|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 26, 2021 16:53:28 GMT -6
Bumped into a screaming deal on some used focal shape 6.5, great shape and about 40% of retail, just had to do a 3 hour drive ! ibb.co/9W7n77b
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2021 19:57:57 GMT -6
How do you like them?
|
|
|
Post by Guitar on Dec 26, 2021 20:03:11 GMT -6
I use Aria 906 which should be very similar to those, and for me, they're great monitors! Nice score.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 27, 2021 1:32:42 GMT -6
I do. I had a pair before.
I have had amphion too and became a fan of passive radiators for cleaner tighter bass.
The focal onboard dsp is useful for fighting my smaller room lower mid bass issues: you have a low frequency filter normally for setting subs but you can experiment with just losing lowest signal ,like below 40, a lpf and hpf and a filter which attenuates at 180.
The 65 aren’t huge but have some weight/ presence to their sound which I also appreciate. For me the shape 65 are kinda I between the amphion 15 and 18, not as mid range forward as the 15, but fast and accurate, not as voluptuous as the 18 or having that big sound envelop, but having a weight and presence that is clearer, say really hearing the texture of the kick,more revealing less beautiful.
I think the shape are good mixing tools.
Of all the monitors we have discussed recently, I have never demoed here the atc and am still interested in the 12, just curious, if it would be king in my little room with its particular small room problems.
My used Shape 65 were $1200 cdn, they retail for $2500 and the atc 12 would be easily $3 grand, so the used Shape were a good deal.
|
|
|
Post by theshea on Dec 27, 2021 2:29:11 GMT -6
Bumped into a screaming deal on some used focal shape 6.5, great shape and about 40% of retail, just had to do a 3 hour drive ! ibb.co/9W7n77baaah wish it happened to me ... i am on focal alphas 65‘s and my next step up would be the shapes 65. i know the alphas don‘t have the best rep but i like them, know how they sound (using them for like the last 5years) and thinking staying in the focal sound family rather than jumping round different speakers would suit me better. or am i thinking wrong?
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 27, 2021 2:57:42 GMT -6
If you like Focal, might as well stay in the line!
Have you considered the evo 65, a lot of redesign work has been done. The YT demos I have watched sound impressive but not quite as tight fast as the Shape.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 27, 2021 3:47:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by theshea on Dec 28, 2021 2:11:32 GMT -6
If you like Focal, might as well stay in the line! Have you considered the evo 65, a lot of redesign work has been done. The YT demos I have watched sound impressive but not quite as tight fast as the Shape. i guess the stepu from my alphas to the new evo is to small. if i change i wanna hear a good amount of „betterness“.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 28, 2021 3:29:19 GMT -6
All good.
When listening to the evo videos,I thought they do sound good, but for me a little of that port lower mid/bass bloom seemed to be there.
I find the shape, with the passive resister cleaner, but there are different materials, amps etc., too.
I hear the solo b are better still, more money, of course: some love their tweeters some not.
Good luck with your search.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 28, 2021 9:54:24 GMT -6
Having fun dialing in these focal shape Been running REW, checking speaker placement measurements and my listening position As these were used no break in needed I have returned the low pass cutoff to full range and of course the true lower bass really fils out the bottom. I have dropped the 180 filter full but think I will bring it back up 1 db at a time, as the mids sound a little thin. have raised tweeter 2 db, maybe a holdover of liking my Sony 7506 which have a hyped high end, , the shape tweeter is not harsh actually present but smooth So far so good I repositioned some of my absorbers , putting my 3 tall bookshelf absorbers across my back wall, that makes it about 18 inches deep, as I have a 4 inch panel there already. ibb.co/XJ9HJ2Bibb.co/mXqm1L5
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 15,794
|
Post by ericn on Dec 28, 2021 15:31:14 GMT -6
Having fun dialing in these focal shape Been running REW, checking speaker placement measurements and my listening position As these were used no break in needed I have returned the low pass cutoff to full range and of course the true lower bass really fils out the bottom. I have dropped the 180 filter full but think I will bring it back up 1 db at a time, as the mids sound a little thin. have raised tweeter 2 db, maybe a holdover of liking my Sony 7506 which have a hyped high end, , the shape tweeter is not harsh actually present but smooth So far so good I repositioned some of my absorbers , putting my 3 tall bookshelf absorbers across my back wall, that makes it about 18 inches deep, as I have a 4 inch panel there already. ibb.co/XJ9HJ2Bibb.co/mXqm1L5 Yeah if you use the 7506’s as a reference point your going to find that your boosting the highs🤪 I can’t talk since in my go bag you will find 7506’s sitting next to a pair of Grados and they are a common reference point that you can drive with just about anything!
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Dec 30, 2021 1:02:45 GMT -6
Bumped into a screaming deal on some used focal shape 6.5, great shape and about 40% of retail, just had to do a 3 hour drive ! ibb.co/9W7n77bDid you give up on the Kali In monitors?
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 30, 2021 5:56:46 GMT -6
I did return them, but not because I didn’t think they were good.
I knew in my room, I preferred speakers with passive radiators, which the focal shape have.
As I got the Shape used they were only a few $100 cdn more than the Kali, so for me better value.
The Kali have a good balanced sound and if you want a little more bottom end and oomph, I’d recommend the in-8 over the 5.
You’ll never know until you try, see if you can demo. The Kali aren’t $2-3,000 monitors, but seem well made and offer good value.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Dec 30, 2021 9:06:36 GMT -6
I just got the new Kali 5" 3 way. Still breaking them in. There a pinch light on the low end, but have exceptional imaging and are much quieter than any of the monitors I've used.
That quietness is really nice, you can hear better and it's more relaxing. The 8" are probably killer. I wanted a small footprint, so if I think of them like they're a modern NS-10, they're great!
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Dec 30, 2021 15:53:43 GMT -6
I’m wondering what they had going on in the demo of the 3way IN-5 I heard- Low end was plentiful, deep and clear, maybe they need a really long break in period? Also I wonder about QC since a small company, if batches come out different? The older IN-8 next to them sounded seriously broken, it was very dramatic. Thanks for all the info Kcat
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Dec 30, 2021 19:47:46 GMT -6
I think they need a good 3 days to open up. I thought the bass was there too but it is a 5 inch driver so won’t push as much air as a larger driver.
Pretty certain they are manufactured in China not certain how small batches are. I would think they would do biggest run possible to keep unit price down?
I honestly thought them good monitors: just got the job done and got out of the way.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Jan 1, 2022 22:27:07 GMT -6
I didn't know Focal had a new lower priced line.. now I'm wondering if they would have been a better choice than the Kali's. Still, the Kali's are 3 way, and I do hear more low level detail with 3 ways than most 2 ways.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2022 1:31:32 GMT -6
I didn't know Focal had a new lower priced line.. now I'm wondering if they would have been a better choice than the Kali's. Still, the Kali's are 3 way, and I do hear more low level detail with 3 ways than most 2 ways. The original alphas were awful and the CMS/Shapes/Arias are warm but good and usable. The OG alphas didn't use focal woofers iirc. I just wish they would have a tweeter inbetween the alu/mag alloy and the beryllium. And do the Solo 2 in a better cabinet. they should bring back the Kevlar tweets from the car line imo
|
|
|
Post by theshea on Jan 2, 2022 3:38:25 GMT -6
I didn't know Focal had a new lower priced line.. now I'm wondering if they would have been a better choice than the Kali's. Still, the Kali's are 3 way, and I do hear more low level detail with 3 ways than most 2 ways. The original alphas were awful and the CMS/Shapes/Arias are warm but good and usable. The OG alphas didn't use focal woofers iirc. I just wish they would have a tweeter inbetween the alu/mag alloy and the beryllium. And do the Solo 2 in a better cabinet. they should bring back the Kevlar tweets from the car line imo so, am i missing a lot with my original alpha 65‘s? i am using those for over 5 years. i have a mono avantone mixcube for volume balancing bit that‘s my monitoring situation. so: what should i demo if i want a „significant“ step up? i am not rich. budget ~1000 €.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Jan 2, 2022 5:29:10 GMT -6
I still think you should try the shape, the combo of the passive resister and the dsp gives you a lot of control over their tone. The new evo does have a focal woofer. I think there is a direct comparison video on you tube alpha to evo.
Or stretch your budget a bit and demo the dynaudio lyd48, it’s a very good 3 way.
|
|
|
Post by nick8801 on Jan 2, 2022 6:46:53 GMT -6
Bumped into a screaming deal on some used focal shape 6.5, great shape and about 40% of retail, just had to do a 3 hour drive ! ibb.co/9W7n77baaah wish it happened to me ... i am on focal alphas 65‘s and my next step up would be the shapes 65. i know the alphas don‘t have the best rep but i like them, know how they sound (using them for like the last 5years) and thinking staying in the focal sound family rather than jumping round different speakers would suit me better. or am i thinking wrong? I think if you’re happy with your work, don’t change anything!
|
|