|
Post by Johnkenn on Jul 23, 2024 12:26:23 GMT -6
start beating out the software counterparts?
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Jul 23, 2024 12:55:47 GMT -6
I picked up the Strymon night sky and the Merris Mercury X a while back, they are stellar units designed as guitar pedals, but I like them better than any studio rack reverb unit i've ever used, that said i own lexicon stuff(merris has some lex in it) but haven't owned a Bricasti, I believe they max out at 48k/24bit but i can't hear a problem at all, they are extremely versatile and lush AF sounding ππ»ππ»
|
|
|
Post by copperx on Jul 23, 2024 12:58:30 GMT -6
Yesterday, I spent half the day with a Bricasti. As I tweaked settings and compared it to other reverbs, I thought: "It sounds better, but does it sound $4000+ better than anything else?" Yes, it absolutely does.
As for the lowest price point at which hardware reverbs sound better than plugins, that's a more interesting question. Some here have suggested the PCM70 is the cheapest thing that is better than plugins. Casey, in the purple forum, praised $200 Lexicons. However, he also thinks that the HD Cart plugin sounds just like the 480.
|
|
|
Post by copperx on Jul 23, 2024 13:01:25 GMT -6
I picked up the Strymon night sky and the Merris Mercury X a while back, they are stellar units designed as guitar pedals, but I like them better than any studio rack reverb unit i've ever used, that said i own lexicon stuff(merris has some lex in it) but haven't owned a Bricasti, I believe they max out at 48k/24bit but i can't hear a problem at all, they are extremely versatile and lush AF sounding ππ»ππ»
For what applications? Mostly guitars? Or do you also like them for vocals, drums, etc.?
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 23, 2024 13:10:40 GMT -6
Slightly off-topic story that might be a point in favor of pretty much any decent hardware reverb.
A few weeks ago I was tracking a vocal part for a one off demo and I wanted to put some vanity reverb on for the singer. But I needed it to be resource light for tracking so put on Presonus' built in RoomVerb thing with just a standard chamber effect. I spent about two minutes EQ'ing it and getting out some weird resonances and then just left it on there.
Here's the weird thing.
As the mix progressed, the reverb never bothered me so I just left it on there. When I delivered that mix the client was like "what reverb is that, it sounds fantastic!!"
So here's my theory, it sounded good because he was singing into it and working it as it went. That itself is an argument for a hardware reverb at least during tracking. RoomVerb is NOT a good reverb but it's not painful either, it's just as plain Jane algorithmic reverb as you can get. But it really did sound good and I think it's because the performance matched the 'verb.
Anyway, I thought that was interesting. Pretty much any hardware reverb would be better than RoomVerb, if you get a performance that matches the sound that could be the real thing.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Jul 23, 2024 13:14:15 GMT -6
I picked up the Strymon night sky and the Merris Mercury X a while back, they are stellar units designed as guitar pedals, but I like them better than any studio rack reverb unit i've ever used, that said i own lexicon stuff(merris has some lex in it) but haven't owned a Bricasti, I believe they max out at 48k/24bit but i can't hear a problem at all, they are extremely versatile and lush AF sounding ππ»ππ»
For what applications? Mostly guitars? Or do you also like them for vocals, drums, etc.?
They are complex guitar pedals and/or legit studio pieces you can use on anything, they have tons of control parameters and sound better to my ears than any plugin ive used for reverb, the night sky is a tool that is seemingly endless in its creative potential, sonically they sound better than my JW modded lex's, my go to plug reverbs are liquid sonics 7th heaven(bricasti) and the FF pro r, but they're not close to these guys either imo
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Jul 23, 2024 13:28:22 GMT -6
start beating out the software counterparts? I haven't really found them to be better in a mix, the times I've used vintage Lexicon stuff, or the Bricasti. Maybe I didn't go deep enough. I ditched a PCM-70 for the flexibility of Altiverb a LONG time ago. Don't really see that box as on any kind of a pedestal vs plugins. Obviously some very talented folks disagree. The thing for me with plugins is, I change my mind a lot. It's kind of cool to be able to swap in a different verb super late in a mix and get re-inspired. Recently it's been Little Plate, for whatever reason. I'm sure an original EMT would be rad, but it would also be less flexible. The IK Sunset Sound verb is sometimes great but sometimes meh. It's all very contextual for me. I am typically trying to put just a smidge of icing on a great tasting cake.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jul 23, 2024 14:38:50 GMT -6
I don't know. They just are just different. Modern plugin reverbs are excellent. You can always filter the send and eq them after. Lexicon is gone and people should stop expections emulations to match because the spatial perception will be different and modern floating point CPUs will need different settings to emulate the perceived effects of the primitive converters and dsp chips used in older fx boxes.
Goodhertz Megaverb replaced the Alesis reverbs. It's just better and cheaper than a fixed up Midiverb II.
Liquidsonics Tai Chi is phenomenal.
Relab Sonsig Rev-A beats their hardware emulations. It and the Softube Tsar-1 are incredibly easy to use.
Liquidsonics Cinematic Rooms is the best boring reverb ever if you use it for music.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jul 23, 2024 14:48:19 GMT -6
For what applications? Mostly guitars? Or do you also like them for vocals, drums, etc.?
They are complex guitar pedals and/or legit studio pieces you can use on anything, they have tons of control parameters and sound better to my ears than any plugin ive used for reverb, the night sky is a tool that is seemingly endless in its creative potential, sonically they sound better than my JW modded lex's, my go to plug reverbs are liquid sonics 7th heaven(bricasti) and the FF pro r, but they're not close to these guys either imo The Strymon Big Sky is better in a studio context as sends than as guitar pedals. More settings of tone and low end controls are usable without sounding very silly with the ability to filter and eq them before and after and blend them them in beyond the mix knob.
|
|
|
Post by niklas1073 on Jul 23, 2024 15:22:45 GMT -6
My interpretation is that in spring reverbs, you would probably win a plugin at pretty modest spendings. Plates then again tend to become rather costly and eat a lot of real estate which maybe is not a realistic comparison for most and great plate plugs are out there. In the digital world I really donβt have enough experience to have an opinion. Never used bricasti in neither plugin nor hw versions, and since that seem to be a milestone for reverb I suppose itβs required to at least have given them a go before judging digital reverbsβ¦
|
|
|
Post by nnajar on Jul 23, 2024 15:48:43 GMT -6
bricasti or EMT. otherwise plugins are fine. I'm totally ITB now which i never thought would happen and I'm happy as hell. My bricasti is at my buddy's studio hooked up to his Neve.
|
|
|
Post by nobtwiddler on Jul 23, 2024 16:20:31 GMT -6
About 18 months ago, I got so fed up with upkeep, and repair costs on my vintage digital effects, I took most of my effects racks, and sold it as a package, (90% were working fine, but some weren't) $7500. (somebody got a great deal!) AMS 1580 AMS RMX16 with the extra programs LEX PCM-60 LEX PCM-70 LEX PCM-80 LEX PCM-90 LEX 224 XL Kurzweil Stereo effect unit KLARK TEKNIK DN780 w/remote TC 2290 Digital delay with sampling TC 1210 Stereo Chorus / Doubler Eventide H3000 fully loaded MIC MIX Master Room XL-305 (had 2 of these) Then I looked at maintenance costs of the vintage analog fx stuff. So I sold my original EMT 140 (stereo tube plate) AKG BX-10 AKG BX-25 Other than "braggin rights" no regrets!
|
|
|
Post by copperx on Jul 23, 2024 17:06:27 GMT -6
About 18 months ago, I got so fed up with upkeep, and repair costs on my vintage digital effects, I took most of my effects racks, and sold it as a package, (90% were working fine, but some weren't) $7500. (somebody got a great deal!) AMS 1580 AMS RMX16 with the extra programs LEX PCM-60 LEX PCM-70 LEX PCM-80 LEX PCM-90 LEX 224 XL Kurzweil Stereo effect unit KLARK TEKNIK DN780 w/remote TC 2290 Digital delay with sampling TC 1210 Stereo Chorus / Doubler Eventide H3000 fully loaded MIC MIX Master Room XL-305 (had 2 of these) Then I looked at maintenance costs of the vintage analog fx stuff. So I sold my original EMT 140 (stereo tube plate) AKG BX-10 AKG BX-25 Other than "braggin rights" no regrets!
I have a few questions:
1. Who was the lucky bastard who got that deal and why wasn't it me, god, why? what have I done wrong?. 2. What are you using instead of all that?
I'm especially interested in what are you using as an H3000 replacement.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Jul 23, 2024 17:39:37 GMT -6
I think Tony is on to something. I heard someone use the Eventide H9 pedal as his hardware reverb. It sounded absolutely gorgeous. Richer than any plug-in I have, (better than the PCM 60 and PCM 70 I used to have, if memory serves).
If I wan't disabled now and selling things off, I'd grab one and try it for myself.
|
|