|
|
Post by M57 on Mar 10, 2023 17:02:41 GMT -6
I'm shopping for an approximately 34" monitor for a Mac Studio (not purchased yet). Most internet searches point me toward the LG Ultrafine model (LG 34BK95U-W) that comes in at around $1000 (Amazon). They have LG 34" Ultrawide monitors at half that price and less. This is a recording studio; I don't need gaming quality graphics, do I?
There's 5k, 4k, ultrafine, ultrawide. - What are folks using/recommend in this size range?
|
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Mar 10, 2023 17:23:39 GMT -6
Im' looking at my LG Ultrawide right now, running on my Mac Studio. I bought in on the suggestions of people here. I did not pay a grand. link I got this one and I've been really happy with it. |
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 10, 2023 17:24:05 GMT -6
I use a 2k 32".
I sit about 2ft away from it and I find this about the right size and resolution for me.
Pixel pitch (resolution/screen size) matters as being too large (if the screen is large but resolution is low meaning they pixels are physically large) results in obvious aliasing and blockiness.
Too small of a pixel pitch (say 4k at 32") means that all print is very small in native resolution and probably needs uprezing which will reduce functional resolution and wastes money buying a higher resolution..
Also, I only buy IPS panels in matte/non reflective finish. They're much brighter and richer and you don't see your reflection..
|
|
|
|
Post by geoff738 on Mar 10, 2023 17:43:29 GMT -6
I too am confused by the monitor options but I’m space constrained and would prefer a 27 or even 24 inch model. Am I being dumb going that small. I’d like to do some elementary photo editing too, but just family/holiday stuff, nothing particularly demanding.
Cheers,
Geoff
|
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Mar 10, 2023 17:47:24 GMT -6
Im' looking at my LG Ultrawide right now, running on my Mac Studio. I bought in on the suggestions of people here. I did not pay a grand. link I got this one and I've been really happy with it. Nice! So you're saying the UltraFine is probably overkill? |
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Mar 10, 2023 17:47:47 GMT -6
What great timing, I'm literally looking for computer monitors right now. To M57, most $300-400 monitors are going to be just fine. No need for a 1k plus monitor unless you're video editing and need a really good, calibrated monitor with proper coloring.
To the group: any thoughts on using a TV vs a computer monitor? And also 16:9 vs Ultrawide 21:9? Right now I use a 32" TV and it works pretty good but I need to readjust my desk setup to get my computer screen out of the way of my speaker monitors (currently getting weird reflections with how things are setup).
|
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Mar 10, 2023 17:49:31 GMT -6
I use a 2k 32". I sit about 2ft away from it and I find this about the right size and resolution for me. Pixel pitch (resolution/screen size) matters as being too large (if the screen is large but resolution is low meaning they pixels are physically large) results in obvious aliasing and blockiness. Too small of a pixel pitch (say 4k at 32") means that all print is very small in native resolution and probably needs uprezing which will reduce functional resolution and wastes money buying a higher resolution.. Also, I only buy IPS panels in matte/non reflective finish. They're much brighter and richer and you don't see your reflection.. Can you elaborate on "IPS Panels" ? I know nothing about computer monitors... |
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Mar 10, 2023 17:51:02 GMT -6
I use a 2k 32". I sit about 2ft away from it and I find this about the right size and resolution for me. Pixel pitch (resolution/screen size) matters as being too large (if the screen is large but resolution is low meaning they pixels are physically large) results in obvious aliasing and blockiness. Too small of a pixel pitch (say 4k at 32") means that all print is very small in native resolution and probably needs uprezing which will reduce functional resolution and wastes money buying a higher resolution.. Also, I only buy IPS panels in matte/non reflective finish. They're much brighter and richer and you don't see your reflection.. 2k ..interesting ..and even more inexpensive! I'm about 3' away from the screen - and more when tracking. I also notice that a lot of these are 75 hz and above. I seem to remember that the studio only supports 60 hz. Can anyone confirm that? |
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Mar 10, 2023 18:01:59 GMT -6
Also -- Thoughts about curved vs flat? My desk is curved so curved would look awesome. But is it good or bad that they would curve into/towards the front edge of my monitors (..again, a cool look). Might not it be better sonically if the edges of the screen stays well behind the boxes (essentially pointing towards the center of the speaker boxes (Dyn 48's)?
|
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Mar 10, 2023 18:08:45 GMT -6
And also 16:9 vs Ultrawide 21:9? Right now I use a 32" TV and it works pretty good but I need to readjust my desk setup to get my computer screen out of the way of my speaker monitors (currently getting weird reflections with how things are setup). I'm using two monitors right now. A 21" and an iMac 27". So I'm really use to keeping the playing field on one screen and dragging plug-ins to the other, so the Ultrawide just makes a lot of sense to me. I am, however, also interested in how the proximity of the screen to my monitors (they're practically touching) affects things sonically, and how much I should try and avoid that. |
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Mar 10, 2023 18:31:20 GMT -6
Im' looking at my LG Ultrawide right now, running on my Mac Studio. I bought in on the suggestions of people here. I did not pay a grand. link I got this one and I've been really happy with it. I have the exact same monitor and it’s perfect for my needs. |
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 10, 2023 18:47:11 GMT -6
I use a 2k 32". I sit about 2ft away from it and I find this about the right size and resolution for me. Pixel pitch (resolution/screen size) matters as being too large (if the screen is large but resolution is low meaning they pixels are physically large) results in obvious aliasing and blockiness. Too small of a pixel pitch (say 4k at 32") means that all print is very small in native resolution and probably needs uprezing which will reduce functional resolution and wastes money buying a higher resolution.. Also, I only buy IPS panels in matte/non reflective finish. They're much brighter and richer and you don't see your reflection.. Can you elaborate on "IPS Panels" ? I know nothing about computer monitors... It's a type of display technology. It's brighter than others and can look more crisp I think. Re: TV.. TVs these days are mostly just big monitors. However, some look better than others as monitors. Can't really know which unless you tried them. |
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 10, 2023 18:49:28 GMT -6
I have one of these and I like it. LG 32QN55T-B 32inch QHD IPS HDR10 Monitor with FreeSync (Renewed) Black a.co/d/jentbIW |
|
|
|
Post by donr on Mar 10, 2023 19:04:18 GMT -6
I use a couple year old 55" curved Samsung TV for a monitor, about 3' away. The 4k resolution is 'way too small for DAW use, I have to downscale so the DAW looks like you'd expect. Also, the TV has a latency that can't be improved, even with "PC" or Game mode. Other than that, it's great.
For DAW work, high Rez really isn't required, I've found. TV, OTOH, looks good at high rez.
|
|
|
|
Post by copperx on Mar 10, 2023 19:49:16 GMT -6
I use a 2k 32". I sit about 2ft away from it and I find this about the right size and resolution for me. Pixel pitch (resolution/screen size) matters as being too large (if the screen is large but resolution is low meaning they pixels are physically large) results in obvious aliasing and blockiness. Too small of a pixel pitch (say 4k at 32") means that all print is very small in native resolution and probably needs uprezing which will reduce functional resolution and wastes money buying a higher resolution.. Also, I only buy IPS panels in matte/non reflective finish. They're much brighter and richer and you don't see your reflection.. I really enjoy high DPI so I got a 24" 4k monitor which is great. However, I think the sweet spot is a 28" 4k. Looks amazing. 2k at 32" is too low of a DPI for me. Although it can work if you don't deal with text too much. |
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 10, 2023 22:29:20 GMT -6
I use a 2k 32". I sit about 2ft away from it and I find this about the right size and resolution for me. Pixel pitch (resolution/screen size) matters as being too large (if the screen is large but resolution is low meaning they pixels are physically large) results in obvious aliasing and blockiness. Too small of a pixel pitch (say 4k at 32") means that all print is very small in native resolution and probably needs uprezing which will reduce functional resolution and wastes money buying a higher resolution.. Also, I only buy IPS panels in matte/non reflective finish. They're much brighter and richer and you don't see your reflection.. I really enjoy high DPI so I got a 24" 4k monitor which is great. However, I think the sweet spot is a 28" 4k. Looks amazing. 2k at 32" is too low of a DPI for me. Although it can work if you don't deal with text too much. 2k 32" at 2ft away I can't see individual pixels.. I have a 32" 4k monitor for my gaming computer but text is very small on it. I even sit very close to it too. |
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Mar 11, 2023 0:06:14 GMT -6
Im' looking at my LG Ultrawide right now, running on my Mac Studio. I bought in on the suggestions of people here. I did not pay a grand. link I got this one and I've been really happy with it. Nice! So you're saying the UltraFine is probably overkill? I'd think so Im' looking at my LG Ultrawide right now, running on my Mac Studio. I bought in on the suggestions of people here. I did not pay a grand. link I got this one and I've been really happy with it. I have the exact same monitor and it’s perfect for my needs. I thought you were one of the LGites here. I think mine is actually a 29" and I still like it. |
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Mar 11, 2023 1:22:22 GMT -6
I'm in agreement with what most here are saying: I use an LG 32" Ultra HD, and it's perfect for DAW use. I even color grade on it for professional video, though I'm really at the point of wanting a more consistent and predictable tool for that--that's what makes the money over here these days.
Still, this general series of lower budget LGs are great displays, and it's hard to go wrong with one. Mine is 4k, but as svart mentioned, I usually scale my UI to a 1080-like layout.
I've also got mine on a VESA mount that's attached via vise grip to the back of my desk. I can pull the screen close to me while doing fine editing, and push it back out of the way during mixing or critical listening to get rid of any interference with my KH310s. I'm pretty happy with the setup.
|
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 11, 2023 3:54:57 GMT -6
I’m a small monitor evangelist  Nothing bigger than 24” HD All that light and visuality in front of you! I read these threads and I’m starting to think I’m alone in hating computer monitors. I have a blank screen saver I activate the moment I’ve done with a DAW mouse movement. I want to listen not look. It’s just me isn’t it |
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Mar 11, 2023 5:59:25 GMT -6
HDMI display video output
Support for one display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz
DVI output using HDMI to DVI Adapter (sold separately)
Does this mean the Studio requires a 60Hz monitor? Most of them spec at 75 and above.
|
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 11, 2023 8:32:26 GMT -6
HDMI display video outputSupport for one display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz DVI output using HDMI to DVI Adapter (sold separately) Does this mean the Studio requires a 60Hz monitor? Most of them spec at 75 and above. Nope. 60 just means that's the minimum. They'll auto-negotiate. A 75hz monitor will simply work at 60hz instead. Buying a higher refresh rate screen for studio work is a waste. High refresh rates are for games where timing is critical. |
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Mar 11, 2023 17:56:59 GMT -6
What specs should I be looking at for eye strain? Brightness? Contrast? Anti-glare? All of the above?
|
|
|
|
Post by BenjaminAshlin on Mar 12, 2023 4:30:31 GMT -6
I use a 43 inch 4k monitor. It would recommend 32-40 inch 4k for your new studio.
I haven't found ultrawides to be very useful in the studio due to the need for vertical real estate. If you already use an ultrawide then fair play, but if you haven't used one in the studio try before you buy. They are very good for multi document use or excel use.
|
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Mar 12, 2023 11:03:37 GMT -6
I highly recommend the LG DualUp. Been using it for a couple weeks and I love it. Ideally suited for a DAW. It's the same size as two stacked 24" screens. So it's slightly higher than it is wide. It also comes with a fantastic desk mount with a very heavy duty articulating arm. Matte finish to the screen. Really everything I was looking for. It can also take two different input sources and split the screen if you need such things. Honestly... buy it. Try it. Return it if you don't like it. I bet you'll keep it.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2023 12:11:54 GMT -6
I use a pair of BenQ wide monitors. Nominally, they're 34" monitors, but the aspect ratio is different (resolution of each is 3440 x 1440). Price per monitor is $899, but they do specials once in a while. I got onto the dual-monitor bandwagon back in my developer days and it stayed with me. The top-to-bottom size of the monitor is about the same as a regular 27" monitor, but you get a lot more real-estate side-to-side. This reduces a neck problem for me and also keeps me from having to raise my speakers to shoot over the computer monitor. Graphically these are excellent, although they may fall a little short for serious photography or color-grading (gamut is good, but not quite what you need). I've had them for 3-4 years without problems. They're currently on my Studio Ultra. |
|
