kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,049
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Mar 1, 2021 3:27:05 GMT -6
A little long but at around 6:00 you can hear the hiss of his other Kali monitors and that the 5 don’t have that hiss.
A positive review.
Ps he’s a mastering engineer with some pretty nice gear and some barefoots.
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Mar 1, 2021 9:30:39 GMT -6
I really want to be one of those guys that gets a pair of monitors and I hear exactly what I want to hear! Where have these “insert monitor brand here” been all my life! I'm not sure you will ever get "that" feeling without a lot of room treatment and/or room correction software (like Sonarworks). I went through the same thing. I might have been able to save a bunch of money if I just got Sonarworks sooner. There is no way for any monitor to sound perfect in my room. After doing the measurements and applying the curve it created, my low mid mix troubles disappeared. It's amazing how much easier it is to mix when you can trust what you are hearing. As far as monitor controllers (from your previous post), I have a Dangerous Monitor ST. No real complaints at all. It does not color the sound a all and has some great functions for a fair price.
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Mar 1, 2021 14:42:59 GMT -6
My room sounds really good and I've been in here long enough to know it. It is a sound where I like to hear the room, if that makes sense? I have a decent size room and I was looking at 3 way and mid fields. The Dangerous AD+ and Convert-2 got me there, just an amazing D/A! That is what I was missing all along. I'm not sure I need another pair of monitors. What I'm using now will suffice(would like to try something bigger with more boom, I want to feel the drums), but I do however need a better monitor controller. I have a Dangerous Source and although the options and features are nice, I'm looking for something better. Have you compared the Source vs the Monitor ST?
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Oct 14, 2021 19:31:47 GMT -6
I had a quick listen to these today, and the in-8 older model, also KRK rockit 8 and Adam 5”. I wasn’t considering Kali, I need something like JBL/KRK/Yamaha that fills the room and gives a ballpark of highs and lows. These surprised me though, for 5 inch 3-way they sounded more like reference quality 8’s. Like headphones the bass was very tight and audible, not much decay in the sub region, sounded more like sealed woofer AND went pretty deep. The highs were gentle, the overall feel seemed mid forward, but in a smooth way. However I wouldn’t get them for clients, because the sweet spot is kind of narrow and they sound very screwed up and ugly outside of it, until you crank them up all the way. Inside the sweet zone, totally immersive like headphones, no sizzle or bass ringing that the other brands have. The sales guy said they updated the cone and amp, they sounded like totally different compared to the IN-8 that was there. Maybe the in-8 was broken? Was “hollow” kind of sounding, the in-5 was louder and fuller, more detailed lows. I know an amp matters a lot, the difference was large. Not sure what to do anymore. I spent a total of maybe 2 songs listening.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2021 19:54:47 GMT -6
I had a quick listen to these today, and the in-8 older model, also KRK rockit 8 and Adam 5”. I wasn’t considering Kali, I need something like JBL/KRK/Yamaha that fills the room and gives a ballpark of highs and lows. These surprised me though, for 5 inch 3-way they sounded more like reference quality 8’s. Like headphones the bass was very tight and audible, not much decay in the sub region, sounded more like sealed woofer AND went pretty deep. The highs were gentle, the overall feel seemed mid forward, but in a smooth way. However I wouldn’t get them for clients, because the sweet spot is kind of narrow and they sound very screwed up and ugly outside of it, until you crank them up all the way. Inside the sweet zone, totally immersive like headphones, no sizzle or bass ringing that the other brands have. The sales guy said they updated the cone and amp, they sounded like totally different compared to the IN-8 that was there. Maybe the in-8 was broken? Was “hollow” kind of sounding, the in-5 was louder and fuller, more detailed lows. I know an amp matters a lot, the difference was large. Not sure what to do anymore. I spent a total of maybe 2 songs listening. The Kali 8” cabinet is resonant. The lp6 was better than the 8. Don’t believe deaf guys on Gearslutz or the manufacturer.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Oct 14, 2021 20:04:44 GMT -6
yeah, it seemed like a lot of forcing of opinions when they came out, turned me off completely. And today I was curious since they were there, and 3-way. I have to say the in8 v1 sounded like I expected for $299, the in5 v2 was nothing like it at all. Maybe I shouldn’t have used the ‘reference’ word, because something felt too good to be true. I just didn’t have much time to do a real once over, like dipswitches, etc. I bet the iN-8’s were set lower to hide the hiss. The highs on the Kali in5 v2 around 9k are recessed a little, felt great like cleaner speakers but also a little questionable what is really going on.
|
|
|
Post by phdamage on Oct 14, 2021 22:20:39 GMT -6
Hmm, what can you get that is better for $700 ? There’s a pair of B&W 805 matrix speakers on eBay right now for $750 if you’ve got an amp
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Oct 15, 2021 7:25:30 GMT -6
Those are regular hi-fi speakers though..
Dan said, "The Kali 8” cabinet is resonant. The lp6 was better than the 8. Don’t believe deaf guys on Gearslutz or the manufacturer."
I bought the lp6 after selling the lovely Avantone Abbey's to pay bills. I'll eventually get something better, but they are just good enough to work on, so they're holding down the fort for me until I can afford something better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2021 8:35:04 GMT -6
Those are regular hi-fi speakers though.. Dan said, "The Kali 8” cabinet is resonant. The lp6 was better than the 8. Don’t believe deaf guys on Gearslutz or the manufacturer." I bought the lp6 after selling the lovely Avantone Abbey's to pay bills. I'll eventually get something better, but they are just good enough to work on, so they're holding down the fort for me until I can afford something better. Old B&W Matrix were the mastering standard in the 80s and 90s. Tannoys, Yamaha NS line, ProAcs, Auratones, NHT, and everything that came out of the Seas diy kit world including Amphions were all Hifi speakers too. It doesn’t stop them from being highly effective tools. Honestly most modern monitors sound too good. You get the eq half right and tons of mixes and masters that are whack in a car sound fine on them. They just play them back, buried content and stuff in the background and all. You can create huge stages with tons of depth with sends and delays and it will all play back on a pair of ATCs or something when all of what you did will hurt it in a car or hifi towers vs a dry mix. You don’t have to brutally level performances. They’ll just play back. If they’re smaller modern nearfields that cost over 1k a pair and the crappy limiting, clipping, and compression isn’t too grindy, they’ll even lie to you that slammed modern releases have better mixes than pre look ahead limited ones because they had tons of noise reduction and a million bands of eq but when you play it back on a pair of towers or Yamahas, none of that shit matters once the brain adjusts and all you can hear is the lack of any dynamic variation and it’s flat and boring.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Oct 15, 2021 10:27:01 GMT -6
Yes! The hifi stuff can be incredibly insanely good. I have Kef 105s that destroy when it comes to detail and feeling neutral. Before I recapped them, they had the sweetest top end, pure vintage greatness, but a teeny soft for modern monitoring.. Sadly had to replace the wax PIO caps, there’s a kit out there for that. HOLY Detail! The new caps took them to high end modern resolution, could hear the dimension of the vocal booth. Bass is very lean for their size, they want to be concert loud. I liked to put a little smiley EQ on them for normal listening. If I wanted something close to their resolution I’d be shopping for a while and expect to spend plenty thousands.
Here’s a vid of the same model, also show the bookshelf model. At 9 min he describes the sound. They can be found for good price sometimes.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,098
|
Post by ericn on Oct 15, 2021 11:21:18 GMT -6
Those are regular hi-fi speakers though.. Dan said, "The Kali 8” cabinet is resonant. The lp6 was better than the 8. Don’t believe deaf guys on Gearslutz or the manufacturer." I bought the lp6 after selling the lovely Avantone Abbey's to pay bills. I'll eventually get something better, but they are just good enough to work on, so they're holding down the fort for me until I can afford something better. A speaker has no idea if it’s a HiFi speaker or a studio monitor, there is no set defining factor other than who sells it. Frankly with all of these cheap generic near fields with generic plate amps I’ll say it, the average modern hifi speaker is more pro than what is sold as pro, the drivers and cross over in most passive midline hi fi would definitely be considered more “pro based on design and build. Hell even BobO’s big Duntech/ Dunlevys were sold as highend consumer speakers. The biggest issue today is that all the cheap “ Active Studio monitors” use drivers that would have been laughable 30 years ago, but that built in DSP makes them useable and almost listenable. I laugh till I almost pee myself every time I see a high end DA feeding a pair of speakers with the cheapest AD you can find inside a digital plate amp. The biggest difference between the OEM consumer and pro version of most these days is the “pro” has an XLR input and the hifi has WiFi streaming. Sure somebody might have “ voiced “ the DSP slightly differently, but that is easy to change if you know what your doing.
|
|
|
Post by superwack on Oct 15, 2021 11:44:26 GMT -6
I saw a tour of the Ferrari factory in Maranello and they leave all the computer assists, traction control, etc. turned off and take the cars out to the track then up to the mountains to do the tuning and set up then, once they've gotten it as good as they can, they engage the "DSP. Seems like this would be the way to design speakers. Get the cabinet, drivers, and crossover as good as possible THEN implement DSP to get that last 5% In the world of DSP monitors, I was looking at the Dynaudio Core 59 and noticed they have an orbital tweeter that can be rotated for horizontal or vertical replacement and state the sweet spot is halfway between the tweeter and midrange driver (which don't appear to be centered). I asked Dynaudio where the tweeter is as I was trying to see if they would fit on my speaker stands at the correct height and the documents they have only show the outside cabinet dimensions. I got the response from support: We do not have that measurement and will not be able to supply it to you in the future! Curious. Made me move to the opposite direction and now I'm looking into PSI
|
|
|
Post by phdamage on Oct 15, 2021 13:35:57 GMT -6
Old B&W Matrix were the mastering standard in the 80s and 90s. Tannoys, Yamaha NS line, ProAcs, Auratones, NHT, and everything that came out of the Seas diy kit world including Amphions were all Hifi speakers too. It doesn’t stop them from being highly effective tools. Honestly most modern monitors sound too good. You get the eq half right and tons of mixes and masters that are whack in a car sound fine on them. They just play them back, buried content and stuff in the background and all. You can create huge stages with tons of depth with sends and delays and it will all play back on a pair of ATCs or something when all of what you did will hurt it in a car or hifi towers vs a dry mix. You don’t have to brutally level performances. They’ll just play back. If they’re smaller modern nearfields that cost over 1k a pair and the crappy limiting, clipping, and compression isn’t too grindy, they’ll even lie to you that slammed modern releases have better mixes than pre look ahead limited ones because they had tons of noise reduction and a million bands of eq but when you play it back on a pair of towers or Yamahas, none of that shit matters once the brain adjusts and all you can hear is the lack of any dynamic variation and it’s flat and boring. frankly, I kinda bought them on a whim after finding out they were in both rooms at Electrical (and I had heard Abbey Road as well, at some point - possibly the era you're talking about?). But I still love working on them. not at all fatiguing and I think they translate pretty well (better now that I'm using Sonarworks). Been playing with the idea of getting something else, but I can't really justify it right now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2021 19:45:39 GMT -6
Those are regular hi-fi speakers though.. Dan said, "The Kali 8” cabinet is resonant. The lp6 was better than the 8. Don’t believe deaf guys on Gearslutz or the manufacturer." I bought the lp6 after selling the lovely Avantone Abbey's to pay bills. I'll eventually get something better, but they are just good enough to work on, so they're holding down the fort for me until I can afford something better. A speaker has no idea if it’s a HiFi speaker or a studio monitor, there is no set defining factor other than who sells it. Frankly with all of these cheap generic near fields with generic plate amps I’ll say it, the average modern hifi speaker is more pro than what is sold as pro, the drivers and cross over in most passive midline hi fi would definitely be considered more “pro based on design and build. Hell even BobO’s big Duntech/ Dunlevys were sold as highend consumer speakers. The biggest issue today is that all the cheap “ Active Studio monitors” use drivers that would have been laughable 30 years ago, but that built in DSP makes them useable and almost listenable. I laugh till I almost pee myself every time I see a high end DA feeding a pair of speakers with the cheapest AD you can find inside a digital plate amp. The biggest difference between the OEM consumer and pro version of most these days is the “pro” has an XLR input and the hifi has WiFi streaming. Sure somebody might have “ voiced “ the DSP slightly differently, but that is easy to change if you know what your doing. What’s in a Neumann or Genelec is worse than a Chinese dvd case amp based on TI class D ICs. STmicroectronics :thumbsdown: The only monitors sold in the us with amps you wouldn’t be afraid of buying separately use off the shelf class d modules, ATC, or Quested. And ATC’s own amps are good just because they’re not bad or underpowered. That’s an achievement in 2021. There is stuff that’s better than them and there has been since the 80s. Quested’s MC2 amps are insane though.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,049
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Oct 16, 2021 1:08:22 GMT -6
They better sound good with those prices!
Of monitors I have heard, the atc are my fave, someone was selling some smaller Quested on GS recently, with ericn’s consistent recommendations here was very tempted!
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,098
|
Post by ericn on Oct 16, 2021 15:33:09 GMT -6
They better sound good with those prices! Of monitors I have heard, the atc are my fave, someone was selling some smaller Quested on GS recently, with ericn’s consistent recommendations here was very tempted! There are a couple of pairs of speakers I don’t need but want for sale used right now. 1st the Quested 2205’s on EBay ! One of Rogers all time favorites if only they still made the woofers. Anybody in Brooklyn willing to do a pickup and pack? I will be happy to let you play for a week or 2 😀 2nd a pair of the little PMC’s on GS that need work, let’s see tech 2.4mi away and reconer 3.7mi 3rd big old pair of B&W 808’s yeah they are big, but think 801 matrix that will play loud. 4th a pair of B&W 802’s locally the price is right I wouldn’t even need to connect the battery in the X5 because they would fit in the Tesla. 5th because if I’m going to piss the wife let’s go all out a couple of pairs of Soundlab Electrostatics ! If you think the ATC non s-dome in the 25’s is the greatest midrange you need to hear what a guy who couldn’t hear his speakers but makes the characters on the Big Bang look like they failed math these are your speakers. Practical? Hell no ! Cat killers ? Hell yes! If the cat that doesn’t officially exist keeps waking me at 5 AM I’m going to buy em. I keep thinking the first 2 would match really well with the SVS Sb3000 minis and compete with BradD’s new set up of SCM20’s JL audio X-over for the high pass ( keeps The subs DSP away from the ATC’s and stereo SVS SB3000’s Problem is I really like those non mini SB3000’s. Or do I just find a new cabinet builder and break down and build the Brians ( named after my dearly departed cabinet builder and fellow speaker geek the guy fing got Ferrari to send paint so one of the Spice girls Ferrari would match her speakers). The Brian is the son of the Quested 302 / 3202: 2 volt 8’s vented down to 33HZ, Volt 3in dome ( second best dome only to the ATC s & I don’t think Brad will sell me a pair of the S series! Highs are by either the Transducer labs Carbon dome or Beryllium Dome. Carbon better mesh with Volt mid, but BE gives the line source Magnepan a ribbon a run for it’s money.
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Oct 16, 2021 22:23:03 GMT -6
Kali has released the 2nd wave of the IN8 link
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,049
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Oct 16, 2021 23:35:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by noob on Feb 6, 2024 22:49:36 GMT -6
I don't see any other threads about the Kali IN-8 V2's specifically, so I decided to resurrect this one. I might be late to the party, but I got a pair of V2's recently and they are really great, I'm very impressed.
I always overlooked them because of the price, but they do seem to punch way above their weight class imo. Sounds very flat across the entire spectrum, the mids sound really clear, love the 3-way design with the coaxial hf and mid driver, with the separated low end driver. The low end is punchy, no boominess at all from what I can tell. Very comfy, warm sounding speakers. Not lacking high end though, just not magnifying it at all, very pleasent to listen to. The stereo image is great, there's a huge sweet spot because of the coax.
There is definitely much more high end roll off than my Amphion One15's, but very different monitors all together. I like how they work in tandem, but have yet to use them enough to see how well they translate.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,049
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 7, 2024 4:45:26 GMT -6
Interesting, what’s your sense of their detail and dynamic? Yes, two very different monitor designs !
The new speaker material, faster transient response and lower distortion sound good. i demoed some 5’s a year ago, sent them back , thought they sounded good, but not so dynamic , not so detailed .
|
|
|
Post by noob on Feb 7, 2024 8:15:13 GMT -6
Interesting, what’s your sense of their detail and dynamic? Yes, two very different monitor designs ! The new speaker material, faster transient response and lower distortion sound good. i demoed some 5’s a year ago, sent them back , thought they sounded good, but not so dynamic , not so detailed . The transient response is about what I'd expect from these class d amps, but the three way with the coax design adds a ton of detail imo. Compared to my passive systems, not as snappy, but a ton of clarity in the mids. It all depends on what you mean when you say detail. If I were to compare these to other monitors in the price range, I'd say they are far more detailed, yes.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,049
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 7, 2024 8:22:31 GMT -6
That’s fair and yes I was comparing the Kali to my memories of other more expensive monitors. I thought the Kali very good value, but for me they weren’t keepers.
The new 8 sound like they are improved.
|
|
|
Post by noob on Feb 7, 2024 8:30:01 GMT -6
That’s fair and yes I was comparing the Kali to my memories of other more expensive monitors. I thought the Kali very good value, but for me they weren’t keepers. The new 8 sound like they are improved. Yeah, if you're in the market for a $3-5k set of speakers, the Kali IN8s won't compete with that bracket imo. But they do compete up to the $2k range, I would say. I got these used for 600, and they far outdo anything I've heard under $1k. Since I'm using them in tandem with my passive systems, they are perfect because they have a huge sweetspot and give me that class d, active monitor perspective for cheap. I was watching a youtube video with Jeff Ellis, a great mixing engineer. He uses the IN8's to do the majority of his mix work, so they can easily pass as mains. Then again, he is doing the last 10% of the mix on some PMC's. All the detailed work he does is on the Kalis though. They can definitely get the job done.
|
|