|
Post by matt@IAA on Jul 2, 2021 20:49:06 GMT -6
Without a doubt people will be quoting that paper for a long time to come.
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Jul 2, 2021 21:20:36 GMT -6
It’s nice to see the system worked. Maybe all the censorship is unnecessary then? In other words, Twitter didn’t take this link down so we’re able to see it was challenged and debunked. If you just nuke it on Twitter or YouTube, then it can live on much longer because that often raises more questions than answers. The damaging message is already out, and what you call 'censorship' simply serves to amplify it. Its promoters know this, and they play the game expertly. They're very, very good at the game.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 2, 2021 21:45:56 GMT -6
If you link to it now it says "retracted" all over top of it. Much more effective than the authors being able to say "they took it down because they don't want the truth to get out." I don't think the censorship, well intended or not has helped to get to the bottom of much yet. If someone quoted and linked to it at this point it wouldn't carry any weight. Anyway, I don't know what the answer is but the way it has been done up to this point has been like throwing fuel on the fire, I like this better.
Also, to follow up on another post earlier...Dr. Kory mentioned a debate he had about ivermectin with Dr. Luis Garegnani. It is available here now for anyone interested:
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Jul 2, 2021 22:05:00 GMT -6
If you link to it now it says "retracted" all over top of it. Much more effective than the authors being able to say "they took it down because they don't want the truth to get out." I don't think the censorship, well intended or not has helped to get to the bottom of much yet. If someone quoted and linked to it at this point it wouldn't carry any weight. Anyway, I don't know what the answer is but the way it has been done up to this point has been like throwing fuel on the fire, I like this better. Also, to follow up on another post earlier...Dr. Kory mentioned a debate he had about ivermectin with Dr. Luis Garegnani. It is available here now for anyone interested: The thing is, you're smart, and curious. You actually WANT to know what's going on. Most people are not like you and will take a headline at face value.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 3, 2021 0:06:11 GMT -6
I don’t know, I think when you treat people like children they are more apt to act like that(see the way the mask situation was handled). I think you have to shoot straight with people and if they reject it then just chalk it up to natural selection 🤣
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Jul 3, 2021 7:53:23 GMT -6
It’s not about treating them like children. Without a doubt there is a portion of the population who simply can’t read and digest a medical research article with a critical eye. Back when no one but doctors read medical journals it’s not a big deal. Today there’s a combination of access (good!) and ability to spread information (good!) that opens up unique avenues for disinformation (bad). The way social media works as a confirmation bias enhancer makes this very difficult. Most people don’t go read the actual article referenced in a headline. Most people read social media posts or watch YouTube videos. Some people who saw Dr Malone - a trusted expert - tweet that article out will forever remain convinced of the danger of the vaccines and that the article was pulled for reasons other than poor quality research.
I’m curious - has Dr Malone said anything about the retraction?
You know the game newspapers play in politics - shout the headline, whisper the retraction.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 3, 2021 9:21:04 GMT -6
Dr. Malone did tweet the link to the retraction and apologized for sharing the original so that’s good.
I just don’t see the world/people the same as some of you guys do. That’s fine…I’m not sure rehashing any of that would be productive at this point ✌🏻
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Jul 3, 2021 9:50:32 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 3, 2021 11:57:26 GMT -6
I really enjoyed that Matt, thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
Post by Bat Lanyard on Jul 7, 2021 18:59:19 GMT -6
I'll add this to the mix. I've found the First Trust covid tracker to be very insightful over the last year. In this age of being able to discuss what room Mix Magazine wants to proclaim amazing as political, but on the other hand dismissing, censoring and banning any contradictory opinion to vaccines on all platforms, having a group of dudes just look at the numbers every week is pretty interesting. This is their last Tracker, but there are 51 other posts just looking at the facts that are very informative. www.ftportfolios.com/Common/ContentFileLoader.aspx?ContentGUID=7f901f0e-d21e-4a79-9a5e-f6603b35d3b2
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Jul 8, 2021 7:10:03 GMT -6
Thanks for the link, Bat Lanyard. It seems to be great information. I was only bothered by one statement in the narrative: "Vaccines, which were miraculously developed in less than a year thanks to Operation Warp Speed, have helped many to return to more normal life." The first 5 words are highly disputed in the medical research scientific community (my son is a research biologist, this is not hearsay). Due to the prevalence of graphene (a mineral being mined for it's electrical properties and whose principal use is that of a conductor). The graphics page contains a lot of important information.
|
|
|
Post by Bat Lanyard on Jul 8, 2021 7:35:44 GMT -6
Thanks for the link, Bat Lanyard . It seems to be great information. I was only bothered by one statement in the narrative: "Vaccines, which were miraculously developed in less than a year thanks to Operation Warp Speed, have helped many to return to more normal life." The first 5 words are highly disputed in the medical research scientific community (my son is a research biologist, this is not hearsay). Due to the prevalence of graphene (a mineral being mined for it's electrical properties and whose principal use is that of a conductor). The graphics page contains a lot of important information. Glad you found it useful, Ward. I thought that sentence was very interesting as well. Lots of subtleties in there. I don't want to argue the right/wrong or the politics though, respectfully. Just thought it was worth posting because week by week I found them to have sober, unbiased statistics and charts that bore an incredibly different picture than what was being pushed everywhere. Highly informative to go back through their blog and look at the charts. I'll just add that I've been so grateful to live in Texas during this time. Our governor has been a rockstar and really stepped up.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Jul 8, 2021 8:51:52 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Jul 8, 2021 11:17:48 GMT -6
Can we just take a second to recognize that the presence of a "conductor" in our blood (via a vaccine injection) is not inherently a bad thing? Just saying "it's a conductor!" doesn't really mean anything and shouldn't automatically cause concern.
I have no idea what this latest thing is now about graphene, or if in fact there actually is graphene even present in the vaccine, but iron and water are conductors too, and we definitely need those in our blood. Give me a legitimate reason to be concerned about graphene in the vaccine and I'll listen, but don't tell me I should be concerned just because it's a conductor.
I'll do some Googling on graphene, but color me skeptical at this point.
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Jul 8, 2021 11:22:38 GMT -6
None of that engenders confidence. And THAT is the essence of this whole conversation. Nothing is engendering my confidence at this point. Certainly not the CDC or FDA, and certainly not crazy people on the internet, and CERTAINLY not our politicians. I'm liking you more and more everyday good doctor. If the powers that be are for it, I'm against it. Pretty simple.
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Jul 8, 2021 11:43:09 GMT -6
And here's a fun fact now that we have studied this thing for awhile past the knee jerk reaction: the median age of death due to covid (80.1) is GREATER than the median life expectancy of humans (72.5 years). I know I'm late to this discussion but can we please get a grip and look at facts reasonably without the doomsday scenario for every issue? Yes, people died of Covid. Every death is tragic but that's what we do. We humans die. No one gets out alive. To me, living in fear isn't living. Might as well get on with it if we are fearful. I haven't and will not get any vaccine nor has my immediate family. If you have, I'm all for it. No judgment here. But were good. And if I check out due to Covid, it's been a good ride. Y'all can split up my gear up between you. My family has no interest in it lol.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jul 8, 2021 11:56:09 GMT -6
Joe B - *no politics* on pressuring people to take the vaccine : “Now we need to go community by community, neighborhood by neighborhood, and often times door by door – literally knocking on doors to get help to the remaining people,”
White House press secretary Jen Psaki on coronavirus preventative measures : “targeted community by community, door to door outreach to get the remaining Americans vaccinated.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci : individuals will begin to see “almost two types of America” between the vaccinated and unvaccinated as the Delta variant spreads across the nation".
I suppose this may be where our medical well being and personal health issues intersect with politics and get this thread locked down?? This will not end well. I'm not sure why the government now feels it necessary to send door to door folks out to "convince" people into taking the vaccine? One would certainly assume that anyone who wanted the vaccine would have had the opportunity by now, no?
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Jul 8, 2021 13:03:43 GMT -6
Door to door campaigns are silly. I think the right is taking the worst possible interpretation (zomg they're going to come force people!) while the left is gleefully giving all kind of red meat for people to freak out over it by saying things that amount to public interest supersedes privacy. It's dumb. But with regard to your question - I've been surprised that when we've offered vaccines on our work sites a decent chunk of people haven't done it simply because of laziness or whatever. They have no objection to it, but it doesn't matter to them enough to go do it. When we have a nurse on site offering it, they'll take it. My friend who works in a hospital in Louisiana says the same thing - most people who haven't been vaccinated aren't opposed or reluctant, but just lazy. Maybe lazy is the wrong word, I don't mean it as a pejorative. Don't care enough to take time out of their day to go do it. If you put the best interpretation on what the administration is saying, they're going to reach that group of people. Edit to fix my use of the word for when one suit of cards beats another but also the word for a former President
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 8, 2021 13:12:10 GMT -6
I would think getting full FDA approval would be a better first step before going door to door. Actually I don’t think going door to door is ever going to be a good idea, not where I live at least 😁
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Jul 8, 2021 13:48:29 GMT -6
Door to door campaigns are silly. I think the right is taking the worst possible interpretation (zomg they're going to come force people!) while the left is gleefully giving all kind of red meat for people to freak out over it by saying things that amount to public interest supersedes privacy. It's dumb. But with regard to your question - I've been surprised that when we've offered vaccines on our work sites a decent chunk of people haven't done it simply because of laziness or whatever. They have no objection to it, but it doesn't matter to them enough to go do it. When we have a nurse on site offering it, they'll take it. My friend who works in a hospital in Louisiana says the same thing - most people who haven't been vaccinated aren't opposed or reluctant, but just lazy. Maybe lazy is the wrong word, I don't mean it as a pejorative. Don't care enough to take time out of their day to go do it. If you put the best interpretation on what the administration is saying, they're going to reach that group of people. Edit to fix my use of the word for when one suit of cards beats another but also the word for a former President Agreed. I think this is what the outreach effort is trying to achieve. I don't see it as nefarious in any way. Also, I tried to legitimately type something here on RGO the other day about a particular brass horn, the cousin of the coronet, and it got automatically replaced with *no politics*. If John ever introduces a new "Brass & Woodwinds" subforum, there may be some difficulties...
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jul 8, 2021 13:55:49 GMT -6
What percentage of the US population do you think has decided to NOT get the vaccine at this point? Either out of personal health reasons, lack of FDA approval or whatever reason? Not out of laziness or "I just haven't got around to it yet"....
There's certainly a large percentage of US adults. Why the need for the administration to "get all remaining Americans vaccinated". That seems to go beyond a helpful reminder.... Perhaps not nefarious, but certainly over-reaching IMO.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jul 8, 2021 14:01:59 GMT -6
Actually I don’t think going door to door is ever going to be a good idea, not where I live at least 😁 Haha!! Nor where I live. There's public dirt roads I won't go down that I know are legit public county roads that have "personalized" -- "no trespassing - violators will be shot" signs on them. Residents prefer their privacy. And I can respect that. Plus, I don't want my ass shot off.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Jul 8, 2021 14:04:17 GMT -6
What percentage of the US population do you think has decided to NOT get the vaccine at this point? Either out of personal health reasons, lack of FDA approval or whatever reason? Not out of laziness or "I just haven't got around to it yet".... There's certainly a large percentage of US adults. Why the need for the administration to "get all remaining Americans vaccinated". That seems to go beyond a helpful reminder.... Perhaps not nefarious, but certainly over-reaching IMO. I don't see it as over reaching either. There are public outreach campaigns for all sorts of things, medical or otherwise. Think about how many people can't be bothered to or forget or don't have the time/headspace to fill out a census card and mail it in on their own, important as the census is, but will participate in the census if someone knocks on their door. Those that are against taking the vaccine will, I'm sure, be certain to let the person on the other end know how they feel. There is, however, a certain subset of the population that would be fine with getting or actively wants to get the vaccine but simply can't find the time for any number of different reasons. I really don't see how any of this needs to be viewed as any more than what it is. Nobody is making anybody take the vaccine.
|
|
|
Post by seawell on Jul 8, 2021 14:32:43 GMT -6
Personally, I find it creepy but of course we all view things differently. I guess it's just that medical information and choices have been considered to be such a personal thing for so long. The idea of anyone knocking on my door, asking me absolutely anything about my health or what treatments I have or have not gotten is nuts to me. After the past year plus, I guess I shouldn't be surprised though. I get it, a pandemic is different but I never appreciated the "get vaccinated so you don't kill grandma" approach. That's way over the top in my opinion.
I'm not so sure about people just not getting around to it. Everyone I know that hasn't gotten it yet is a pretty hard "no." That, coupled with the fact that you turn on TV and see full crowds at sporting events, etc.. then add in a little pandemic fatigue or whatever you want to call it and I think people are just over it at this point.
You have to keep in mind too, A LOT has been asked of everyone... from lockdowns, to business closures to homeschooling, etc.. For many, asking them to get vaccinated(for whatever reasons they have) is the final straw. I really wish the administration would do a better job of acknowledging people that have had covid + recovered with antibodies are in as good if not a better spot that those that have been vaccinated. I fall into this camp.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Jul 8, 2021 14:44:45 GMT -6
As an example, I'll just say that there are plenty of immigrant communities that are notoriously hard to reach, for ANYTHING.
Not that, as a population block, they're necessarily en masse against the particular thing for which they are being reached out to, but simply just because they're not "plugged in" to American society in the same way that a lot of the rest of us take for granted.
Why do I care that non-citizens are made aware of their options and given an easier opportunity to receive the vaccine if they so desire? Because they can spread Covid just as easily as the rest of us and the virus really doesn't care which population block it came from or to which it is going.
|
|