|
|
Post by allmidi on Aug 8, 2024 5:23:55 GMT -6
I've stumbled upon an interesting video where a guitarist says that analog setups introduce more latency than digital alternatives.
For me, any buffer size higher than 128 samples is unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
Post by doubledog on Aug 8, 2024 15:31:13 GMT -6
I can take up to about 256 tracking some instruments, but for vocals, much smaller (and I find most everyone else feels the same). I track everything while monitoring through UA Console (and mute any armed tracks in Pro Tools) so there is no perceived latency and everyone is happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Aug 10, 2024 11:01:45 GMT -6
I don’t know man, analog monitor path, no latency. Buffer at 1028.
|
|
|
|
Post by svart on Aug 19, 2024 9:10:21 GMT -6
Anything under 10ms is mostly inaudible unless it's being A/B'd directly. Some folks are ok up to around 50ms and some can barely stand over 10ms. Buffer at 128 or 256 usually works fine at 88.2K.
I think most times when folks hear "latency" they're actually hearing DPC latency through a plugin because some plugs have a lot of un-reported latency.
|
|
|
|
Post by allmidi on Aug 19, 2024 23:33:45 GMT -6
That is true as well, while some plugins have near zero latency, others can introduce an additional latency.
Another thing worth noting: for keyboardists using soft synths only, there is no audio input and therefore the actual latency will be only about half of what a guitar player will experience (for the same sample rate and buffer size settings).
|
|
