|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 19, 2014 16:18:03 GMT -6
Not really sure I know of one...
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Oct 19, 2014 16:34:24 GMT -6
Sure--GreatRiver Me1NV. DanK actually walked me through how to wire up some caps in the insert jack to work as a HPF because there was such low end extension and girth everything was huge....other "neve clones" I've used did NOT have that quality. Even when you filtered it, down to the filter is was SO "huge" and solid that you could filter it at 150hz or something and still have "lots of lows". Ultimately, I'd love to have kept it, but it NEEDED the matching EQ. I would love to have that channel, but the EQ price was too steep....and I felt like a preamp I NEEDED to EQ all the time wasn't really right one for me. What on earth is lacking low end for you? I want a preamp that starts gently rolling everything at 240hz....
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on Oct 19, 2014 16:41:59 GMT -6
I've been through this from Fearn to Neve to UA. At the end of it all I found the easiest way to get more bottom end was through high quality mics and position.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Oct 19, 2014 16:46:38 GMT -6
To my ear the Lola sounds kind of like that in examples, I've never owned one though.
My SCA N72 is the bottomiest preamp of my stuff, much more than the API 312 type.
I remember the 3124+ having a pretty big bottom, too. (or 512c).
a tape simulation plugin is a good shortcut to this kind of sound, too, or certain compressors. I've just used Kramer Master Tape to good effect.
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Oct 19, 2014 17:56:33 GMT -6
I must say, I spend all my life wishing my preamps had a HPF that went up as far as 300Hz (depending on the dB per octave)
most of mine a really quite flat down to 20HZ to have more bottom would require it to have a rise in its response which I probably wouldn't want.
Is there a particular instrument you want this for John? My first thought is patching a pulteq in front of it, it can do the big bottom thing with the pultec trick of cut and boost at same frequency...I had a 500 series JLM PEQ500 that did that well and had more frequency points than you could poke a stick at.
cheers
Wiz
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 19, 2014 19:10:25 GMT -6
im looking into a kickdrum pre, the api style isn't beef enough for me there, but only there. I may just build a single Dons classics NV73, or a pair of lola's, but i need to hear winetree 's first!
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Oct 19, 2014 19:32:13 GMT -6
Well, there's always the Vintech X73i with the built-in EQ. It's got plenty of nice round bottom to begin with and the EQ is very very musical especially in the high and low bands.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Oct 19, 2014 21:37:30 GMT -6
1073/1084 and appropriately designed clones. HUUGE bottom.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 20, 2014 7:38:27 GMT -6
I'm always HPFiltering on everything. The hardest time I have is getting lows tightened up. To answer the question directly, I'd vote for Neve anything for a big bottom, just push them a little.
|
|
|
Post by jimwilliams on Oct 20, 2014 8:48:22 GMT -6
Even if a preamp/audio device rolls off at 20 hz, you will have phase shift that increases with lowered frequency. It will start the phase shift at 200 hz. This creates sloppy bass, that is a bit tough to tighten up.
If the roll off points are set to 2 hz, the phase shift kicks in at 20 hz, not audible. Then all your harmonics line up in the proper order as well.
It's not only the spectrum or frequency response that sets the amount of low end depth you have, it's also the phase alignment. Neve 1073 designs usually have about 50 degrees of phase shift at 20 hz. Not my first choice for a solid low end.
Add to that the phase shift isn't linear either, it has a deviation from linear phase which causes more time smears.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Oct 20, 2014 10:03:41 GMT -6
And yet....my ears tell me different. Damn things. I can't get em trained to follow specs.....
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by ericn on Oct 20, 2014 10:39:21 GMT -6
And yet....my ears tell me different. Damn things. I can't get em trained to follow specs..... [br One mans great low end is another mans phase shift!
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Oct 20, 2014 10:45:15 GMT -6
Ain't that the truth. Specs don't make records. Humans do. And we all hear differently and want different things out of music / sound. I'd been looking for the "right" kick drum sound for at least a decade. I always used API's or API variants on drums. I'd gone thru a dozen kick drum mics from Fet47's, to gefell's to other Neumann's to all the typical dynamics. No go,,,, Still looking for that ultimate kick drum sound. At that stage I figured I was going to have to go to one of those Yamaha sub kick thingies...... Then I put a 73 on virtually ANY of those mics. Boom. Done. Yeah, phase city..... heh heh
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by ericn on Oct 20, 2014 11:24:27 GMT -6
Ain't that the truth. Specs don't make records. Humans do. And we all hear differently and want different things out of music / sound. I'd been looking for the "right" kick drum sound for at least a decade. I always used API's or API variants on drums. I'd gone thru a dozen kick drum mics from Fet47's, to gefell's to other Neumann's to all the typical dynamics. No go,,,, Still looking for that ultimate kick drum sound. At that stage I figured I was going to have to go to one of those Yamaha sub kick thingies...... Then I put a 73 on virtually ANY of those mics. Boom. Done. Yeah, phase city..... heh heh Bill that's why we have Mr Eric's first 2 rules of audio ( ah hell life in general) 1. Never Knock what works! 2 It's not how you got there, it's that you got there. Yes having some understanding of why and how something works and what that means in sonic terms helps., and I do appreciate Guys like JIms per suite of sonic perfection, but 99% of the clients I get don't really want anybody to hear what they sound like they pay me to make them sound like they wish they sounded!
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Oct 20, 2014 14:03:29 GMT -6
So, ignoring the difference (which isn't even mutually exclusive) of "more low end" versus "linear/true low end"....I'm actually wanting to get back to why JK is asking. Not only application/issue.....but, what frequency range is constituting "low end" for him.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 20, 2014 17:10:25 GMT -6
Really thinking about 60-100 hz. I would imagine the Neves probably are the goto's.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Oct 20, 2014 19:15:44 GMT -6
Really thinking about 60-100 hz. I would imagine the Neves probably are the goto's. <<thumbsup>> And rock solid down into the 40Hz range....
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Oct 20, 2014 20:30:31 GMT -6
I can't think of any time outside a kick drum I boost that range at all. Quite the opposite. That's really why I was curious.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 20, 2014 20:58:23 GMT -6
Just moving the forum chatter...
|
|
|
Post by hadaja on Oct 21, 2014 0:30:04 GMT -6
So now we know a Nevish pre is great not only on vocals and but for kick drum as well.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 21, 2014 9:15:46 GMT -6
I think it's been pretty well known that if u want big fat drum sounds track/w neves, aggressive drum sounds use API, mix SSL, at least that was the semi old school staple as I knew it.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Oct 21, 2014 9:53:17 GMT -6
Not trying to be a wise guy, but I think a U47 FET might accomplish what I think you're looking for Tony.
I love the Heritage Audio 1073 with EQ, but cant's afford it.
I regularly use UAD's Pultec plug on drums, then dial in the fat by ear. On vocals, their LA2 thickens things a bit if you like it..
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 21, 2014 10:04:17 GMT -6
Not trying to be a wise guy, but I think a U47 FET might accomplish what I think you're looking for Tony. I love the Heritage Audio 1073 with EQ, but cant's afford it. I regularly use UAD's Pultec plug on drums, then dial in the fat by ear. On vocals, their LA2 thickens things a bit if you like it.. u mean like the one i've got sitting on my desk right here? 8) I kid MJB, this is actually JK's thread, but i'm definitely looking for a bass drum specific pre to power my 14x26" kick drum, not for the faint of heart huge sound 8) As of now, i'm prob going to build a single Don's classic's NV73 and a pair of lola's, our buddy Wintree is coming down in the next few weeks, we're going to put some things through the paces, including the mentioned pre's, diy mics, and some INSANE original Neumann tube mics, i thought i was a diy freak, but winetree puts me to shame, with a little original real deal sprinkled on top lol, he's awesome!! i'm so excited about it i can hardly stand it! I will post up samples of course 8)
|
|
|
Post by ephi82 on Oct 21, 2014 10:05:36 GMT -6
Sure--GreatRiver Me1NV. DanK actually walked me through how to wire up some caps in the insert jack to work as a HPF because there was such low end extension and girth everything was huge....other "neve clones" I've used did NOT have that quality. Even when you filtered it, down to the filter is was SO "huge" and solid that you could filter it at 150hz or something and still have "lots of lows". Ultimately, I'd love to have kept it, but it NEEDED the matching EQ. I would love to have that channel, but the EQ price was too steep....and I felt like a preamp I NEEDED to EQ all the time wasn't really right one for me. What on earth is lacking low end for you? I want a preamp that starts gently rolling everything at 240hz.... I have a Great River and love it! I love every bit of lower end beef it gives, but you can control how much you get by how much gain you call up in the first stage of the amp. I use it with a decent but hardly vintage style tube LDC and it gives a really big vocal sound. Note that it's not just more low end, it's gives the overall sound more weight, or would "dimension" be a better descriptor? I really like how it flatters the SM-57 and SM-81 mics. I think in both cases, it has enough gain to drive those Shure mics notorious for needed lots of gain. I bet SM-7B fans would love it. Last, its a terrific DI for bass.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 21, 2014 11:30:24 GMT -6
I can't think of any time outside a kick drum I boost that range at all. Quite the opposite. That's really why I was curious. Even then I don't boost it, I cut other regions first and it's usually good to go after that.
|
|