Converters don't matter, it's been proven

I emailed Ethan to let him know about this thread and see if he wanted to come join the conversation but he said he rather not if its just gonna be insults thrown around . He told me I could post his email as a response ,



"Yes, they twist and argue and throw insults. That's why I said I'm glad
to be part of a thread that discusses audio fidelity, but not one that
starts with "Ethan proved(to Ethan)." :->)

I also loved this: "there are so many problems with this 'scientific'
comparison i don't know where to start."

Right, they never know where to start. All they have is "you're wrong"
but they can never explain why I'm wrong or what is right. So all that's
left is insults like these from the thread:

Ethan believes Ethan is right till Ethan finds
Ethan was wrong and Ethan can make money !

That guy Ethan is a huge troll, the hugest.

I like Ethan, I just feel his testing material
always has a low quality to it

Then there's the clueless:

I'm no expert, but I think it's pretty nuts and
bolts to say jitter is indeed the enemy, it
represents accuracy

It's clear that tonycamphd is not an expert. But there's nothing I could
possibly say in that thread to convince him that jitter is irrelevant. I
could post scientific test results showing that people cannot hear
jitter even when it's ten times greater than any typical converter, yet
he will not be swayed. And that is exactly the problem.

--Ethan"