|
Post by rowmat on Jun 14, 2024 16:37:25 GMT -6
In a nutshell we didn’t deal with tuning “non-singers”.
We hardly tuned a vocal once in six years running the studio.
Maybe a word or phrase once in a blue moon using ReaTune in Reaper but no more.
I guess that’s because we didn’t offer mix only services and we recorded nearly everything we mixed so we could catch anything obvious during tracking.
Comping takes ironed out most tuning issues when there were some.
Typically we either knew the artists prior to recording them or received demos from others we weren’t familiar with and could vet them.
Plus we often hired session musicians and backing vocalists when required.
If someone approached us out of the blue who we knew we didn’t want to take on as a client we were either “too busy” or would tell them their style wasn’t a good fit for our type of production.
We turned out a lot of stuff that had a slightly ‘rustic’ early 1970’s vibe so absolute perfection was not the goal.
And we didn’t use click tracks or snap stuff to the grid. It just wasn’t how we worked.
As the studio was at the back of the producer’s own house rather than a rented commercial building our overheads were low enough not to force us to take on anyone or anything which in hindsight I was grateful for.
Granted a couple slipped through the cracks that tested our sanity but I couldn’t for the life of me have spent hours tuning someone who can’t sing in tune along with “polishing turds”.
FFS if the singer is really unable to sing remotely in tune they should probably just AI themselves and post it on TikTok! 😵💫
|
|
|
Post by gmichael on Jun 14, 2024 17:21:15 GMT -6
you don't. turning entire performances rather than just things blatantly bad sounds weird in general. non singers? hell no. you must let them suck. if they don't know that they suck, then there is no problem because they don't think there is a problem and this is a service industry. it's like serving ketchup on a hot dog to someone that asks for it. I get it...but this is a business. If a client wants to give me $10k for a project, then I'm not going to not do the job as a matter of cultural protest lol. This is the correct answer. We have to disenfranchise from the perception we have crafted and honed to inform our perspective about what the work is supposed to be. Keep your studio open and adjust to the money as becomes mandated by the client.
I call them vanity jobs.
We aren't professional bubble poppers self awareness coaches or client educators we help people live out dreams in exchange for money.
Nobody ever said this was easy! In 2024 this type of client is part of the new landscape At first I opposed this but I've accepted it as just what it is. People with more money than talent is a quantifiable percent of the client base. Even the top 1% do vanity jobs and they are lying if they say they aren't.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 14, 2024 17:31:11 GMT -6
I’m pretty damn good at tuning vocals but I haven’t found any real short cuts. I use melodyne, but I know I’m not using it to its fullest potential, still, it’s a time consuming, tedious task to do it right. Locking it to a key may help, certain parts of the song, but it’ll back fire on you too. Especially when a song modulates. Chords that switch from major to minor. Borrowed minor chords that don’t belong in the scale. It’s the melody following a melodic minor scale with a changing 7th scale step? The software just doesn’t keep up. You have to go line by line and listen. Often you just want to tune the main parts a certain percentage so that they don’t sound over processes, and keep the long ending sustain notes on perfect pitch. Lately I’ve been using the build in pitch correction from Cubase and it’s been a bit better/faster/easier than melodyne. Yeah it's kind've similar to Re-Pitch and AT with the ability to draw.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 14, 2024 17:48:12 GMT -6
I get it...but this is a business. If a client wants to give me $10k for a project, then I'm not going to not do the job as a matter of cultural protest lol. This is the correct answer. We have to disenfranchise from the perception we have crafted and honed to inform our perspective about what the work is supposed to be. Keep your studio open and adjust to the money as becomes mandated by the client.
I call them vanity jobs.
We aren't professional bubble poppers self awareness coaches or client educators we help people live out dreams in exchange for money.
Nobody ever said this was easy! In 2024 this type of client is part of the new landscape At first I opposed this but I've accepted it as just what it is. People with more money than talent is a quantifiable percent of the client base. Even the top 1% do vanity jobs and they are lying if they say they aren't.
That's basically my whole business these days...And it's a weird spot for a "producer." I usually say with these jobs, "I don't want to borrow any trouble..." Meaning, I'm not going to tell this guy from Iowa that I think the vocal sounds tuned to hell and back because it HAD to be. I'm not going to say, "Man, I really think you could sing that second line better..." (if they're singing remotely that is) or "Let me take another stab at that whole vocal." I'm not going to create more work for myself. I already do half the time...I'll hear something that bothers me in a bounce and I just can't let it go...even though the client would most assuredly not even notice. But they're getting what they're paying for...and the way I look at it, for the most part, they aren't paying me for vocal production. It's amazing how this is the onyl freaking job in the world where there's no set pricing. In a day where a carton of Milk is $6, and streaming pays $.0005 per impression to the songwriters...people still bitch and moan about paying my pittance of a fee. In my instance, they're paying me to be a producer like a movie producer and then get music production basically for free. I coordinate everything, handle the session, mix and master. If you want to make a record, you're gonna have to pay for it. Everyone with a computer and a $100 interface is making music now. It's been devalued to the point that a single in 1962 cost $.99 and it's a $1.29...so 30 cents in 60 years. On top of that the mechanical royalty has been set by a "Copyright Royalty Board" since the early 1900s...The rate for a mechanical royalty was .02 cents in 1907. 117 years later it's $12.4 cents. How lucky we are. So - if no one else values me, I'm determined to value myself.
|
|
|
Post by rowmat on Jun 14, 2024 17:55:22 GMT -6
“Everyone with a computer and a $100 interface is making music now.”
And you don’t even need that these days. Everyone with a cell phone is a TikTok wannabe superstar!
And AI auto-fix-everything apps for people recording themselves on their phones are coming especially with the next generation of phones.
Take a voice sample and AI will correct/enhance it, generate the lyrics and there’s ‘you’ singing the entire song.
Take a selfie pic and use that to auto generate an AI music video clip with you surrounded by your adoring AI generated fans.
Zero knowledge, skill or talent required.
Tuning non-singers and polishing turds? Seems the price of entry is too low?
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Jun 14, 2024 18:06:45 GMT -6
ahem...It is true that some people tune better than others. But heavy tuning - how do you minimize the artifacts? I'm talking Melodyne here - or hey - if there's a better option... Like there's a gun to my head, and the bank's about to pull the trigger
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Jun 14, 2024 20:40:37 GMT -6
I finally figured out that it I scanned the piano with melodyne and then scanned the vocals, it does a reasonable job.
|
|
|
Post by geoff738 on Jun 14, 2024 21:28:16 GMT -6
So, question. If I am playing guitar, bass, whatever, if something is a couple cents out, I can hear it. If I try to sing, I can’t carry a tune in abucket. Abysmal. That doesn’t make sense to me that I can hear instruments marginally out, but I can’t hear it when I sing. Maddening. I would love to be a decent singer.
Edit: Is there any hope for me to become a half way decent singer?Plus its not like I have a voice with much character. Think Neil Young but thin and reedy. Ok, even thinner and reedier. And, I’m sixty. So what little range I had, is probably not going to improve much. I just find it very curious I can’t hear how out of tune I am while singing, and can’t adjust. Baffling to me.
Cheers, Geoff
|
|
|
Post by russellcreekps on Jun 14, 2024 22:03:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Jun 14, 2024 22:42:17 GMT -6
ahem...It is true that some people tune better than others. But heavy tuning - how do you minimize the artifacts? I'm talking Melodyne here - or hey - if there's a better option... Like there's a gun to my head, and the bank's about to pull the trigger I try to at least do a blank check first.
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Jun 14, 2024 23:42:44 GMT -6
Like there's a gun to my head, and the bank's about to pull the trigger I try to at least do a blank check first. and there it is
|
|
|
Post by roundbadge on Jun 14, 2024 23:55:05 GMT -6
Just went through it with a singer/talker guy who basically hates his voice. lots of careful discussion during multiple takes..cadence and rhythm, lots of comping and lots of patience
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Jun 15, 2024 6:14:34 GMT -6
Funny that this came up. Just a few days ago I worked with a singer who really doesn't understand pitch. He can come in with his melodies and some of them work ok, but when we try to change the melody even slightly, he just can't hear it. He sounds like a mini moog with glide set too high. Crazy. We do our best to coach singers and then I use Variaudio in Nuendo and adjust each note by ear to pull them into acceptable range. I find if you snap them to a tuning grid, it makes the performance robotic and unnatural. Variaudio is quite good at some pretty heavy tuning without getting weird sounding. It has a lot of controls on each note to adjust when the tuning begins and then how much and how deep the warble can be. It's great. Of course, this all happens after we have worked with them and feel we got the best they can do. I never tune while they are watching or in the studio. They sort of freak out or get depressed that they can't sing any better.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 15, 2024 10:43:21 GMT -6
Just went through it with a singer/talker guy who basically hates his voice. lots of careful discussion during multiple takes..cadence and rhythm, lots of comping and lots of patience I bet you’re charging more than I do lol.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 15, 2024 10:44:57 GMT -6
Funny that this came up. Just a few days ago I worked with a singer who really doesn't understand pitch. He can come in with his melodies and some of them work ok, but when we try to change the melody even slightly, he just can't hear it. He sounds like a mini moog with glide set too high. Crazy. We do our best to coach singers and then I use Variaudio in Nuendo and adjust each note by ear to pull them into acceptable range. I find if you snap them to a tuning grid, it makes the performance robotic and unnatural. Variaudio is quite good at some pretty heavy tuning without getting weird sounding. It has a lot of controls on each note to adjust when the tuning begins and then how much and how deep the warble can be. It's great. Of course, this all happens after we have worked with them and feel we got the best they can do. I never tune while they are watching or in the studio. They sort of freak out or get depressed that they can't sing any better. Yeah. Nothing worse than trying to tune and they want to have a conversation. Or better yet, tell me how to do it.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Jun 15, 2024 11:32:46 GMT -6
Then again, maybe AI voices aren't that bad after all... Kinda like Don Kirshner's progression, from The Monkees, to The Archies. Not sure if I'm a Believer yet though.
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Jun 15, 2024 13:05:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by gmichael on Jun 15, 2024 14:49:45 GMT -6
This is the correct answer. We have to disenfranchise from the perception we have crafted and honed to inform our perspective about what the work is supposed to be. Keep your studio open and adjust to the money as becomes mandated by the client.
I call them vanity jobs.
We aren't professional bubble poppers self awareness coaches or client educators we help people live out dreams in exchange for money.
Nobody ever said this was easy! In 2024 this type of client is part of the new landscape At first I opposed this but I've accepted it as just what it is. People with more money than talent is a quantifiable percent of the client base. Even the top 1% do vanity jobs and they are lying if they say they aren't.
That's basically my whole business these days...And it's a weird spot for a "producer." I usually say with these jobs, "I don't want to borrow any trouble..." Meaning, I'm not going to tell this guy from Iowa that I think the vocal sounds tuned to hell and back because it HAD to be. I'm not going to say, "Man, I really think you could sing that second line better..." (if they're singing remotely that is) or "Let me take another stab at that whole vocal." I'm not going to create more work for myself. I already do half the time...I'll hear something that bothers me in a bounce and I just can't let it go...even though the client would most assuredly not even notice. But they're getting what they're paying for...and the way I look at it, for the most part, they aren't paying me for vocal production. It's amazing how this is the onyl freaking job in the world where there's no set pricing. In a day where a carton of Milk is $6, and streaming pays $.0005 per impression to the songwriters...people still bitch and moan about paying my pittance of a fee. In my instance, they're paying me to be a producer like a movie producer and then get music production basically for free. I coordinate everything, handle the session, mix and master. If you want to make a record, you're gonna have to pay for it. So - if no one else values me, I'm determined to value myself. The folks who bitch about upfront basic fee schedules get a pass from me. They aren't the demographic imo. Someone who comes in with an appreciation of their own time and the bucks to indulge in their dream will be more likely to value your time and your money. I don't work for free ever. I'll work cheap for those on a tight budget but are making a run up the hill and have legit invested in being their very best and can handle the uncomfortable (for some) truths about where the holes are in their presentation.It's typically arrangement voicings stuff as you'd know,maybe some pitch issues on the range extensions but to me that's easily sorted with proper vocal technique training. The ones who aren't even close to pitch but either can't or won't hear it get charged full rates and I'm happy as to explain it. You'd think that would chase the money off but it doesn't really. The ones it chases off were likely always gonna be a problem to get paid from so I'm grateful they just feck off under their own steam. But I don't take this kind of work as diminishing of my ability, I mean I used to but economics insist I get over myself and trudge on. I guess the option to go out and get some soul destroying job exists but I prefer to reassess my expectations and do what I ultimately gives me a better sense of myself. I can't or won't be judging myself on the gauge of work done for people who aren't artists and don't have the creators soul. That they might not fully understand or appreciate what they are asking isn't my job to explain to someone who still won't fully appreciate what I'm offering except for the fee I charge, that they can appreciate and it gives them a metric to go by. For vocals that never stand a chance without complete tuning butchery, I charge for that almost as much for assembling a basic production. So a track I might have been able to adminstrate and produce for a few thousand bucks +/- with great players etc now costs between 4500-7000aud . Not sure we are supposed to disclose this type of info but I'm not bashful about my money at all. For an original song written for that person of course it's more. Letting someone sing badly over a song written for them is hard but I suppose this is where the life lesson of letting go is most needed. So I say John, charge accordingly for these extraordinary add ons, get your money, do the job and find a path to gratitude because these jobs keep the shingle out for when those jobs who know how to appreciate you and respect your gift and guidance come along. We aren't the sum of one job, we are in this for the long haul and to whatever extent in it to win it on our own terms. There are so many more people that do music because they can, I strongly sense you do music because it's who you actually are. People like us just have to be who we are.
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Jun 15, 2024 15:22:13 GMT -6
That's basically my whole business these days...And it's a weird spot for a "producer." I usually say with these jobs, "I don't want to borrow any trouble..." Meaning, I'm not going to tell this guy from Iowa that I think the vocal sounds tuned to hell and back because it HAD to be. I'm not going to say, "Man, I really think you could sing that second line better..." (if they're singing remotely that is) or "Let me take another stab at that whole vocal." I'm not going to create more work for myself. I already do half the time...I'll hear something that bothers me in a bounce and I just can't let it go...even though the client would most assuredly not even notice. But they're getting what they're paying for...and the way I look at it, for the most part, they aren't paying me for vocal production. It's amazing how this is the onyl freaking job in the world where there's no set pricing. In a day where a carton of Milk is $6, and streaming pays $.0005 per impression to the songwriters...people still bitch and moan about paying my pittance of a fee. In my instance, they're paying me to be a producer like a movie producer and then get music production basically for free. I coordinate everything, handle the session, mix and master. If you want to make a record, you're gonna have to pay for it. So - if no one else values me, I'm determined to value myself. The folks who bitch about upfront basic fee schedules get a pass from me. They aren't the demographic imo. Someone who comes in with an appreciation of their own time and the bucks to indulge in their dream will be more likely to value your time and your money. I don't work for free ever. I'll work cheap for those on a tight budget but are making a run up the hill and have legit invested in being their very best and can handle the uncomfortable (for some) truths about where the holes are in their presentation.It's typically arrangement voicings stuff as you'd know,maybe some pitch issues on the range extensions but to me that's easily sorted with proper vocal technique training. The ones who aren't even close to pitch but either can't or won't hear it get charged full rates and I'm happy as to explain it. You'd think that would chase the money off but it doesn't really. The ones it chases off were likely always gonna be a problem to get paid from so I'm grateful they just feck off under their own steam. But I don't take this kind of work as diminishing of my ability, I mean I used to but economics insist I get over myself and trudge on. I guess the option to go out and get some soul destroying job exists but I prefer to reassess my expectations and do what I ultimately gives me a better sense of myself. I can't or won't be judging myself on the gauge of work done for people who aren't artists and don't have the creators soul. That they might not fully understand or appreciate what they are asking isn't my job to explain to someone who still won't fully appreciate what I'm offering except for the fee I charge, that they can appreciate and it gives them a metric to go by. For vocals that never stand a chance without complete tuning butchery, I charge for that almost as much for assembling a basic production. So a track I might have been able to adminstrate and produce for a few thousand bucks +/- with great players etc now costs between 4500-7000aud . Not sure we are supposed to disclose this type of info but I'm not bashful about my money at all. For an original song written for that person of course it's more. Letting someone sing badly over a song written for them is hard but I suppose this is where the life lesson of letting go is most needed. So I say John, charge accordingly for these extraordinary add ons, get your money, do the job and find a path to gratitude because these jobs keep the shingle out for when those jobs who know how to appreciate you and respect your gift and guidance come along. We aren't the sum of one job, we are in this for the long haul and to whatever extent in it to win it on our own terms. There are so many more people that do music because they can, I strongly sense you do music because it's who you actually are. People like us just have to be who we are. Hey…good to see you back….how did your remote recording job go? I really want to read your posts but I am struggling with the giant block of text…..could I gently ask that you put some paragraphs in? cheers Wiz
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 15, 2024 15:44:51 GMT -6
Idk if it’s different in Australia, but I’d be lucky to ever get another job if I ask for $2500 US a track. It’s just not happening. Or maybe it would happen twice a year…but I definitely undervalue myself and I should probably be screaming my hard fought accolades in this industry from the mountain top…but it’s just not my personality. I DESPISE sales.
But there’s not another job I can do that I can make this much money with this little time put in it. Now - I need MORE of those jobs, but hell - sometimes I can probably make like $80/hour and up when I consider how much time I’m actually spending on it. And by no means do I mean I’m skimping on these people…I track at the same studio and hire session guys…so there aren’t ever really any surprises. They use PT and so do I, so I have a template that I start with…so if I’m pulling session data from another tune from like the last time I was in, it’s pretty much 75% there. It’s awesome.
I’ve slowly raised my prices around 25-35% for new people and people haven’t really batted an eye. But in reality, the $1000/song seems to be the sweet spot at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by gmichael on Jun 15, 2024 17:21:14 GMT -6
The folks who bitch about upfront basic fee schedules get a pass from me. They aren't the demographic imo. Someone who comes in with an appreciation of their own time and the bucks to indulge in their dream will be more likely to value your time and your money. I don't work for free ever. I'll work cheap for those on a tight budget but are making a run up the hill and have legit invested in being their very best and can handle the uncomfortable (for some) truths about where the holes are in their presentation.It's typically arrangement voicings stuff as you'd know,maybe some pitch issues on the range extensions but to me that's easily sorted with proper vocal technique training. The ones who aren't even close to pitch but either can't or won't hear it get charged full rates and I'm happy as to explain it. You'd think that would chase the money off but it doesn't really. The ones it chases off were likely always gonna be a problem to get paid from so I'm grateful they just feck off under their own steam. But I don't take this kind of work as diminishing of my ability, I mean I used to but economics insist I get over myself and trudge on. I guess the option to go out and get some soul destroying job exists but I prefer to reassess my expectations and do what I ultimately gives me a better sense of myself. I can't or won't be judging myself on the gauge of work done for people who aren't artists and don't have the creators soul. That they might not fully understand or appreciate what they are asking isn't my job to explain to someone who still won't fully appreciate what I'm offering except for the fee I charge, that they can appreciate and it gives them a metric to go by. For vocals that never stand a chance without complete tuning butchery, I charge for that almost as much for assembling a basic production. So a track I might have been able to adminstrate and produce for a few thousand bucks +/- with great players etc now costs between 4500-7000aud . Not sure we are supposed to disclose this type of info but I'm not bashful about my money at all. For an original song written for that person of course it's more. Letting someone sing badly over a song written for them is hard but I suppose this is where the life lesson of letting go is most needed. So I say John, charge accordingly for these extraordinary add ons, get your money, do the job and find a path to gratitude because these jobs keep the shingle out for when those jobs who know how to appreciate you and respect your gift and guidance come along. We aren't the sum of one job, we are in this for the long haul and to whatever extent in it to win it on our own terms. There are so many more people that do music because they can, I strongly sense you do music because it's who you actually are. People like us just have to be who we are. Hey…good to see you back….how did your remote recording job go? I really want to read your posts but I am struggling with the giant block of text…..could I gently ask that you put some paragraphs in? cheers Wiz The non paragraph thing is irritating me to no end. I might have a glitch but each time I create a paragraph it creates a separate post. I'm noticing this with other posters as well. My apologies for the bad formatting,could be my machine or OS. Recordings went very well, thank you. I have not heard back about project moving to next phase,likely its a budget issue
|
|
|
Post by gmichael on Jun 15, 2024 17:27:06 GMT -6
Idk if it’s different in Australia, but I’d be lucky to ever get another job if I ask for $2500 US a track. It’s just not happening. Or maybe it would happen twice a year…but I definitely undervalue myself and I should probably be screaming my hard fought accolades in this industry from the mountain top…but it’s just not my personality. I DESPISE sales. But there’s not another job I can do that I can make this much money with this little time put in it. Now - I need MORE of those jobs, but hell - sometimes I can probably make like $80/hour and up when I consider how much time I’m actually spending on it. And by no means do I mean I’m skimping on these people…I track at the same studio and hire session guys…so there aren’t ever really any surprises. They use PT and so do I, so I have a template that I start with…so if I’m pulling session data from another tune from like the last time I was in, it’s pretty much 75% there. It’s awesome. I’ve slowly raised my prices around 25-35% for new people and people haven’t really batted an eye. But in reality, the $1000/song seems to be the sweet spot at the moment. Average track here is about 3k. There are many that will work for far less but that's they also have a reputation often for never delivering. The past year rates have increased but Ithink client base determines rate. I don't have much competition in my patch and those clients who choose me can afford it. States is saturated market and so much comp drives down fees maybe. If it were me I would find a way to have a story of an experience to sell, people want an experience and to be part of a story i think
|
|
|
Post by gmichael on Jun 15, 2024 17:37:10 GMT -6
I finally figured out that it I scanned the piano with melodyne and then scanned the vocals, it does a reasonable job. Thats the most efficient way to go about it to me. Just slapping it across the vocal can be made an even worse process without the anchoring reference.
Also, with sample pianos, we can adjust the tuning of piano to close the gap if it's just a piano/vox track. Not always ideal but sometimes it works a charm
|
|
|
Post by russellcreekps on Jun 15, 2024 18:46:56 GMT -6
I finally figured out that it I scanned the piano with melodyne and then scanned the vocals, it does a reasonable job. Thats the most efficient way to go about it to me. Just slapping it across the vocal can be made an even worse process without the anchoring reference.
Also, with sample pianos, we can adjust the tuning of piano to close the gap if it's just a piano/vox track. Not always ideal but sometimes it works a charm
Great tip! Didn’t know you could do that…can it be done with guitar tracks? Or do I need to play/program in piano chords (even if there’s no piano in the song) and go from there? And do you need the more expensive versions to do that? Thx
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Jun 15, 2024 19:52:06 GMT -6
Gene "back in de House"! Will ketchup here before bed... Chris
|
|