Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2022 9:28:46 GMT -6
Lynx Avid HD Burl Antelope Aurora You keep finding those in every pro studio. For the most obvious reasons. I keep finding Apollo's in pro studio's, must be different over here. |
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Feb 16, 2022 11:19:07 GMT -6
Ward you forgot Apollo
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 15,951 
|
Post by ericn on Feb 16, 2022 11:47:19 GMT -6
Lynx Avid HD Burl Antelope Aurora You keep finding those in every pro studio. For the most obvious reasons. I keep finding Apollo's in pro studio's, must be different over here. I think Wards idea of pro is a large scale room with SSL, API, Neve etc. you just don’t see them as much. My 2 cents, if I was going to make a move to a new interface I would probably jump on either AVID HD native, HDX or Carbon, unless you’re going with a Burl, 2192, or Lavry Gold the difference is going to be small, but for many the reduction in latency is priceless. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2022 20:16:08 GMT -6
Lynx Avid HD Burl Antelope Aurora You keep finding those in every pro studio. For the most obvious reasons. Also rme pci-e cards. Those things run better than anything. Use any separate converters you want. Only Lynx pci-e and thunderbolt is close. |
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Feb 17, 2022 7:19:13 GMT -6
I'm always forgetting something . . . wife's birthday, kids at the bus stop, keys, pants. etc |
|
|
|
Post by svart on Feb 17, 2022 8:38:57 GMT -6
These days the best interface is the one that best simplifies the workflow. I use MOTU now since it has all the I/O I needed without a bunch of extraneous patching and extra gear. All-in-one.
With as much processing as I do to the tracks I don't see the benefit of spending a lot more money for a few % of difference at the A/D level. A few dB of compression, saturation or EQ will immediately negate the functional fidelity differences between converters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2022 8:52:11 GMT -6
These days the best interface is the one that best simplifies the workflow. I use MOTU now since it has all the I/O I needed without a bunch of extraneous patching and extra gear. All-in-one. With as much processing as I do to the tracks I don't see the benefit of spending a lot more money for a few % of difference at the A/D level. A few dB of compression, saturation or EQ will immediately negate the functional fidelity differences between converters. Funny ain't it? Most analogue gear will heavily impact specs by simply being in the chain, especially vintage stuff. |
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Feb 17, 2022 11:18:44 GMT -6
These days the best interface is the one that best simplifies the workflow. I use MOTU now since it has all the I/O I needed without a bunch of extraneous patching and extra gear. All-in-one. With as much processing as I do to the tracks I don't see the benefit of spending a lot more money for a few % of difference at the A/D level. A few dB of compression, saturation or EQ will immediately negate the functional fidelity differences between converters. And ultimately I came to the conclusion that sitting tight with my 828es was the correct move. No need to chase after something that doesn’t need chasing. |
|
