|
Post by seawell on Aug 23, 2021 8:25:50 GMT -6
Or a choice in trusting that your natural immunity since recovering from covid has value and is solid protection moving forward. Vaccine for everyone is never going to work so get pissed and sanctimonious all you want but if you’re actually interested in seeing this thing end you’ll be pro-everything(vaccine/therapeutics, etc…)
|
|
|
Post by ehrenebbage on Aug 23, 2021 8:37:34 GMT -6
Or a choice in trusting that your natural immunity since recovering from covid has value and is solid protection moving forward. Vaccine for everyone is never going to work so get pissed and sanctimonious all you want but if you’re actually interested in seeing this thing end you’ll be pro-everything(vaccine/therapeutics, etc…) Your herd immunity approach might work for you as an individual, but the collective impact of individual decisions is pushing our healthcare system to the very brink of collapse. Also, I am pro anything which might be helpful. But I also recognize that we need to stop the bleeding and theoretical band aids aren't doing the trick. *edit* If prior infection is proven to be solid protection, I would be perfectly fine using that record in place of a vaccination where vaccines might be mandated. We need to get through this quickly and I don't care how we do it. I'm good with whatever works.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 23, 2021 9:18:17 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by ehrenebbage on Aug 23, 2021 9:49:04 GMT -6
Prior infection is similar to vaccination. Double edged sword - also looks like the protection it confers against infection wanes over time. On the plus side it probably protects against severe illness for much longer. Fantastic! Assuming this is correct, which I trust that it is, I'd support a record of a prior infection to serve in place of a vaccine where vaccines are mandated. I get that my posts might sound sanctimonious, but I don't consider myself to be morally superior to anyone. I'm encouraging us to consider how our individual choices affect the people around us. I get that people have different world views, different degrees of trust in institutions, different health circumstances, different experiences informing their decisions. But in this moment we need to think beyond our own self interest as much as we can. The questions is, can the crucial systems in our society support the collective impact of individual choices? An individual wants to take the chance with the prior infection immunity approach? Fine for them. They'll probably be okay. Tens of millions of people want to take the herd immunity risk? Totally different. Maybe a small percentage of people will be hospitalized and a smaller number will die, but a small percentage of tens of millions of people is a huge number. Are our healthcare/education/economic systems robust enough to hold up under the weight of that? What's the plan? People overlook that it's not just deaths or even hospitalizations which impact our healthcare system. My next door neighbor is a nurse practitioner at a local urgent care clinic. For a year now, the vast majority of her time has been spent testing patients. The massive flood of testing alone is impacting the availability and quality of care.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Aug 23, 2021 10:59:25 GMT -6
Prior infection is similar to vaccination. Double edged sword - also looks like the protection it confers against infection wanes over time. On the plus side it probably protects against severe illness for much longer. Fantastic! Assuming this is correct, which I trust that it is, I'd support a record of a prior infection to serve in place of a vaccine where vaccines are mandated. I truly appreciate this and it's all I'm asking for. Keep in mind I got covid before a vaccine was available to me so I didn't have a choice at the time. Thankfully I did well and didn't require hospitalization but just having it at all was scary for sure. I do agree we need to all balance personal liberties in light of helping our fellow citizens. I just hate when the media makes an effort to divide in such a black and white way between vaccinated vs unvaccinated with zero nuance. I'd bet if we all hung out in person we'd find out we agree on way more than we disagree and we'd all have a great time(until someone brought up analog vs ITB 😂) Thank you Matt for sharing that information, much appreciated!
|
|
|
Post by ehrenebbage on Aug 23, 2021 11:03:00 GMT -6
Or a choice in trusting that your natural immunity since recovering from covid has value and is solid protection moving forward. Vaccine for everyone is never going to work so get pissed and sanctimonious all you want but if you’re actually interested in seeing this thing end you’ll be pro-everything(vaccine/therapeutics, etc…) I want to make it clear that I'm not intending for all of my ire to be directed at you : ) I appreciate the way you work through this conversation, and you seem to be trying to look for solutions. My frustration is mostly with the people who are capitalizing on the misinformation economy. Also, my opinion is that, while the unvaccinated are crushing our healthcare systems, everyone including vaccinated people should be thinking about what we can do to stop the bleeding. If vaccinated folks are spreading the virus we need to take responsibility and adjust accordingly. Some folks on my side of the debate may not care to look out for the unvaccinated, but at least look out for the people who are busting their butts to handle the crisis as well as people who are suffering through the collateral damage.
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Aug 23, 2021 11:32:29 GMT -6
Or a choice in trusting that your natural immunity since recovering from covid has value and is solid protection moving forward. Vaccine for everyone is never going to work so get pissed and sanctimonious all you want but if you’re actually interested in seeing this thing end you’ll be pro-everything(vaccine/therapeutics, etc…) Every reasonable person is pro-everything. The anger directed towards the anti-vax crowd is well-founded and IMO hardly sanctimonious: if we can all agree that reasonable people are pro-everything, we can also agree that anti-vaxxers are unreasonable and selfish, and are slowing (or, arguably, preventing) our collective progress against this pandemic.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,098
|
Post by ericn on Aug 23, 2021 13:11:23 GMT -6
They are not looking at the current efficacy, they are basing the authorization for the booster based on the project efficacy. These curves are not linear and it not only takes time for the booster to take full effect and get people to get the shots in arms. I got my immuno Compromised booster on Tuesday and it kicked my ass, felt like I had been hit by a new Ford Bronco, I have been hit by a 2000’s Jetta this was worse till Friday afternoon.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,098
|
Post by ericn on Aug 23, 2021 13:16:39 GMT -6
At the moment kind of, but aquirred immunity from infection is not necessarily effective against mutations and is different for every individual. To much of the population has immunity issues and unless their GP spent their whole 7min appointment explaining it they don’t know. Hell 73-78% is obese now go look at how many say they are.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Aug 23, 2021 13:54:33 GMT -6
Hell 73-78% is obese now go look at how many say they are. If we're really serious about saving lives this is a conversation we're going to have to have as a nation once we put this behind us. Preferably before we come up against whatever the next challenge turns out to be. Less obese people should be a goal both parties can agree on. I'm not sure there's a single thing we can do as a nation to help our healthcare system more.
|
|
|
Post by teejay on Aug 23, 2021 14:09:28 GMT -6
Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infectionResults:...In vaccinated subjects, antibody titers decreased by up to 40% each subsequent month while in convalescents they decreased by less than 5% per month. Six months after BNT162b2 vaccination 16.1% subjects had antibody levels below the seropositivity threshold of <50 AU/mL, while only 10.8% of convalescent patients were below <50 AU/mL threshold after 9 months from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: This study demonstrates individuals who received the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine have different kinetics of antibody levels compared to patients who had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, with higher initial levels but a much faster exponential decrease in the first group.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Aug 23, 2021 14:13:31 GMT -6
Or a choice in trusting that your natural immunity since recovering from covid has value and is solid protection moving forward. Vaccine for everyone is never going to work so get pissed and sanctimonious all you want but if you’re actually interested in seeing this thing end you’ll be pro-everything(vaccine/therapeutics, etc…) Every reasonable person is pro-everything. The anger directed towards the anti-vax crowd is well-founded and IMO hardly sanctimonious: if we can all agree that reasonable people are pro-everything, we can also agree that anti-vaxxers are unreasonable and selfish, and are slowing (or, arguably, preventing) our collective progress against this pandemic. Right, but exactly who is the anti-vax crowd? I was told it was republicans, then evangelicals, then particularly white evangelicals. Then I found out how low the vaccination rate was in the black population and that messed that narrative all up. In other words are you running into these morons on a daily basis or are you upset by what you're being told? How many of the "anti-vaxxers" were just COVID vax hesitant, not anti-vax altogether? How many are going to feel better about things and get the Pfizer shot today now that it has full FDA approval? I bet a lot actually. I can't help but feel like some of you guys are raging against a caricature that has been carefully crafted by a politically motivated media. It's easier if there is an "enemy" or a "bad guy" to hate but very rarely in life have I found that to be the case. Case in point, what is someone going to do now that has an employer mandate that they get vaccinated but has a doctor advising them that they shouldn't? There are some people that should not get this vaccine, that has somehow gotten lost in the conversation. I personally know people in this exact predicament. Who should they listen to? All I'm trying to get across is that the people I know that haven't been vaccinated aren't not getting vaccinated for any of the reasons you're saying. This whole situation is more nuanced than some want to believe and people have been making incredibly difficult decisions on almost a daily basis for a year and a half now. I think 99.99% of people are doing the best they can. Sure there are morons but they exist on all sides of the political spectrum. I still think the best place to channel any anger over all this is at the government(2020 and 2021 versions) and the FDA, CDC, WHO, NIH etc.. The messaging has been garbage so many times. That is more to blame for hesitancy than anything else in my opinion. They botched it terribly with masks right in the beginning and it has been an uphill battle ever since. People intentionally spreading misinformation are the absolute worst but they were sure teed up a perfect scenario by the people in charge that were supposed to be better at their jobs than they turned out to be.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 23, 2021 14:13:45 GMT -6
teejay Antibodies are a correlate of protection but that doesn't mean they're the only thing going on. There was a really good paper I linked a few pages back from 2011 or so talking about how complex the duration of immunity is and how the different parts of the immune system correlate to protection. The study I linked is not a lab test but real-world evidence. They did random surveillance on 350,000 people, and did periodic nose swab and blood tests to check for infection and antibodies. Those findings are much more useful than a lab test that's only looking at one part of immunity.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,098
|
Post by ericn on Aug 23, 2021 14:21:07 GMT -6
Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infectionResults:...In vaccinated subjects, antibody titers decreased by up to 40% each subsequent month while in convalescents they decreased by less than 5% per month. Six months after BNT162b2 vaccination 16.1% subjects had antibody levels below the seropositivity threshold of <50 AU/mL, while only 10.8% of convalescent patients were below <50 AU/mL threshold after 9 months from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: This study demonstrates individuals who received the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine have different kinetics of antibody levels compared to patients who had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, with higher initial levels but a much faster exponential decrease in the first group. Of course here is one little wrinkle with any antibody testing, the test themselves are not accurate, I mean 30% false positive untrustworthy. No lab director worth a damn is ever going to look at the results of a level study and want their name anywhere near it.
|
|
|
Post by teejay on Aug 23, 2021 14:23:47 GMT -6
FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine. We have a choice between an FDA approved vaccine with a track record of 200 plus million doses administered in the US alone and 340,000 pages of data, versus whatever experimental combination of unproven treatments and home remedies your favorite anti establishment advisor thinks might work. With the Pfizer vaccine approved as safe by the FDA, and in light of Pfizer's projected $33.5 Billion in vaccine sales for 2021, we can now expect that Pfizer is no longer absolved from lawsuits related to any short or long-term issues that arise from the use of their vaccine. Correct? After all, they were protected because it was experimental. Now that it has been declared "safe", they have nothing to worry about.
|
|
|
Post by ehrenebbage on Aug 23, 2021 14:31:00 GMT -6
Every reasonable person is pro-everything. The anger directed towards the anti-vax crowd is well-founded and IMO hardly sanctimonious: if we can all agree that reasonable people are pro-everything, we can also agree that anti-vaxxers are unreasonable and selfish, and are slowing (or, arguably, preventing) our collective progress against this pandemic. Right, but exactly who is the anti-vax crowd? I was told it was *clowns, then evangelicals, then particularly white evangelicals. Then I found out how low the vaccination rate was in the black population and that messed that narrative all up. In other words are you running into these morons on a daily basis or are you upset by what you're being told? I run into them and they fall all over the political spectrum. I also recognize that the public figures who are anti vax, anti masks, anti distancing...basically anti every preventative measure, are largely playing to a conservative base. This isn't media spin...they ARE the media figures, community leaders and politicians. ***With some prominent exceptions, like Bret Weinstein, RFK Jr., etc.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Aug 23, 2021 14:49:29 GMT -6
Right, but exactly who is the anti-vax crowd? I was told it was *clowns, then evangelicals, then particularly white evangelicals. Then I found out how low the vaccination rate was in the black population and that messed that narrative all up. In other words are you running into these morons on a daily basis or are you upset by what you're being told? I run into them and they fall all over the political spectrum. I also recognize that the public figures who are anti vax, anti masks, anti distancing...basically anti every preventative measure, are largely playing to a conservative base. This isn't media spin...they ARE the media figures, community leaders and politicians. ***With some prominent exceptions, like Bret Weinstein, RFK Jr., etc. I guess I don't watch/read whoever they are. I find Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow to be equally unbearable to watch for example. My real life interactions don't reflect what you're saying but I recognize that we don't live in the same town so I'm sorry you're having those interactions. Even still are you finding it to be a vast minority of people or most?
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 23, 2021 14:56:31 GMT -6
teejay all vaccines are covered by special legal protections. COVID had a certain carve-out, but all vaccine manufacturers get special coverage. You can't sue, there's a special vaccine court that handles cases. Otherwise we'd probably not have any vaccines at all. www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html
|
|
|
Post by narxist on Aug 23, 2021 15:12:36 GMT -6
Case in point, what is someone going to do now that has an employer mandate that they get vaccinated but has a doctor advising them that they shouldn't? There are some people that should not get this vaccine, that has somehow gotten lost in the conversation. I personally know people in this exact predicament. Who should they listen to? They should listen to their doctor and complete the paperwork for an exemption.
|
|
|
Post by ehrenebbage on Aug 23, 2021 15:34:09 GMT -6
I run into them and they fall all over the political spectrum. I also recognize that the public figures who are anti vax, anti masks, anti distancing...basically anti every preventative measure, are largely playing to a conservative base. This isn't media spin...they ARE the media figures, community leaders and politicians. ***With some prominent exceptions, like Bret Weinstein, RFK Jr., etc. I guess I don't watch/read whoever they are. I find Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow to be equally unbearable to watch for example. My real life interactions don't reflect what you're saying but I recognize that we don't live in the same town so I'm sorry you're having those interactions. Even still are you finding it to be a vast minority of people or most? I don't watch them either but they have massive, massive audiences. Numerous conservative politicians, church leaders, etc. are going to great lengths to spread the word. Not entirely sure what you're asking re: majority vs minority. Can you clarify? My personal bubble is pretty diverse. I wouldn't pretend that my perspective is all encompassing, but I've lived and worked in a bunch of places and my friends and family are from all walks of life. I can say that most of the anti vax stuff that shows up on my radar comes from my conservative friends and acquaintances, and they often share content straight from politicians and media figures.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Aug 23, 2021 15:41:51 GMT -6
I guess I don't watch/read whoever they are. I find Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow to be equally unbearable to watch for example. My real life interactions don't reflect what you're saying but I recognize that we don't live in the same town so I'm sorry you're having those interactions. Even still are you finding it to be a vast minority of people or most? I don't watch them either but they have massive, massive audiences. Numerous conservative politicians, church leaders, etc. are going to great lengths to spread the word. Not entirely sure what you're asking re: majority vs minority. Can you clarify? My personal bubble is pretty diverse. I wouldn't pretend that my perspective is all encompassing, but I've lived and worked in a bunch of places and my friends and family are from all walks of life. I can say that most of the anti vax stuff that shows up on my radar comes from my conservative friends and acquaintances, and they often share content straight from politicians and media figures. I was just asking how often are you running into people like that. Hopefully not often.
|
|
|
Post by rowmat on Aug 23, 2021 15:49:40 GMT -6
I run into them and they fall all over the political spectrum. I also recognize that the public figures who are anti vax, anti masks, anti distancing...basically anti every preventative measure, are largely playing to a conservative base. This isn't media spin...they ARE the media figures, community leaders and politicians. ***With some prominent exceptions, like Bret Weinstein, RFK Jr., etc. I guess I don't watch/read whoever they are. I find Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow to be equally unbearable to watch for example. My real life interactions don't reflect what you're saying but I recognize that we don't live in the same town so I'm sorry you're having those interactions. Even still are you finding it to be a vast minority of people or most? The ruling class have worked out how to divide the peasants for millenia by using their own idealogy against them via a combination of tribal bias confirmation and cognitive dissonance (fueled by media propaganda irrespective of any facts) in order to keep them trapped within their own opposing tribes and fixated on fighting against each other. For instance throughout 2020 many political pundits staunchly advised against getting vaccinated because they distrusted anything promoted by a certain orange haired individual occupying the White House. Fast forward to a change of government and several of those same pundits now state that anyone who is vaccine hesitant obviously must either be a pro orange man supporter, on the far right or a white supremacist/terrorist.
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Aug 23, 2021 15:52:42 GMT -6
Every reasonable person is pro-everything. The anger directed towards the anti-vax crowd is well-founded and IMO hardly sanctimonious: if we can all agree that reasonable people are pro-everything, we can also agree that anti-vaxxers are unreasonable and selfish, and are slowing (or, arguably, preventing) our collective progress against this pandemic. Right, but exactly who is the anti-vax crowd? I was told it was *clowns, then evangelicals, then particularly white evangelicals. Then I found out how low the vaccination rate was in the black population and that messed that narrative all up. In other words are you running into these morons on a daily basis or are you upset by what you're being told? How many of the "anti-vaxxers" were just COVID vax hesitant, not anti-vax altogether? How many are going to feel better about things and get the Pfizer shot today now that it has full FDA approval? I bet a lot actually. I can't help but feel like some of you guys are raging against a caricature that has been carefully crafted by a politically motivated media. It's easier if there is an "enemy" or a "bad guy" to hate but very rarely in life have I found that to be the case. Case in point, what is someone going to do now that has an employer mandate that they get vaccinated but has a doctor advising them that they shouldn't? There are some people that should not get this vaccine, that has somehow gotten lost in the conversation. I personally know people in this exact predicament. Who should they listen to? All I'm trying to get across is that the people I know that haven't been vaccinated aren't not getting vaccinated for any of the reasons you're saying. This whole situation is more nuanced than some want to believe and people have been making incredibly difficult decisions on almost a daily basis for a year and a half now. I think 99.99% of people are doing the best they can. Sure there are morons but they exist on all sides of the political spectrum. I still think the best place to channel any anger over all this is at the government(2020 and 2021 versions) and the FDA, CDC, WHO, NIH etc.. The messaging has been garbage so many times. That is more to blame for hesitancy than anything else in my opinion. They botched it terribly with masks right in the beginning and it has been an uphill battle ever since. People intentionally spreading misinformation are the absolute worst but they were sure teed up a perfect scenario by the people in charge that were supposed to be better at their jobs than they turned out to be. Folks who are unvaccinated because they have poor access are not anti-vax, assuming they remain unvaccinated due to that lack of access. Ditto for folks who have medical reasons. The term is pretty straight-forward, IMO: if you oppose vaccination writ large, you are anti-vaccination. Race is not a factor in this issue. Since you brought it up, though: it's worth noting that there are four times as many unvax'd (r) people than black people in the US, and the rate of vaccine *hesitancy/refusal* (the more important metric, in terms of the argument i'm making here) is also higher amongst (r) people than it is amongst black people. So the race thing here feels a bit like a strawman, and certainly smacks of a certain amount of willingness to buy into the culture war rhetoric of a particular corner of the ideological spectrum. Anywho, back to the point. If a bipoc person is avoiding the vaccine because they've bought into the culture war nonsense, while also taking advantage of and enjoying our (for-now😭) re-opened society, they are every bit the selfish jerk that a white person is for doing the same. If someone wants to avoid vaccination, that is their right, and I have no problem with it whatsoever. Where I take umbrage, however, is when they begin to interact with society in-person, risking the health and safety of others. I hope you're right about the FDA approval, but I am not optimistic. I think most people were using it as a cover, and I fully expect the goalposts to be moved in response to the FDA's decision. I genuinely hope I am very wrong. If an employer mandates vaccines (a move which, btw, i fully support and intend to enact in my own business), an at-risk employee can get a good ol' fashioned "doctor's note" where applicable. It seems fairly simple to me.
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Aug 23, 2021 15:58:02 GMT -6
I guess I don't watch/read whoever they are. I find Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow to be equally unbearable to watch for example. My real life interactions don't reflect what you're saying but I recognize that we don't live in the same town so I'm sorry you're having those interactions. Even still are you finding it to be a vast minority of people or most? The ruling class have worked out how to divide the peasants for millenia by using their own idealogy against them via a combination of tribal bias confirmation and cognitive dissonance (fueled by media propaganda irrespective of any facts) in order to keep them trapped within their own opposing tribes and fixated on fighting against each other. For instance throughout 2020 many political pundits staunchly advised against getting vaccinated because they distrusted anything promoted by a certain orange haired individual occupying the White House. Fast forward to a change of government and several of those same pundits now state that anyone who is vaccine hesitant obviously must either be a pro orange man supporter, on the far right or a white supremacist/terrorist. Pundits were not opposed to the orange guy's vaccine. The opposition and skepticism came in the wake of reports that the orange guy was pressuring premature approval so a vaccine would drop before election day. I think you may be a victim of the very situation you are describing above.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Aug 23, 2021 16:24:10 GMT -6
Right, but exactly who is the anti-vax crowd? I was told it was *clowns, then evangelicals, then particularly white evangelicals. Then I found out how low the vaccination rate was in the black population and that messed that narrative all up. In other words are you running into these morons on a daily basis or are you upset by what you're being told? How many of the "anti-vaxxers" were just COVID vax hesitant, not anti-vax altogether? How many are going to feel better about things and get the Pfizer shot today now that it has full FDA approval? I bet a lot actually. I can't help but feel like some of you guys are raging against a caricature that has been carefully crafted by a politically motivated media. It's easier if there is an "enemy" or a "bad guy" to hate but very rarely in life have I found that to be the case. Case in point, what is someone going to do now that has an employer mandate that they get vaccinated but has a doctor advising them that they shouldn't? There are some people that should not get this vaccine, that has somehow gotten lost in the conversation. I personally know people in this exact predicament. Who should they listen to? All I'm trying to get across is that the people I know that haven't been vaccinated aren't not getting vaccinated for any of the reasons you're saying. This whole situation is more nuanced than some want to believe and people have been making incredibly difficult decisions on almost a daily basis for a year and a half now. I think 99.99% of people are doing the best they can. Sure there are morons but they exist on all sides of the political spectrum. I still think the best place to channel any anger over all this is at the government(2020 and 2021 versions) and the FDA, CDC, WHO, NIH etc.. The messaging has been garbage so many times. That is more to blame for hesitancy than anything else in my opinion. They botched it terribly with masks right in the beginning and it has been an uphill battle ever since. People intentionally spreading misinformation are the absolute worst but they were sure teed up a perfect scenario by the people in charge that were supposed to be better at their jobs than they turned out to be. Folks who are unvaccinated because they have poor access are not anti-vax, assuming they remain unvaccinated due to that lack of access. Ditto for folks who have medical reasons. The term is pretty straight-forward, IMO: if you oppose vaccination writ large, you are anti-vaccination. Race is not a factor in this issue. Since you brought it up, though: it's worth noting that there are four times as many unvax'd (r) people than black people in the US, and the rate of vaccine *hesitancy/refusal* (the more important metric, in terms of the argument i'm making here) is also higher amongst (r) people than it is amongst black people. So the race thing here feels a bit like a strawman, and certainly smacks of a certain amount of willingness to buy into the culture war rhetoric of a particular corner of the ideological spectrum. Anywho, back to the point. If a bipoc person is avoiding the vaccine because they've bought into the culture war nonsense, while also taking advantage of and enjoying our (for-now😭) re-opened society, they are every bit the selfish jerk that a white person is for doing the same. If someone wants to avoid vaccination, that is their right, and I have no problem with it whatsoever. Where I take umbrage, however, is when they begin to interact with society in-person, risking the health and safety of others. I hope you're right about the FDA approval, but I am not optimistic. I think most people were using it as a cover, and I fully expect the goalposts to be moved in response to the FDA's decision. I genuinely hope I am very wrong. If an employer mandates vaccines (a move which, btw, i fully support and intend to enact in my own business), an at-risk employee can get a good ol' fashioned "doctor's note" where applicable. It seems fairly simple to me. My point is if you listen to certain news outlets you'd think there's only one very specific type of person not getting vaccinated and that isn't true. It hasn't been true at any point of this vaccine campaign but they never let a little truth get in the way of a good story I guess. I consider that kind of reporting very irresponsible and down right dangerous. I'm not trying to make it a racial issue, I was just shocked that when I started looking into it, out of all groups to have a low vaccination rate it was a group that votes 90% dem. That does not support the narrative at all. As far as putting people at risk. If two unvaccinated people go to the grocery store, they both know the risk they are taking, correct? Or...are you now worried about vaxxed people being infected by unvaccinated people too? If so, that's a part of a larger discussion. I think there is going to be a good bump due to FDA approval(and as a result many mandates). Time will tell but I'm optimistic.
|
|