|
Post by M57 on Dec 25, 2022 6:39:42 GMT -6
Let's say I'd want to purchase a stereo compressor (or eq) for the mix buss, but also to be able to use one or both of its channels for tracking. Assuming this is the only peice of gear that I anticipate wanting to do this with, should I just deal with the hassle of switching cables all the time, or should I get a patch bay? I wouldn't be doing it that often, maybe a couple times a week at most and likely a lot less, so I don't think that wear and tear would be an issue. Is there such a thing as a tiny patchbay that only supports a couple of units? One solution that comes to mind ..I use 500 series pre-amps. Are there perhaps boxes with switching to let me do this assuming the compressor is also 500 series? Hmm ..might there be such a thing as a 500 series patchbay module, or is that just silly? EDIT: Yeah, I know how to use a search engine.. www.blacklionaudio.com/store/500-series-racks/pbr-8-500-series-rack/..but I'd like to hear what folks think..
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Dec 25, 2022 6:57:39 GMT -6
Doing a little more research on the 500 series option..
Also the Fredenstein Bento 8 Pro. It doesn't have a patchbay per se but..
TepeOP review: Of course all bets are off if I decide to go with 19" gear. Then my original question still applies.
|
|
|
Post by subspace on Dec 25, 2022 7:02:30 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 25, 2022 7:19:28 GMT -6
A patch-bay serves two purposes: signal flow and reducing wear and tear on your hardware i/o, all connection to HW are set and forget, wear goes on the PB.
There is the convenience factor of the front facing bay as well.
Sansung S also has switching on the front panel, another good feature.
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Dec 25, 2022 8:35:25 GMT -6
I'm starting to realize that even with just a single gear purchase, I'm probably going to want a standard bay. One thing I didn't think of is that I already have a Buss Compressor that sits on the 2 buss. I'll want to avoid multiple DA/AD trips from my interface, which I'm pretty sure means I'll also want to have the buss compressor hooked up to the bay. The Samson S does the trick very affordably. Of course, I'd be spending more on cables than the bay.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 25, 2022 8:50:49 GMT -6
I’ve had 3 samsung S, zero problems.
I have my ssl clone on the bay, use logic’s i/o plug, works perfectly
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Dec 25, 2022 10:18:57 GMT -6
You want a patchbay, once you go there you will never understand those who haven't. Even the live racks have a small patchbay for emergency re-routing!
|
|
|
Post by srb on Dec 26, 2022 8:29:42 GMT -6
Gotta go with a patchbay! You'll be glad you did.
|
|
|
Post by plinker on Dec 26, 2022 13:45:01 GMT -6
I don’t think a patch bay is worth the hassle for one/two pieces of gear. Go with Digital patching through your interface.
We had a big thread about it earlier this year.
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Dec 26, 2022 13:56:41 GMT -6
I don’t think a patch bay is worth the hassle for one/two pieces of gear. Go with Digital patching through your interface. We had a big thread about it earlier this year. So if I buy a set of EQP's and I want to use one of them for tracking, then switch to using both of them on the mix buss AND I already have a stereo compressor on my mix buss, there's a way to hook it up so using digital patching using Logic? Could someone point me towards that thread? Mind you I want them to work in series with the compressor on the mix buss. Even if I can do that with digital patching, it's going to involve multiple da/ad trips, and I'll still have to manually change one of them out for tracking, right?
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Dec 26, 2022 13:58:17 GMT -6
I don’t think a patch bay is worth the hassle for one/two pieces of gear. Go with Digital patching through your interface. We had a big thread about it earlier this year. I’m going to counter this my friend, it never stops at 2😁 always easier 2 start at 2 as well as the initial investment in patchbay cabling doesn’t hurt as much. That’s probably the biggest drawback to adding patchbays is that huge hit you take investing in something so blah cabling. You make the investment in bays early and you simply incorporate each necessary cable investment with the purchase of each piece! See mom did learn something in B-school 😜
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Dec 26, 2022 15:37:58 GMT -6
Get a 2 ru panel with xlr punches. Wire it up with some cables and a few panel mount xlr’s. Make up a few 16” xlr patch cables, label it with a ptouch out over in and you’re all set to go and can pop a few more in there if / when you expand your outboard.
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Dec 26, 2022 16:27:49 GMT -6
Get a 2 ru panel with xlr punches. Wire it up with some cables and a few panel mount xlr’s. Make up a few 16” xlr patch cables, label it with a ptouch out over in and you’re all set to go and can pop a few more in there if / when you expand your outboard. You mean something like this? XLR PatchbayI'm still trying to wrap my head around how it would work with no normalized connections.
|
|
|
Post by plinker on Dec 26, 2022 16:56:50 GMT -6
I don’t think a patch bay is worth the hassle for one/two pieces of gear. Go with Digital patching through your interface. We had a big thread about it earlier this year. So if I buy a set of EQP's and I want to use one of them for tracking, then switch to using both of them on the mix buss AND I already have a stereo compressor on my mix buss, there's a way to hook it up so using digital patching using Logic? Could someone point me towards that thread? Mind you I want them to work in series with the compressor on the mix buss. Even if I can do that with digital patching, it's going to involve multiple da/ad trips, and I'll still have to manually change one of them out for tracking, right? -Yes; it will require extra da/ad trips, but unless your converter stinks, you won't hear it. Also, depending on your interface, you may/not have latency.
-Yes; you can do it in Logic as a send. You'll have to work in your interface UI to route the send to/from the hardware. -During tracking, if you want the processor to be directly after the preamp, then you'll have to rewire. Otherwise, take the preamp signal into your interface, and route it back out to the processor like you would any other digital patch.
I like the DIY small patchbay that Jeremy suggested. I was going to do that once, but find it's just easier doing it digitally.
Also, how many times a week are you going to have to be going from tracking to mixing, really?? Is it enough to warrant a patchbay? You can always go down that path, if needed.
Just some thoughts -- I'm no pro, so grain-of-salt here.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Dec 26, 2022 17:19:13 GMT -6
I went the XLR patchbay route as they are used in Mastering Studio's and I wanted the very best quality. I only have a small number of tracking and mixing units so they fitted on a 32XLR to DB25 bay. I went with a Networksound patchbay they are beautifully made and very high quality - I then bought 4x custom made Nutrik XLR to DB25 snakes. It wasn't cheap to buy it all (quality patching never is) but the quality, reliability and flexibility is well worth it. Plus with an XLR bay you can patch mics directly into the bay. www.networksound.com/index.php/products/pbays/xlr32db25
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Dec 26, 2022 17:31:01 GMT -6
Mr patchbay, reconditioned TT bays, I am using a pair of bays that date back to at least the 1920’s. Yeah in theory the XLR’s are better but, we don’t have a standard for the pins on an XLR, we do for TT 1/4in or the Military jacks. Once you introduce yourself to the wonderful world of normalling and realize the durability of real switching jacks you won’t go back.
|
|
|
Post by jmoose on Dec 26, 2022 18:38:23 GMT -6
I'm starting to realize that even with just a single gear purchase, I'm probably going to want a standard bay. One thing I didn't think of is that I already have a Buss Compressor that sits on the 2 buss. I'll want to avoid multiple DA/AD trips from my interface, which I'm pretty sure means I'll also want to have the buss compressor hooked up to the bay. The Samson S does the trick very affordably. Of course, I'd be spending more on cables than the bay. You don't want to use "cables" with a patchbay, you need to use snakes for a whole lotta reasons. I'll go the other way and say if there's only a handful of gear? Then you probably don't need a patchbay as long as things are setup so you can easily access the rear panels. When I do remote production there's never a patchbay on site, everything gets home runned point A to point B. Wear & tear on XLR jacks? Never. Failure point is almost always the wiring itself... One reason to avoid a patchbay all together is that every single connection point has the possibility to add noise and be a failure point. Its simple, think of something basic like mic pre > compressor > A/D and if that's a home run? Two patchcables. Introduce a patchbay and now there's about 6 connection points. Many reasons to use proper snakes & not single cables. Density. Strain relief. Cost! Future expansion?! Most bays, especially the TRS style the jacks are too close together to accept standard patch cables. If you have cables with the "fat guitar" style plug? They're going to push against each other which is going to put stress on the jacks and eventually failure. Any patchbay is going to need the rear runs elevated & tied off to eliminate stress on the jacks. Using snakes offers advantages like way, way less weight and overall easier cable management. Single cables or multi pair snakes? Its the same 24 or 26 gauge copper inside. But single cables have a thick rubber jacket which adds an insane amount of bulk & weight... and therefore, stress on the jacks. You might also find, at a certain point in studio expansion that all the thick rubber & single cables going every which way makes things much harder to manage. Think about piles of 8 cables vs something like this - www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/J8CHTRSTRS5--jumperz-j8chatrs-atrs-5-amphenol-8-channel-snake-5-footI'd also take a stance that unless you get ALL the gear on bays? They might be of limited use. Not only whatever outboard gear is around, but also all the I/O on the interface and anything else in the studio universe. Most other things tend to be a compromise. The whole point of having a patchbay is flexibility. So if only half the things in a studio are on it..? I'd just say give it some real thought, especially on future expansion. Comprehensive patchbay, even at the most basic levels is not an inexpensive endeavor and really not the kind of thing you want to do over because it wasn't planned well... a few jacks/points short... wiring that's a foot too short in a new configuration... Planned well a good patchbay can grow with the studios needs and might even outlive everything else in the room. My bays are on console #2 and interface #3? Some of the wiring goes back to the days when I was running 2" analog tape.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Dec 26, 2022 23:11:15 GMT -6
TT or XLR seem to work well, but I’ve never met a TRS patchbay that seemed worth a damn.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Dec 27, 2022 0:34:11 GMT -6
soundcraft makes an 8 x8 channel 1/4 rack pack bay.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 27, 2022 6:48:39 GMT -6
Guess, I just got lucky with my 3 trs pb.
Maybe, it comes to pro vs non pro use ?
I’m no pro, but am always recording/mixing something.
I used db25 and combos of xlt/trs to my trs pb, patched all i/o once, and just patch on front: never a problem.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Dec 27, 2022 14:51:57 GMT -6
Guess, I just got lucky with my 3 trs pb. Maybe, it comes to pro vs non pro use ? I’m no pro, but am always recording/mixing something. I used db25 and combos of xlt/trs to my trs pb, patched all i/o once, and just patch on front: never a problem. There may well be good ones, but what I typically see in project studios are TRS bays that flex under stress when patching and poor quality jacks that are a bad mix with that kind of duress. This is probably because people who buy TRS bays may trend budget conscious, I can see a world in which there are more robust offerings and my friends and clients just aren’t buying them.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 27, 2022 15:21:14 GMT -6
I had cheaper ones before that were problematic, but, so far, the Samsung S, has been solid. I also bought heavier duty cables.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Dec 27, 2022 19:13:17 GMT -6
soundcraft makes an 8 x8 channel 1/4 rack pack bay. Those are super high quality units. I considered getting these units before I finally went for an XLR bay.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Dec 28, 2022 9:28:28 GMT -6
The thing that bantam (TT) and 1/4" LONG FRAME (military style) patch cables have in common, and which both differ from that found on the more common and cheaper 1/4" patch cables being discussed here, is the less pronounced tip.
This allows for easier insertion and removal from the patchbay and also doesn't cause the contacts inside the bay to have to flex so much. You may not want this in a guitar cable, but this is a good thing for a patch cable (and associated patch bays) being inserted and removed on a constant basis.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Dec 28, 2022 9:40:46 GMT -6
The thing that bantam (TT) and 1/4" LONG FRAME (military style) patch cables have in common, and which both differ from that found on the more common and cheaper 1/4" patch cables being discussed here, is the less pronounced tip. This allows for easier insertion and removal from the patchbay and also doesn't cause the contacts inside the bay to have to flex so much. You may not want this in a guitar cable, but this is a good thing for a patch cable (and associated patch bays) being inserted and removed on a constant basis. Let’s not forget switching jacks designed for a high duty cycle of being plugged and unplugged, sadly most TRS bays use a switching jack designed for being occasionally plugged and unplugged like on the back of a Cheap mixer.
|
|