|
Post by svart on May 8, 2024 7:58:45 GMT -6
I still love crushing vocals with my hardware 1176 on the way in. I don't think it's "magical" or anything like that, but it does the thing and I don't have to worry so much about stuff later.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on May 8, 2024 7:59:19 GMT -6
Now that’s the first time I’ve heard you mentioning HW’s dirty little secret - it’s a pain in the ass. And why I’ve stayed ITB because of all the recall. But I’m going to focus on just using HW for the prominent elements. Maybe just focus on buses. Something like this: Drums - 78 Bass - 124 Acoustic - 78 Master - 33609 and maybe a HW EQ. Keeping up with real would be new for me… Funny thing: I use hw more on channels and less on subgroups, because I can use the “commit to this insert” function in pt to capture the hw, and then my recalls are itb and infinitely repeatable. for mix buss, I use all stepped knob hw for ease of recall (though I sometimes “cheat” by swapping in a plugin with comparable settings if a client needs a quick revision and I am not able to hook up the hw.) Great idea
|
|
|
Post by drbill on May 8, 2024 9:57:38 GMT -6
Now that’s the first time I’ve heard you mentioning HW’s dirty little secret - it’s a pain in the ass. And why I’ve stayed ITB because of all the recall. If you like the completely resetting everything, that's cool - some dig that. But if you just want easy recall and are swearing off hardware because of it, in my humble opinion - I'd suggest that you're doing hybrid wrong. I've mentioned my approach before, and for me, recalling my entire hardware studio is just as easy and just as fast as recalling a plugin mix. Hardware recall and setup is a non-issue.
|
|
|
Post by vvvooojjj on May 8, 2024 16:50:03 GMT -6
Give the 609 a try as parallel drum compressor. Been using the UAD one for some time and it works in surprisingly many genres.
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on May 8, 2024 17:17:46 GMT -6
Now that’s the first time I’ve heard you mentioning HW’s dirty little secret - it’s a pain in the ass. And why I’ve stayed ITB because of all the recall. If you like the completely resetting everything, that's cool - some dig that. But if you just want easy recall and are swearing off hardware because of it, in my humble opinion - I'd suggest that you're doing hybrid wrong. I've mentioned my approach before, and for me, recalling my entire hardware studio is just as easy and just as fast as recalling a plugin mix. Hardware recall and setup is a non-issue. I definitely hear you on this, Bill, but most of us can't afford to have as many HW options as you have, much less the I/O. I love my LA-2A on Vox and bass, but I can't afford a second one to have dedicated to each application...
|
|
|
Post by drbill on May 8, 2024 19:53:27 GMT -6
If you like the completely resetting everything, that's cool - some dig that. But if you just want easy recall and are swearing off hardware because of it, in my humble opinion - I'd suggest that you're doing hybrid wrong. I've mentioned my approach before, and for me, recalling my entire hardware studio is just as easy and just as fast as recalling a plugin mix. Hardware recall and setup is a non-issue. I definitely hear you on this, Bill, but most of us can't afford to have as many HW options as you have, much less the I/O. I love my LA-2A on Vox and bass, but I can't afford a second one to have dedicated to each application... Yup. I hear ya. But you can still scale it to whatever your particular gear count / budget is. IME, getting analog gear involved in a mix is a win/win. No matter how much or how little you have!
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on May 9, 2024 4:37:41 GMT -6
I’ve been asking myself lately if I’m becoming lazy or my motivations have shifted, because having built up 3 racks of boutique tube and solid state hardware I’m not using it anymore when I mix except for some units on the stereo mix bus. I get to the mix stage - I look at all the gear in the racks and I just sigh at the idea of setting it all up and then recalling it as I work on different and projects. It feels a bit old fashioned - which I realise is a ridiculous statement. I bought the 1178 Pulsar plugin and it sounds great to my ears. I know the AS 1178 hardware will sound better, but the fact only I will care and appreciate it here in 2024 has been demotivating for me, and it doesn’t help all my favourite mix engineers now mix ITB I really need to get back to my old “audio enthusiast” self. Now that’s the first time I’ve heard you mentioning HW’s dirty little secret - it’s a pain in the ass. And why I’ve stayed ITB because of all the recall. But I’m going to focus on just using HW for the prominent elements. Maybe just focus on buses. Something like this: Drums - 78 Bass - 124 Acoustic - 78 Master - 33609 and maybe a HW EQ. Keeping up with real would be new for me… +1 I think I’m in phase with you John on that approach. I’ve just moved my studio to a bigger room and I’m redoing my patch bay and converters. I’m going to keep my hardware on my stereo bus. And then come out of the box for a few key elements. Drums Vox Bass So probably 4 channels perhaps a couple more. It seems to be the middle ground and an amount of analog recall I can face on a daily basis.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on May 11, 2024 1:43:17 GMT -6
Now that’s the first time I’ve heard you mentioning HW’s dirty little secret - it’s a pain in the ass. And why I’ve stayed ITB because of all the recall. But I’m going to focus on just using HW for the prominent elements. Maybe just focus on buses. Something like this: Drums - 78 Bass - 124 Acoustic - 78 Master - 33609 and maybe a HW EQ. Keeping up with real would be new for me… Funny thing: I use hw more on channels and less on subgroups, because I can use the “commit to this insert” function in pt to capture the hw, and then my recalls are itb and infinitely repeatable. for mix buss, I use all stepped knob hw for ease of recall (though I sometimes “cheat” by swapping in a plugin with comparable settings if a client needs a quick revision and I am not able to hook up the hw.) This sound like the work flow for me too. I already have a great HW stereo bus chain. I’ll use a few special boxes on some channels but render to file for ITB recall. Plus, have you seen the price of a set of tubes for a Retro STA level - I’d rather not have that thing running too many hours tracking and then mixing!
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on May 11, 2024 4:47:53 GMT -6
I’m no pro, but when I downsized my ob and sold my board, it was because I was lazy about the recall and for convenience. I still think it sounds better, so I use good pres and comps while tracking and a good ssl clone on 2 bus for mixing. If I was starting over, I’d get a Silver bullet, probably a few other choice comps, 1178, 3a, 609, would love a Stam child and Stam’s current stereo pultec, with the mid band and stepped pots. My laziness was around board resetting: found with my ob, since I was mostly recording myself , you kinda had sweet spots which didn’t need a lot of tweaking. Plugs are good, but I find my previous trax with more ob, had more weight and gravitas!
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on May 11, 2024 8:42:03 GMT -6
I’ve got an x6 (wish I hadn’t been so cheap and bought the x8) so I’ve got 6 outs. So I’ve got the 1178 on Drumbus, soon the Stam 660 will be on bass and vocal. I’ll probably print bass and just keep on vocals. Then my plan is the Stam 33609 on the master. I feel like the three most important aspects are vocals, drums and bass. That’s the foundation and then the rest supports it. Maybe one day a Bricasti. Wait - I guess not because I only have one channel left lol. Oh wait! I’ve got two outs on my Hilo I think I can use.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on May 11, 2024 10:08:44 GMT -6
For fux sake, if you are buying a bricasti, get another interface: don’t make me come down there ! Hardware inserts, was something I loved about my 16 channel Symphony and having all I/o on my patchbay and logic’s I/o utility plug in.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on May 11, 2024 10:55:22 GMT -6
For fux sake, if you are buying a bricasti, get another interface: don’t make me come down there ! Hardware inserts, was something I loved about my 16 channel Symphony and having all I/o on my patchbay and logic’s I/o utility plug in. Why? I want the Apollo front end.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on May 11, 2024 11:02:58 GMT -6
For fux sake, if you are buying a bricasti, get another interface: don’t make me come down there ! Hardware inserts, was something I loved about my 16 channel Symphony and having all I/o on my patchbay and logic’s I/o utility plug in. It's one aspect of my PC that greatly appeals - a supper efficient PCIe card as a flexible digital interface. I'm just looking into changing to an RME RayDAT card (£500) 32 I/O over ADAT. 2x AES streams to my HEDD 192 and Avocet. Then add a Ferrofish A32 Pro for £2,500 and I've got 32 channels I can throw around to cover Cubase HW inserts - zero latency monitoring - FX Loops. I've heard a demo of the Ferrofish A32 Pro and the ADA are truly excellent - and surprisingly good when you consider the relatively reasonable cost. I like the idea of having way more channels than I currently need. I/O is like RAM .... it pays to buy more than you currently need.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on May 11, 2024 11:15:23 GMT -6
For fux sake, if you are buying a bricasti, get another interface: don’t make me come down there ! Hardware inserts, was something I loved about my 16 channel Symphony and having all I/o on my patchbay and logic’s I/o utility plug in. It's one aspect of my PC that greatly appeals - a supper efficient PCIe card as a flexible digital interface. I'm just looking into changing to an RME RayDAT card (£500) 32 I/O over ADAT. 2x AES streams to my HEDD 192 and Avocet. Then add a Ferrofish A32 Pro for £2,500 and I've got 32 channels I can throw around to cover Cubase HW inserts - zero latency monitoring - FX Loops. I've heard a demo of the Ferrofish A32 Pro and the ADA are truly excellent - and surprisingly good when you consider the relatively reasonable cost. I like the idea of having way more channels than I currently need. I/O is like RAM .... it pays to buy more than you currently need. You should check out that Black Lion expansion.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on May 11, 2024 11:58:36 GMT -6
For fux sake, if you are buying a bricasti, get another interface: don’t make me come down there ! Hardware inserts, was something I loved about my 16 channel Symphony and having all I/o on my patchbay and logic’s I/o utility plug in. Why? I want the Apollo front end. I meant buy more io, if you need it, x6 has adat in, so you could add another 8 I/o pretty easily, if you wanted.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on May 11, 2024 12:24:51 GMT -6
Why? I want the Apollo front end. I meant buy more io, if you need it, x6 has adat in, so you could add another 8 I/o pretty easily, if you wanted. Yeah that’s probably what I’d do if I ever needed more…go to an adat expansion. I thought the adda in the revolution was killer, so that one has my eye. But first I gotta pay for the 660 and all the other stuff I’ve bought on glorious credit. The chickens are starting to arrive if you know what I mean.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on May 11, 2024 12:55:06 GMT -6
It's one aspect of my PC that greatly appeals - a supper efficient PCIe card as a flexible digital interface. I'm just looking into changing to an RME RayDAT card (£500) 32 I/O over ADAT. 2x AES streams to my HEDD 192 and Avocet. Then add a Ferrofish A32 Pro for £2,500 and I've got 32 channels I can throw around to cover Cubase HW inserts - zero latency monitoring - FX Loops. I've heard a demo of the Ferrofish A32 Pro and the ADA are truly excellent - and surprisingly good when you consider the relatively reasonable cost. I like the idea of having way more channels than I currently need. I/O is like RAM .... it pays to buy more than you currently need. You should check out that Black Lion expansion. Thanks - I had a look - they're cheap (a possible positive) and the specs look reasonable- ish - the dynamic range is very poor though at 112dB and 110dB. Though to be fair to BLA they off the following explanation about their "year 2004" dynamic performance! **Dynamic range is affected by our preference to tuning individual stages for tonality. We found that the best sounding parts in the output path weren’t necessarily the lowest noise components but they resulted in an optimal tone and signal purity that is instantly apparent to the listener. Electronic design is a game of compromise and we’re confident your ears will agree with our choices.The Ferrofish is a lot more expensive (though not Lynx Aurora N kinda money) and the specs reflect that with dynamic range of almost 120dB I/O. Dynamic range matters to my set-up and gain staging approach. If I'm heading out of the box into a $7,000 vocal HW chain I want the best ADA's I can realistically afford. Again, another "with that said" .... worrying about dynamic range into a 1950's design Retro STA Level is a joke .... I get that! Overall I'm not sure the BLE is quite up to the spec's I'm looking for - though I'm sure it sounds very good and the price is certainly attractive. I'd just buy Lynx A N if I had the extra money spare.
|
|
|
Post by phdamage on May 11, 2024 13:23:07 GMT -6
Do you have the 1178 on the mix bus? No. Drumbus. I've been wanting the Stam 609 mkII for the master...but alas it is only in my mind. Do it! My Stam 609 mkII lives on mix bus for me. Though maybe 1 in 20 goes to the Stam SSL instead
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on May 11, 2024 13:46:06 GMT -6
I’m no pro, but when I downsized my ob and sold my board, it was because I was lazy about the recall and for convenience. I still think it sounds better, so I use good pres and comps while tracking and a good ssl clone on 2 bus for mixing. If I was starting over, I’d get a Silver bullet, probably a few other choice comps, 1178, 3a, 609, would love a Stam child and Stam’s current stereo pultec, with the mid band and stepped pots. My laziness was around board resetting: found with my ob, since I was mostly recording myself , you kinda had sweet spots which didn’t need a lot of tweaking. Plugs are good, but I find my previous trax with more ob, had more weight and gravitas! What about Access Analog. I have tried their service before and it works perfectly - I was impressed. I'ts no different to someone sending out of their DAW into their own rack and then committing it to file. I've always been surprised the service isn't more popular and talked about more on audio forums.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on May 11, 2024 15:15:08 GMT -6
I get it but always think at one point how much will you have paid them and you have no gear?
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on May 11, 2024 15:19:12 GMT -6
I’m no pro, but when I downsized my ob and sold my board, it was because I was lazy about the recall and for convenience. I still think it sounds better, so I use good pres and comps while tracking and a good ssl clone on 2 bus for mixing. If I was starting over, I’d get a Silver bullet, probably a few other choice comps, 1178, 3a, 609, would love a Stam child and Stam’s current stereo pultec, with the mid band and stepped pots. My laziness was around board resetting: found with my ob, since I was mostly recording myself , you kinda had sweet spots which didn’t need a lot of tweaking. Plugs are good, but I find my previous trax with more ob, had more weight and gravitas! What about Access Analog. I have tried their service before and it works perfectly - I was impressed. I'ts no different to someone sending out of their DAW into their own rack and then committing it to file. I've always been surprised the service isn't more popular and talked about more on audio forums. You try Control Hub? I’ve been pretty impressed…just happened on a Reid Shippen Bass Trace with a sansamp into a CL-1B I think? I’ll have to look again. Anyway - it instantly got me the bass sound I wanted. I kinda played around and can pretty much get there with plugs…but it does seem like the trace is maybe doing a little better job compressing? There’s a certain part on a song I was mixing where when the bass player goes up the neck for an octave kinda part, it obviously loses weight and volume. The plugs can handle it, but when you listen to the whole mix, I swear the Control Hub one just sounds more distinct. The notes seem to pop out more. That kind of sounds like every experience I’ve had with software vs. hardware…close, but there’s something missing with punch/attack/dynamic range. Or to put it more clearly, it just subtly sounds a little better. But I need to try Access analog again.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on May 11, 2024 15:19:38 GMT -6
I get it but always think at one point how much will you have paid them and you have no gear? Yeah. Kinda takes the fun out of it lol
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on May 11, 2024 15:28:20 GMT -6
One of these places is servo controlled so you actually do make the moves .
For me though, it’s like sub plans, you just pay and own nothing, cept your Songs/work.
You do get access to great gear and price is right, but.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on May 11, 2024 16:21:47 GMT -6
I get it but always think at one point how much will you have paid them and you have no gear? For me, it’s the fact I have access to racks of outboard with needing to have the physical space for racks of outboard. The cost of Access Analog for me is relatively affordable (as it’s small sums) in the general scheme of things.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on May 11, 2024 16:42:38 GMT -6
I don’t disagree, we are just discussing preference. I use my ob while tracking, some plugs while mixing and my ssl clone on 2 bus. Happy for now. If I had a little windfall, sure would be fun to buy some more OB !
|
|