|
Post by kcatthedog on Jan 2, 2015 14:03:23 GMT -6
Here is a simple comparative comment to questions that i posted.
Converter semantics ?
I realize that we are talk about different boxes (Rm, Burl, Svarts, etc.) but Svart is using arguably the best converters, no in line transformers, so I thought the point was the best resolution AD/DA with no colouring added, ( but you can add that with other devices , if desired) ?
plus very competitive prices, high part/design/build/presentation quality and delivery assurance ?
or have I misunderstood ?
answer by svart:
"The RM devices use the same converters, not much difference there. I'm using opamps and other things as stock parts that RM charges as upgrades. I'm also using a clock source for the ADC that's likely to be extreme overkill for the application, but it'll never be accused of being sub-par.
Otherwise, there are no capacitors in series with my signal path. There are provisions for them though. ?
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Jan 2, 2015 18:07:10 GMT -6
I am considering acquiring a mastering-grade 2x2 AD/DA. Been looking at things like Metric Halo ULN-2, Lynx Hilo, the Ross Martin stuff, etc. - What is latest on this piece?
- When will it ship?
- What does it look like?
- Paypal payment?
- Paypal payment?
- Who is svart, and why should I spend my money with him?
Thank you! welcome to the forum man, svart(chris) does electronic engineering work for a living, designing gear with bandwidths and complexity that far exceeds anything an audio converter does, so these kinds of converters are actually below his pay grade from what i understand, there is no doubt they will be everything we'd expect sound wise as compared to the Ross Martin superbeast stuff, it's got top of the line single op amps and power supply's per card, and the best converter chips available paired and used in single channel implementation, the spec sheet will read as good as the best stuff out there bar none. My confident guess is the workmanship and elegance of layout and case will be about as good as it gets.
|
|
|
Post by jimwilliams on Jan 3, 2015 10:56:43 GMT -6
The PCM1794 DAC's can be direct coupled. The PCM4222 has a 2.5 volt bias voltage present at the inputs. Provisions for quality blocking caps should be fitted.
I run my PCM4222EVM without blocking caps. There is 2.5 volts bias present as the PCM4222 is a single ended powered device needing a 2.5 volt bias to set the zero cross point. The feed from my console also using direct coupled ADA4898-2 opamps can take it well, there is sufficent headroom as the converters are set to clip at +20 dbu. If one connects a transformer coupled device, the 2.5 volt bias will charge the coils and reduce low frequency headroom.
A low impedance electrolytic blocking cap like a Panasonic FR series paralleled with a quality film cap, WIMA FKP-2 or 3, or the exotics will lessen the sonic losses when the blocking caps are needed. A computer jumper could be fitted so the end user can bypass the caps themselves without using a soldering iron or cutting traces.
|
|
|
Post by joey808 on Jan 4, 2015 11:57:08 GMT -6
Prob in the for ADC, how do you get on the list?
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Jan 4, 2015 11:57:31 GMT -6
Hey svart, any idea how long until I can get my hands onto the ad/da pair?
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 4, 2015 12:33:03 GMT -6
Hey svart, any idea how long until I can get my hands onto the ad/da pair? Not a hard date, but maybe 6-8 weeks from right now barring significant issues and day job requirements. I have the ADC boards coming next week at some point. I need to see the quality of the pcb and then I order enough parts for 10 boards. I have about 75% of the DAC board layout done. Since I learned a bunch about placement and fitment issues on the ADC board prototypes, I will likely go straight to a production quantity with these after going through my checklist of issues. It takes about two weeks to get the boards once ordered. I made a bunch of progress on the chassis planning. I need to start drawing the design in CAD. I still have to decide whether to have the chassis made by someone else or if I can take on making chassis. I have a person looking into doing silkscreening for these on the chance that I take on the chassis work. I also need to finish up the code. The majority of it is working, but I have some issues with getting the setting arrays working. This is simply a learning curve thing and I should be able to get through it pretty quickly I think. Also working up a plan for automated testing of units. Since RM seems to have a large amount of units failing or not working when delivered, I'm going to implement a standard "burn in" and final production test so that the units are turned on and run for a couple days and then tested to make sure they are still working. I think that's about it for now.
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Jan 4, 2015 13:07:04 GMT -6
Any way to have 2 DAC cards and an AD card in 1 chassis? That would be ideal for analog mastering.
Svart DAC to Hardware Hardware to Svart ADC Svart DAC to monitors.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 4, 2015 13:20:53 GMT -6
Any way to have 2 DAC cards and an AD card in 1 chassis? That would be ideal for analog mastering. Svart DAC to Hardware Hardware to Svart ADC Svart DAC to monitors. Unfortunately no. The boards are too wide to fit 3 wide in a 1u chassis, And since the scope of the design was only a stereo ad/da, i don't have extra provisions for chaining them internally. I could probably do a 2u with 4 boards acting as two separate systems, but the issue there is that SPDIF/AES is only stereo. You'd need separate i/o for the two systems. Maybe someone makes a 4 channel interface, i dunno.
|
|
|
Post by joey808 on Jan 4, 2015 13:31:05 GMT -6
Prob in the for ADC, how do you get on the list? ?
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 4, 2015 13:52:25 GMT -6
Prob in the for ADC, how do you get on the list? ? You did by posting in this thread. The first batches will be smaller since I'm fronting the design and build costs out of my pocket. After the first couple batches of ten, I should have cash enough to buil much larger batches and keep stock on hand so there will be no more lists.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 4, 2015 13:55:44 GMT -6
This is the list. Just confirm you want one here. svart I want a DAC too.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 4, 2015 14:11:31 GMT -6
I am considering acquiring a mastering-grade 2x2 AD/DA. Been looking at things like Metric Halo ULN-2, Lynx Hilo, the Ross Martin stuff, etc. - What is latest on this piece?
- When will it ship?
- What does it look like?
- Paypal payment?
- Paypal payment?
- Who is svart, and why should I spend my money with him?
Thank you! I think most of this has been answered in earlier posts and by the helpful folks on the forum. However, i do want to clarify something. None of those converters you listed are "mastering quality". If you want true mastering quality, you have to get a Weiss, Lavry, Forssell ,etc level converter which are designed for that specific purpose in mind. Anything else is just marketing speak. The "mastering" quality description of the ICs i am using was added by a user describing their purchase. It is not one I added to my product and i aim to keep expectations grounded in reality. I'm designing a solid converter using chips and parts that have been chosen by lots of other people as their favorites for many reasons. I have a background in designing cost effective solutions that work as intended and should last a long time. I also believe this design will perform as good or better than many other converter systems that cost more money, and I am designing these with that belief driving my decisions. I will leave the marketing terms like "mastering quality" to others to use if they decide my product exceeds their expectations.
|
|
|
Post by joey808 on Jan 4, 2015 14:19:25 GMT -6
Thanks Svart, Ill take a ADC.
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Jan 4, 2015 14:24:23 GMT -6
I am considering acquiring a mastering-grade 2x2 AD/DA. Been looking at things like Metric Halo ULN-2, Lynx Hilo, the Ross Martin stuff, etc. - What is latest on this piece?
- When will it ship?
- What does it look like?
- Paypal payment?
- Paypal payment?
- Who is svart, and why should I spend my money with him?
Thank you! I think most of this has been answered in earlier posts and by the helpful folks on the forum. However, i do want to clarify something. None of those converters you listed are "mastering quality". If you want true mastering quality, you have to get a Weiss, Lavry, Forssell ,etc level converter which are designed for that specific purpose in mind. Anything else is just marketing speak. The "mastering" quality description of the ICs i am using was added by a user describing their purchase. It is not one I added to my product and i aim to keep expectations grounded in reality. I'm designing a solid converter using chips and parts that have been chosen by lots of other people as their favorites for many reasons. I have a background in designing cost effective solutions that work as intended and should last a long time. I also believe this design will perform as good or better than many other converter systems that cost more money, and I am designing these with that belief driving my decisions. I will leave the marketing terms like "mastering quality" to others to use if they decide my product exceeds their expectations. What makes the "Weiss, Lavry, Forssell" mastering grade while this isn't? Just curious what's in their special sauce.
|
|
|
Post by LesC on Jan 4, 2015 15:11:56 GMT -6
Any way to have 2 DAC cards and an AD card in 1 chassis? That would be ideal for analog mastering. Svart DAC to Hardware Hardware to Svart ADC Svart DAC to monitors. Unfortunately no. The boards are too wide to fit 3 wide in a 1u chassis, And since the scope of the design was only a stereo ad/da, i don't have extra provisions for chaining them internally. I could probably do a 2u with 4 boards acting as two separate systems, but the issue there is that SPDIF/AES is only stereo. You'd need separate i/o for the two systems. Maybe someone makes a 4 channel interface, i dunno. This is a perfect situation for the separate ADAT interface that was mentioned previously. I'm in for one AD/DA for sure, but I would get at least one more if there was a box available to interface up to four of your boxes through an ADAT optical connection. Up to 96k would be sufficient. The only multiple AES3 and/or SPDIF-to-ADAT boxes I can find have either been out of production for several years or are incredibly expensive and do a lot more than the ADAT conversion, such as the RME ADI-4 DD or the ADI-192 DD. Ideally I'd like to keep using my RME UFX, with 2 or 3 of svart's ad/da's and the Burl ADC connected via ADAT. I really like TotalMixFX and the RME drivers and I like the UFX's instrument input for recording an ultra-clean direct guitar input for reamping with the Kemper. My other alternative would be to buy a scaled down version of the amazing system that tonycambell is getting, maybe get a Lynx AES16e or an RME HDSPe AES or some other PCI Express card providing 16 channels of digital I/O. But certainly my preference would be to keep using the UFX as the interface.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 4, 2015 21:58:55 GMT -6
I think most of this has been answered in earlier posts and by the helpful folks on the forum. However, i do want to clarify something. None of those converters you listed are "mastering quality". If you want true mastering quality, you have to get a Weiss, Lavry, Forssell ,etc level converter which are designed for that specific purpose in mind. Anything else is just marketing speak. The "mastering" quality description of the ICs i am using was added by a user describing their purchase. It is not one I added to my product and i aim to keep expectations grounded in reality. I'm designing a solid converter using chips and parts that have been chosen by lots of other people as their favorites for many reasons. I have a background in designing cost effective solutions that work as intended and should last a long time. I also believe this design will perform as good or better than many other converter systems that cost more money, and I am designing these with that belief driving my decisions. I will leave the marketing terms like "mastering quality" to others to use if they decide my product exceeds their expectations. What makes the "Weiss, Lavry, Forssell" mastering grade while this isn't? Just curious what's in their special sauce. At least in my mind, it's the mindset behind the design. Those are specifically designed with that in mind. As far as the designs themselves are concerned, they typically spare no expense on anything. My design attempts to make as best a compromise as possible between price and performance. Those guys do things like fully discrete audio and power paths, discrete single bit-by-bit conversion, etc. Oven compensated super clocking, etc. There is absolutely a reason they cost so much, and why the top mastering engineers use them and not those other, cheaper, boxes. Whether or not a mastering engineer ends up using my box is not a design-driving concern for me. If they do, I'll be glad for it, but I'm not going to pretend my design is anywhere as awesome as a Lavry gold. As an engineer I'd be happy to even be mentioned in the same sentence when being compared to someone like Lavry or Weiss though. Anyway, I'm not going to lie. I'm not doing a whole lot of R&D for this at all. I'm essentially taking chips and making them work together. I'm not inventing my own discrete single-bit converter.
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Jan 5, 2015 2:55:17 GMT -6
Hey svartIf I order just the AD.. can the DA be dropped in later? or best to get all at once? cheers Wiz
|
|
|
Post by category5 on Jan 5, 2015 8:31:04 GMT -6
All you need is a format converter like the old Alesis AI4 to get 4 stereo aes/spdif boxes to interface light pipe for 8 I/o of these. You can even combine with other boxes for versatility.
The Lynx aurora can function this way as well, piping any combination of up to 4 stereo I/o into a single light pipe.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 5, 2015 9:48:46 GMT -6
Hey svartIf I order just the AD.. can the DA be dropped in later? or best to get all at once? cheers Wiz Honestly things are coming together faster than I expected, so the DAC board might be available at the time of launch, which would be a better option as far as I'm concerned. I designed it to be pretty easy to install, but the fewer instances of people installing their own boards, the fewer possibilities for people sending these back for service..
|
|
|
Post by LesC on Jan 5, 2015 10:31:26 GMT -6
All you need is a format converter like the old Alesis AI4 to get 4 stereo aes/spdif boxes to interface light pipe for 8 I/o of these. You can even combine with other boxes for versatility. The Lynx aurora can function this way as well, piping any combination of up to 4 stereo I/o into a single light pipe. Yes, all I need is a format converter, why doesn't anybody make a simple one like the Alesis AI4? I don't particularly want to buy a box that hasn't been in production for so long. Judging by the number of comments on the other site, I think there is quite a market for an AI4-type box, and absolutely no competition being manufactured today that I can find, with the exception of the very expensive RME products.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 5, 2015 10:39:53 GMT -6
All you need is a format converter like the old Alesis AI4 to get 4 stereo aes/spdif boxes to interface light pipe for 8 I/o of these. You can even combine with other boxes for versatility. The Lynx aurora can function this way as well, piping any combination of up to 4 stereo I/o into a single light pipe. Yes, all I need is a format converter, why doesn't anybody make a simple one like the Alesis AI4? I don't particularly want to buy a box that hasn't been in production for so long. Judging by the number of comments on the other site, I think there is quite a market for an AI4-type box, and absolutely no competition being manufactured today that I can find, with the exception of the very expensive RME products. I'm pretty convinced this needs to be the next product I put out. On paper it seems to be pretty easy to implement as long as the ADAT chips are available to purchase. Since it's a proprietary format, they do not give out enough information so that someone could implement it in software. You essentially have to buy the chips which gives you the license to use ADAT format. I have some older Wavefront ADAT chips laying around. Once the ADC/DAC build starts to wind down, I'll see if I can wire a prototype up and test it out.
|
|
|
Post by jfoc on Jan 5, 2015 10:57:57 GMT -6
You can pick up old RME products for a song. I got a 1st gen multiface w/PCI card for 225 of evilbay
|
|
|
Post by LesC on Jan 5, 2015 11:22:45 GMT -6
Yes, all I need is a format converter, why doesn't anybody make a simple one like the Alesis AI4? I don't particularly want to buy a box that hasn't been in production for so long. Judging by the number of comments on the other site, I think there is quite a market for an AI4-type box, and absolutely no competition being manufactured today that I can find, with the exception of the very expensive RME products. I'm pretty convinced this needs to be the next product I put out. On paper it seems to be pretty easy to implement as long as the ADAT chips are available to purchase. Since it's a proprietary format, they do not give out enough information so that someone could implement it in software. You essentially have to buy the chips which gives you the license to use ADAT format. I have some older Wavefront ADAT chips laying around. Once the ADC/DAC build starts to wind down, I'll see if I can wire a prototype up and test it out. Wow, I'm so happy to hear this! 4 digital in-out up to 96k (AES/EBU and/or SPDIF coax and/or SPDIF toslink or some combination), whatever you can make fit. I've been looking for a box like this for years.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jan 5, 2015 11:58:29 GMT -6
I'm pretty convinced this needs to be the next product I put out. On paper it seems to be pretty easy to implement as long as the ADAT chips are available to purchase. Since it's a proprietary format, they do not give out enough information so that someone could implement it in software. You essentially have to buy the chips which gives you the license to use ADAT format. I have some older Wavefront ADAT chips laying around. Once the ADC/DAC build starts to wind down, I'll see if I can wire a prototype up and test it out. Wow, I'm so happy to hear this! 4 digital in-out up to 96k (AES/EBU and/or SPDIF coax and/or SPDIF toslink or some combination), whatever you can make fit. I've been looking for a box like this for years. It would probably be AES/SPDIF in/out and ADAT in/out for sure, and I could probably look into pulling off the WC somewhere in there and have WC out for those who want it. Maybe I could add other features too. It's a little early to say, but I'll think about it.
|
|
|
Post by lpedrum on Jan 5, 2015 12:33:28 GMT -6
I'm interested/curious about the ADC but not having a lot of knowledge when it comes to converters I need some answers:
1. I own a Symphony 8x8. Would I be able to connect this ADC via the SPDIF on the Symphony? 2. Will the ADC have WC? would I be able to slave the ADC to the Symphony clock? 3. Would this setup create any problems monitoring through Maestro? 4. If I eventually added the DAC would that give me two additional outputs for hardware insert mixing?
Obviously these questions would be best answered by someone who knows the Symphony well. Apogee suggested that I buy a used Rosetta 200, but perhaps this ADC would be an even better and cheaper choice. For me it all depends on if it would work well with the Symphony. Thanks much for any help to these questions!
|
|