|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 24, 2023 16:32:25 GMT -6
Looking at taking over a 15 x 30 cabin/shack/cottage thing on a friend's property to move my rehearsal space to for the next year or so. The goal is to set up to record our rehearsals in a more serious way as well as to track basic drums and stuff like that as we start making an actual album. Our idea is to kind of make this a Basement Tapes type thing but with random musicians sort of showing up over the next year as opportunity arises.
Anyway, most of my stuff is going to stay in my mixing/overdub studio but I'm going to be sub letting my current rehearsal space and emptying that. So everything that was there is available to me. So now I have a few options for how I want to do things and I'd love y'all's input.
So first the set up and then the next post will be the questions/options.
_________
Again, the idea would be that most of the stuff is tracked live in one room. The reality is that I'll probably overdub many lead vocals and will certainly overdub sweetening instruments such as extra organ or percussion. But I'd like to keep bass/drums/guitars/piano live. Embrace the bleed. And also, we really will be rehearsing in here as well as recording... I don't see much difference though for this project.
Now that I'm not sharing a space, I can mike everything up with the "good stuff" which should be fun. Here's what will be miked...
Drums - I'm a minimalist. Two overheads, snare, kick. That's how I do it. Vocals - Two lead vocal mics that I'll use depending on the instrument I'm playing BGV - One background vocal mic Room - Probably one or two room/ambience mics which may or may not get used Bass - Run as DI, might throw a mic on there just in case. More inclined to re-amp as needed. Two guitar amps miked Piano - (possibly, although maybe not depending on space) with two mics Keyboard - two DI's
So we're talking 16 channels assuming I move the piano in.
What I've been doing is running all of that through my A&H GS3000, then out to JoeCo Black Box hard disk recorder, then back into the board (inline) for monitoring. The Black Box has suited my need for stress free rehearsal recording because I wasn't doing anything other than recording rehearsals. So the fact that it couldn't interface with a DAW didn't matter.
In this new space I can actually leave a computer there so the Black Box might be unneeded.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 24, 2023 16:44:00 GMT -6
So I have some choices to make since I'm going to have to spend something to change my setup to what I want to do.
1) Do I even want to use the GS3000? I like the inline workflow and I kind of like the idea of "mixing down" stuff that I like and then printing it to bring it to my home studio for further work. I'll have the space, I figure at the least it's convenient. But I'm open to other ways of doing this.
2) I'll be using my Trident S20's (four channels) as pre-amps for drums. I also have a pair of DBX 160's, a pair of RNC's, a Benson Studio Tallbird, and a TC Electronic M100 that are available. I could unrack some of my gear in my main studio but I really don't want to because I have other mixing projects I'm working on and I don't want to mess with my flow.
3) The big question is interface. Right now I'm considering either two MOTU 16as or one Presonus 32r. My plan is take 16 channels out from the board, send that to the DAW, then send 16 back to the same channels (inline format) and send those mixdowns back to the DAW in DAW channels 17 - 32. So I'll have 16 channels of raw takes and 16 of on the fly prints.
3a) Either MOTU or Preonus would work for that. But Presonus has the advantage of a pre-mixing a bunch of stuff as well as different instrument lineups. I would disable EQ on the board for tracking and do all of that on the Presonus for easier recall and then I would just use the EQ on the board for my mixdowns. I also like that the Presonus inputs are front facing so it can serve as a stagebox too. The MOTU has the advantage of better conversion (I assume) as well as compatibility with my other MOTU gear, not a small thing. But the disadvantage is that MOTU's software mixer is something I cannot decipher so I will be stuck in manual adjustments on my board for different instrument lineups.
Ok, that's probably enough to get the ball rolling.
I guess another option would be a MOTU 24AI and a 24AO. That would be enough channels for my purposes. Or should I just go ultra cheap and just attach a Beherincrapper to my MOTU Ultralite and spend the money on an extra AS Opto Comp and some other outboard to track through?
Enough for now...
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 24, 2023 16:46:14 GMT -6
And... this would be the one area where a purple site style "sell all that shit and do this instead" would actually be welcome. Since we're not doing our album in a studio this time, I do have some potential budget. Not much, but some. I'd rather spend it on promotion later down the line (as well as mastering and all that stuff) since I already own a ton of gear, but I'm open to anything that will make it easier to get where we want to go.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2023 16:49:37 GMT -6
Hmm, I'd say you need at least a 48 Channel RND console with Aurora's for conversion. plinker , did Shadow do good?
P.S There is some actual advice on its way.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 24, 2023 16:58:59 GMT -6
Hmm, I'd say you need at least a 48 Channel RND console with Aurora's for conversion. plinker , did Shadow do good?
P.S There is some actual advice on its way.
At the minimum. Although I don't want the Aurora's to be a weak point so if we're gonna go in for the RND Console, should probably not go cheap on converters. Gonna need 64 I/O of Prism Sound most likely. Just to capture the full depth of the cows mooing in the pasture next door.
|
|
|
Post by plinker on Jul 24, 2023 17:02:20 GMT -6
Hmm, I'd say you need at least a 48 Channel RND console with Aurora's for conversion. plinker , did Shadow do good? Haha! The Shadow Knows!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2023 17:13:25 GMT -6
At the minimum. Although I don't want the Aurora's to be a weak point so if we're gonna go in for the RND Console, should probably not go cheap on converters. Gonna need 64 I/O of Prism Sound most likely. Just to capture the full depth of the cows mooing in the pasture next door. Ah yes, please forgive me. I forgot about the delicate shuffle of a spider on the moon, the fourth resonance created by breath refracting off a triangle or the sound of a glint in a sales persons eye as I buy the same piece of equipment for the fourth time. Or is that John? Or me? I can't remember.
Sorry, I'm just de-railing your thread here. Carry on..
------------------------------------------------------------
Anyway, I'll tidy up the multiple posts and get to the advice bit:
Me thinks you're overthinking it, personally I'd have a solid setup where I could just walk in and record without having to repatch or mess around. Nothing destroy's creativity more than flapping around like jelly.
Simple as this, have everything mic'd up into a board connected to an interface / PC (or whatever you want to use). Set levels, don't clip, mix later.. Done. Live recordings tend not to need as much post as you're not trying to fill in tons of gaps.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 24, 2023 17:25:23 GMT -6
At the minimum. Although I don't want the Aurora's to be a weak point so if we're gonna go in for the RND Console, should probably not go cheap on converters. Gonna need 64 I/O of Prism Sound most likely. Just to capture the full depth of the cows mooing in the pasture next door. Ah yes, please forgive me. I forgot about the delicate shuffle of a spider on the moon, the fourth resonance created by breath refracting off a triangle or the sound of a glint in a sales persons eye as I buy the same piece of equipment for the fourth time. Or is that John? Or me? I can't remember.
Sorry, I'm just de-railing your thread here. Carry on..
------------------------------------------------------------
Anyway, I'll tidy up the multiple posts and get to the advice bit:
Me thinks you're overthinking it, personally I'd have a solid setup where I could just walk in and record without having to repatch or mess around. Nothing destroy's creativity more than flapping around like jelly.
Simple as this, have everything mic'd up into a board connected to an interface / PC (or whatever you want to use). Set levels, don't clip, mix later.. Done. Live recordings tend not to need as much post as you're not trying to fill in tons of gaps.
This is kind of why I'm leaning towards the Presonus 32r. It just feels like it will be really easy. Having recallable mixes "ITB" so to speak could be super valuable to not waste time patching stuff. Mix 1 - Standard lineup Mix 2 - Dude with mandolin shows up, save that mix in case he comes back again Mix 3 - etc etc etc In this case I wouldn't even be using the pre-amps on the board. The board would be there as a patch bay, for EQ/inserts on mix down, and for vibe (hey, vibe matters!). The Presonus line inputs totally bypass all processing (except conversion) so I can use the Tridents for the drums, my Portico 5032's for vocals (those I would be willing to unrack from the main studio since they're very portable), and stock Xmax for everything else.
|
|
|
Post by gouge on Jul 24, 2023 17:50:15 GMT -6
i had a similar setup with a soundcraft ghost.
i ended up incorporating half normalled points via a patch on the output of all external preamps and inputs of converters so i could completley bypass the console as needed. which i ended up doing.
console gets used for monitor only, setting up mixes on the fly to test ideas, extra preamps and eq when needed, mix downs otb, stereo out to tape/dsd during full band recording.
i set things up like that because i noted engineers i admired would typically go direct to tape or adc when tracking if they were not using the preamps in the control room mixer. idea being less shit in the path.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2023 18:18:42 GMT -6
This is kind of why I'm leaning towards the Presonus 32r. It just feels like it will be really easy. Having recallable mixes "ITB" so to speak could be super valuable to not waste time patching stuff. Mix 1 - Standard lineup Mix 2 - Dude with mandolin shows up, save that mix in case he comes back again Mix 3 - etc etc etc In this case I wouldn't even be using the pre-amps on the board. The board would be there as a patch bay, for EQ/inserts on mix down, and for vibe (hey, vibe matters!). Essentially that's similar to what I do in the studio as well, all of the inserts can be used or bypassed at any stage via the flick of a button. I don't ever repatch, if I need to reuse something I'll change the outputs ITB (via the DAW) or route via the desks FX (well it's a cue to FX) loop via a blend knob. This allows me to track with HW or not, rehash, change on the fly, parallel process etc. etc. whatever I need. For example I've got a reverb patched into FX loop 1 but again at the flick of a button using Pro Tools templates and board returns I can switch to an ITB reverb / compressor or both in a second and still have them blended across the FX loop (there's a USB to EXT (FX) channel function).
I have dedicated mic's assigned to each channel and as the studio's evolved there's basic HW tracking definitions set for every one, in short once I've thrown up faders I'm 90% there and I can instantly tell how the mix will effect the final product but more importantly if I've messed up whilst tracking. Hey, I've had a long hiatus and this is how I learned originally.
This wouldn't be possible without a DAW and / or desk that can be used as a routing matrix, point being make it as easy for yourself as possible. If the Presonus can be used as a simple but effective distributor that requires minimal or even zero change that would be my choice, as Gouge said you can experiment from there on. I'd setup the desk to DAW functionality first though..
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 24, 2023 19:52:53 GMT -6
Hmm... this is another argument in favor of the Presonus 32r. With my current set of gear, I don't think I could bypass the console with the MOTU AO/AI combo. The MOTU's would just be taking lines from the board and then sending them back into the board. Bypassing would require patching.
The 32R on the other hand can go straight to the DAW before hitting the board at all. It has 32 ins (plus an RCA in if you count that... 34) and 18 outs (two of which are Main Monitor out so for our purposes call it 16).
I could take 16 mic/line inputs straight into the 32R and then into the DAW. Then I can run 16 outs from the DAW into the board, process those and run them back into the remaining 16 ins on the 32R. The big question is if the 32R supports half-normal patching. I kinda doubt a unit that is $100/ch can do that but if it can I could listen to the "processed" tracks and still have 16 safety tracks getting tracked raw. This is appealing because I don't always trust every channel on this board (or really any board for that matter).
So the 32R also has the advantage of having Presonus' Capture software which align with Studio One for a simplified tracking experience. That's appealing. But what other devices could do what I'm looking for the 32R to do here? That can take the signal and send half to the DAW and half unconverted to the board?
(Also, thanks for helping crystalize my thoughts here guys!)
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Jul 24, 2023 20:49:44 GMT -6
GS3K and black box? Well before you listed equipment I was thinking RADAR and the AH GS3 I saw on eBay! For this type of situation I like the simple recorder, you can move files to a computer and edit and need less I/O.
Hunch, like playing live my hunch is you’re going to end up with the kit completely mic’ed up just because in a band playing live situation it’s about control and isolation.
Situations like this are where I love patchbays because, where as you are thinking preset set up, my experience is I need to be able to change and reroute on the fly, being able to swap where my best pre’s are from song to song really speeds things up.
KiT I would want with me for this: 1. SSL or other clean problem solver EQ. 2 filters filters filters, they just make it easier to deal with the environment and carve out crap when everyone is playing together. 3. This where I lust for the rack of DBX 160a RAT used live in the 80’s it was 6ft tall and every space occupied. Dynamic control just makes it easier. 4. Lots of Gobos blankets and acustic panels, the ability to isolate and to retune the room, golden. 5. Run like I run live, a couple of utility mics and DI’s ready to go that are not normally used but ready to go because it’s just easy to grab in a hurry. 6 headphones you both love and trust.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 24, 2023 21:33:45 GMT -6
GS3K and black box? Well before you listed equipment I was thinking RADAR and the AH GS3 I saw on eBay! For this type of situation I like the simple recorder, you can move files to a computer and edit and need less I/O. Hunch, like playing live my hunch is you’re going to end up with the kit completely mic’ed up just because in a band playing live situation it’s about control and isolation. Situations like this are where I love patchbays because, where as you are thinking preset set up, my experience is I need to be able to change and reroute on the fly, being able to swap where my best pre’s are from song to song really speeds things up. KiT I would want with me for this: 1. SSL or other clean problem solver EQ. 2 filters filters filters, they just make it easier to deal with the environment and carve out crap when everyone is playing together. 3. This where I lust for the rack of DBX 160a RAT used live in the 80’s it was 6ft tall and every space occupied. Dynamic control just makes it easier. 4. Lots of Gobos blankets and acustic panels, the ability to isolate and to retune the room, golden. 5. Run like I run live, a couple of utility mics and DI’s ready to go that are not normally used but ready to go because it’s just easy to grab in a hurry. 6 headphones you both love and trust. I actually love the GS3 plus Blackbox setup for my current uses (straight up recording rehearsals). The problem is that if I want to do any overdubs I have to dump it into my DAW and then use another interface to do all that. Which I can do I suppose, it's just a bit clunky to do kind of on a whim. So what you gain in simplicity (and it IS dead simple) you lose in creativity. Can't do the... "wow, that was awesome... play it back I wanna try to put a guitar solo over that." You could make the case that "so what?" Just let the live stuff be the live stuff and think about the overdubs separately. I guess this is what the Radar stuff is for? But I love the direction you're taking this. Not mentioned is that I do have loads of gobos and blankets and panels and things I've been collecting from various studio closings [sniff] and other things. Same deal with mics and affordable and simple processing. And the thing I love about the GS3K is the usable EQ and effective filters. Isn't there an audio interface with an all analog passthrough? Seems like this would be a thing. Why can't I can't 16 channels and send an identical signal to the DAW and to the board? I can actually do that with the JoeCo Blackbox, I just can't overdub anything. ericn do you know if the Bluebox has the all analog passthrough? Not clear from the website text.
|
|
|
Post by mythundreamt on Jul 25, 2023 14:43:34 GMT -6
the sound of a glint in a sales persons eye as I buy Indubitably the most beautiful thing I have read on an audio forum in 20 years of doing so. Merci bo peep for that.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 26, 2023 13:59:46 GMT -6
So here's the first update.
I'm going to test out the StudioLive 32R in my current rehearsal space, it arrives on Friday.
It appears from what I can determine from various block diagrams that I can choose to route the signal either to USB or to Analog out. If that's the case, while not quite as good as being able to split the signal (analog out AND USB), it certainly helps. I think I can use the 32R as a combo of a stage box, USB interface, and digital patchbay.
Here's my thinking on routing for now.
- 16 inputs going into the console taking live sounds off of the floor. Tape Outs from the console into the first 16 inputs of the 32R. The 16 outputs of the 32R will go back into the Tape Ins on the console to make for a standard inline arrangement. The GS3000 is great for this. The Main Outs on the 32R will go to the Console so that I can take advantage of speaker switching between my PA mains and my near fields.
- With the mixing software for the 32R I can create easy templates depending on what I want to send to those 16 outputs, this would be used for either mix downs or for playback with easy level adjustment via physical faders.
- The six auxes on the console will send to various FX and return to channels 17 - 22 on the 32R.
- Four channels of Trident S20 pres (drums) and two channels of Portico 5032 (vocals) will go into 23 - 28 of the 32R which bypasses pre-amp path entirely for true line input.
- Channels 29 - 32 on 32R will be left open for just random "hey let's try this" type miking.
So I will end up with 32 channels hitting the AD conversion at the same time that I can then digitally reroute, bus, or whatever either back out to the board via 16 analog outs or into the DAW depending on what I'm doing. The channels are individually switchable as either sending to USB or to Analog outs so I think this will allow this to function like a patchbay in some respects. For example I could send a recorded guitar part out to the console, sent to Studio Tall Bird, and then back into DAW with just a few clicks. If I need more sends I can use the Grouping system on the GS3000 instead.
But most of my patching needs will be surrounding trying out different mikes and things as opposed to effects (tracking only in this room, with the exception of "printing" Console EQ or rough mixes). And as long as I'm not trying to track more than 16 tracks at the same time I'll be covered there.
I know I was nervous before about sending too much through the console first just cuz of gremlins and whatever, but I think as long as I'm sending drums and vocals through ultra reliable signal paths, I can deal with the possibility of a live guitar part fritzing out. It's really only drums that I would be pissed to lose a live take of.
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Jul 26, 2023 14:27:05 GMT -6
This has no real bearing on what you decide to do bc you will base your decision on actual experience when you have the mixer in your hands Friday. That said I recently read a thread on reddit where the literal quote when it comes to mixers was, “friends don’t let friends buy Presonus”. 😬
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2023 15:43:51 GMT -6
So here's the first update. I'm going to test out the StudioLive 32R in my current rehearsal space, it arrives on Friday. Are you purposely trying to overcomplicate this?
Personally I'd have probably gone for something like an A&H Qu 24 Chrome, then dumped all the external amps and the console (because they're not strictly necessary). If the board is good enough quality there's zero reason why it won't sound fantastic especially if you follow Eric's advice and try to isolate things a bit. With said digital board you can do the "blackbox" idea or record to a DAW. Whatever strikes the mood, either way you can do a mock or even final mix with it as well. Don't even need a powerful machine, some old laptop would do because you'll use the internal CPU power of the digital desk to do some degree of mixing.
Also, it's shiny and has faders. What more could one want?
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 26, 2023 16:35:47 GMT -6
This has no real bearing on what you decide to do bc you will base your decision on actual experience when you have the mixer in your hands Friday. That said I recently read a thread on reddit where the literal quote when it comes to mixers was, “friends don’t let friends buy Presonus”. 😬 Haha. Yeah, I think the reputation has improved over the years across the board on their product lines. But supposedly the previous generation of their mixers were very bad.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 26, 2023 16:38:09 GMT -6
So here's the first update. I'm going to test out the StudioLive 32R in my current rehearsal space, it arrives on Friday. Are you purposely trying to overcomplicate this?
Personally I'd have probably gone for something like an A&H Qu 24 Chrome, then dumped all the external amps and the console (because they're not strictly necessary). If the board is good enough quality there's zero reason why it won't sound fantastic especially if you follow Eric's advice and try to isolate things a bit. With said digital board you can do the "blackbox" idea or record to a DAW. Whatever strikes the mood, either way you can do a mock or even final mix with it as well. Don't even need a powerful machine, some old laptop would do because you'll use the internal CPU power of the digital desk to do some degree of mixing.
Also, it's shiny and has faders. What more could one want?
Overthinking is my favorite kind of thinking! I don’t know, it feels kinda silly to have two mixers. I pulled the trigger on the 32R to just stop thinking and try something, but I’ll be fast on the return trigger finger.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2023 16:56:14 GMT -6
Overthinking is my favorite kind of thinking! I don’t know, it feels kinda silly to have two mixers. I pulled the trigger on the 32R to just stop thinking and try something, but I’ll be fast on the return trigger finger. Don't you already have two mixers with the A&H + Presonus? Anyway, I wasn't suggesting you get them at the same time. It's just another option to consider whilst you're still in the returns phase.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 26, 2023 17:31:38 GMT -6
Overthinking is my favorite kind of thinking! I don’t know, it feels kinda silly to have two mixers. I pulled the trigger on the 32R to just stop thinking and try something, but I’ll be fast on the return trigger finger. Don't you already have two mixers with the A&H + Presonus? Anyway, I wasn't suggesting you get them at the same time. It's just another option to consider whilst you're still in the returns phase. The Presonus is just a rack mixer, so no faders and all that. Just 32 ins and 18 outs plus USB I/O. But the simplest thing of all would be to get two MOTU's, a 24AO and a 24AI and just wire up the whole board. The problem with that is that MOTU's digital mixer is just inscrutable to me so I'd be totally analog when it comes to recall on the live in the room sound, cue mixes, etc. Although... I suppose I could accomplish a lot of those same things just through my DAW, StudioOne for this project. If I'm taking every channel in and out from the board and running zero plugins, I could do that with very low RTL and use the DAW to save mix snapshots and cues and the like. I don't know, something about the 32R just seems easy and easy is what I want.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 26, 2023 20:47:20 GMT -6
Shifting gears... I'm going to go with a different approach.
Ordering 24 channels of MOTU I/O. Went this way for three reasons.
1) Cabling. I already have the D-SUB's from the JoeCo Blackbox in place so it's a trivial matter to replace the Blackbox with the two MOTU's. 2) Now that I've resolved to run through the board mostly, there's no reason for any preamps. So the 32R actually adds stuff I don't need. 3) I can sync these with my Ultralight AVB to give myself a total of 24 I/O from the board, six inputs from outboard preamps, two interface pres, two interface instr ins, and six outputs for whatever. Simpler and more flexible.
And I don't need to learn the stupid MOTU mixer cuz I'll monitor off the board as I'm doing now.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jul 27, 2023 8:02:06 GMT -6
I haven't read all the replies yet, but here's my initial thoughts.
Go with 24+ channels. You never know when you want to add a mic to something or keep something patched up for later use. There's been plenty of times in the studio where we've been tracking something that just isn't working at the moment and we've changed gears to something else for a short period and then jumping back to the original instrument once inspiration strikes. Leaving things patched up can facilitate that.
Motu 24AI is what I use and it's been rock solid and sounds great. Yeah the Motu "mixer" sucks, but at least once the routing is set, you can forget about it. For me, I usually name my streams so that I can easily pull up the stream in Reaper and then just use the mixer in Reaper to do all the work for setting monitoring sends, etc.
I'd also use a few snakes with XLR/TRS boxes on the ends if possible. It just makes things tidy to run a snake to the drums, a snake to the guitars, a snake to the vocals, etc, and then use regular XLRs from there to the mics. I do this and it really cuts down on the clutter. I suppose you could just bundle the regular XLR cables with velcro ties as well though.
I don't know about the location of the cabin.. If it's really far from civilization, you might think about extra mics, stands, cables (or a way to repair them: soldering gear, extra connectors, etc) and all sort of consumable/expendable stuff. Take 2x the amount of drum heads, sticks, strings and picks you might need since those things have a habit of breaking or getting lost at the worst times. It seems like the logistical stuff tends to cut sessions short more often than technical problems.
Also, since it's a "cabin" and I have no idea of the layout or interior decoration, you might take a bunch of acoustic panels. You never know when you'll run into an issue that a lowly panel can fix.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jul 27, 2023 14:04:42 GMT -6
I haven't read all the replies yet, but here's my initial thoughts. Go with 24+ channels. You never know when you want to add a mic to something or keep something patched up for later use. There's been plenty of times in the studio where we've been tracking something that just isn't working at the moment and we've changed gears to something else for a short period and then jumping back to the original instrument once inspiration strikes. Leaving things patched up can facilitate that. Motu 24AI is what I use and it's been rock solid and sounds great. Yeah the Motu "mixer" sucks, but at least once the routing is set, you can forget about it. For me, I usually name my streams so that I can easily pull up the stream in Reaper and then just use the mixer in Reaper to do all the work for setting monitoring sends, etc. I'd also use a few snakes with XLR/TRS boxes on the ends if possible. It just makes things tidy to run a snake to the drums, a snake to the guitars, a snake to the vocals, etc, and then use regular XLRs from there to the mics. I do this and it really cuts down on the clutter. I suppose you could just bundle the regular XLR cables with velcro ties as well though. I don't know about the location of the cabin.. If it's really far from civilization, you might think about extra mics, stands, cables (or a way to repair them: soldering gear, extra connectors, etc) and all sort of consumable/expendable stuff. Take 2x the amount of drum heads, sticks, strings and picks you might need since those things have a habit of breaking or getting lost at the worst times. It seems like the logistical stuff tends to cut sessions short more often than technical problems. Also, since it's a "cabin" and I have no idea of the layout or interior decoration, you might take a bunch of acoustic panels. You never know when you'll run into an issue that a lowly panel can fix. Great advice. Moving this direction for sure. The cabin is actually kind of unique. It's only a few miles from civilization and only five miles from my house in small town (Austin area) TX. But it's plopped down in the middle of a field on a 25 acre farm for God knows what reason. (I think it used to be an office when the farm made money?) It's a 15' x 30' structure on a raised concrete foundation. Floor feels solid (though who knows?) but the walls are basically a drum head. So I'm bringing tons and tons of acoustic panels and I'm going to attack reflections as close to the source as I can. Good news is I'm not doing any mixing here so my hope is I can control ugly frequencies with various funky gobo forts and things. Hey, it don't need to look pretty to sound pretty! The project itself (posted this on another topic surrounding mic ideas) is meant to be kind of ramshackle. So as long as the captured sounds are inoffensive, it's ok. Great idea on snakes by the way. At my current rehearsal space I just have a 16x16 box and honestly, it would have been better to have four 4x4 boxes instead. I'll keep an eye out on Craigslist, these things are always popping up.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jul 27, 2023 14:59:18 GMT -6
I haven't read all the replies yet, but here's my initial thoughts. Go with 24+ channels. You never know when you want to add a mic to something or keep something patched up for later use. There's been plenty of times in the studio where we've been tracking something that just isn't working at the moment and we've changed gears to something else for a short period and then jumping back to the original instrument once inspiration strikes. Leaving things patched up can facilitate that. Motu 24AI is what I use and it's been rock solid and sounds great. Yeah the Motu "mixer" sucks, but at least once the routing is set, you can forget about it. For me, I usually name my streams so that I can easily pull up the stream in Reaper and then just use the mixer in Reaper to do all the work for setting monitoring sends, etc. I'd also use a few snakes with XLR/TRS boxes on the ends if possible. It just makes things tidy to run a snake to the drums, a snake to the guitars, a snake to the vocals, etc, and then use regular XLRs from there to the mics. I do this and it really cuts down on the clutter. I suppose you could just bundle the regular XLR cables with velcro ties as well though. I don't know about the location of the cabin.. If it's really far from civilization, you might think about extra mics, stands, cables (or a way to repair them: soldering gear, extra connectors, etc) and all sort of consumable/expendable stuff. Take 2x the amount of drum heads, sticks, strings and picks you might need since those things have a habit of breaking or getting lost at the worst times. It seems like the logistical stuff tends to cut sessions short more often than technical problems. Also, since it's a "cabin" and I have no idea of the layout or interior decoration, you might take a bunch of acoustic panels. You never know when you'll run into an issue that a lowly panel can fix. Great advice. Moving this direction for sure. The cabin is actually kind of unique. It's only a few miles from civilization and only five miles from my house in small town (Austin area) TX. But it's plopped down in the middle of a field on a 25 acre farm for God knows what reason. (I think it used to be an office when the farm made money?) It's a 15' x 30' structure on a raised concrete foundation. Floor feels solid (though who knows?) but the walls are basically a drum head. So I'm bringing tons and tons of acoustic panels and I'm going to attack reflections as close to the source as I can. Good news is I'm not doing any mixing here so my hope is I can control ugly frequencies with various funky gobo forts and things. Hey, it don't need to look pretty to sound pretty! The project itself (posted this on another topic surrounding mic ideas) is meant to be kind of ramshackle. So as long as the captured sounds are inoffensive, it's ok. Great idea on snakes by the way. At my current rehearsal space I just have a 16x16 box and honestly, it would have been better to have four 4x4 boxes instead. I'll keep an eye out on Craigslist, these things are always popping up. Sounds like a lot of fun! Yeah for the snakes, it's just a lot easier to have a 30-50ft snake run somewhere than try to have a big bundle of regular XLR cables that long..
|
|