ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Apr 20, 2015 16:39:02 GMT -6
Years ago I remember walking in after an somebody has done a complete recall of a mix to hear "He recalled the wrong song" 30 sec latter as tape is rolling "Yeah but it sounds fucking awesome!"
so it can work once in a blue moon!
|
|
|
Post by carymiller on Apr 20, 2015 18:40:06 GMT -6
YOU WRITE THE SONGS, WE ADD THE MAGIC !!!Just saw a FB ad for this and couldn't resist clicking... although I was thinking of keeping this as my new secret to a next level mix, I thought in the spirit of Tim Tebow getting another chance in the NFL I'd share with y'all. I present pre-mixed 'templates' for Pro Tools and Cubase! www.protools.studiomixpro.com/ a Warning though (as stated on the site) "Please verify sufficient wave size (input volume) of drum channels (BaseDrum...)" yes, Base is spelled like that. Viva the dumbing down! As much as I rely on template sessions of my own creation for speed and ease of use...the problems I have with this are threefold: A. You are talking about mixing without any creativity. I personally consider a great mix to essentially work like an instrument to be played by a pro. Without any sense of arrangement or improvisational skills to speak of, the act of creation is removed from the process entirely. Maybe it's better than where your ears and skills can take you on your own...but it will sound derivative and neutered to pro mixing engineers as people use the same templates without any imagination over and over. B. This doesn't involve reference monitoring your projects from the start, so jumping to the middle of you mix without understanding the audio'system balance, depth and stereo image means making substancial changes on your own becomes a lot harder to pull off. You won't really understand how the entirety of the mix interacts. C. Great mixing engineers have what I call a "fingerprint" or an overall sense of space and balance within the stereo spectrum. Regardless of the equipment available to them...they will guide things to resemble the asthetics they'really always chasing after in their minds. You simply can't find your own "fingerprint" this way. It takes years of "killing yourself to live" so to speak.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Apr 21, 2015 11:46:36 GMT -6
A lot of pros have templates, even though they don't realize it, nor call it that. We call it their "sound" and it consists of doing things in similar ways from song to song, band to band, based on subconscious repetition.
It may not be written down, or maybe it is. In the case of CLA/TLA, they do things in very precise ways from job to job. Channels are set up the same way, settings are recalled in similar ways, the same equipment is used over and over, etc.
It's silly that people are selling templates to folks that they don't know, but I also don't believe in the "fresh mixes for every band" marketing line because it implies that the engineer/mixer is NOT using subconscious memory to form the new mixes, which is psychologically impossible.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Apr 21, 2015 16:12:40 GMT -6
A lot of pros have templates, even though they don't realize it, nor call it that. We call it their "sound" and it consists of doing things in similar ways from song to song, band to band, based on subconscious repetition. It may not be written down, or maybe it is. In the case of CLA/TLA, they do things in very precise ways from job to job. Channels are set up the same way, settings are recalled in similar ways, the same equipment is used over and over, etc. It's silly that people are selling templates to folks that they don't know, but I also don't believe in the "fresh mixes for every band" marketing line because it implies that the engineer/mixer is NOT using subconscious memory to form the new mixes, which is psychologically impossible. Your missing a couple of important points. 1. These top pros have assistants / interns to gain stage and do housekeeping to make sure things fit within the template as well as instructions for those submitting tracks. 2. The guy who created the template is the guy mixing and has created this over time and through refinement. 3 The template is a starting point not a print of Defcato mix.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Apr 21, 2015 18:02:57 GMT -6
A lot of pros have templates, even though they don't realize it, nor call it that. We call it their "sound" and it consists of doing things in similar ways from song to song, band to band, based on subconscious repetition. It may not be written down, or maybe it is. In the case of CLA/TLA, they do things in very precise ways from job to job. Channels are set up the same way, settings are recalled in similar ways, the same equipment is used over and over, etc. I always assumed when I saw photos of CLA and other mixers' racks far away from the mix position that they had assistants to tweak compressors, EQ, delay settings etc. I am surprised their method is so scientific, but if it works for them....
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Apr 21, 2015 18:10:30 GMT -6
They are riding input levels to hit a certain spot on the outboard gear. That allows them to mix very fast and sadly, pretty formula. I don't follow that school at all. I am not in the business to see how fast I can mix a song. I am in it to see how good I can mix it.
R
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Apr 21, 2015 18:15:10 GMT -6
They are riding input levels to hit a certain spot on the outboard gear. That allows them to mix very fast and sadly, pretty formula. I don't follow that school at all. I am not in the business to see how fast I can mix a song. I am in it to see how good I can mix it. R Thanks for confirming that Randy. I agree that it's sad about how formulaic it is and the resulting sameness of sound from countless bands.
|
|
|
Post by carymiller on Apr 21, 2015 21:15:54 GMT -6
A lot of pros have templates, even though they don't realize it, nor call it that. We call it their "sound" and it consists of doing things in similar ways from song to song, band to band, based on subconscious repetition. It may not be written down, or maybe it is. In the case of CLA/TLA, they do things in very precise ways from job to job. Channels are set up the same way, settings are recalled in similar ways, the same equipment is used over and over, etc. It's silly that people are selling templates to folks that they don't know, but I also don't believe in the "fresh mixes for every band" marketing line because it implies that the engineer/mixer is NOT using subconscious memory to form the new mixes, which is psychologically impossible. I can talk about how I approach things and send someone a session template I would start with...but that doesn't mean they can get "my" sound. They don't know how to compensate for how their recording sounds to start against what I would key a mix to do generally by the end. Every engineer has their own sound/template/fingerprint...whatever you want to call it...but this...if it's helping you a bit that's one thing, but there's no way it's a cure-all. For starters even if you're all digital there's no guarantee you own the same plugins they do; and how good would a template which only uses stock plugins be, etc? Honestly I pull from the same bag of tricks I've been refining for nearly two decades all the time. I totally agree with your statement, it's impossible not to go with aesthetics that appeal to you. The bad implications here are that mixers are essentially inconsequential. Which just isn't true (and this is coming from a guy who helped develop an automatic mastering process.)
|
|
|
Post by levon on Apr 21, 2015 23:44:25 GMT -6
They are riding input levels to hit a certain spot on the outboard gear. That allows them to mix very fast and sadly, pretty formula. I don't follow that school at all. I am not in the business to see how fast I can mix a song. I am in it to see how good I can mix it. R You're spot on Randy, but these guys are paid per song, right? They're not in the business of seeing how fast they can mix, they're in the business of making as much money as possible. More songs per day, more money. Okay, they're good and the stuff sounds good on radio, but, as mentioned, it tends to get sterile and formulaic. Personally, I prefer raw and emotional mixes and I think, ideally, people who are mixing should somehow be involved in the creation (i.e. writing/arranging/tracking) of a song.
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Apr 21, 2015 23:47:59 GMT -6
I whole hearted-ly agree, Levon and that goes especially for the artists. So many stars these days come in and sing and leave the rest to the studio guys. Sad that they don't have the time or care to invest time at the studio on their own records. I have seen it a lot.
R
|
|
|
Post by levon on Apr 21, 2015 23:55:57 GMT -6
I whole hearted-ly agree, Levon and that goes especially for the artists. So many stars these days come in and sing and leave the rest to the studio guys. Sad that they don't have the time or care to invest time at the studio on their own records. I have seen it a lot. R These 'stars' are probably also mostly in the business of making money. If they would make more money selling toilet paper, they would just do that. It's sad. Unfortunately, the 'music industry' is full of non-musicians.
|
|
|
Post by carymiller on Apr 22, 2015 0:36:34 GMT -6
I whole hearted-ly agree, Levon and that goes especially for the artists. So many stars these days come in and sing and leave the rest to the studio guys. Sad that they don't have the time or care to invest time at the studio on their own records. I have seen it a lot. R These 'stars' are probably also mostly in the business of making money. If they would make more money selling toilet paper, they would just do that. It's sad. Unfortunately, the 'music industry' is full of non-musicians. I unfortunately have to agree with you there.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Apr 22, 2015 6:28:32 GMT -6
I whole hearted-ly agree, Levon and that goes especially for the artists. So many stars these days come in and sing and leave the rest to the studio guys. Sad that they don't have the time or care to invest time at the studio on their own records. I have seen it a lot. R These 'stars' are probably also mostly in the business of making money. If they would make more money selling toilet paper, they would just do that. It's sad. Unfortunately, the 'music industry' is full of non-musicians. It's no longer about being a famous singer, it's about being a famous celebrity who sings! We used love the artist for the art, now everybody wants to know everything about the artists life!
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Apr 22, 2015 11:08:10 GMT -6
Everybody but me, Eric. Couldn't care less about knowing anything about these new acts.
It use to not be that way for me. I looked forward to learning everything I could about artists I liked. Ones who moved me that is.
Seems like every great artist I liked had an interesting back story. These days, it's cookie cutter back story's. Heard one, heard em all.
No soul in popular music these days. All they want to do is drink and party. Well, who works a hard week to pay for the beer?? I want to hear about that guy.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Apr 22, 2015 11:45:17 GMT -6
Cowboy, I think those of us who grew up in an era when we couldn't know what our faveorite artist was having for dinner, or their favorite shoe, wanted to know more of substance than knowing everything they want us to know. The other day I was discussing John Hiatts Have a Little Faith IN Me, and the back story of his addiction and what the song is about this is good , knowing someone's every detail is a bit much , the public has to realize that they wouldn't want everything out their and that most of what they see is controlled and they don't know or understand the motivation .
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Apr 22, 2015 12:18:31 GMT -6
That's a very good point. One I hadn't really thought of. There used to be a mystique about an artist almost as if they were all above us. Of coarse those that know famous people know that's not true but now with Twitter, everybody knows that's not true. All the icons are gone and we are left with mere mortals.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Apr 22, 2015 14:54:51 GMT -6
At least some of us mere mortals still play and sing with all the soul we have :-)
Cary makes an interesting point I can elaborate on. There were two mixes of the Psychedelic Furs song "Until She Comes". One by Steven Street, one by Hugh Padgham. I have both. When you listen to the Street mix, there's of course nothing "wrong" with it, but the drums are too prominent among other things. Then you listen to Padgham's mix, and it's absolute magic, you're drawn into a world of imagination, where you feel you've been that guy waiting for 'her", and you sense the type of woman being sung about, how she looks, how she moves and pulls at your heart, and so many other things. And yet, they're THE SAME TRACKS ! In comparison, Steven Street's mix was no better, in fact worse than any mix I might do, but oh my, Padgham's was in another universe altogether.
I only hope that one day I can work with someone like that who can bring out the magic and mystery in my music and help make it happen, by being a co-creater of great art. I've been helped many times by our good friend cowboycoalminer, and it's been one of the happiest circumstances of all my musical experiences. So, no matter how helpful the templates are, (and I think they can be really helpful), the subtle decisions being made by a great engineer or producer are in fact, indispensable.
In the end, music has been a huge part of making us who we are, we care, put our love and sweat into it, and we want to share our efforts with other people, to return the energy we've been blessed with by so many great artists. Bad business can of course derail an artist, but I for one hope to make enough money to pursue my dream of making better and better music, until I make my masterpiece. I don't need much, just a little security and some comfortable surroundings, and oh yeah, my own place to record, and some good friends to play with.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Apr 22, 2015 15:07:42 GMT -6
That's a very good point. One I hadn't really thought of. There used to be a mystique about an artist almost as if they were all above us. Of coarse those that know famous people know that's not true but now with Twitter, everybody knows that's not true. All the icons are gone and we are left with mere mortals. Glen Frey talked about this in the Eagles Documentary, when they got to their "Desperado" album and the outlaw theme. He said one of the parallels between rock bands back then and outlaws was that you heard about them before you actually saw them. So, there was a mystique created. Yeah, you may have seen the album cover and a poster of their upcoming show, but that was it until you actually were in the auditorium with them and saw them face to face. With video and then Autotune, the mystique left the building. Anybody can sing, and its usually accompanied by a video barrage. So, looks and celebrity are what it's about now that there is no mystique left up to imagination. It's fabricated before they come to the building, if they come at all. My town never gets concerts anymore and there used to be 30 a year.
|
|
|
Post by brucerothwell on Apr 23, 2015 12:37:58 GMT -6
I use templates in Pro Tools -- but not as a magic bullet -- only for a starting point, especially for songs that are for the same album.
|
|