|
Post by donr on Jan 7, 2022 22:16:24 GMT -6
Some good points here. The *no politics* administration last year did propose requiring banks to report all transactions over $600 to the IRS. That didn't fly with Congress thank goodness. I guess we must have the computing power to make out all those tax audits.
Gov't will tax anything that moves. I know they'd love to get a VAT here in the US. Thing is, they'll eternally spend more than they'll ever collect. They just print more dollars, diluting the currency. Fiat money is probably doomed, over time. I don't know. Lucky the dollar is still the world's reserve currency, only because all the others are generally worse.
--- Ha, the name of the adminstration has been redacted by the Borg. Clue, it was last year. I'm reminded of Shakira's "Hips Don't Lie," where Wyclif Jean says, *No Fighting*
This video is 12 years old, one of the first homegrown funny things I saw on Youtube.
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Jan 8, 2022 9:54:36 GMT -6
Just as an example...I buy some of my bourbon from the secondary market. Some of it is over $100 per bottle. It has already been taxed once. In all honesty, the government has no business knowing my fucking liquor buying habits. This comment makes absolutely no sense. It's not a sales tax we're talking about here. It's income tax. And it's not a new tax that you'd have to pay it. It's just how they are keeping track of income so dodgers are caught more easily. However, if you are buying alcohol on a secondary market and not paying sales tax...that is definitely against the law and much of your state and local government revenue is depending on such transactions. So they'd be interested. Remember federal government doesn't mess with sales tax, but the people selling alcohol second hand have to be reporting income overall. And that goes for all second hand markets. I mean, the used clothing market is far larger in most nations that the new cloths market is, but a lot of those sales are never reported. Getting more of that money would help paying for services easier. And again, it's nothing new about the requirements, just how it's being administered.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 10:11:07 GMT -6
Just as an example...I buy some of my bourbon from the secondary market. Some of it is over $100 per bottle. It has already been taxed once. In all honesty, the government has no business knowing my fucking liquor buying habits. This comment makes absolutely no sense. It's not a sales tax we're talking about here. It's income tax. And it's not a new tax that you'd have to pay it. It's just how they are keeping track of income so dodgers are caught more easily. However, if you are buying alcohol on a secondary market and not paying sales tax...that is definitely against the law and much of your state and local government revenue is depending on such transactions. So they'd be interested. Remember federal government doesn't mess with sales tax, but the people selling alcohol second hand have to be reporting income overall. And that goes for all second hand markets. I mean, the used clothing market is far larger in most nations that the new cloths market is, but a lot of those sales are never reported. Getting more of that money would help paying for services easier. And again, it's nothing new about the requirements, just how it's being administered. It completely makes sense. If I want to sell something that I just paid sales taxes on, it’s none of the government’s business. Obviously we share a different view of the government’s role in our lives. I have a problem with paying taxes on something at multiple stages.
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Jan 8, 2022 10:28:23 GMT -6
This comment makes absolutely no sense. It's not a sales tax we're talking about here. It's income tax. And it's not a new tax that you'd have to pay it. It's just how they are keeping track of income so dodgers are caught more easily. However, if you are buying alcohol on a secondary market and not paying sales tax...that is definitely against the law and much of your state and local government revenue is depending on such transactions. So they'd be interested. Remember federal government doesn't mess with sales tax, but the people selling alcohol second hand have to be reporting income overall. And that goes for all second hand markets. I mean, the used clothing market is far larger in most nations that the new cloths market is, but a lot of those sales are never reported. Getting more of that money would help paying for services easier. And again, it's nothing new about the requirements, just how it's being administered. It completely makes sense. If I want to sell something that I just paid sales taxes on, it’s none of the government’s business. Obviously we share a different view of the government’s role in our lives. I have a problem with paying taxes on something at multiple stages. So that's why there are limits on the transactions and the revenue of what they are looking for. Selling a bottle of something here and there isn't going to raise eyebrows. If you are reselling a lot of bottles, say a few every month, and not reporting that revenue it might trigger a flag. But that's if you are truly trying to move stuff on the regular and aren't accounting for money coming in and going out. It shouldn't be an issue if you buy a bottle of something, decide it's not for you, and sell the remainder. If the sale price is above the trigger amount, then you should just consider scanning your receipts so you can show covering your expense.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 10:43:14 GMT -6
It completely makes sense. If I want to sell something that I just paid sales taxes on, it’s none of the government’s business. Obviously we share a different view of the government’s role in our lives. I have a problem with paying taxes on something at multiple stages. So that's why there are limits on the transactions and the revenue of what they are looking for. Selling a bottle of something here and there isn't going to raise eyebrows. If you are reselling a lot of bottles, say a few every month, and not reporting that revenue it might trigger a flag. But that's if you are truly trying to move stuff on the regular and aren't accounting for money coming in and going out. It shouldn't be an issue if you buy a bottle of something, decide it's not for you, and sell the remainder. If the sale price is above the trigger amount, then you should just consider scanning your receipts so you can show covering your expense. If I sell one bottle a month - which I don’t, but for this example - they’re $100. That would trigger a 1099, correct?
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Jan 8, 2022 10:44:35 GMT -6
So that's why there are limits on the transactions and the revenue of what they are looking for. Selling a bottle of something here and there isn't going to raise eyebrows. If you are reselling a lot of bottles, say a few every month, and not reporting that revenue it might trigger a flag. But that's if you are truly trying to move stuff on the regular and aren't accounting for money coming in and going out. It shouldn't be an issue if you buy a bottle of something, decide it's not for you, and sell the remainder. If the sale price is above the trigger amount, then you should just consider scanning your receipts so you can show covering your expense. If I sell one bottle a month - which I don’t, but for this example - they’re $100. That would trigger a 1099, correct? I'm going to try to find an easy to understand page about this sometime, maybe one already got posted I think. But yeah that's $1,200 which is double the $600 annual limit, so you'd be expected to report that as income. But it's more complicated than that. If you bought the bottles for $50 /ea and sold for $100 /ea you would only have to report $50 of income. This means a ton of record keeping, I think, of buys and sales, lots of receipts.
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Jan 8, 2022 10:51:12 GMT -6
Exactly. If you plan to move it regularly, you have to maintain accounting. You'd show that you are being taxed on the profit. If you are just making sure you haven't lost money, I don't think you'd pay anything.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 10:58:00 GMT -6
Exactly. If you plan to move it regularly, you have to maintain accounting. You'd show that you are being taxed on the profit. If you are just making sure you haven't lost money, I don't think you'd pay anything. That’s a nightmare.
|
|
|
Post by donr on Jan 8, 2022 14:53:42 GMT -6
I've had similar thoughts about selling cars and registering them with States' DMV's. If I sell a car I bought new, paid the sales tax on, the new buyer has to pay sales tax again on the purchase price of the vehicle to register it. And so on when the new buyer sells again. The only work around is leasing, where in some states, you only pay sales tax on the portion of the car's value that's the lease term. In others tho, you have to pay the sales tax on the new value of the car at the time of lease. It's a racket, I tell ya.
|
|
cj
Full Member
Posts: 31
|
Post by cj on Jan 8, 2022 15:24:14 GMT -6
After being a daily reader of this forum for the past 18 months, this is the conversation that finally forced me to become a member. LOL! In my day job, I am involved in some very specific areas of tax which also takes me to Capitol Hill. While my expertise is not in 1099-Ks, maybe I can help clarify some of the myths and half-truths that I've seen across the internet. Federal Income Tax – Generally speaking, the Federal government is allowed to tax every dollar of income you make whether it’s your weekly paycheck or the $10 you made from the lemonade stand on your front lawn. The only reason no one pays taxes on the lemonade stand income is that no one bothers to put it on their tax return even though “technically” you should. The reporting change that is occurring for 2022 basically forces you to declare that lemonade income. The change you’re seeing from Venmo and others is a way to capture this “lemonade money”. In March 2021 the House passed H.R. 1319 (see Sec.9674) which eventually got passed by the Senate and signed by the President. The D’s passed this bill using a process called Budget Reconciliation. The process requires that the legislation be paid for over the next 10 years, hence, the lower limit of $600 is one of the ways they are going to help pay for everything else that was in the bill. Btw, the Budget Reconciliation process is typically used so you can bypass the other party. The D’s used it here. The R’s used it back in 2017 for a different piece of legislation. So for 2022, all Goods & Services you sell will be reported by the payment providers to the IRS as income. You will now have to offset that income by keeping all your records such as your original receipts so that you can prove to the IRS that you originally paid $2,000 for that compressor which you sold for $1,800…and therefore offsets the $1,800 income on the 1099K. This will certainly be a record keeping nightmare for many common folks. This Venmo page might help: Venmo 2022 1099K
I know tax talk makes most people’s eyes glaze over but I hope some of this helps.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 15:44:36 GMT -6
After being a daily reader of this forum for the past 18 months, this is the conversation that finally forced me to become a member. LOL! In my day job, I am involved in some very specific areas of tax which also takes me to Capitol Hill. While my expertise is not in 1099-Ks, maybe I can help clarify some of the myths and half-truths that I've seen across the internet. Federal Income Tax – Generally speaking, the Federal government is allowed to tax every dollar of income you make whether it’s your weekly paycheck or the $10 you made from the lemonade stand on your front lawn. The only reason no one pays taxes on the lemonade stand income is that no one bothers to put it on their tax return even though “technically” you should. The reporting change that is occurring for 2022 basically forces you to declare that lemonade income. The change you’re seeing from Venmo and others is a way to capture this “lemonade money”. In March 2021 the House passed H.R. 1319 (see Sec.9674) which eventually got passed by the Senate and signed by the President. The D’s passed this bill using a process called Budget Reconciliation. The process requires that the legislation be paid for over the next 10 years, hence, the lower limit of $600 is one of the ways they are going to help pay for everything else that was in the bill. Btw, the Budget Reconciliation process is typically used so you can bypass the other party. The D’s used it here. The R’s used it back in 2017 for a different piece of legislation. So for 2022, all Goods & Services you sell will be reported by the payment providers to the IRS as income. You will now have to offset that income by keeping all your records such as your original receipts so that you can prove to the IRS that you originally paid $2,000 for that compressor which you sold for $1,800…and therefore offsets the $1,800 income on the 1099K. This will certainly be a record keeping nightmare for many common folks. This Venmo page might help: Venmo 2022 1099KI know tax talk makes most people’s eyes glaze over but I hope some of this helps. Thanks. Not sure I see where people were misconstruing this? So - I’m confused about what your saying with “offset.” Are you saying you would only be taxed on $1800 instead of the original by showing the original receipt? Also - do I need to mix the classified section? I don’t want and IRS repercussions.
|
|
|
Post by Chad on Jan 8, 2022 15:59:00 GMT -6
This article is helpful: www.investopedia.com/new-tax-ruling-side-income-5215172--------------- Reverb has an FYI page about these new laws and how they're handling it: help.reverb.com/hc/en-us/articles/4411577966227--------------- Here is a snippet from Reverb's URL: As of January 1, 2022, marketplaces like Reverb are required to report a seller’s sales if they sell $600 or more on the platform in a calendar year. This new reporting requirement means that if you hit the $600 sales threshold, Reverb is required to collect tax identification information and issue you a Form 1099-K.
What happens when you hit the tax reporting threshold
If you hit $600 in sales on Reverb, we’ll reach out to collect your tax identification information. You have the option to add this information to your account here at any point prior to hitting the threshold, but you will be required to provide it once you reach $600 or more in sales. This information will help us issue you a Form 1099-K, help you file your taxes, and ensure your payouts are not impacted.
Once you’ve provided your tax information, no additional action is needed from you until later this year. We’ll reach out with more information and next steps as appropriate.
Reporting your sales doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll pay income tax
Receiving a 1099-K doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll pay income tax on your Reverb sales. For example, say a Reverber bought a guitar for $1,600 in 2019 and sold it for $1,000 in 2022. Reverb would still have to report the $1,000 payment on a 1099-K, but the seller would have no taxable income to report since the resale amount was less than the original purchase price. However, everyone’s situation is different. If you have questions about your taxable income, it’s best to work with a tax professional.
|
|
cj
Full Member
Posts: 31
|
Post by cj on Jan 8, 2022 16:20:43 GMT -6
Thanks. Not sure I see where people were misconstruing this? So - I’m confused about what your saying with “offset.” Are you saying you would only be taxed on $1800 instead of the original by showing the original receipt? Also - do I need to mix the classified section? I don’t want and IRS repercussions.
Maybe this example will help... Let’s say you sold a used compressor for $1,800 using Venmo. Your gross income from the sale is $1,800 which Venmo will show on the 1099K that they send you. However, now when you fill out your 2022 income tax return next January, you will now record that $1,800 gross income but you’ll also be able to show your ‘cost of goods sold’ as $2,000 which gives you a net income of -$200. This is obviously a loss and therefore you will not owe income tax. But all of this math needs to be shown on your 2022 tax return.
$1,800 Gross Income - $2,000 original cost = -$200 net income : No tax owed since it’s a loss.
As another example, if you sold the compressor for $2,200 and made a profit then the math becomes
$2,200 Gross Income - $2,000 original cost = +$200 net income : Tax is owed on the $200.
You’re fine with the classifieds. This reporting rule change only affects payment processors.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Jan 8, 2022 16:43:38 GMT -6
so stuff we bought decades ago we need to have the receipt or pay tax on full amount as income? Jesus… guess accountants are going to be in very short supply real quick. I don’t sell stuff often but I still have the receipts filed away somewhere. Thought I was being dumb saving it all this time but I guess not lol.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 17:01:04 GMT -6
Thanks. Not sure I see where people were misconstruing this? So - I’m confused about what your saying with “offset.” Are you saying you would only be taxed on $1800 instead of the original by showing the original receipt? Also - do I need to mix the classified section? I don’t want and IRS repercussions. Maybe this example will help... Let’s say you sold a used compressor for $1,800 using Venmo. Your gross income from the sale is $1,800 which Venmo will show on the 1099K that they send you. However, now when you fill out your 2022 income tax return next January, you will now record that $1,800 gross income but you’ll also be able to show your ‘cost of goods sold’ as $2,000 which gives you a net income of -$200. This is obviously a loss and therefore you will not owe income tax. But all of this math needs to be shown on your 2022 tax return.
$1,800 Gross Income - $2,000 original cost = -$200 net income : No tax owed since it’s a loss.
As another example, if you sold the compressor for $2,200 and made a profit then the math becomes
$2,200 Gross Income - $2,000 original cost = +$200 net income : Tax is owed on the $200.
You’re fine with the classifieds. This reporting rule change only affects payment processors.
What if I wrote off the $2000 as a business expense? I would be taxed for the $1800, right?
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 17:12:13 GMT -6
So how is this taxing the rich? Almost like it’s a lie.
|
|
cj
Full Member
Posts: 31
|
Post by cj on Jan 8, 2022 17:39:08 GMT -6
Maybe this example will help... Let’s say you sold a used compressor for $1,800 using Venmo. Your gross income from the sale is $1,800 which Venmo will show on the 1099K that they send you. However, now when you fill out your 2022 income tax return next January, you will now record that $1,800 gross income but you’ll also be able to show your ‘cost of goods sold’ as $2,000 which gives you a net income of -$200. This is obviously a loss and therefore you will not owe income tax. But all of this math needs to be shown on your 2022 tax return.
$1,800 Gross Income - $2,000 original cost = -$200 net income : No tax owed since it’s a loss.
As another example, if you sold the compressor for $2,200 and made a profit then the math becomes
$2,200 Gross Income - $2,000 original cost = +$200 net income : Tax is owed on the $200.
You’re fine with the classifieds. This reporting rule change only affects payment processors.
What if I wrote off the $2000 as a business expense? I would be taxed for the $1800, right?
Excellent question. Yes, you are correct. It basically becomes a "depreciation recapture" event.
The nuances of this recapture is certainly outside my expertise so at this point I will bring up the catch all phrase of "Everyone’s situation is different. It's always best to consult with your personal tax professional."
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Jan 8, 2022 18:16:34 GMT -6
Time for you guys to sign up for a Coinbase account.
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Jan 8, 2022 18:22:20 GMT -6
Time for you guys to sign up for a Coinbase account. Is that like, cryptocurrency or something?
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jan 8, 2022 19:51:49 GMT -6
Time for you guys to sign up for a Coinbase account. I was just thinking if someone came up with a music gear buying/selling site that had crypto as a payment option they'd get a lot of business this year. In other news, maybe this new IRS accounting will get rid of these knuckleheads that have marked up used gear beyond new prices during the supply chain issues of the past couple of years.
|
|
|
Post by Chad on Jan 8, 2022 20:40:13 GMT -6
Time for you guys to sign up for a Coinbase account. I was just thinking if someone came up with a music gear buying/selling site that had crypto as a payment option they'd get a lot of business this year. In other news, maybe this new IRS accounting will get rid of these knuckleheads that have marked up used gear beyond new prices during the supply chain issues of the past year. I’ve been thinking this way as well.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Jan 8, 2022 21:54:17 GMT -6
I had some cash economy today…..but it’s all $100’s, which you can’t do anything with and banks track when you deposit, so, still not underground. FWIW.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 23:26:43 GMT -6
Have you guys checked out the HMBL app? Gasless crypto buying and peer to peer crypto transfers. Soon to also be USD like Venmo and PayPal except all over the world with instant foreign currency conversion. My understanding is PayPal and Venmo are only in like two countries.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 8, 2022 23:27:43 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jan 8, 2022 23:31:54 GMT -6
I had some cash economy today…..but it’s all $100’s, which you can’t do anything with and banks track when you deposit, so, still not underground. FWIW. You're in NC too aren't you? I just used a $100 bill at Printworks Bistro no problem. Save those and go out for a nice dinner
|
|