|
Post by raddistribution on Jan 17, 2019 12:47:33 GMT -6
Introducing the Heritage Audio SUCCESSOR!
Let your mixes succeed with the new Heritage Audio Successor Master Bus Compressor.
Why would you settle with sterile VCAs in your mix or instrument bus duties now that the Successor is available?
Traditionally bus compression has been taken care of by VCA style devices, based on ICs, which are wholly unrelated to the warmth, fatness and the character associated with discrete Class A technology, including chunky transformers and diode bridge-based gain reduction.
The Heritage Audio Successor brings all these and then more: A fully Carnhill transformer coupled input and output unit, the new Successor is a true stereo diode-bridge based bus compressor with advanced sidechain filtering and built in parallel processing capabilities, sharing the class A ´73 type output stage that Heritage Audio is famous for.
Based on legendary vintage diode bridge designs, it keeps the sonic character of such units, but the added features make it a new beast on its own and will make your mixes shine in modern production environments. Ultra fast attack and releases allow for larger than life drum bus compression sounds, while the complex sidechain filter lets you tailor your mix to extents not previously available. From FET like, all-buttons-in drum sounds (now in stereo!) to VCA style mix bus with added warmth and fatness only transformers can bring, the Heritage Audio Successor is here to stay hooked up in your bus and make your mixes shine through.
FEATURES: True Stereo operation on single controls with matched gain cells for extremely precise left/right tracking and nearly zero offset in between channels. Compression tracking works in so called Oxford mode (highest signal takes over compression opposed to summing left and right channels)
Carnhill transformer coupled balanced inputs and outputs for added character and vintage vibe.
´73 style class A output stages bring the desired ´73 sound to your mix or drum buses.
Diode-bridge based compression excels bringing 2nd order harmonic distortion characteristics and true vintage tone while eliminating nasty odd harmonic content.
Ultra-fast attack and release time options never found in vintage designs allows for far more flexible settings, including FET like sounds and volume maximizing without transient artifacts.
Complex sidechain filtering options elaborates over the already common high pass filters, introducing mid band peak type filters and high frequency compression, allowing bus correction not possible before.
Sidechain SEND and RETURN connections allow for external sidechain signals or further external processing of the internal one.
Blend control offers built in parallel compression without any external equipment.
Blend ON/OFF button allows for instant comparison in between WET and DRY signals.
Stepped controls for easy recall of settings.
Product Info: MPN: SUCCESSOR UPC: 750536937164 MAP: $1499
The SUCCESSOR will begin shipping at the end of Q1, and dealers are now accepting orders.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jan 17, 2019 14:16:08 GMT -6
Damn. This looks awesome
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 17, 2019 14:30:05 GMT -6
YES!!! Wet / Dry blend. SOMEone is listening!!!
Congrats Heritage. Looks awesome.
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Jan 17, 2019 14:30:26 GMT -6
OMG, my dreams are coming true...companies are finally giving us more 2254 style compressor options. First the Stam, now this? And hopefully some offerings from Audioscape and/or Warm I’m the near future would be awesome.
I just wish this was dual mono.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 17, 2019 14:35:07 GMT -6
I like that they took it "to a new level" beyond just "replicating" a 30 year old design that was designed to work with consoles and tape. Love that it's true stereo and not "linked" dual mono - so there is only one set of controls, and I like that they have the blend / mix, stepped pots, and I LOVE that it's 1 space instead of 2+. Forward and rearward thinking both. And I trust Heritage!! Glad I didn't jump on "the other one". I think this one suits me and my workflow better.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 17, 2019 14:36:29 GMT -6
PS - I also like that they gave it it's own name instead of relying on existing classic numbers to brand it.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jan 17, 2019 14:48:59 GMT -6
How many steps are in the threshold and gain switches?
|
|
|
Post by stormymondays on Jan 17, 2019 15:49:42 GMT -6
This looks awesome, and I’ll be able to demo it. I’m out of rack space though...
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Jan 17, 2019 16:00:44 GMT -6
PS - I also like that they gave it it's own name instead of relying on existing classic numbers to brand it. It’s really hard not to read this post and the one before it as just a negative dig at Stam... at the very least passive Aggressive. Whether you intended like that or not, perhaps consider that before posting. Cheers Wiz
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 15,133
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Jan 17, 2019 16:12:35 GMT -6
A clone’s a clone, what ever you call it? Personally, I like that relationship to be clear and close. I have the bla agb, supposed to be a 609 clone, but it doesn’t seem to sound much like a 609 to me.
It seems to have its own voice and I use it accordingly, but I hope the sa609 sounds like a 609.
So, is the new bla comp 1u as they are using the same board technique as the 73 pres or are transformers mounted are their sides or is it because of the true stereo pots and wiring ?
|
|
|
Post by dreamsambas on Jan 17, 2019 16:25:54 GMT -6
Looks great. Anyone know if this is more of a 33609 or a 2254 inspired comp? Heritage already has their take on the 2264.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,961
|
Post by ericn on Jan 17, 2019 16:51:12 GMT -6
PS - I also like that they gave it it's own name instead of relying on existing classic numbers to brand it. It’s really hard not to read this post and the one before it as just a negative dig at Stam... at the very least passive Aggressive. Whether you intended like that or not, perhaps consider that before posting. Cheers Wiz I didn’t see it as a Direct Stam dig, I saw it as a dig at just about every other clone builder including Heritage’s past products!
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 17, 2019 17:29:07 GMT -6
Looks great. Anyone know if this is more of a 33609 or a 2254 inspired comp? Heritage already has their take on the 2264. 33609 with SSL controls
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 17, 2019 17:42:43 GMT -6
PS - I also like that they gave it it's own name instead of relying on existing classic numbers to brand it. It’s really hard not to read this post and the one before it as just a negative dig at Stam... at the very least passive Aggressive. Whether you intended like that or not, perhaps consider that before posting. Cheers Wiz It's not pointed at Stam. It's pointed at any of a dozen clone manufacturers that label their gear 47, 87, 3a, 2a, 76, 73 and a dozen other numbers whether or not they are even close to the aforementioned classics. That's just so boring and unimaginative IMO. How is applauding their (Heritage's) forward thinking features a dig at Stam? How many 47's are out there that use a V14M or real M7? Not many. If any. How close are they? Well....closer than close to a complete joke depending on which one you choose, but they all say "47" don't they? So....I have no problem with my statement. Sorry if it offends. It wasn't meant to. It was a congrats to Heritage as I applaud their direction, not a dig to anyone else. We've got tons of old units, clones and clones of clones. How about some new stuff with a tip of the hat to the classics - with their own vibe. That's what would excite me. The "Successor" seems to be headed that direction.
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Jan 17, 2019 17:47:07 GMT -6
And I trust Heritage!! Glad I didn't jump on "the other one". This was absolutely a dig at Stam. At least own it when you do take a shot.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 17, 2019 17:48:46 GMT -6
And I trust Heritage!! Glad I didn't jump on "the other one". This was absolutely a dig at Stam. At least own it when you do take a shot. nope. That's just a fact. How is it a "dig" when I say (but you didn't quote) "I think this one suits me and my workflow better."? Maybe quote my whole post for context next time. The 609 looks to be amazing - and I was a gnat's hair from pulling the trigger. I'm sure those who purchased will be MORE than pleased. I have no doubts. Especially if they need dual mono operation as well as stereo. This one is just better for my applications. Nothing wrong about that, and nothing wrong with voicing my appreciation to it's features vs any others.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 17, 2019 18:21:19 GMT -6
Now that is tempting. Love the 10DCs, but this looks more flexible for stereo bus.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jan 17, 2019 18:38:56 GMT -6
It’s really hard not to read this post and the one before it as just a negative dig at Stam... at the very least passive Aggressive. Whether you intended like that or not, perhaps consider that before posting. Cheers Wiz It's not pointed at Stam. It's pointed at any of a dozen clone manufacturers that label their gear 47, 87, 3a, 2a, 76, 73 and a dozen other numbers whether or not they are even close to the aforementioned classics. That's just so boring and unimaginative IMO. How is applauding their (Heritage's) forward thinking features a dig at Stam? How many 47's are out there that use a V14M or real M7? Not many. If any. How close are they? Well....closer than close to a complete joke depending on which one you choose, but they all say "47" don't they? So....I have no problem with my statement. Sorry if it offends. It wasn't meant to. It was a congrats to Heritage as I applaud their direction, not a dig to anyone else. We've got tons of old units, clones and clones of clones. How about some new stuff with a tip of the hat to the classics - with their own vibe. That's what would excite me. The "Successor" seems to be headed that direction. The Successor. Very fitting name LOL I like this version myself. Im thinking along the same lines as you. The SA609 looked damn good. But this is cool too and would fit how I like to work better. Im sure they both sound very different and both very good!
|
|
|
Post by dreamsambas on Jan 17, 2019 22:29:30 GMT -6
Looks great. Anyone know if this is more of a 33609 or a 2254 inspired comp? Heritage already has their take on the 2264. 33609 with SSL controls Woah- nice!
|
|
|
Post by javamad on Jan 18, 2019 7:11:17 GMT -6
This was absolutely a dig at Stam. At least own it when you do take a shot. nope. That's just a fact. How is it a "dig" when I say (but you didn't quote) "I think this one suits me and my workflow better."? Maybe quote my whole post for context next time. The 609 looks to be amazing - and I was a gnat's hair from pulling the trigger. I'm sure those who purchased will be MORE than pleased. I have no doubts. Especially if they need dual mono operation as well as stereo. This one is just better for my applications. Nothing wrong about that, and nothing wrong with voicing my appreciation to it's features vs any others. Just to calm the waters a little I will say that I read DrBills statement and understood that he was glad he kept his funds and now has an option he likes even more. Anyways .., back to discussing gear
|
|
|
Post by stormymondays on Jan 18, 2019 7:55:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jan 18, 2019 10:41:13 GMT -6
nope. That's just a fact. How is it a "dig" when I say (but you didn't quote) "I think this one suits me and my workflow better."? Maybe quote my whole post for context next time. The 609 looks to be amazing - and I was a gnat's hair from pulling the trigger. I'm sure those who purchased will be MORE than pleased. I have no doubts. Especially if they need dual mono operation as well as stereo. This one is just better for my applications. Nothing wrong about that, and nothing wrong with voicing my appreciation to it's features vs any others. Just to calm the waters a little I will say that I read DrBills statement and understood that he was glad he kept his funds and now has an option he likes even more. Anyways .., back to discussing gear Yes. Exactly. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jan 18, 2019 11:01:06 GMT -6
damn the threshold isn't stepped.
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Jan 18, 2019 12:17:45 GMT -6
damn the threshold isn't stepped. Can you get a stepped version?
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jan 18, 2019 12:22:44 GMT -6
damn the threshold isn't stepped. Can you get a stepped version? Could modify possibly yourself. Depends on how its wired up. Shame as everything else is stepped.
|
|