|
Post by nobtwiddler on Nov 21, 2021 11:50:39 GMT -6
I've heard great mixes done entirely "In the Box" and of course, broken out to a console, or summing mixer. But at least for me, it comes down to one thing.
And I feel, no one really directly compares the two. Never really hear of that on the forums.
If the same mix done "In the Box" is broken out, The Out of Box version always sounds better... At least to me.
It's the same mix, just run thru my hardware, instead of the Plugs, I try to match everything as best as I can.
Personally I don't really care why it sounds better...it just does.
My take.
|
|
|
Post by keymod on Nov 21, 2021 12:25:47 GMT -6
I've heard great mixes done entirely "In the Box" and of course, broken out to a console, or summing mixer. But at least for me, it comes down to one thing. And I feel, no one really directly compares the two. Never really hear of that on the forums. If the same mix done "In the Box" is broken out, The Out of Box version always sounds better... At least to me. It's the same mix, just run thru my hardware, instead of the Plugs, I try to match everything as best as I can. Personally I don't really care why it sounds better...it just does. My take. Yup.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Nov 21, 2021 16:19:48 GMT -6
I've heard great mixes done entirely "In the Box" and of course, broken out to a console, or summing mixer. But at least for me, it comes down to one thing. And I feel, no one really directly compares the two. Never really hear of that on the forums. If the same mix done "In the Box" is broken out, The Out of Box version always sounds better... At least to me. It's the same mix, just run thru my hardware, instead of the Plugs, I try to match everything as best as I can. Personally I don't really care why it sounds better...it just does. My take.
Mixing ITB you can learn a lot using an AB plug in on the 2B. You need additional harmonics with saturation tools. It's a fact to me and there is a great plus too, with Kelvin for example I shape the sound.
You can have everything ITB and more.
|
|
|
Post by ab101 on Nov 21, 2021 20:00:06 GMT -6
What if there were PCI-e cards or the like, with transformers, etc. in them? There could be repeatability and yet some out of the box flavor. Maybe this is the future. It seems that Wes Audio was heading in this direction with the Titan 500 series rack and 500 series units, but I believe that is USB operated. A PCI-e type arrangement could be more powerful, perhaps with a 500 series rack that connects to it. With so many going itb, it seems that hardware manufacturers need to think outside the box - pun intended. Just thinking out loud here! '
|
|
|
Post by Mister Chase on Nov 21, 2021 20:08:17 GMT -6
What if there were PCI-e cards or the like, with transformers, etc. in them? There could be repeatability and yet some out of the box flavor. Maybe this is the future. It seems that Wes Audio was heading in this direction with the Titan 500 series rack and 500 series units, but I believe that is USB operated. A PCI-e type arrangement could be more powerful, perhaps with a 500 series rack that connects to it. With so many going itb, it seems that hardware manufacturers need to think outside the box - pun intended. Just thinking out loud here! ' I mean, you are kind of describing the McDSP APB box. Hardware, but controlled via software. I have a Wes Audio Prometheus and its great, too.
Wouldn't mind living like that although when tracking I want knobs(Wes Audio has them not the McDSP) and shiz. Tracking is probably the main reason I'll stick with hardware and make more kits etc...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2021 20:17:57 GMT -6
I've heard great mixes done entirely "In the Box" and of course, broken out to a console, or summing mixer. But at least for me, it comes down to one thing. And I feel, no one really directly compares the two. Never really hear of that on the forums. If the same mix done "In the Box" is broken out, The Out of Box version always sounds better... At least to me. It's the same mix, just run thru my hardware, instead of the Plugs, I try to match everything as best as I can. Personally I don't really care why it sounds better...it just does. My take. That's exactly what I said, you're adding junk back into a very clean medium. Without a bit of additional distortion / harmonics etc. it can be extremely difficult to get a mix sounding wide, dimensional or loud.. Whether it be tracking boxes with a bit of colour, summing mixers or ITB summing consoles it's all there to achieve the same goal. However at this point IMV it isn't an ITB vs. OTB debate, it's one of general quality. Plugs IME are just as hit and miss as the clone HW market, I've had a few 2A HW clones and plugins alike that sound nothing like the originals (or variations of)..
|
|
|
Post by plinker on Nov 21, 2021 21:33:40 GMT -6
I've heard great mixes done entirely "In the Box" and of course, broken out to a console, or summing mixer. But at least for me, it comes down to one thing. And I feel, no one really directly compares the two. Never really hear of that on the forums. If the same mix done "In the Box" is broken out, The Out of Box version always sounds better... At least to me. It's the same mix, just run thru my hardware, instead of the Plugs, I try to match everything as best as I can. Personally I don't really care why it sounds better...it just does. My take. Good stuff!
Just for clarity, what processing/pathways does the "broken out" incorporate? Is it simple summing, or additional processing, saturation, etc??
If it's just summing, what is it being summed through?
Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by christophert on Nov 22, 2021 4:13:37 GMT -6
I have had way more than a decade comparing my ITB vs OTB mixes. OTB always is much better to my ears. Wider stereo image / more punchy and powerful and more separation. Tubes / inductor EQ's / vintage console modules / class A gear / Bricasti and spring reverbs / tape delays / passive mix busses + tube preamp make up gain. All items together blow ITB away. I'm lucky that I have slowly collected an amazing array of the best of the best over 3 decades. And I LOVE my plug-ins too If I was only doing electronic / sample based music, then maybe I would change my mind and find ITB better? The great exodus to ITB mixing allows me to differentiate what I do compared to others - so it is a good business move too. Keeps me working.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Nov 22, 2021 8:28:15 GMT -6
I have had way more than a decade comparing my ITB vs OTB mixes. OTB always is much better to my ears. Wider stereo image / more punchy and powerful and more separation. Tubes / inductor EQ's / vintage console modules / class A gear / Bricasti and spring reverbs / tape delays / passive mix busses + tube preamp make up gain. All items together blow ITB away. I'm lucky that I have slowly collected an amazing array of the best of the best over 3 decades. And I LOVE my plug-ins too If I was only doing electronic / sample based music, then maybe I would change my mind and find ITB better? The great exodus to ITB mixing allows me to differentiate what I do compared to others - so it is a good business move too. Keeps me working.
I don't get the point, I make the experience that I simply dial in what I miss. The rest is getting used to a different workflow, a different way to get the goal.
Was it a PITA to find out how I get the low spectrum sit right, mixing ITB. Yes it was, and sometimes still is, but I am getting used to it, and then it's light-years easier compared to the racks and the desk.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Nov 22, 2021 9:01:46 GMT -6
And I'm going to go back to.. I mixed almost entirely OTB for almost 15 years. I used the DAW and converters as a *tape deck* and very little plugins up until about 5 years ago. Since then I gravitated towards a more hybrid ITB/OTB approach and then within the last year, entirely ITB.
In that time I learned one important lesson, one that people already know but for some reason don't apply to this situation..
The people (including me) who hear that OTB sounds better than ITB are doing so because they are mostly OTB and have gotten used to getting the best out of it. Just switching to ITB and not learning how to optimize but still trying to compare is not a genuine reflection of how ITB sounds. You don't just buy a compressor and put it in the rack and expect to get the best sound out of it right away, right? You want to try to find the best (sweet spot) settings, right?
It's taken me a while to get things optimized and figure out what works best and I'm finding it's MUCH better than OTB in many ways.
And also learned one thing while doing all this.. Customers might be wow'd by some gear but ultimately they don't care as long as it sounds good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2021 9:17:07 GMT -6
And I'm going to go back to.. I mixed almost entirely OTB for almost 15 years. I used the DAW and converters as a *tape deck* and very little plugins up until about 5 years ago. Since then I gravitated towards a more hybrid ITB/OTB approach and then within the last year, entirely ITB. I'm just having deja vu.. I'm sure quite a few of us on this board had this exact same conversation a decade and a half ago on GS (and every month or so from thereon), some might have jumped sides but the conclusions are still the same. Plugs suck / are great, only OTB for me and you do you chief.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Nov 22, 2021 9:36:33 GMT -6
And I'm going to go back to.. I mixed almost entirely OTB for almost 15 years. I used the DAW and converters as a *tape deck* and very little plugins up until about 5 years ago. Since then I gravitated towards a more hybrid ITB/OTB approach and then within the last year, entirely ITB. I'm just having deja vu.. I'm sure quite a few of us on this board had this exact same conversation a decade and a half ago on GS (and every month or so from thereon), some might have jumped sides but the conclusions are still the same. Plugs suck / are great, only OTB for me and you do you chief. Definitely deja vu. But times have changed a bit since I last waded into these waters. If I had to guess, I'd say it's pretty rare at this point for someone to be 100% ITB or 100% OTB. It seems like, while there are some purists, most OTB people are actually OTB-Leaning Hybrid and most ITB are really just ITB-Leaning Hybrid especially when you factor tracking in (and excluding electronic music styles).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2021 10:17:52 GMT -6
I'm just having deja vu.. I'm sure quite a few of us on this board had this exact same conversation a decade and a half ago on GS (and every month or so from thereon), some might have jumped sides but the conclusions are still the same. Plugs suck / are great, only OTB for me and you do you chief. Definitely deja vu. But times have changed a bit since I last waded into these waters. If I had to guess, I'd say it's pretty rare at this point for someone to be 100% ITB or 100% OTB. It seems like, while there are some purists, most OTB people are actually OTB-Leaning Hybrid and most ITB are really just ITB-Leaning Hybrid especially when you factor tracking in (and excluding electronic music styles). I was being cheeky, this is an ageless argument where one debates the equivalence of grey poupon or dijon mustard with intense vigour. Whatever gets the best results for you.. Simple as that. Probably should have started with that statement but as I said before, hindsight's a derrière..
|
|
|
Post by Mister Chase on Nov 22, 2021 10:21:12 GMT -6
All very interesting. For a long time the idea must have been that while you could mix ITB, there was no way to make them sound the same. Mr Holmes says he just dials in now. So perhaps it is possible, just the methods to get there aren't as straightforward. ITB is a very open world and everyone has their own style with the gazillion plugs out there.
However, like I said before in some thread, I'm still waiting for the plugin that can do what a real tape machine does. That's not a knock against software necessarily, either. I am getting used to these new RND 542s and while they are nice, they still aren't much like my tape machine. I've yet to hear a plug or other hardware give the musicality and tucking in of that machine. Could I achieve it ITB? Maybe so. But maybe they aren't thinking that way with plugs yet. And maybe it would be difficult/more time consuming (until a template comes into play)
As a for instance, if you throw the UAD Ampex ATR-102 in plugin doctor, you'll see a dead accurate EQ curve of L/R. It appears as only one line. Perhaps that is indeed how that machine can be aligned, but I think IK did a good job with their true stereo and transport modeling. I feel like their tape plugs get a little closer to that "je ne sais quoi" because you can see there's a little movement involved as well as both channels not being dead nuts accurate curves to one another. Even my brand new RND 542s can't match *exactly*.
I think we are getting there but can you imagine having 10s of thousands of tools to choose from if you were opening a studio in the 70s? You had API, Neve, whatever consoles and machines there were. Then you worked with it. Finding that workflow and set of tools is just so much more open ended and not a given towards a specific result in the digital world...
|
|
|
Post by christophert on Nov 22, 2021 15:38:05 GMT -6
I have had way more than a decade comparing my ITB vs OTB mixes. OTB always is much better to my ears. Wider stereo image / more punchy and powerful and more separation. Tubes / inductor EQ's / vintage console modules / class A gear / Bricasti and spring reverbs / tape delays / passive mix busses + tube preamp make up gain. All items together blow ITB away. I'm lucky that I have slowly collected an amazing array of the best of the best over 3 decades. And I LOVE my plug-ins too If I was only doing electronic / sample based music, then maybe I would change my mind and find ITB better? The great exodus to ITB mixing allows me to differentiate what I do compared to others - so it is a good business move too. Keeps me working.
I don't get the point, I make the experience that I simply dial in what I miss. The rest is getting used to a different workflow, a different way to get the goal.
Was it a PITA to find out how I get the low spectrum sit right, mixing ITB. Yes it was, and sometimes still is, but I am getting used to it, and then it's light-years easier compared to the racks and the desk.
It really does depend on what desk you were using. Most desks stereo mix busses are very average chip based pathways. I would prefer mixing ITB than using a chip based mix bus (even an SSL).
|
|
|
Post by mjheck on Nov 22, 2021 15:49:21 GMT -6
I’ve probably posted this before, but two things I noticed specifically - using unlinked or dual mono where you can helps bridge the gap quite a bit.
Second, if I start OTB and try to match it ITB, I usually fail. If I start ITB and try to beat it with analog I usually fail.
There are just so many decisions piled on top of other decisions, it’s very hard to interrupt that flow with an abrupt turn.
MJH
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Nov 22, 2021 16:08:31 GMT -6
I’ve probably posted this before, but two things I noticed specifically - using unlinked or dual mono where you can helps bridge the gap quite a bit. Second, if I start OTB and try to match it ITB, I usually fail. If I start ITB and try to beat it with analog I usually fail. There are just so many decisions piled on top of other decisions, it’s very hard to interrupt that flow with an abrupt turn. MJH I just started another thread on dual mono vs stereo compression. I was mostly thinking about outboard but it sounds like you're saying you think that doing dual mono ITB widens the stereo field. Why would that be?
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Nov 22, 2021 16:17:08 GMT -6
I don't get the point, I make the experience that I simply dial in what I miss. The rest is getting used to a different workflow, a different way to get the goal.
Was it a PITA to find out how I get the low spectrum sit right, mixing ITB. Yes it was, and sometimes still is, but I am getting used to it, and then it's light-years easier compared to the racks and the desk.
It really does depend on what desk you were using. Most desks stereo mix busses are very average chip based pathways. I would prefer mixing ITB than using a chip based mix bus (even an SSL).
Today you can have everything ITB. The crap SSL sound, that NEVE or API thing.
It's just a matter of getting to know the plug ins better and better.
|
|
|
Post by jmoose on Nov 22, 2021 16:36:22 GMT -6
I think we are getting there but can you imagine having 10s of thousands of tools to choose from if you were opening a studio in the 70s? You had API, Neve, whatever consoles and machines there were. Then you worked with it. Finding that workflow and set of tools is just so much more open ended and not a given towards a specific result in the digital world... What's funny to me is that a lot of "modern new digital" is basically chasing 1970s analog. Really. How many plug companies say their "pultec/1176/tape/console whatever" is modeled after and sounds exactly like the real thing? Just one or two yeah..? They all do it. Sell the dream over & over again. But this time it'll be different! This new & improved formula has real sugar... I mean harmonics... How many people here don't... DO NOT have, as in never bought or used once some kinda "vintage reenactment" plug in? I do. And I use 'em. Even with the real stuff an arms reach away. At the same time, I don't have any desire to play dress up and repeat history just for the sake of it. Still too much new ground to be discovered.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Nov 22, 2021 16:58:32 GMT -6
It really does depend on what desk you were using. Most desks stereo mix busses are very average chip based pathways. I would prefer mixing ITB than using a chip based mix bus (even an SSL).
Today you can have everything ITB. The crap SSL sound, that NEVE or API thing.
It's just a matter of getting to know the plug ins better and better.
I'm sorry but this is not true. You an have an APPROXIMATION of everything ITB. And really, not even that. Not "everything". There are a lot of analog pieces I love that are not modeled as plugins. If you want to mix ITB - Go for it!! Don't call it an equal to analog. It's not. Just as analog is not an equal to digital. Use both for what they are best at and be happy. To prove your way is best when others disagree is not helpful. Use BOTH and get further faster. This thread is tedious..... I'm probably in a crappy mood, as I've got Covid and can spare no empathy right now. LOL Be safe all....
|
|
|
Post by Mister Chase on Nov 22, 2021 17:23:21 GMT -6
I think we are getting there but can you imagine having 10s of thousands of tools to choose from if you were opening a studio in the 70s? You had API, Neve, whatever consoles and machines there were. Then you worked with it. Finding that workflow and set of tools is just so much more open ended and not a given towards a specific result in the digital world... What's funny to me is that a lot of "modern new digital" is basically chasing 1970s analog. Really. How many plug companies say their "pultec/1176/tape/console whatever" is modeled after and sounds exactly like the real thing? Just one or two yeah..? They all do it. Sell the dream over & over again. But this time it'll be different! This new & improved formula has real sugar... I mean harmonics... How many people here don't... DO NOT have, as in never bought or used once some kinda "vintage reenactment" plug in? I do. And I use 'em. Even with the real stuff an arms reach away. At the same time, I don't have any desire to play dress up and repeat history just for the sake of it. Still too much new ground to be discovered. Sure. A lot of it seems to be focused on that point in history. They do indeed all sell the dream over and over. "MKIII version even closer to the hardware!"
etc.
I've got loads of them. Most of my plugs are analog gear based. Though my most used one is Fabfilter pro q3 lol.
Definitely no desire to repeat history for the sake of it... but for the sound of it? Idk... history makes a pretty good case.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Chase on Nov 22, 2021 17:23:41 GMT -6
Today you can have everything ITB. The crap SSL sound, that NEVE or API thing.
It's just a matter of getting to know the plug ins better and better.
I'm sorry but this is not true. You an have an APPROXIMATION of everything ITB. And really, not even that. Not "everything". There are a lot of analog pieces I love that are not modeled as plugins. If you want to mix ITB - Go for it!! Don't call it an equal to analog. It's not. Just as analog is not an equal to digital. Use both for what they are best at and be happy. To prove your way is best when others disagree is not helpful. Use BOTH and get further faster. This thread is tedious..... I'm probably in a crappy mood, as I've got Covid and can spare no empathy right now. LOL Be safe all.... Agree with this.
Also, feel better!
|
|
|
Post by mjheck on Nov 22, 2021 17:24:47 GMT -6
[Why would that be?[/quote]
Man, the why is above my knowledge base. It’s just something I noticed - probably did something on accident with the UAD 33609 or Manley Vari Mu. I did play around with two channels of analog preamps (not just compressors) and the effect was similar. I assume it is just the subtle differences of each side hitting a little differently and compressing harder or exciting different frequencies.
I’m sure one of the many dudes way smarter than me can express why or explain what idiot thing I did wrong to have that impression.
But if you have the ability to toggle between the two on something like a guitar bus give it a shot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2021 17:49:26 GMT -6
Today you can have everything ITB. The crap SSL sound, that NEVE or API thing.
It's just a matter of getting to know the plug ins better and better.
I'm sorry but this is not true. You an have an APPROXIMATION of everything ITB. And really, not even that. Not "everything". There are a lot of analog pieces I love that are not modeled as plugins. If you want to mix ITB - Go for it!! Don't call it an equal to analog. It's not. Just as analog is not an equal to digital. Use both for what they are best at and be happy. To prove your way is best when others disagree is not helpful. Use BOTH and get further faster. This thread is tedious..... I'm probably in a crappy mood, as I've got Covid and can spare no empathy right now. LOL Be safe all.... The best digital things are decidedly not emulations! The emulations are a joke compared to stuff like Presswerk, DC8C3, Kotelnikov, and Molot. They’re mostly horrible.
|
|
|
Post by nobtwiddler on Nov 22, 2021 18:54:47 GMT -6
"I'm sorry but this is not true. You an have an APPROXIMATION of everything ITB."
Couldn't have said it better, myself.
|
|