|
|
Post by Randge on Feb 14, 2014 11:27:09 GMT -6
rtzaudio.com/PEQ1549.htmlI have a pair of these in Nashville to demo if anyone wants to. These are the transformered ones. My personal pair are transformerless and aren't leaving the rack! R
|
|
|
|
Post by noah shain on Feb 14, 2014 12:10:05 GMT -6
rtzaudio.com/PEQ1549.htmlI have a pair of these in Nashville to demo if anyone wants to. These are the transformered ones. My personal pair are transformerless and aren't leaving the rack! R So great looking! What opamp is in there? Also, I'm needing an EQ with filters where the hi pass has no shoulder bump. Just a roll off. Is there a bump on the shoulder of the hi pass? Beautiful looking module. Wish I was in Nashville! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2014 14:09:44 GMT -6
dead link?
|
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Feb 14, 2014 14:47:47 GMT -6
I have checked this on my studio computer, my ipad and my wifes Mac and the link works for all. Just copy and paste it if it isn't coming up I guess.
R
|
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Feb 14, 2014 14:49:11 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by jsteiger on Feb 14, 2014 16:56:52 GMT -6
Link works fine for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Feb 15, 2014 12:04:32 GMT -6
Noah,
I just realized that I didn't answer your question. There is no bump unless you want one by engaging the bottom filter and setting the q to do so. It really is a great eq and so useful in many instances. It is a great flattery eq if something already sounds great and can be surgical to get rid of the ugly, too.
R
|
|
|
|
Post by noah shain on Feb 15, 2014 19:48:21 GMT -6
Noah, I just realized that I didn't answer your question. There is no bump unless you want one by engaging the bottom filter and setting the q to do so. It really is a great eq and so useful in many instances. It is a great flattery eq if something already sounds great and can be surgical to get rid of the ugly, too. R Thanks Randge. Definitely on my short list for the 1608. Any chance a pair is gonna end up in LA any time? |
|
|
|
Post by grummy on Feb 15, 2014 20:49:14 GMT -6
I'm no where near L.A.
What's the deal between tranni vs non tranni?
Randge - You've heard both and prefer the tranniless?
Is that why they aren't leaving your rack?
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 15, 2014 20:56:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 15, 2014 21:01:13 GMT -6
JK you just damaged me. I'll never be able to consider the subject of transformers in the same way again. Ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 15, 2014 21:04:44 GMT -6
Let me just say - I was unprepared for what I saw when searching for a tranny pic. I'M the one that's damaged... OK - back on topic  |
|
|
|
Post by grummy on Feb 15, 2014 21:47:35 GMT -6
Hahahahaha
|
|
|
|
Post by mulmany on Feb 15, 2014 22:57:44 GMT -6
Looks cool. But got to say what's with the florescent green and red writing?
|
|
|
|
Post by joey808 on Feb 17, 2014 0:24:06 GMT -6
Any audio examples?
|
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Feb 17, 2014 0:52:07 GMT -6
Joey, send me a file you know well and I can sweep the bands and let you hear it.
R
|
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Feb 17, 2014 0:53:29 GMT -6
Grummy,
I have lots of old gear with lots of transformers already so I opted for the transformerless ones to keep my tracks cleaner. The difference is very subtle after trying both out.
R
|
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Feb 17, 2014 0:55:02 GMT -6
Noah,
I am sure if you were serious about a purchase that sending them out for a demo isn't out of the question. I am sure glad I have a pair.
R
|
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Oct 14, 2014 15:42:08 GMT -6
|
|
