|
Post by carymiller on May 11, 2015 11:15:26 GMT -6
Would a small group of people on this forum maybe want to design a summing mixer together?
Something simple that solves the issues of several designs which lack features that would make things optimal.
This would not be to create a mini console with EQ, more so to make a truly simple and elegant summing solution.
I am not as talented with a soldering iron as I'd like...but I understand topology and signal flow enough to talk brass tax....also I think a lot in terms of ease of use and ergonomics in a pro setting.
Something with FOUR MONO...and EIGHT to TWELVE STEREO channels would be best I think...for reasons worth discussing.
I just realized there's a lot of talking in the summing/console thread and in others...but a better more affordable solution might be worth talking about and actually designing.
|
|
|
Post by svart on May 11, 2015 11:20:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on May 11, 2015 14:41:10 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by wiz on May 11, 2015 17:13:32 GMT -6
There is a guy here in Oz.. Rob Squire at Proharmonic who makes custom summing/monitor switches/VU meter/Headphone amps... With the US dollar so strong against ours at the moment.. might be worth looking into. www.proharmonic.comRob is arguably the leading tech in Oz. cheers Wiz
|
|
|
Post by NoFilterChuck on May 11, 2015 17:53:33 GMT -6
also, there are a thousand and one summing mixer projects in progress or completed over at GroupDIY.com
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on May 11, 2015 18:29:33 GMT -6
If it is just for summing. I measured the ZED series by Allen and Heath a few yeras ago. I have my doubts that any DIY project can beat those specs for about 400$. Plus you have good EQs, and real 100 mm faders. Plus two send / returns for external HW fxs. The best of it all: The ZEDs sound good, and can handle tons of base - very clean and puncy. Its a budget console with specs which are near to big funitures of the 80s. It should be forbiden to build such a good qualty in China. I always wonder why none of the tecs is offering mods for those consols. They are easy to open modular designed.... how often I do wished solo buttons... or a few more routing options... www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct07/articles/allenandheathZED14.htm
|
|
|
Post by drbill on May 11, 2015 19:43:30 GMT -6
It seems simple from the outside, but experience with console manufacturers and design in the past leads me to believe that there's a lot more to it than meets the eye. It would no doubt become an all consuming commitment. My $.02.
|
|
|
Post by carymiller on May 11, 2015 20:04:55 GMT -6
It seems simple from the outside, but experience with console manufacturers and design in the past leads me to believe that there's a lot more to it than meets the eye. It would no doubt become an all consuming commitment. My $.02. I agree...I'm skeptical of what I want being "easy". In my experience it never is.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on May 12, 2015 0:16:14 GMT -6
This could be a grassroots project. Instead of you footing the bill for parts and R&D Cary, it could be something everyone got behind and pitched in on to make happen. In the end everyone would get be given a BOM which would include the PCB's. You could either build it, or have one of us who's into DIY heavily build it for you for a cost. If we were talking about a compressor, or a D/A etc. I wouldn't suggest this, but, we are talking about something that almost near everyone needs. Something like this could be funded quickly and it could also be done quickly if it were set up this way.
I have some ideas on a signal flow chart that I work on from time to time on what I think would be the perfect summing rig. It's not finished but it's nearly. If this were to be something like a grassroots effort everyone who chooses to participate could create their own signal flow charts, placing whatever you think would be the perfect summing rig and at the end we can take the best of the best, through polls and then come together to see if any users features could be combined with other users features. Then you'd have a final vote on say 3 options and go with the winner. At that point, money that's in the pot could be paid to someone we all approve and have them draw out the schematic and board design, unless there was a designer on the list that was willing to do the design at no cost to help the cause.
Everyone would have to understand going into it from the beginning that the final design could be costly in parts, or if you choose, labor. But, you would have that BOM and PCB's to slowly piece together your kit.
Just an idea.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on May 12, 2015 1:08:14 GMT -6
I've seen shootouts where people preferred digital summing, just saying.
But yeah, plenty of already existing schema. Not a whole lot of new data to be drummed up by reinventing the wheel, unless there's a particular obscure topology you're interested in doing.
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on May 12, 2015 2:37:07 GMT -6
If you're just thinking about passive summing then yes, there's tons of it, it's simple and can be done with a handful of resistors and wire. I know what I'm talking about is building a complete unit that features summing section but with an output section that works together with different stages to give the outputted program material the feeling of being mixing through a console, and a damn good console. There are some things that have not been done yet, some ideas that no one has put all together. It can be done, I'm with Cary on this, I'd love to see an all in one summing rig that made it possible to be hybrid and get that console feeling completely. it's all in the back end and creativity and quality components will get it there.
|
|
|
Post by keymod on May 12, 2015 4:46:43 GMT -6
Speck LiLo? That, with the automation/recall features of an SSL Sigma or Greiner Summation, would be my ultimate summing mixer.
|
|
|
Post by svart on May 12, 2015 7:28:41 GMT -6
So I'll add a few things.
All summing is passive at the point where the signals are mixed, the summing resistors.
Active summing is simply a passive summing network with gain afterwards.
You have a choice of voltage summing(non-inverting buffer) or current summing(inverting virtual earth), each has it's drawbacks.
Non-inverting buffer drawbacks: Poor isolation, adding/subtracting channels causes level changes, higher summing resistor noise, more channels added to the bus need more gain.
Inverting current summing: Good isolation, no level changes with addition and subtraction of channels but noise gain changes, less summing resistor noise, needs extremely good grounding for noise immunity, needs opamps capable of high currents.
|
|
|
Post by carymiller on May 12, 2015 8:56:52 GMT -6
This could be a grassroots project. Instead of you footing the bill for parts and R&D Cary, it could be something everyone got behind and pitched in on to make happen. In the end everyone would get be given a BOM which would include the PCB's. You could either build it, or have one of us who's into DIY heavily build it for you for a cost. If we were talking about a compressor, or a D/A etc. I wouldn't suggest this, but, we are talking about something that almost near everyone needs. Something like this could be funded quickly and it could also be done quickly if it were set up this way. I have some ideas on a signal flow chart that I work on from time to time on what I think would be the perfect summing rig. It's not finished but it's nearly. If this were to be something like a grassroots effort everyone who chooses to participate could create their own signal flow charts, placing whatever you think would be the perfect summing rig and at the end we can take the best of the best, through polls and then come together to see if any users features could be combined with other users features. Then you'd have a final vote on say 3 options and go with the winner. At that point, money that's in the pot could be paid to someone we all approve and have them draw out the schematic and board design, unless there was a designer on the list that was willing to do the design at no cost to help the cause. Everyone would have to understand going into it from the beginning that the final design could be costly in parts, or if you choose, labor. But, you would have that BOM and PCB's to slowly piece together your kit. Just an idea. I like this idea because we're designing something functional this way...but also something that in the end will result in the best repeatable workflow for a range of people. I'd get behind this.
|
|
|
Post by jimwilliams on May 12, 2015 9:46:59 GMT -6
With so many designs already out, seems like a re-inventing of the wheel. I like phase reverse, filters, EQ, routing, sends, a fader I can ride and, oh wait, all that extra stuff is called a console.
With quality used recording consoles selling for 5 cents on the dollar or less, a sum mixer project seems like a short loaded money pit with unpredictable results.
|
|
|
Post by carymiller on May 12, 2015 10:01:27 GMT -6
With so many designs already out, seems like a re-inventing of the wheel. I like phase reverse, filters, EQ, routing, sends, a fader I can ride and, oh wait, all that extra stuff is called a console. With quality used recording consoles selling for 5 cents on the dollar or less, a sum mixer project seems like a short loaded money pit with unpredictable results. EDIT (typing on a phone sorry!): Maintenance alone on vintage consoles can be a money pit. shipping, wiring, patch bays, wall panels for XLR inputs, etc. While I appreciate the candor, there are multiple posts on why I want something set and forget simple. if a DAW is going to handle faders, phase flip, and EQ on this equation, what I want is a close approximate in tone to mix through Jim. Something that effectively works like the bus section and final stereo out on a console. is this perfect or romantic, or ideal? No, but it would solve a lot of problems for fast turnaround mixes professionally for me.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,967
|
Post by ericn on May 12, 2015 11:02:03 GMT -6
With so many designs already out, seems like a re-inventing of the wheel. I like phase reverse, filters, EQ, routing, sends, a fader I can ride and, oh wait, all that extra stuff is called a console. With quality used recording consoles selling for 5 cents on the dollar or less, a sum mixer project seems like a short loaded money pit with unpredictable results. Hey Jim How many times have I said that a summing mixer is simply a Console stripped of some features that fit some designers Idea of how you should work? Every piece of gear can require maitance at some point. The fact is if you want a summing mixer that makes everybody happy you end up with a console, this why nobody has hit and out of the park home run with a summing system, the engineer has to adapt to the designers workflow .
|
|