|
Post by tonycamphd on Feb 2, 2015 12:14:37 GMT -6
Pats vs Colts if the deflated balls are responsible for 6 touchdowns, that would account for 36 points, the colts could add that to their sole 7 points equaling 43 total points, netting them a loss with a final score of 45-43. 18 of the winning 45 points were scored on running plays, rendering the whole thing moot imo, the pats crushed the colts...period. That said, the patriots would have lost to the Eagles in the 2005 SB if they weren't actually cheating, they won by 3 points, and YES they were stealing play calls. Pats=cheaters, Brady+Belichick= the best of all time. If yesterdays Pats team went up against the best 49er's team or Steelers team back in the day, those teams would get crushed by the modern day sophistication alone IMO.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Feb 2, 2015 14:32:59 GMT -6
Is cheating only TECHNICALLY cheating if you would have lost? Or is cheating not cheating if you would have won anyway? I dunno. Just a rhetorical question I'd love answered.... heh heh
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Feb 2, 2015 15:13:08 GMT -6
Is cheating only TECHNICALLY cheating if you would have lost? Or is cheating not cheating if you would have won anyway? I dunno. Just a rhetorical question I'd love answered.... heh heh Cheating is cheating in any respect but who cheated?
|
|