|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Apr 18, 2024 14:23:51 GMT -6
I'm not trying to become a Lewitt fanboy but they keep coming out with cool stuff. The "Ray" is the Lewitt 440 but with LIDAR that measures the singers distance and adjusts the mic to compensate for gain and proximity accordingly. And it's an all analog signal path. So it's not DSP modifying the sound, it's DSP modifying analog components to modify the sound. The review samples sound convincing. And it's barely more than the 440 on which it's based. It's being targeted at podcasters and such but I can see it being very useful for two things in my own world. Novice singers with awful mic technique (I get a bunch of these) and musicians who are playing seated instruments where mic technique requires compromises on playing technique. Piano and drums come to mind. As a piano player it could be really cool to be able to play without worrying about having to get my head back to where the mic is. How well would it work? Who knows, the bleed could get weirdly variable. But it's interesting. www.lewitt-audio.com/ray
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Apr 18, 2024 14:24:54 GMT -6
Haha... I wonder if they call it the Ray after Ray Charles. He sure could have used this. Probably not, probably it's rays of light. But it COULD be!
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Apr 18, 2024 14:40:44 GMT -6
I... Believe to my Soul, that's possible. IMHO the Pure's are nice. Just a bit bright on this bright singer. Me! Their more neutral-ish/darker Tube models work better on me. I like NOT screwing around with Pre's/Plugs/etc... If possible. Chris
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Apr 18, 2024 14:46:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Apr 18, 2024 14:47:55 GMT -6
If only auto-focus can work on my brain... Hmmm. Chris
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Apr 19, 2024 9:33:37 GMT -6
Interesting concept. I wonder how it would work in a studio setting where there is bleed. Could be very uncontrolled in the bleed sound. For podcasting or voiceover, it might be handy. The price is definitely inexpensive.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Apr 19, 2024 10:05:49 GMT -6
Interesting concept. I wonder how it would work in a studio setting where there is bleed. Could be very uncontrolled in the bleed sound. For podcasting or voiceover, it might be handy. The price is definitely inexpensive. My thoughts as well. But on the other hand, no worse than compression right?
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Apr 19, 2024 10:16:50 GMT -6
Proximity effect is my question. It seems to increase the low end as you move away and take it away as you get closer. Seems like it could end up sounding like a dynamic EQ on bleed.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Apr 19, 2024 12:36:08 GMT -6
Proximity effect is my question. It seems to increase the low end as you move away and take it away as you get closer. Seems like it could end up sounding like a dynamic EQ on bleed. Yeah, I think probably more effective on overdubs and very controlled scenarios. Also I'm guessing that it works a lot better in a very dry room. I'd really love to try out a bunch of this stuff since it's very novel. Can't justify the purchase but it'd be cool to experiment with it.
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Apr 19, 2024 17:54:48 GMT -6
This is a super interesting idea, no doubt. But I do need to note that I generally do not like (nor do I use) autofocus with my lenses, even the newest LIDAR-based autofocus modules. I use all my Zeiss as purely manual-focus lenses.
|
|