|
Post by thehightenor on Jan 4, 2024 4:19:05 GMT -6
So my Tim Pierce stadium volume set-up is having to come to an end and I'm back to a one room space. I hate recording E. guitars with headphones on - I like to hear the parts coming back through my monitors so I can immediately hear how the parts sit in the mix - I can't stand headphones going on and off on and off when your self engineering. My tube amps are a Fender Princeton and a Tone King Imperial MK2 (I have tried the Nueral plugin amp equivalents and they're good but to my ears get nowhere near the quality and sheer clarity of the mids of a real tube amp) So I have two choices tocontiune using my tube amps. Grossman ISO cab www.grossmann-audio.de/en/Surh RL IR Or BOSS TAE (similar to Suhr) So basically ISO cab vs Reactive load and IR's The ISO box allows me to use my fairly well stocked mic and pre-amp collection but I'm worried it might sound a bit "boxy" then again IR's might sound a bit artificial? My musical style is Sting, Peter Gabriel, Paul Simon, Crowded House, Beatles etc .... basically fairly traditional singer songwriter stuff so not focused on heavy guitars. Any advice and experience would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by indiehouse on Jan 4, 2024 6:04:30 GMT -6
ragan has done a bunch of tests on this. I’m using the Suhr with some choice third party IR’s. Another option is the Fryette Powerstation. It is a tube based reamper with a direct out. The interesting thing about the reamping section is that you can get full power tube saturation from your amp, and use the Fryette to get volume under control and mix your amp. You’ll miss out on speaker breakup though.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Jan 4, 2024 6:33:12 GMT -6
ragan has done a bunch of tests on this. I’m using the Suhr with some choice third party IR’s. Another option is the Fryette Powerstation. It is a tube based reamper with a direct out. The interesting thing about the reamping section is that you can get full power tube saturation from your amp, and use the Fryette to get volume under control and mix your amp. You’ll miss out on speaker breakup though. Thanks, I'm only really going for on the edge of break up tones and the occasional power chord with a bit more distortion but only just beyond a crunch tone nothing of a metal or heavy rock genre. I phoned Grossman Audio in Germany - spoke to Mr Grossman himself - very nice guy. He said he put a lot of science and maths into his design and the box even comes with an EQ sheet to remove the exact frequency he is aware the box can generate - you can't fairer than that. It's not cheap it will cost me $1300 delivered to my door but it will give me a "mini" Tim Pierce set up. A close guitarist friend has said he'll buy it minus the shipping cost from me if I don't like it (as he's decided he'd like one) so I'm only gambling $100 trying it. I'm thinking I'll go for it unless someone has tried one on here and truly hates it!
|
|
|
Post by bricejchandler on Jan 4, 2024 6:56:13 GMT -6
Well this question is for me!! I've had both the Grossmann and the Suhr! and I sold both of them...
I really really really wanted to love them.
They actually sounded somewhat similar. Boxy mids and fuzzy kind of DIed sounding High end.
Tracking guitars for me used to be so simple. I play a Strat directly into a Princeton Brownface or a 5E3, miced with an AEA R44 a foot out in front, it sounds perfect. But I had to move to a smaller place and that wasn't possible anymore so I bought the Grossmann hoping it would give me that amp sound. The feel was good, there's that weight under the pick and compression that I never felt using plugin amps, it was nice to play through but it just always sounded a little off, I got decent results with eq and IR reverb to put it in a space but it was always a bit of a struggle to have it sit in a mix, it lacked depth and really just didn't sound like my amp. Every time I was happy with a tone, I'd compare it to the same thing tracked with the Princeton through its own speaker and cab, and I would be crushed. I'd spend hours trying to find a tone that I deemed acceptable, and then I 'd plug into the Princeton miced with a 57 and get a better tone in 5 seconds.
So I sold after a year and replaced it with the Suhr. Again, 2d sound, weird fuzzy high end. I ended up using the Suhr as a loadbox and then put York Audio IRs in a Iridium so I could use the Room sound of the Iridium. It sounded ok but not great. It didn't have the same weight under the fingers when playing compared to the Grossmann. I also sold it pretty fast once I realized that My Princeton still sounded way better when just miced regularly.
I've heard demos of both the Grossmann and the Suhr online that sounded ok, for like super clean clinical tones or metal distorded sounds but the thing is my amps live at the edge of break up and it just didn't translate well at all. The breakup always ended up sounded thin and fizzy instead of compressed and creamy.
Nowadays, my amps are in the closet just sitting on the floor, all the clothes act as a dampener and when closing the sliding doors, I'm actually able to get pretty decent isolation, pretty silly system but it sounds better than either other solution to my ears, though I'm not able to have my amps super loud, but for cleans it sounds great. Parallel to that I'm using the UA dream when I want more pushed sounds, does it sound as good as my amps? nope! Does it feel as nice playing as my amps? definitely not but it sits in a mix way better than the Grossmann or the Suhr. I've got my Dream plugged in to a UTC DI into a CA70 ( which I know you own) and honestly, I have tracks where listening back I wasn't able to tell if I'd recorded with my amp or the Dream. I have a Fabfilter eq preset that mimics my Princeton's eq profile and when applied to the Dream tracks, it sounds very close in a mix. The Coil helps massively to make it sound more realistic, better depth and weight. Plugged directly into the interface preamps, it's a bit bland.
My experience with the Dream makes me want to try their OX stomp, see if that works better.
If you want to PM me your email I could maybe send you some files so you can hear how each solution sounds.
|
|
|
Post by bricejchandler on Jan 4, 2024 7:25:43 GMT -6
I'm listening to a bunch of stuff I've tracked over the years.
If I had to chose one between the 2 it would be the Grossmann no doubt, the Grossmann tracks better than anything I've found tracked through the Suhr.
But there is still something lacking. It's not as bad in the high end as I remembered, a lot of the tracks are actually maybe on the duller side and lack some bite, though maybe I ended up tracking that way because if I pushed the High end too much it would get harsh, I don't know, it's been a few years.
Things I've tracked through the Dream sound a bit thinner compared to the Grossmann, but they have that bite that cuts through a mix that I was never able to get with the Grossmann.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Jan 4, 2024 7:28:33 GMT -6
Well this question is for me!! I've had both the Grossmann and the Suhr! and I sold both of them... I really really really wanted to love them. They actually sounded somewhat similar. Boxy mids and fuzzy kind of DIed sounding High end. Tracking guitars for me used to be so simple. I play a Strat directly into a Princeton Brownface or a 5E3, miced with an AEA R44 a foot out in front, it sounds perfect. But I had to move to a smaller place and that wasn't possible anymore so I bought the Grossmann hoping it would give me that amp sound. The feel was good, there's that weight under the pick and compression that I never felt using plugin amps, it was nice to play through but it just always sounded a little off, I got decent results with eq and IR reverb to put it in a space but it was always a bit of a struggle to have it sit in a mix, it lacked depth and really just didn't sound like my amp. Every time I was happy with a tone, I'd compare it to the same thing tracked with the Princeton through its own speaker and cab, and I would be crushed. I'd spend hours trying to find a tone that I deemed acceptable, and then I 'd plug into the Princeton miced with a 57 and get a better tone in 5 seconds. So I sold after a year and replaced it with the Suhr. Again, 2d sound, weird fuzzy high end. I ended up using the Suhr as a loadbox and then put York Audio IRs in a Iridium so I could use the Room sound of the Iridium. It sounded ok but not great. It didn't have the same weight under the fingers when playing compared to the Grossmann. I also sold it pretty fast once I realized that My Princeton still sounded way better when just miced regularly. I've heard demos of both the Grossmann and the Suhr online that sounded ok, for like super clean clinical tones or metal distorded sounds but the thing is my amps live at the edge of break up and it just didn't translate well at all. The breakup always ended up sounded thin and fizzy instead of compressed and creamy. Nowadays, my amps are in the closet just sitting on the floor, all the clothes act as a dampener and when closing the sliding doors, I'm actually able to get pretty decent isolation, pretty silly system but it sounds better than either other solution to my ears, though I'm not able to have my amps super loud, but for cleans it sounds great. Parallel to that I'm using the UA dream when I want more pushed sounds, does it sound as good as my amps? nope! Does it feel as nice playing as my amps? definitely not but it sits in a mix way better than the Grossmann or the Suhr. I've got my Dream plugged in to a UTC DI into a CA70 ( which I know you own) and honestly, I have tracks where listening back I wasn't able to tell if I'd recorded with my amp or the Dream. I have a Fabfilter eq preset that mimics my Princeton's eq profile and when applied to the Dream tracks, it sounds very close in a mix. The Coil helps massively to make it sound more realistic, better depth and weight. Plugged directly into the interface preamps, it's a bit bland. My experience with the Dream makes me want to try their OX stomp, see if that works better. If you want to PM me your email I could maybe send you some files so you can hear how each solution sounds. Brilliant - thanks for that feedback - though you realise you just popped on my two best solutions You didn't just "shoot my fox" you blew up the entire woods PM sent! Thanks
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 4, 2024 8:11:39 GMT -6
Honestly I think a silverface Princeton is one of the best studio amps you can have. You don't have to turn it up a whole lot to get the "tone" from it. I usually set them just below "too loud to stand in front of while playing" and then move the mic around for best tone while leaving the treble/bass around mid (with a little tweaking).
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jan 4, 2024 8:16:07 GMT -6
Try the Grossman, as you said you're only risking shipping.
My experience is that guitar sounds (acoustic and electric both) are so personal and taste driven that you basically just have to try everything yourself. We can all mostly agree on what makes a good vocal sound or a B3 sound, not so on guitar.
For example I saw some shootout of a J45 vs the new lower end one with satin finish. Everyone raved about the real J45 but in the shootout it sounded like thin crap to me (and also worse than any J45 I've ever heard, must have been a weird recording).
But the very thing I HATED was what some people were looking for. Evidently? I guess?
Anyway, try the Grossman. You might love it.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 4, 2024 8:26:36 GMT -6
Oh and I should say that if you want that magical Princeton tone to just happen, then you need an R121. It IS the mic for fender breakup tones.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jan 4, 2024 8:51:07 GMT -6
This isn't what you're looking for but I bought one to try and then immediately bought two more. I have one in my Blues Jr, one in my Deluxe, and one in my Silvertone Twin Twelve. With the Fenders it is indistinguishable in the mix. Then with Silvertone it sounds really great and really close but not quite like a 50 year old cabinet made of cardboard and papier mache that's falling apart. Plus there's no weird phasey IR stuff cuz it's just an analog DI big heavy transformer and some frequency tuning. I don't know why, but it works and it's only $99. Maybe that plus the Grossman box could be just the ticket? I'm telling you this thing nails it, it really does. friedmanamplification.com/shop/essentials/mic-no-mo/
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jan 4, 2024 8:53:39 GMT -6
One note on the Mic No Mo, it's not a load box. It sits between the amp stage and the speaker stage. Maybe that's why it works so well? The native speaker (or whatever you use) is still reacting to the signal and interacting with the amp as normal. We have real electrical engineers on here that can explain it perhaps.
But it's not made for quiet recording, it's made for recording/stage shows without a mic. But with the iso box? I'd love to hear someone try it.
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Jan 4, 2024 8:58:53 GMT -6
I have been extremely happy with Weber attenuators. Since they also make speakers, their attenuators to my ear, don’t crap or fart out like some others. I like them a lot and they make various ones for varying amp sizes. I have one even for my Vibro Champ. IMO, they are worth a look.
ETA: I also have a Princeton and a Marshall Studio 20 whatevermacallit, that I have attenuators for.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Jan 4, 2024 9:14:25 GMT -6
Oh and I should say that if you want that magical Princeton tone to just happen, then you need an R121. It IS the mic for fender breakup tones. I demoed a R121 and an AEA R92. I kept the R92 - I have never heard a better guitar tone from my Princeton and Tone King MK2. I blend in a touch of 57 - it's magic.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Jan 4, 2024 9:15:38 GMT -6
I'm going to have to find a solution within my house to continue to record my amps with my mics and pres. My son loves Harry Potter - maybe he can sleep under the stairs
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jan 4, 2024 9:23:43 GMT -6
I'm going to have to find a solution within my house to continue to record my amps with my mics and pres. My son loves Harry Potter - maybe I can he can sleep under the stairs This is a great solution! He'll love it, everyone wins!!
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Jan 4, 2024 9:24:03 GMT -6
I'm going to have to find a solution within my house to continue to record my amps with my mics and pres. My son loves Harry Potter - maybe I can he can sleep under the stairs Or you could put your amps in Hermione’s bag. 😃
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 4, 2024 10:06:44 GMT -6
Have not tried either, but if the amp can't breathe, it won't sound "right". My experience with iso boxes is not positive. Getting a pair of Emery Micro Baby's has been excellent. 1-2 watts, and still surprisingly loud in the room, but manageable.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jan 4, 2024 10:25:49 GMT -6
I can also recommend anything Benson makes. The Vinny is used by some folks I know and they've got a new thing called the Bellringer which is variable from 1 watt to 30 watts or so. The Vinny is louder than you would expect for a 1 watter but still probably fine for 'home' levels. www.bensonamps.com/amps/vinny
|
|
|
Post by anders on Jan 4, 2024 10:54:47 GMT -6
My go-to is recording a DI alongside a power soaked amp (Weber Mass Lite).
Later I can reamp the finished take at an acceptable hour in a better room at a decent volume, with a close mic and room mics.
An added bonus, is that it is much easier to perform edits on a clean signal, the reverb tails won't be an issue, and breakup, reverb, room tone, etc will tend to smooth out any stretching artefacts.
|
|
|
Post by ragan on Jan 4, 2024 10:58:59 GMT -6
I’ve tried lots of stuff. If I’m not mic’ing amps, my favorite is to use my amps with the Suhr RL, through Ownhammer IRs. Sometimes I prefer it sonically to mic’d amps. In fact I did a blind test here on RGO where most people picked the Suhr over the actual amps mic’d. But, I love mic’ing amps, so what I’m doing for this record is using the Suhr or the Iridium to get takes, then re-amping in batches of tracks when I can be loud. I built some cabs with the same speakers as my main amps and I can mic them up in another room (or if I’m at the cabin, in another building) and tweak the amp and pedal settings at mix position. It’s really fun.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Jan 4, 2024 11:04:52 GMT -6
I can also recommend anything Benson makes. The Vinny is used by some folks I know and they've got a new thing called the Bellringer which is variable from 1 watt to 30 watts or so. The Vinny is louder than you would expect for a 1 watter but still probably fine for 'home' levels. www.bensonamps.com/amps/vinnyI need to check one of these out.
|
|
|
Post by indiehouse on Jan 4, 2024 16:28:15 GMT -6
I can also recommend anything Benson makes. The Vinny is used by some folks I know and they've got a new thing called the Bellringer which is variable from 1 watt to 30 watts or so. The Vinny is louder than you would expect for a 1 watter but still probably fine for 'home' levels. www.bensonamps.com/amps/vinnyYeah, I have a Benson Monarch. LOUD. Very loud. I had the Monarch+ with Power Scaling. Still very LOUD. And very EXPENSIVE. I sold it cause I just couldn't stomach the amount of money I had tied up in a 15 watt 1x12 tube amp with simple controls. Killer amp though. I still have my Monarch head that I bought used before the pandemic skyrocketed demand...and price. A much better solution for lowering volume is the Fryette Power Station.
|
|
|
Post by jmoose on Jan 4, 2024 17:19:10 GMT -6
I haven't tried the Grossman cab but it looks like a tweaked up, modernized version of the Demeter iso box (and others) which I have used...
These things aren't dead silent. Quiet yes but not silent there's still rumble & such coming from the cab that you can't get away from. Not really sure I'd want to be in a one room studio with an iso cab for a long time... still better off burying the thing somewhere else on your property. Run some 50 or 100 foot lines into the basement and back again...
Only had one experience with the shur IR box where a guy brought one in and frankly, I'll admit there was likely some pilot error on both our parts but we just couldn't get a result. Not quickly anyway and with the rest of the group ready to go, well... lets just plug into that perfectly good 4x12 over in the corner hang a 57 and geez!! In 30 seconds it creamed anything we tried over the last two hours.
I've used the 2 notes stuff a couple times, kinda dig it. Haven't tried all the 'game console' stuff like Helix boxes. I did try a Kemper and it was terrible. Sounded fine but really hated the feel. All the nuance of changing pick attack, volume control work etc had a heavy blanket. Like I was disconnected from the string windings or using junk cables or something.
Think the thing to remember with any iso box is that yeah, there's going to be kind of a weird frequency at times that can't be totally dialed out... but even more so, mic choice & placement can help but is really limited. If you like the sound of super close miked cabs, like a 57 or 421 jammed into the dust cap maybe you won't even notice?
But if you dig the sound of a mic pulled 6" back from the cab? Get a little air around it? That tone isn't there. And forget about using any figure 8 mics, they always sound bizarre to me in iso cabs and I'll stick with the basics. YMMV.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Jan 4, 2024 17:33:33 GMT -6
I haven't tried the Grossman cab but it looks like a tweaked up, modernized version of the Demeter iso box (and others) which I have used... These things aren't dead silent. Quiet yes but not silent there's still rumble & such coming from the cab that you can't get away from. Not really sure I'd want to be in a one room studio with an iso cab for a long time... still better off burying the thing somewhere else on your property. Run some 50 or 100 foot lines into the basement and back again... Only had one experience with the shur IR box where a guy brought one in and frankly, I'll admit there was likely some pilot error on both our parts but we just couldn't get a result. Not quickly anyway and with the rest of the group ready to go, well... lets just plug into that perfectly good 4x12 over in the corner hang a 57 and geez!! In 30 seconds it creamed anything we tried over the last two hours. I've used the 2 notes stuff a couple times, kinda dig it. Haven't tried all the 'game console' stuff like Helix boxes. I did try a Kemper and it was terrible. Sounded fine but really hated the feel. All the nuance of changing pick attack, volume control work etc had a heavy blanket. Like I was disconnected from the string windings or using junk cables or something. Think the thing to remember with any iso box is that yeah, there's going to be kind of a weird frequency at times that can't be totally dialed out... but even more so, mic choice & placement can help but is really limited. If you like the sound of super close miked cabs, like a 57 or 421 jammed into the dust cap maybe you won't even notice? But if you dig the sound of a mic pulled 6" back from the cab? Get a little air around it? That tone isn't there. And forget about using any figure 8 mics, they always sound bizarre to me in iso cabs and I'll stick with the basics. YMMV. Thanks for that feedback, I appreciate you sharing your experiences.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Jan 4, 2024 18:59:42 GMT -6
I’m back to mic’ing small amps (Princeton Reverb, Silvertone 1482) and loving it.
Had more than workable experiences with both an amp in a box stomp box into a cheap IR loader (with Ownhammer IRs) and then the Fender expansions in Amplitube.
The amp simply takes less futzing and headgaming myself to get inspired. Plus I have the space to do it now. If I wanted to record late at night I’d happily use Amplitube again (to give my neighbors a break).
|
|