|
Post by wiz on Dec 19, 2022 4:04:55 GMT -6
From streaming services?
I am wondering how successful it was.
Cheers Wiz
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 19, 2022 4:49:57 GMT -6
Meaning all your songs were no longer in their domains or as a career move ?
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Dec 19, 2022 6:14:52 GMT -6
I have not removed any music but I might as well be giving it away on my website. I have not received a dime from streaming in the last few years, though streams are up. I don't have the money to hire a lawyer to sort it out. The current scenario isnt sustainable for artists.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
Member is Online
|
Post by ericn on Dec 19, 2022 6:58:05 GMT -6
I have not removed any music but I might as well be giving it away on my website. I have not received a dime from streaming in the last few years, though streams are up. I don't have the money to hire a lawyer to sort it out. The current scenario isnt sustainable for artists. This says it all! t-shirtat.com/shop/this-shirt-costs-5750-spotify-streams-shirt/
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Dec 19, 2022 7:27:15 GMT -6
The odd thing is I used to get an annual check. Since COVID hit, I have not received anything, even though we released our two biggest albums in that time. Something is fishy but unless you are a major label, I think your options are few.
|
|
|
Post by bchurch on Dec 19, 2022 8:26:46 GMT -6
I do okay with ASCAP royalties for all the meaningless production music I've done, but never made more than $100 in a year from streaming or mp3 sales from music I put my heart and a quart of blood into. "The business of creativity" can be quite oxymoronic and unevenhanded.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Dec 19, 2022 9:01:55 GMT -6
I certainly have clients who’ve removed earlier records as a career move. Insecurity I guess?
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 19, 2022 9:50:25 GMT -6
If you own all the masters, I’m not sure why it would be an issue.
|
|
|
Post by mike on Dec 19, 2022 10:13:10 GMT -6
My view, Streaming is not sustainable for indie artist's and it's the same as it ever was of whoever controls distribution, controls the revenue stream for Their sustainability (which is usually not the artist.)
In the old days labels controlled distribution, so you had to get a record deal to get distributed, few got that, and the many to most who did got a less than fair deal since they didn't have the distribution leverage (and marketing budgets etc.)
In the next stage as years passed, culture and media moved to CD's and digital downloads through 3rd party sites that offered indie artists self distribution through their platform for roughly a 8-10% cut or something similar, meant motivated and talented indie artists could cut out a decent to modest living selling CD's at shows and downloads online putting in allot of hours doing their own writing/recording, booking, performing and marketing etc essentially being both the artist and their own label with self distribution. With exceptions to every rule the bread and butter for most during this time were CD sales at shows, so product and touring often enough were important.
As time and culture moved on to streaming, and labels by then had gone through their own evolution of downsizing, closing or merging with other labels to survive, some of those survivors made deals or then merged with streaming co's and platforms reclaiming distribution and controlling the money, And as the Who would say,.. meet the new boss,..same as the old boss.
While there are exceptions to every rule, the constant remained of whoever controls distribution controls the money and their sustainability.
Since Streaming services aren't sustainable for operations to the vast majority of indie artists, I think their only way to financially sustain their work through their own art is to control distribution, offering product that is quality, unique and exclusive to a base that is hopefully already built and growing by going direct to consumer. That means allot of work and more than being the artist but also your own label since you also have to do the marketing and distribution work.
But sustainability through streaming platforms for 99.9% in my view is not an option. My thought is place a sampler only of your music on the streaming sites that gives you presence on their platform without giving away your product content essentially for free and either a link or google search from their site leads the consumer back to your web site for direct marketing and distribution of your unique and exclusive content to your base directly, instead of trying to market and sell your art for less than pennies on the dollar through a streaming site which doesn't really pay at all if sustainability through your art is your goal.
My 2 cents,
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Dec 19, 2022 10:14:40 GMT -6
From streaming services? I am wondering how successful it was. Cheers Wiz No. Actually the opposite here. Trying to put up as much as we can and as quickly as we can. I'm not sure what the plan is on removing it. Maybe you can elaborate on your thoughts on that? Like some mentioned, I can understand pulling down some earlier stuff that you don't want heard. The game is rigged, no doubt, but I'm not sure there is any other way at this point.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Dec 19, 2022 10:17:42 GMT -6
Whoever controls distribution controls their own sustainability in my view. I'd agree Mike - but also add that whoever controls the Masters is who is making the $$. Streaming services are paying out unimaginable amounts every hour, but it's all going to the record companies who own the masters. And they are doing what they always do. . Owning your own masters is where it's at.
|
|
|
Post by stratboy on Dec 19, 2022 12:07:40 GMT -6
Well, Wiz owns his masters, so I am curious about his thinking behind the question
|
|
|
Post by stratboy on Dec 19, 2022 12:13:38 GMT -6
Mike says, “My thought is place a sampler only of your music on the streaming sites that gives you presence on their platform without giving away your product content essentially for free and either a link or google search from their site leads the consumer back to your web site for direct marketing and distribution of your unique and exclusive content to your base directly, instead of trying to market and sell your art for less than pennies on the dollar through a streaming site which doesn't really pay at all if sustainability through your art is your goal.“
This could make sense if your website offering is in non-streaming formats, like vinyl, CDs or cassette. Ironically, my personal listening is moving more and more to Apple Music and the radio. With Shazam, if I hear a song on terrestrial radio that I like, I can add it to a playlist with two clicks. Plus Nashville has some fantastic radio stations. Coming from a really bland radio market, turning the dial here is heavenly.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 19, 2022 12:24:14 GMT -6
I mean, for most people, even owning the masters makes me no money. Because - I assume - no one is listening to my music in the vast outer space that is streaming radio. I actually love mike idea of putting a sampler up and then directing to the site for people to purchase the music. That being said - why would people buy the cow when they’re getting the milk for free? They’d just move on to other music. Honestly, we’re in an art form that has been devalued so much that it’s as hard to make money doing it as it was 80 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by indiehouse on Dec 19, 2022 12:58:49 GMT -6
I love discovering new music, and will happily buy a record I really dig. But I gotta hear it first. I’m not plopping down $20 or more based on a sampler. And if I can’t listen to it, I’ll generally move on, unless the album came highly recommended. There’s just so much good music out there.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 19, 2022 13:30:43 GMT -6
I love discovering new music, and will happily buy a record I really dig. But I gotta hear it first. I’m not plopping down $20 or more based on a sampler. And if I can’t listen to it, I’ll generally move on, unless the album came highly recommended. There’s just so much good music out there. Your cup is half full lol. I would have said there’s so much bad music out there.
|
|
|
Post by indiehouse on Dec 19, 2022 13:35:36 GMT -6
I love discovering new music, and will happily buy a record I really dig. But I gotta hear it first. I’m not plopping down $20 or more based on a sampler. And if I can’t listen to it, I’ll generally move on, unless the album came highly recommended. There’s just so much good music out there. Your cup is half full lol. I would have said there’s so much bad music out there. Oh, you’re def right about that, as well.
|
|
|
Post by craigmorris74 on Dec 19, 2022 14:30:31 GMT -6
I removed one album from streaming a couple years back. I was unhappy with how the master, done in the CD era, translated to streaming. I’d also like to have a label reissue it on LP, so when it comes out again it will be fresh.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
Member is Online
|
Post by ericn on Dec 19, 2022 14:55:26 GMT -6
I mean, for most people, even owning the masters makes me no money. Because - I assume - no one is listening to my music in the vast outer space that is streaming radio. I actually love mike idea of putting a sampler up and then directing to the site for people to purchase the music. That being said - why would people buy the cow when they’re getting the milk for free? They’d just move on to other music. Honestly, we’re in an art form that has been devalued so much that it’s as hard to make money doing it as it was 80 years ago. Yeah that’s the problem with streaming; someone who likes it will stream it, but they really have to Absolutely LOVE IT to buy it. I remember in the early days of ITunes streaming there were a couple of things I bought because that was the only way to get them but most of the time it just pissed me off. The other thing was if you had to buy it I knew people who would just buy the song when if they could stream they would add the album.
|
|
|
Post by bchurch on Dec 19, 2022 16:21:40 GMT -6
I'm pulling for Bandcamp. Have been for a long time. But connecting with listeners and turning them into fans to convert to a sale would be one thing. Getting them to use another app / service is another. That's the firewall. It's not an impossible gap to close, but Bandcamp's got to do some work on that themselves.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Dec 19, 2022 16:47:41 GMT -6
Spotify has Instagram promotion cornered as far as I can tell. Soundcloud will link there, but not once has a client track been at Soundcloud. I'm not on FB so no idea what music shitshow that is.
|
|
|
Post by bchurch on Dec 19, 2022 16:51:11 GMT -6
Spotify has Instagram promotion cornered as far as I can tell. Soundcloud will link there, but not once has a client track been at Soundcloud. I'm not on FB so no idea what music shitshow that is. People still use Facebook? Who knew?
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Dec 19, 2022 16:53:04 GMT -6
I posted the question to see if anyone had problems actually getting all the music off the varying sites that its on...
I go through distrokid and it goes out to a shitload of places...... was wondering how long it took, and how successful it was...
The reasons....
I will do a larger post on this, but basically I am redoing all of my previous releases and want to remove the old stuff and put up the new stuff... and work out where its best to put it...
Which will be another question later....
cheers
Wiz
|
|
|
Post by Bat Lanyard on Dec 19, 2022 20:14:08 GMT -6
I posted the question to see if anyone had problems actually getting all the music off the varying sites that its on... I go through distrokid and it goes out to a shitload of places...... was wondering how long it took, and how successful it was... The reasons.... I will do a larger post on this, but basically I am redoing all of my previous releases and want to remove the old stuff and put up the new stuff... and work out where its best to put it... Which will be another question later.... cheers Wiz I'm on The Verve Pipe mailing list and the singer Brian pointed this out recently: It's tough to maintain a career in rock and roll (or any genre, for that matter). Streaming doesn't pay the bills (4 million streams = only $200!)
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Dec 19, 2022 21:17:38 GMT -6
I posted the question to see if anyone had problems actually getting all the music off the varying sites that its on... I go through distrokid and it goes out to a shitload of places...... was wondering how long it took, and how successful it was... The reasons.... I will do a larger post on this, but basically I am redoing all of my previous releases and want to remove the old stuff and put up the new stuff... and work out where its best to put it... Which will be another question later.... cheers Wiz I'm on The Verve Pipe mailing list and the singer Brian pointed this out recently: It's tough to maintain a career in rock and roll (or any genre, for that matter). Streaming doesn't pay the bills (4 million streams = only $200!)Must be what he's getting post-record label. The old math I've seen was roughly 2M300K for $10K, and in my experience that is looking pretty accurate as the all-in before it gets divided up.
|
|