|
Post by basspro on Aug 8, 2024 8:57:59 GMT -6
I've been mixing for quite a while now, but the one thing that I still feel like I have trouble with is the kick and bass relationship.
Does anyone have good reference suggestions for Kick dominating low end vs Bass dominating the low end?
I tend to like a lower sounding kick (usually with around a 50-60Hz boost) but as a bass player, I also love a full sounding bass that has definition in a mix. I think I really struggle with getting everything to sound big because I end up trying to get both to sound big. Part of my issue is definitely monitoring, but another big part is approach.
Is it ever common to have the kick lower, but the bass dominating in volume? Also, I get afraid to filter bass. If the kick is lower, can you safely take the HPF above the fundamental without ruining your bass sound? I've definitely seen people mention filtering bass up to around 80Hz.
As someone who has been on a very slow solo journey with recording and mixing, I often have questions like these that would have been answered long ago had I taken the more traditional "intern at a studio and work my way up" route. But, I'm grateful to have places like this to ask these questions - very appreciative of any advice!
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Aug 8, 2024 10:02:08 GMT -6
Of course, jmo, imo, ime, fwiw, although not as loud as recent stuff, the bass/kick interaction on the red hot chili peppers blood sugar sex magic is a good reference, thomas dolby's "science" is amazing, anything Earth wind and fire(G Massenburg) is nails, Eminem "gone crazy" is over the top because of the available space, one thing to consider is that its not a mistake that small bass drums are often accompanied by P bass's(motown) and big bass drums are often accompanied by J bass's(led zeppelin), appropriate orchestration during capture gets you a long way towards the final goal
Mike White is a great friend of mine, this is an excellent video he made that shows how most people get the "kick ducks bass" trick very wrong by smacking the transient, IME only a heavily parameter fortified hardware compressor can pull this off, but there are hundreds of plugins that can do it
|
|
|
Post by niklas1073 on Aug 8, 2024 11:21:52 GMT -6
This is one of those, there are no default way. There are several factors that determine which one is leading. Song related, arrangement, instrumentation, does the bass carry an essential line/harmony. For me it’s one of the first big decisions when opening a mix, which one will lead and which one goes low and which gets high passed. Sometimes the kick goes down to 30hz or lower and bass sits at 80. Sometimes vice versa…
|
|
|
Post by svart on Aug 8, 2024 11:31:40 GMT -6
Always carve out kick around 125Hz. Nothing but tubbiness there. Most people leave wayyyy too much bass below 70Hz in the mix. HPF as much of the woof off the bass as you can stand. Work on the 200Hz region on the bass, either with cuts or with frequency selective compression. Make that 70-250 bass region sit FLAT. Compress the daylights out of the bass so that it doesn't modulate with the kick.
OR, sidechain some ducking on the bass to the kick. Everytime the kick hits, it pulls the bass down ~4dB or so.
|
|
|
Post by bossanova on Aug 8, 2024 14:48:05 GMT -6
Dave Pensado has said, IIRC, “Mixing Hip Hop, I let the kick win. Mixing Rock, I let the bass win.” (regarding which track gets the true lows)
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Aug 8, 2024 21:50:54 GMT -6
It's player and function dependent for me. If the bass player is busy and driving the song in a certain way, I want it to have a thinner low end, so that the movement isn't just a bunch of muddy crap. IF the drummer is funkier and doing a lot of doubles and quick syncopation, I was the BD to be a bit thinner for the same reason.
Then we also need to get into instruments. How muffled is the bass drum? How muffled should it be? Is the bass player using a pick on a bright, freshly strung bass, or fingers and 5 year old strings?
So, to use my time as a Tape Op Message Board moderator, the real answer is "it depends."
|
|
|
Post by rowmat on Aug 8, 2024 22:07:41 GMT -6
This is live but whether or not it helps is another thing.
Specifically from 0:24
|
|
|
Post by alvyn991 on Aug 9, 2024 9:03:33 GMT -6
I've been mixing for quite a while now, but the one thing that I still feel like I have trouble with is the kick and bass relationship. Does anyone have good reference suggestions for Kick dominating low end vs Bass dominating the low end? I tend to like a lower sounding kick (usually with around a 50-60Hz boost) but as a bass player, I also love a full sounding bass that has definition in a mix. I think I really struggle with getting everything to sound big because I end up trying to get both to sound big. Part of my issue is definitely monitoring, but another big part is approach. Is it ever common to have the kick lower, but the bass dominating in volume? Also, I get afraid to filter bass. If the kick is lower, can you safely take the HPF above the fundamental without ruining your bass sound? I've definitely seen people mention filtering bass up to around 80Hz. As someone who has been on a very slow solo journey with recording and mixing, I often have questions like these that would have been answered long ago had I taken the more traditional "intern at a studio and work my way up" route. But, I'm grateful to have places like this to ask these questions - very appreciative of any advice! I feel you on the kick-bass struggle! For reference tracks, check out Kendrick's "Humble" (kick-dominated) and Daft Punk's "One More Time" (bass-dominated). It's common to have the kick lower in freq but the bass louder in volume. And yeah, filtering the bass can be scary, but HPF above the fundamental (around 80-100Hz) can create space and definition.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Aug 9, 2024 9:32:13 GMT -6
You know in an interview they asked Mel Brooks, if he wore Boxer style underwear or Shorts. His answer... "Depends". They also asked Will Smith "who wins" on kick vs bass on his Mixes. Will said "Definitely Slap". On Rock too. Carry on Gentlemen. Chris
|
|
|
Post by smashlord on Aug 9, 2024 9:45:21 GMT -6
I've been mixing for quite a while now, but the one thing that I still feel like I have trouble with is the kick and bass relationship. Does anyone have good reference suggestions for Kick dominating low end vs Bass dominating the low end? If you are having trouble with that relationship, you may need more treatment in your environment. I had what I thought was a well-treated environment for years and then during a remodeling, I added floor to ceiling corner traps. The difference, to say the least, was dramatic. I could hear exactly where the kick and bass were meeting/masking and set the HPF with more precision. Less guesswork. In terms of references, the Dua Lipa record "Future Nostalgia" is pretty fantastic when it comes to an upfront bass driving the song with a massive kick holding down the lowend. Lot's of heavy hitters on that record... Spike Stent, Josh Godwin, Matty Green. I am sure there is probably a separate sub bass side chained to the kick, but the bass instrument (whether it be an actually bass or a VI) is pretty filtered. What I noticed is the bass is quite heavily filtered and lives in the midrange more than you would think, which may not be possible in mixes with more midrange instruments like guitars, piano, etc.... That said, I seem to recall something about Motown records having the bass aggressively HPed at 80Hz because there was the belief that your ear would fill in the rest. There are alot of more organic hip hop records in the vein of the "The Roots" where I have noticed the bass is really aggressive HPed up to like 90hz with what seems to be a 36db/octave slope.
|
|
|
Post by basspro on Aug 9, 2024 10:13:45 GMT -6
I've been mixing for quite a while now, but the one thing that I still feel like I have trouble with is the kick and bass relationship. Does anyone have good reference suggestions for Kick dominating low end vs Bass dominating the low end? If you are having trouble with that relationship, you may need more treatment in your environment. I had what I thought was a well-treated environment for years and then during a remodeling, I added floor to ceiling corner traps. The difference, to say the least, was dramatic. I could hear exactly where the kick and bass were meeting/masking and set the HPF with more precision. Less guesswork. In terms of references, the Dua Lipa record "Future Nostalgia" is pretty fantastic when it comes to an upfront bass driving the song with a massive kick holding down the lowend. Lot's of heavy hitters on that record... Spike Stent, Josh Godwin, Matty Green. I am sure there is probably a separate sub bass side chained to the kick, but the bass instrument (whether it be an actually bass or a VI) is pretty filtered. What I noticed is the bass is quite heavily filtered and lives in the midrange more than you would think, which may not be possible in mixes with more midrange instruments like guitars, piano, etc.... That said, I seem to recall something about Motown records having the bass aggressively HPed at 80Hz because there was the belief that your ear would fill in the rest. There are alot of more organic hip hop records in the vein of the "The Roots" where I have noticed the bass is really aggressive HPed up to like 90hz with what seems to be a 36db/octave slope. Monitoring is 100% an issue and always has been. I'm one of those people that has willfully ignored the good advice to focus on treatment and monitoring so that I could buy shiny new things. I also haven't had a steady place to mix that I could adequately treat (have been in apartments for years). I'm really hoping to find a house with a good sized garage in the next few years and will absolutely be going all out with acoustics when that happens. For now I'm pretty much stuck with headphones or very low level monitoring in a less than ideal sounding room. For quite a while I was mixing on "tracking" headphones like Sennheiser HD280 or AT MX50. I recently got a pair of Sennheiser HD650s and that alone has actually been quite a game changer. Definitely opened my eyes to how much monitoring can impact things. It was immediately apparent that the hyped response from the cheaper headphones was negatively impacting my decisions. Now I can get a rough going in 30 minutes that will be more cohesive than some of my final mixes were previously. But, even with the improved cans, I'm still not really hearing low end the way I really should. Anyway, great suggestions - have really loved Dua Lipa's recent work so I'll definitely check this record out in depth.
|
|
|
Post by Bat Lanyard on Aug 9, 2024 11:56:31 GMT -6
Like a dumbass, I only recently figured out how to real-time reference tracks via PT HDX (playing through Tidal, not imported into the session, etc.) so that I can A/B via my monitor controller. Something super helpful I've been doing is sending my mix to A and the ref track to B but only outputting through a subwoofer with the crossover set to 60 (low as it goes).
It's easily been revealing how much mud is down there in my mix and allows me to better clean things up and make sure the kick/bass relationship is close to the reference. YMMV.
|
|
|
Post by geoff738 on Aug 9, 2024 12:44:17 GMT -6
An alternative approach that I have seen suggested, but have not yet experimented with, is to just duck the bass in the very low end. Anybody tried this?
Cheers, Geoff
|
|