|
Post by AgnosticGospel on Oct 1, 2023 20:43:02 GMT -6
Shopping for my first hardware EQ, and I noticed that Tube Tech's take on the EQP-1 has the bonus frequencies in the mids (1k, 1.5k, 2k). What other Pultec clones offer these? I'm definitely looking for a box with more vibe than the Tube Tech, but I know I would find those frequencies useful. Recording 50s-60s jazz and blues Hammond Organ trio.
Edit: I'm aware of the Pul-tec 1s, but I'm not shelling out for that!
|
|
|
Post by paulcheeba on Oct 1, 2023 21:26:55 GMT -6
I’m waiting with bated breath for the Stam full tec with all the frequencies in a stereo box. It also has a Solid State feature with op amps! Woo hoo!
|
|
|
Post by sean on Oct 1, 2023 21:31:36 GMT -6
Manley Enhanced Pultec, Summit EQP200
|
|
|
Post by AgnosticGospel on Oct 1, 2023 22:12:24 GMT -6
I’m waiting with bated breath for the Stam full tec with all the frequencies in a stereo box. It also has a Solid State feature with op amps! Woo hoo! Is that a new model coming out? Google is coming up snake-eyes on Stam Audio Full Tec. I like the idea of their stereo MEQP-1AS, but I want bandwidth Q control over those mid frequencies, and it doesn't offer that.
|
|
|
Post by smashlord on Oct 1, 2023 23:50:22 GMT -6
The Manley wins on frequencies and form factor.
You could of course get an Audioscape EQP-As and a MEQ-A for the money of the TT or Manley thereabouts, but 5 RU.
|
|
|
Post by paulcheeba on Oct 2, 2023 0:33:57 GMT -6
I’m waiting with bated breath for the Stam full tec with all the frequencies in a stereo box. It also has a Solid State feature with op amps! Woo hoo! Is that a new model coming out? Google is coming up snake-eyes on Stam Audio Full Tec. I like the idea of their stereo MEQP-1AS, but I want bandwidth Q control over those mid frequencies, and it doesn't offer that. That’s the one. I don’t go for Pultecs for precision just a general boost. I already have Miads, Avalon 2055, Soma, CAG, SSL, Neve, Harrison, Amtecs, AML Pultecs, Bettermaker mastering and solid state Pultec plus Wes and Curvebender. And a million ITB options. So I’m not really needing I just love the twist stam is putting on his gear.
|
|
|
Post by plinker on Oct 2, 2023 7:25:46 GMT -6
I have the IGS Rubber Bands Mastering EQ -- it has additional frequencies that are independent of cut/boost. But, not the frequencies you're listing.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Oct 2, 2023 14:49:38 GMT -6
Analog Allstars, if you can find one.
|
|
|
Post by sean on Oct 2, 2023 16:15:42 GMT -6
Analog Allstars, if you can find one. I wish I would have held on to mine...one of those things I built and sold to someone who couldn't do it themselves thinking "I can always build some more"...alas...
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker on Oct 2, 2023 18:13:21 GMT -6
my two stams have the boost/cut mid freq, its a nice touch. very handy
excited to get my stereo stam coming up soon!
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Oct 2, 2023 18:17:39 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by AgnosticGospel on Oct 2, 2023 19:48:32 GMT -6
Yeah, I have drooled over the Empress. But just like the Stam, it offers no control over the mid's Q.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Oct 7, 2023 0:16:24 GMT -6
Yeah, I have drooled over the Empress. But just like the Stam, it offers no control over the mid's Q. What about a Retro 2A3
|
|
|
Post by copperx on Oct 7, 2023 6:14:29 GMT -6
The JLM Audio's PEQ500A has those extra frequencies and bandwidth control. But just like the Analog Allstars, it's inspired by the solid state Pultecs.
|
|
|
Post by AgnosticGospel on Oct 7, 2023 8:29:10 GMT -6
Yeah, I have drooled over the Empress. But just like the Stam, it offers no control over the mid's Q. What about a Retro 2A3 Good call. I had forgotten that the Retro had bonus frequencies.
|
|
|
Post by smashlord on Oct 7, 2023 8:37:55 GMT -6
Yeah, I have drooled over the Empress. But just like the Stam, it offers no control over the mid's Q. What about a Retro 2A3 FWIW, I am a big fan of Retro stuff (the 176 is one of my faves, ever) and I found the 2A3 to be a bit mushy on the bottom when I tried it, but YMMV. Form factor is definitely a plus on that unit, though.
|
|