling the private sector is Fascism. This administration is waaaayyy more fascist than socialist. Strong words. I hope you look up the word Fascism again. I do not believe that you really meant what you wrote. yes, this is wrong, i'll save you the time of looking it up, Fascism is the high jacking of government by corporate interests, unfortunately, that IS partly true. I would also argue capitalism without gov regulation is a fail, if you need proof, see financial collapse 2008. again facts matter.
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Oct 21, 2013 10:10:11 GMT -6
Government controlling the private sector is Fascism. This administration is waaaayyy more fascist than socialist. Strong words. I hope you look up the word Fascism again. I do not believe that you really meant what you wrote. You'd be surprised how many millions feel the same way. This is the USA not Estonia.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 21, 2013 10:12:37 GMT -6
The definition of economic fascism.
An inherent aspect of fascist economies was economic dirigisme,[4] meaning an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence, and effectively controls production and allocation of resources. In general, apart from the nationalizations of some industries, fascist economies were based on private property and private initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state.[5]
|
|