|
Post by crillemannen on Jul 30, 2023 13:10:28 GMT -6
Hey guys,
So I've been thinking of starting up my mixing service again.
Short backstory.. I had a commercial space for about 10 years. Worked with a few bands signed on major metal labels but it never really took off and I got tired of the grinding. So I think it's almost five years or so since I actively searched for mixing jobs.
The thing is that I've been thinking about it ever since. I really love music, and being involved with artists is something I really like. Lesson learned last time is that I don't want to be locked into a certain genre. Of course it's easier to make a name for yourself if you specialize but the variety makes you appreciate the work more I'd say!
Opportunity has also opened up where I will be able to have a super nice hybrid setup with like 3 full 500-series racks, so one aspect is to push the hybrid way. Of course ITB is great but there is still something about working hybrid which I personally like. I will also be able to mix completely analogue for special projects at a higher rate.
Rates are also a hot topic. I thought about being a bit more progressive. Charging different amounts depending on the track count. I know you should really price your service to what you think you're worth, but it's a huge difference working with 20 tracks or 60+.
I know a few of you have tuned in to my channel and heard my work so that's another channel that can be used as marketing.
I'm not sure where I'm going with this but it would be cool to hear your guys opinion. From imaginary potential customers but also from the working professionals lurking around in this forum đ
/ Christian
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 30, 2023 13:29:42 GMT -6
I think it's great to diversify and use all the skills that you have. Not to be discouraging but there has been a race to the bottom for several years now so just don't be shocked by some of the prices some potential clients may expect. Best of luck, I look forward to hearing some of your mixes!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2023 13:41:09 GMT -6
Hey guys, So I've been thinking of starting up my mixing service again. Short backstory.. I had a commercial space for about 10 years. Worked with a few bands signed on major metal labels but it never really took off and I got tired of the grinding. So I think it's almost five years or so since I actively searched for mixing jobs. This is what happened to me just a decade earlier so I'm not sure if I'm the best person to give advice. Anyway, I supplemented studio income with repairs, tech and contracts that eventually took over. It did lead to some opportunities which is great but it also lead to 50 hour weeks, then 70 and on occasion 100+. Between the house, life and everything in general I didn't have much time for music and sold up.
I wish I'd have stuck it out a bit more but on the other hand until artists get paid more I just couldn't see it becoming a lucrative career in this day and age. I'm somewhat sure geographic region plays into this so if I were to dip my toes in the water I'd look at remote mixing first. Anyway, just like you I'm not sure where I'm not entirely sure where I'm going with this either , although the one thing I have learned is chasing the money rainbow by sacrificing the things I wanted to do in the end wasn't all that great.
So, I say go for it.. Get a bit of money behind you, go all in and if it fails again ah well. At least your tried and if you're happy whilst doing it? Well, in my later existence I've realised that accounts for a lot more than you'd think.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jul 30, 2023 15:43:00 GMT -6
So...you want back into the "grinding"?? All this is just my opinion, so take it or leave it - no worries!! It will be a grind, and the industry has changed radically - even in the last 5 years. Expect 60+ hour weeks minimum to clear enough to live on. If you can't fill a 60+ hour week with paying work - you'd better be thinking of ways to supplement your income. If this is your only choice - go for it, and don't ask our opinion. Go headlong into it as hard and as fast as you can. Prepare to live on the little crumbs that artists have left over by mix time, and best of luck!!! If you're looking for a money making opportunity, there are thousands of easier ways that pay double to 10X that would only require 1/10th of the talent you have. There is something to be said for working a "day gig" for 40 hours a week, surviving on that, and using the balance of your time to enjoy your love. Dealing with the 10th mix revision at 11:00PM on Sunday night is not my idea of a good time. A few thoughts on specifics you mentioned : - It's very difficult not to get "pidgeon-holed" into specific genre's. It just tends to happen. I love all kinds of music, but get called over and over and over and over for "the same old thing".... Your best chance is to be well rounded in all types of musics and favor "different" projects over "the same old thing" even if money is less. - in 2023 virtually no one is going to pay extra for an "all analog" mix. Honestly, 99 out of 100 just don't care. - you will be competing against guys mixing in Starbucks on their laptop, trying desperately to "break in" to the business by cutting costs as much as they can. Track count is a good concept on pricing, but the reality is, most won't really understand it, and some of the minimalist track count mixes become much more difficult than the hundreds of track mixes. It all depends. IME, the only way you can really make an estimate is to actually pull up the track and get a feel for it. - My own $0.02 on your pricing conundrum - hourly is the only way to go and still earn enough to feed yourself, keep the lights on, keep clients happy financially and artistically, and let the studio grow organically. Most will push against that saying you can only do project rates nowadays. I really don't give them much of a second thought unless they are doing it full time for a decade or longer. Yeah, the industry has changed, but it's becoming SUPER rare to find anyone who actually makes a full time living at it anymore. I've actually done it and made a living full time in music for 40 years, bought houses, studios have a wife who doesn't work, and put kids thru school, etc.. Believe me, it wasn't easy. I have the scars financially, family wise and career wise to prove it. It takes a huge toll. If there are guys who do flat rate projects full time, have been doing it 20+ years, and who are making bank - I want to hear from you!!!!!! I'm totally open to have been doing it wrong, but I am not seeing long term lasting success any other way - no matter what industry pundits say. These days I charge $0.00 hr. for studio time, and $85.00 hr. for myself so that clients don't take advantage. $85 might seem steep, but I was making that much 15 years ago, and the cost of living has skyrocketed. Hell, the shop rate at the car dealer or local shop is $150+ an hour. $85 hr. - that's what it takes to make me look up and pay attention - and I'll charge that no matter what I'm doing or where I'm going. I'll produce you, engineer, mix, master, orchestrate, solder wires, play keyboards, or do whatever you want me to wherever you want me to do it.....( within reason. ). That method is always fair to the client and fair to me, my family obligations and the studio. Set your own hourly rate, but with a flat rate or project rate - one person or the other always suffers financially. It's impossible to calculate accurately how long a project will take, and what outside forces will push in on you. Best of luck!!
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 30, 2023 16:56:46 GMT -6
So...you want back into the "grinding"??  All this is just my opinion, so take it or leave it - no worries!! It will be a grind, and the industry has changed radically - even in the last 5 years. Expect 60+ hour weeks minimum to clear enough to live on. If you can't fill a 60+ hour week with paying work - you'd better be thinking of ways to supplement your income. If this is your only choice - go for it, and don't ask our opinion. Go headlong into it as hard and as fast as you can. Prepare to live on the little crumbs that artists have left over by mix time, and best of luck!!! If you're looking for a money making opportunity, there are thousands of easier ways that pay double to 10X that would only require 1/10th of the talent you have. There is something to be said for working a "day gig" for 40 hours a week, surviving on that, and using the balance of your time to enjoy your love. Dealing with the 10th mix revision at 11:00PM on Sunday night is not my idea of a good time. A few thoughts on specifics you mentioned : - It's very difficult not to get "pidgeon-holed" into specific genre's. It just tends to happen. I love all kinds of music, but get called over and over and over and over for "the same old thing"....  Your best chance is to be well rounded in all types of musics and favor "different" projects over "the same old thing" even if money is less. - in 2023 virtually no one is going to pay extra for an "all analog" mix. Honestly, 99 out of 100 just don't care. - you will be competing against guys mixing in Starbucks on their laptop, trying desperately to "break in" to the business by cutting costs as much as they can. Track count is a good concept on pricing, but the reality is, most won't really understand it, and some of the minimalist track count mixes become much more difficult than the hundreds of track mixes. It all depends. IME, the only way you can really make an estimate is to actually pull up the track and get a feel for it. - My own $0.02 on your pricing conundrum - hourly is the only way to go and still earn enough to feed yourself, keep the lights on, keep clients happy financially and artistically, and let the studio grow organically. Most will push against that saying you can only do project rates nowadays. I really don't give them much of a second thought unless they are doing it full time for a decade or longer. Yeah, the industry has changed, but it's becoming SUPER rare to find anyone who actually makes a full time living at it anymore. I've actually done it and made a living full time in music for 40 years, bought houses, studios have a wife who doesn't work, and put kids thru school, etc.. Believe me, it wasn't easy. I have the scars financially, family wise and career wise to prove it. It takes a huge toll. If there are guys who do flat rate projects full time, have been doing it 20+ years, and who are making bank - I want to hear from you!!!!!! I'm totally open to have been doing it wrong, but I am not seeing long term lasting success any other way - no matter what industry pundits say. These days I charge $0.00 hr. for studio time, and $85.00 hr. for myself so that clients don't take advantage. $85 might seem steep, but I was making that much 15 years ago, and the cost of living has skyrocketed.  Hell, the shop rate at the car dealer or local shop is $150+ an hour.  $85 hr. - that's what it takes to make me look up and pay attention - and I'll charge that no matter what I'm doing or where I'm going. I'll produce you, engineer, mix, master, orchestrate, solder wires, play keyboards, or do whatever you want me to wherever you want me to do it.....( within reason.  ). That method is always fair to the client and fair to me, my family obligations and the studio. Set your own hourly rate, but with a flat rate or project rate - one person or the other always suffers financially. It's impossible to calculate accurately how long a project will take, and what outside forces will push in on you. Best of luck!! Thereâs a whole lot of wisdom here đ Just wanted to echo that I was hourly, then went flat rate for a few years, now am back to hourly. People took way too much advantage of knowing it was a flat rate & when I figured up what I made per hour at the end of those projects I may as well have been working at a drive through somewhere đ¤Ł. Iâve learned over the years too that the clients that donât want to pay for and respect your time arenât the kind of clients you probably want anyway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2023 17:48:55 GMT -6
Nobody cares about analog these days. Most new analog pieces are toys more than tools or clones of stuff you really donât need. Digital is all over the place but people are making good new processors every few months vs every few years. Analog is best for recording where itâs zero latency to get it done on the way in. Mixing? You need that digital recall because metal bands will fight about levels and stuff.
For metal, the most helpful analog processing now that digital dynamics are good is tape but nobody doing metal can afford to get it done to tape, not from tape to maximize the sound quality. Most metal bands arenât good enough to record a full band in a room to tape and have it mixed as itâs being played. Extreme metal needs ridiculous processing, even the cassette stuff.
Unless youâre doing cookie cutter shit when theyâre not really recording anything but vocals which is what the big metal labels mostly purvey, metal recording quality is lower than ever though so hybrid is useful because you will need every single weapon you can get and a ton of recall. Charging per hour or giving a ballpark rate based on recording quality and what they want works. For cassette stuff, charge out the the wazoo.
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Jul 30, 2023 18:54:12 GMT -6
I kind of went through this same thing recently. I didn't see a way to make it really work without the stress of always worrying about money. So, I am doing a day job and recording only people i believe in. I don't even charge them for the first song of a project and then only charge what they can afford. It's pretty hard to make money in music anymore. It always was, even back in the 80s when I was really going for it. Now, it seems impossible to me. No one has money for recording and everyone with a laptop thinks they are CLA. I can't compete with it so I chose not to. I'm still busy with music nearly every night and weekend, but the day job keeps the lights on.
|
|
|
Post by jmoose on Jul 30, 2023 21:27:35 GMT -6
Rates are also a hot topic. I thought about being a bit more progressive. Charging different amounts depending on the track count. I know you should really price your service to what you think you're worth, but it's a huge difference working with 20 tracks or 60+. You can do whatever ya want but charging by track count seems like an excellent opportunity to beat yourself to a pulp... Some of the "minimalist" stuff that comes through needs just as much, sometimes even more work then a 50+ track prog opus. Sure it's only 13 odd tracks of acoustic & vocals they say... What they don't say is those 13 tracks were all recorded with a 57 into a presonus POS and oh yeah, we clipped every track. Sorry. You can fix it..? Majority of work through here is mix for hire. Nobody cares or pays a premium for analog / hybrid setups. Primarily mix through a baby SSL desk & outboard because I enjoy it and feel it makes a difference in the final product. But the only people who tend to ask a bunch of questions about that are other engineer goobers... The other 98% say things like mix sounds good but vocal levels need a tweak.. or what's up with the guitar reverb? And if you don't want to starve you don't chase artists for work. Artists make one record every 3-4 years. My primary contacts are other industry types... other producers & so on.
|
|
|
Post by smashlord on Jul 30, 2023 21:38:07 GMT -6
I will also be able to mix completely analogue for special projects at a higher rate. As other's have mentioned, 99% of clients either don't know the difference or don't care. I've had clients assume that the analog is outdated and asked if I still use it, I've had others specifically ask that I mix ITB so they could have more flexibility with revisions, and no matter how much you explain you need feedback in a timely fashion because you are using analog, it never happens. I've had only one client in recent memory insist on a completely analog mix, but thats because they spent too much time on Reddit reading up on how they "should make a record" and thought they also needed a U67 and Neve on every source. In the end, when I told them how much it would cost to do that and the limitations with recall, ITB or hybrid quickly became acceptable. I debate everyday selling 1/2 of what I own and just putting it in an index fund, because it just collects dust most of the time.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jul 31, 2023 0:06:44 GMT -6
Definitely do not charge by the track.
I'm doing classical recording/mix/mastering for my full time job and let me tell you that 2-6 track projects can be an absolute bitch. Harder if anything. There is nowhere to hide in those situations and you will have to work harder often on simpler mixes.
When I do movie scores with like 30-120 tracks of audio. They are a breeze usually compared to some exposed 4 track acoustic or chamber music thing.
And while I'm not fully time freelancing thankfully(salary studio position if you can believe that still exists), if I was, I would be doing hourly to mix. I do day rates for recording. And project rates for Mastering. Although Im considering doing hourly on Mastering.
And I love analog, but in your situation, I'd be sticking to all digital except maybe something like a Silver Bullet on the bus. Which is what I do for most freelance projects. The less you have to recall the better. I have also made it a major point that just about everything in my analog work is on stepped switches or stepped pots so recall is faster. But the more gear you use, the more notes you have to take. It add up time wise in a hurry.
The only thing I use a lot of analog gear for is mastering. Where I'll do an all analog pass, the finish it ITB. And even that can be a bitch.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Jul 31, 2023 1:18:57 GMT -6
Lots of great advice above! Just wondering if you've also considered... 1) Teaching singing. Partly as you sing so well. 2) Voice Over. Including commercials etc. 3) Teaching your own "Recording School".* But no matter what... Hourly rules Chris *Hey maybe have them Interns Mix. Then go in just every once in a while to pick up the checks! I am kidding.
|
|
|
Post by christophert on Jul 31, 2023 1:41:31 GMT -6
I think the better model these days is a tracking and mixing studio. Although it is an expensive outlay. Often artists who track - end up with enough confidence to mix in the same facility. Mixing only business is fraught with competing with the laptop crew / or even the iPhone/iPad mixing crew. Soon to be mixing on Apple watches
|
|
|
Post by paulcheeba on Jul 31, 2023 1:55:46 GMT -6
When the best mixers in the world have to teach for a living and plug plugs, thereâs not much hope. Sorry to be so negative.
|
|
|
Post by crillemannen on Jul 31, 2023 6:39:57 GMT -6
Thanks for all the replies! To many to quote so I'll respond in a general matter.
I think one important part of being able to make a living out of music is to have several different business going at the same time. Then mixing and mastering can be a part of that business. I'm well aware of the current situation of people low balling mixers, I mean a guy at my day job thought 100$ was allot for a mix haha...
Touching on the topic of gear. I also do believe like many of you that customers don't care, but it can make you stand out a bit. At least buy you some credibility if that makes sense haha..
I guess you need to be creative in this day and age. I'm not interested in going back to grinding 60h+ weeks. But I like many of you here want to make something out of myself, use all experience you accumulated over the years.
Anyways let's keep it going, I think it's nice to talk about all of this in a therapeutic way đ¤Łđ
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jul 31, 2023 8:55:22 GMT -6
Doubt the "charge by the number of tracks" would fly. You'd just end up getting a minimum number of stems with badly mixed levels and effects and stuff baked in making your job harder or impossible. It's best just to charge by the mix or by the hour. If you're like me, you end up not using a lot of the extra tracks. Most of the time the artists add too many extra pieces trying to overcome their fear of being boring.
|
|
|
Post by paulcheeba on Jul 31, 2023 12:53:42 GMT -6
I often wondered about mastering and mixing guys but after years of recording and mixing attended sessions I totally understand avoiding bands.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Jul 31, 2023 14:11:14 GMT -6
The market is way over crowded, youâre either a known player or one of the millions of bedroom dreamers slashing rates. The hard part is finding clients willing to pay and even harder collecting. Youâre talking about entering a world where you will be competing with 16 year olds with a Mac.
Honestly the guys I know who are doing the most mixing at a live able rate are associated with tracking facilities. People come in thinking â hey letâs track here and we can mix it.â But they realize there is more to it than they think so â it was just easy to have the guy who tracked us mix it at home.â
Gear doesnât get you bookings, at least not enough to pay for itself other than a USB hub.
So good luck.
|
|
|
Post by jmoose on Jul 31, 2023 15:12:02 GMT -6
When the best mixers in the world have to teach for a living and plug plugs, thereâs not much hope. Sorry to be so negative. Nah that's not negative its just realistic. One of my friends, another guy who's been in the music game a long time... we've often wondered if someone like Andrew Scheps makes more money from mixing rockstar rekkids or talking about mixing rockstar rekkids on puremix. Seriously. That trip seems to be a whole microcosm unto itself... in that it seems most of the guys who'd sign up for something like that..? Puremix & plugin of the month collections? They're more then happy to cosplay Andrew Scheps or CLA in the privacy of their spare bedroom and would very likely never consider professional services in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by paulcheeba on Jul 31, 2023 15:17:15 GMT -6
It pays better to be a roadie in the current age than it does to own a million pound studio. They make a fortune but then again they are forced to take drugs and drink too much on their day off.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Jul 31, 2023 15:19:24 GMT -6
It pays better to be a roadie in the current age than it does to own a million pound studio. They make a fortune but then again they are forced to take drugs and drink too much on their day off. Hey have you ever lifted a 21in sub? Those things are heavy!đĽ¸
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Jul 31, 2023 15:20:11 GMT -6
What is expected nowadays: To suffer for the art, as the artist does, even though it's not your art To work for nothing since the artist does To expect the artist to critique your work, and receive your gratitude for it To do unlimited remixes and mix touchups until you earn your: $50 to maybe $75 per song.
You'll work for as much as $10 an hour! If you can do something that sounds that much better than what they or their friends can do, you can charge for it. . . . value added is where you can really get your pay. Adding tracks that they can't or don't quite have the experience to do.
And you'll be explaining the difference between mixing and mastering over and over and over again
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Jul 31, 2023 15:36:30 GMT -6
When the best mixers in the world have to teach for a living and plug plugs, thereâs not much hope. Sorry to be so negative. Nah that's not negative its just realistic. One of my friends, another guy who's been in the music game a long time... we've often wondered if someone like Andrew Scheps makes more money from mixing rockstar rekkids or talking about mixing rockstar rekkids on puremix. Seriously. That trip seems to be a whole microcosm unto itself... in that it seems most of the guys who'd sign up for something like that..? Puremix & plugin of the month collections? They're more then happy to cosplay Andrew Scheps or CLA in the privacy of their spare bedroom and would very likely never consider professional services in the first place. Iâm betting today there is easier, better money selling the dream than living it. Not that Iâm jaded, no not at all.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jul 31, 2023 15:42:33 GMT -6
The market is way over crowded, youâre either a known player or one of the millions of bedroom dreamers slashing rates. The hard part is finding clients willing to pay and even harder collecting. Youâre talking about entering a world where you will be competing with 16 year olds with a Mac. Honestly the guys I know who are doing the most mixing at a live able rate are associated with tracking facilities. People come in thinking â hey letâs track here and we can mix it.â But they realize there is more to it than they think so â it was just easy to have the guy who tracked us mix it at home.â Gear doesnât get you bookings, at least not enough to pay for itself other than a USB hub. So good luck. Iâve found much more satisfaction working with âbeginnersâ and vanity projects. I do production and mixing (and mastering if no budget for it) and the amount of gratitude and excitement is so much more rewarding than dealing with a dude that would slit your throat to get ahead. I canât count the number of times Iâve worked with âartistsâ only to have the well poisoned by other producers and mixers. 95% of the time, they have no ear or concept of what sounds good. They just know the 24 year old with the flat bill and tat sleeve told them they could do betterâŚAnd even when you have a new artist thatâs close to getting signed, you have about a 2% chance of them taking you along for the ride. I mean, I could front the money, own the masters, make them sign a fair dealâŚbut A) finding a good enough artist is pretty tough B) finding a good enough artist that will sign a paper is tough, C) finding a good enough artist that wonât get poached or passed over by a label because they want someone else producingâŚis rare. Anyway - always exceptions to the ruleâŚmaybe some have the chutzpah and patience yo suffer such shit - but I donât these days.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jul 31, 2023 15:45:13 GMT -6
Nah that's not negative its just realistic. One of my friends, another guy who's been in the music game a long time... we've often wondered if someone like Andrew Scheps makes more money from mixing rockstar rekkids or talking about mixing rockstar rekkids on puremix. Seriously. That trip seems to be a whole microcosm unto itself... in that it seems most of the guys who'd sign up for something like that..? Puremix & plugin of the month collections? They're more then happy to cosplay Andrew Scheps or CLA in the privacy of their spare bedroom and would very likely never consider professional services in the first place. Iâm betting today there is easier, better money selling the dream than living it. Not that Iâm jaded, no not at all. Ohhhh most definitely. The money is in selling the illusion that actually âmaking itâ isnât harder than making the NFL or winning a jackpot. I wonât do it though. I tell people up front that I will give them a radio ready product, but what they do with it is up to them.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jul 31, 2023 15:53:10 GMT -6
It pays better to be a roadie in the current age than it does to own a million pound studio. They make a fortune but then again they are forced to take drugs and drink too much on their day off. My daughter is going to be a senior in high school this year. She wants to be a nurse or PA, and is in an internship this summer and all through the school year working in a hospital. Some of those travel nurses are making $200k a year. You know, you could have - just spitballing - three No. 1 songs as a songwriter in Country (pop obviously pays more) and have what many would say a great career. My daughter could reach that payday in 10-15 yearsâŚor double or triple it in a career. As a client of mine said (he sold his energy business for miiiilllions) told me after he asked about a record label and I explained what the outlay would be: âholy shit - there are a LOT better ways to make moneyâŚâ
|
|