|
Post by swurveman on Aug 1, 2014 14:29:03 GMT -6
Round 2 of the quest:
Here's the new version. I think I'm getting closer with a more focused kick and snare, but who knows, its sometimes one step forward and two back. In the studio, the Petty Mix seemed more condensed. So, I put a higher ratio on my C2 with more gain reduction on the compressor than I usually use- on my Mix Bus. Hearing that here, I think it was a mistake for the rest of the mix.
https%3A//soundcloud.com/songflowerrecording/small-town-august-1-wet-studio-a Here's the first attempt:
https%3A//soundcloud.com/songflowerrecording/small-town-july-30
|
|
|
Post by jeromemason on Aug 4, 2014 15:39:59 GMT -6
You've done a really good job man. The difference here is Sound City. There is a reason that room was used so much, with the Neve, and in the TP recording you can just hear it, it's got that signature decay and massive sound to it, just hard to recreate that.
Check out the movie, it's really cool for sure. Explains a lot about the place and just how special it was.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Aug 4, 2014 20:12:48 GMT -6
You've done a really good job man. The difference here is Sound City. There is a reason that room was used so much, with the Neve, and in the TP recording you can just hear it, it's got that signature decay and massive sound to it, just hard to recreate that. Check out the movie, it's really cool for sure. Explains a lot about the place and just how special it was. Thanks Jerome. Yeah, it's hard to re-engineer Sound City and Steve Ferrone tuning his snare and hitting it the way he does, as well as the superb tracking and mixing engineers. Still, it was a fun exercise in drum sound acrobatics, working with tuning snares, different mics, limiters, delays, compressors etc. There is so much that can be done with drums. So, as a budding engineer I am doing lots of reengineering. I saw the Sound City film. It breaks my heart to see all that history go up in smoke, but I feel lucky to have grown up in that era of greatness. Great film.
|
|
|
Post by sopwith on Aug 4, 2014 21:10:16 GMT -6
This thread inspired me to watch the Sound City doc. What a fantastic, signature sound that room had for drums. Sounding good, swurveman!
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Aug 4, 2014 21:55:16 GMT -6
When I had a Bricasti I always liked Studio B better for a room sound. Sounded expensive. BTW, I like your drums just as good if not better. They don't sound the same as the Petty track but that drum sound they got on that tune didn't do it for me. Fleetwood Mac is another story though
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Aug 4, 2014 23:28:10 GMT -6
When I had a Bricasti I always liked Studio B better for a room sound. Sounded expensive. BTW, I like your drums just as good if not better. They don't sound the same as the Petty track but that drum sound they got on that tune didn't do it for me. Fleetwood Mac is another story though whaa? why'd you sell your bricasti? i thought you were digging it?
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Aug 5, 2014 5:43:40 GMT -6
It's a great reverb. Just felt I could get 95% there with software verbs.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 5, 2014 8:21:48 GMT -6
I've enjoyed the exercise here, but I must say, I'm with cowboy, that particular drum part always stuck out like a sore thumb to me. It seemed like they were trying to shoehorn John Bonham into a Tom Petty record.I never thought the drum served the song. Now, the sound itself was extraordinary, and I imagine it could work beautifully in a different context.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Aug 5, 2014 8:53:28 GMT -6
I've enjoyed the exercise here, but I must say, I'm with cowboy, that particular drum part always stuck out like a sore thumb to me. It seemed like they were trying to shoehorn John Bonham into a Tom Petty record.I never thought the drum served the song. Now, the sound itself was extraordinary, and I imagine it could work beautifully in a different context. I would argue the biggest hits of the last 50 years are virtually all drum forward, drums are the 2nd most easily relatable behind vox.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Aug 5, 2014 8:54:09 GMT -6
It's a great reverb. Just felt I could get 95% there with software verbs. This begs the question, what is you fav software reverb?
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 5, 2014 9:27:00 GMT -6
Hearing this song made me go back to Wildflowers. Good album, with an interesting variety of drum sounds. Most artists seem to find a sound and go with it, but not TP and company.
|
|
|
Post by kevinnyc on Aug 5, 2014 10:09:30 GMT -6
It's a great reverb. Just felt I could get 95% there with software verbs. This begs the question, what is you fav software reverb? I'm also interested in how I can 95% of the way there to a Briicasti with software verbs.....the suspense is now killing me And thanks in advance for the tip....
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Aug 5, 2014 11:44:39 GMT -6
What if I told you boys I felt I could take a stock cubase reverb with eq, gate and compression on the aux strip with it and adjust it to sound like any reverb I want. Would you believe me? I feel like I can.
That' said, I'm very fond of the Relab 480 which basically does all that work for me so it's quick and easy. The Lexicon 224 is also one I reach for often. Valhalla Vintage is another.
Honestly I don't fuss over reverb much. Any of them will work well for me usually.
The one have to have is UAD Ocean Way Studios. Just can't mix without it anymore. It takes a flat recording like I do in my basement and makes it sound like it was recorded in a big room. I honestly like it better than the Bricasti rooms. That's saying a lot. It's their most expensive plugin for a reason and it's worth every penny.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 5, 2014 16:24:44 GMT -6
Tony said, " I would argue the biggest hits of the last 50 years are virtually all drum forward, drums are the 2nd most easily relatable behind vox."
Well, I tend to like drums high in a mix too, right under vocals, but something about that drum track just got under my skin, kind of the same way a Foo Fighters drum track is unrelenting, and not always in a good way. Maybe it's a case of too much of a good thing. Funny, I had a conversation with a friend last week who's done the Nashville songwriter route, solo albums, producer thing for a long time, and he mentioned that he often thought drums were mixed too forward. He used a band like Crosby, Stills & Nash as an example of drums not being mixed loud allowing the songs to breath. I'm from the punk era though, and it's hard for me to really lay back.
Cowboy said "The one have to have is UAD Ocean Way Studios. Just can't mix without it anymore. It takes a flat recording like I do in my basement and makes it sound like it was recorded in a big room. I honestly like it better than the Bricasti rooms. That's saying a lot. It's their most expensive plugin for a reason and it's worth every penny." Well, I heard one of his tracks and honestly thought he'd tracked it in a major studio, and told him so before he told me it was the Ocean Ways plug. I gotta wait til summer passes before I have any spendable income though, but that comment makes me itchy to get it.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 5, 2014 17:34:43 GMT -6
https%3A//soundcloud.com/martin-john-butler/eans-logic-demo To cowboy's point, my 16 year old student did a track last summer as an exercise using only Logic, not any plug from anywhere else, just Logic's, including their reverbs. Here's a brief excerpt, an mp3, and to me, this almost sounds like a frickin' Colplay record. I too use ReLab's 480 XL and UAD's EMT 140 exclusively, but could live with this easily if I had to.
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on Aug 5, 2014 19:04:40 GMT -6
I know this isn't what you asked for in your post, but... if this is a real song you are working on for someone or yourself you will destroy it with anything that sounds just like the Wallflowers track. First off because the song is already quite similar in ways, and secondly because the big, bassy kick will rob that unique vocal you have going. The song is pretty cool and you might be better off sticking with a simpler kit sound that lets that vocal stay front and center with a swagger that fits this singer, maybe a pair of overhead U87s ala Muscle Shoals and Odetta. What's the point of putting all that time into copying the Wallflowers production values if you don't even have a proper application for it. Tom's voice has a distinct sound and cut like a Rickenbacker that they have built a supporting cast around sound design-wise. Doesn't strike me as the right sound for this track or this singer in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 5, 2014 20:07:41 GMT -6
Welcome yotonic. Your advice and critique might be out of context, even though you make good points. Perhaps you might consider waiting to hear from the poster as to the purpose of the exercise next time before passing judgement?
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on Aug 5, 2014 22:24:47 GMT -6
Yeah there was actually a compliment in there. It's a song with a cool character of it's own. I know why we all try to understand how sounds are engineered but sometimes our own work is better than we think for the song we are working on. I was just trying to send a vote of confidence for following his own aesthetic although I knew that wasn't what he asked for, hence my preface.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Aug 5, 2014 22:49:04 GMT -6
yes, welcome yotonic , honestly these types of conversations are indictment of the modern recording process of musicians NOT playing together anymore, you end up piecemealing everything together for a vague, disconnected and incongruent end result, i've been there dozens of times... My bet is the TP thing happened primarily in the room, not in the post process.... just like most great music played by great musicians...of course, as always jmo.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 6, 2014 6:23:37 GMT -6
Yes Tony, it's a bit of a quandary. It gets harder and harder to get friends to play together. As we've gotten older, responsibilities to family, work, and other things keep pulling us apart. Now that money has gotten much more difficult to find in the music business, there's even less of a possibility we can afford to put a few players in a nice room. Maybe it's a little different out of NYC, but high rents are killing the music business here.
Then, as we try to make our demos sound cohesive, we come across the reality check, many home recordings are just a different thing that's trying to sound like it was done by musicians working together. I haven't quite figured out how to make my home recordings as real and honest as I'd like to yet, but I'm working on it. On my next song, I'm calling in a few small favors and getting some real players to do bass, 2nd guitar, background vocals, maybe it'll be more organic that way. Just because I can do it, doesn't mean I should.
On topic, sort of, digital snares aren't easy to make sound real. Using Superior Drummer, I've begun using cowboy's method of rendering tracks, which helps for some reason, but I've gotta get in deeper and program more dynamics. Maybe I should get a digital drum kit and just play the fu#%er.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Aug 6, 2014 7:39:52 GMT -6
Maybe I should get a digital drum kit This is what I have done; I use an Alesis DM10X to record MIDI drums into BFD3 and PT. Luckily my drummer has adapted to it but the rubber cymbals are problematic. The hats in particular lack feel and responsiveness. We get good performances nonetheless, and there's always the ability to edit at will. Unfortunately recording a real kit is not an option at my place without treating a room.
|
|
|
Post by unit7 on Aug 6, 2014 8:40:25 GMT -6
Yes Tony, it's a bit of a quandary. It gets harder and harder to get friends to play together. As we've gotten older, responsibilities to family, work, and other things keep pulling us apart. Now that money has gotten much more difficult to find in the music business, there's even less of a possibility we can afford to put a few players in a nice room. Maybe it's a little different out of NYC, but high rents are killing the music business here. This is so true. Makes me want to build my own place even more. Just to struggle against this sad evolution... Btw, re the drums on 'You don't know..', agree that they are very forward, but I've always loved that. I think it backs up the vocal in a brilliant way and give the track it's attitude. The way it's played, obviously played by a master but no show off at all, and then the sound and how it's mixed. Always thought that this kind of production is such a bold and sonically high end thing that would never happen here in Sweden, only in the U.S.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 6, 2014 13:10:21 GMT -6
I do admit, it's a love/hate thing with that track. When the chorus hits, I'm sold.
One of these days I'll look into getting a kt like yours Matt. Is there a particular digital drum kit that's considered state of the art?
Maybe I'll try to find one of those mini drum kits in a suitcase like Charlie Watts used on Street Fighting Man, and use the Glyn Johns 3 mic method ;-)
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Aug 6, 2014 13:32:23 GMT -6
Yeah there was actually a compliment in there. It's a song with a cool character of it's own. I know why we all try to understand how sounds are engineered but sometimes our own work is better than we think for the song we are working on. I was just trying to send a vote of confidence for following his own aesthetic although I knew that wasn't what he asked for, hence my preface. Thanks for the compliment of the song yotonic. I did it as a drum exercise, because I'm just starting to really get into recording and mixing drums. So, it was a challenge and I learned a lot from it. It made me really listen to all the layers of the drum performance and the drum mix. Re-engineering, or reverse engineering or whatever you want to call it can be interesting and informative. I'd recommend it to all budding engineers, just as I'd recommend budding musicians to play in a cover band at some point.
|
|