|
Post by indiehouse on Dec 27, 2019 12:22:09 GMT -6
Are any of these useful?
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Dec 27, 2019 12:55:55 GMT -6
Yes. Some people on here will talk trash about online teaching platforms like Purmix, but there have been a few things I learned from those videos. I've learned more from the Nail The Mix videos. Its all subjective. In my experience its just nice to see someone else's workflow and how they tackle problems. I mean, if I can spend a free hour watching a video, and I take away one trick or technique I wouldn't have thought to use than its worth it for me. Whats been much more useful than the videos is getting the multitracks and mixing them myself, then comparing to the commercial release. That's been a real learning experience for me.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Dec 27, 2019 13:10:55 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soundintheround on Dec 27, 2019 14:07:28 GMT -6
I've tried both. You get what you pay for, MWTM certainly has more to offer and a deeper knowledge base. I'd recommended it for sure. Puremix was OK and not sure I would recommend that one to be honest, but worth checking out to see for yourself.
To me it is more than just tricks, MWTM is not just mixing tutorials.... it actually talks quite a bit about recording and general production, which I find I enjoy even more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2019 14:08:45 GMT -6
It's a mixed bag. Some of the MWtM things are good. Any of the Tchad Blake and Albini videos, Tom Elmherst, Eddie Kramer... to name a few.
A lot of them are a waste of time though, unless you dig just watching a guy do things with no substantive information or conversation to accompany it. I don't.
Never watched any Puremix things.
|
|
|
Post by soundintheround on Dec 27, 2019 14:19:21 GMT -6
A lot of them are a waste of time though, unless you dig just watching a guy do things with no substantive information or conversation to accompany it. I don't. I actually enjoy some of this stuff. I never had much of a studio internship or anything like that, so its cool to see them pick their brains on random topics/etc, you get a better sense of the big picture. More of a conversation at times which I dont really mind. It's made me realize that there isn't so much 'black magic' involved, but just talent + 'engineering experience', which is really just making a series of good decisions and problem solving. I kinda think true top 5% 'Mixers' are somewhat born into it, and although you can kinda learn the art, it def takes a certain personality and type of person to think that way.
|
|
|
Post by reddirt on Dec 27, 2019 20:09:50 GMT -6
Haven't done MWTM but there is so much to learn if you get a pro Puremix subscription. From Protools shortcuts to Andrew Scheps / Lord-Alge / Fab Dupont all mixing the same song there's a wealth of info - great value IMO. Cheers, Ross
|
|
|
Post by MorEQsThanAnswers on Dec 27, 2019 22:04:27 GMT -6
A lot of them are a waste of time though, unless you dig just watching a guy do things with no substantive information or conversation to accompany it. I don't. I actually enjoy some of this stuff. I never had much of a studio internship or anything like that, so its cool to see them pick their brains on random topics/etc, you get a better sense of the big picture. More of a conversation at times which I dont really mind. It's made me realize that there isn't so much 'black magic' involved, but just talent + 'engineering experience', which is really just making a series of good decisions and problem solving. I kinda think true top 5% 'Mixers' are somewhat born into it, and although you can kinda learn the art, it def takes a certain personality and type of person to think that way. I agree! I think these platforms are making the type of education one used to expect from an internship accessible to everyone. What you miss out on in being able to ask direct questions (which is a lot to lose...), you at least gain in time management, replay-ability of the lesson, and not cleaning toilets for free!! I’m fortunate to be in a metropolitan area where studios still exist and was able to get an internship. For someone living up in Timbuk Tu, this would be invaluable
|
|
|
Post by indiehouse on Dec 27, 2019 22:43:48 GMT -6
Puremix is half off the year sub. Wondering if it’s worth the dollars.
|
|
|
Post by reddirt on Dec 27, 2019 23:30:36 GMT -6
Check the free stuff before you commit, but IMO if you can't get your money's worth you are either incredibly advanced in the art, or you're not concentrating ; or you value money not far below family/breathing/enlightenment.😆🙃 Cheers, Ross
|
|
|
Post by Bat Lanyard on Dec 28, 2019 0:12:33 GMT -6
Have done both as well. Both very useful and you will pick up things that will move you forward. Main thing to remember, IMO, is that the focus of both when I had access was mixing and most of what you're watching them do is with extremely well recorded tracks. That's 93% of the battle. Great players, instruments that are setup properly, great room, mic placement, etc. You get 1/2 of the game insight with both of those services. What got things there to the mix is a total mystery for the most part.
IMHO, Eric Valentine's YouTube channel has been just as valuable as both. I found with MWTM I just enjoyed watching legendary guys/gal talk shop on how some of the most amazing music was made.
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Dec 28, 2019 4:51:24 GMT -6
I've been doing Puremix and enjoying it, mostly. I was a read-a-little/experiment-a-lot kind of guy, never having worked in a studio full time, so I think I fit their target customer pretty well. And although I've worked on a number of projects before this, I know what I've learned through Puremix would have helped me build better mixes and likely work a lot faster. Your previous experience level might mean a different experience for you, though.
Learning many of the different workflow templates was great. It was not completely new to me, but many of the approaches engineers taught were things I had not considered. And just learning what these pro mixers use to get work done was helpful and confirming of many things I had already been doing.
I'd say some of the lessons are better organized than others. Some people ramble a lot on things that just aren't really teaching anyone who's already made it to Puremix anything. While others are very specific and quick to explain what they use and why. I admit I've taken notes on most of the lessons and have had to review things when trying to do some mixes myself.
|
|
|
Post by avgatzeblouz on Dec 28, 2019 12:17:19 GMT -6
I think Puremix is more beginner-oriented, generally. I had the chance to watch the video of mastering by Brian Lucey, and that was more advanced, interesting. But I think it is overpriced. I would rather pay one month of rent in LA or NY to be able to make coffee for Elmhirst or Maroquin. That would be way more useful. Same for MWTM. Useful sometimes, but not great, and overpriced. For example, the Elmhirst video : he does not mix Adele for real in front of you. He does not even sets the compressor and Eq on the vocal track ! You don't get to see the needles, except on quick shots ! They sell you dream before everything else, that's for sure.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Dec 28, 2019 12:35:24 GMT -6
IMO those Videos are interesting if you are not able to get consistent (sounding like a record/song) output mixing wise. For example, if your goal is a dark sounding mix, and you get a dark sounding mix = mission accomplished. In my experience I am often unsatisfied with mixes when I don't feel, that the arrangement is not good enough. There is one song, I don't know if I jump out of the window if I have to hear it again, but my instinct tells me... great song, but the arrangement is not where it should be.
Hate it to tell myself to go back on the work bench. But I have too.
In my book, if the arrangement is good, with some luck maybe great, mixing is a breeze.
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Dec 29, 2019 12:28:50 GMT -6
I find it really difficult to sit through those videos. I generally get bored after about 5 mins and completely lose interest.
I’ve saw Tchad Blake do an hour of the MWTM at Javits Center last year and really enjoyed that. Not sure I’d pay for a subscription for anybody else though.
I can’t get through the Eric Valentine videos either. I’m not sure what it is, the guy is a fantastic engineer and producer and I’m sure I’d learn a ton. I just can’t stand the presentation.
|
|
|
Post by tkaitkai on Dec 30, 2019 20:14:12 GMT -6
MWTM is excellent value for the money. Definitely the next best thing to working with a well-known pro in person. Being able to hear/reference excellent raw recordings made by top names is an invaluable tool, and seeing the wild, unconventional mixing choices they make is a always great reminder to stop obsessing over sh*t that doesn't matter and just use your f*cking ears. I get more out of a single MWTM course than I do in a month on Gearslutz.
The same goes for Eric Valentine's YT stuff, as well as Ken Andrews' new channel. PureMix and Nail The Mix are great, too. I would have killed for resources like these 10 years ago. Super grateful!
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 15,022
|
Post by ericn on Dec 30, 2019 22:45:09 GMT -6
One of the biggest problems with these things is the fact that some of the best are far from the best teachers. I always learned the most when I could ask questions as dumb as they might have been. One other thing is, that some of the most skilled AE’s do a lot almost reflexively and have been doing it so long they don’t even notice what they are doing and have a hard time explaining why. Teaching is an under appropriated under paid art, kind of like songwriting, except songwriters get an NBC reality program. They wouldn’t even do a pilot for the teaching based program Why I Tried to Kill Your Kid.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Dec 31, 2019 12:46:49 GMT -6
Do they have any videos where they mix for 3 hours, try to put it together and it sucks so they start all over? I’d like to see how they decide what approach they decided to keep and why they stopped there. I haven’t bought any vids yet because all the free ones I’ve seen I’m like “oh that’s nice” and they are not happy.. then they tweak more and I’m like “oh that sucks, they ruined it” and they stop and say “it’s perfect now”. But it gets done, they are 100% confident it’s exactly right, I’m thinking.. actually I liked it the other way?
|
|
|
Post by soundintheround on Dec 31, 2019 13:06:44 GMT -6
Do they have any videos where they mix for 3 hours, try to put it together and it sucks so they start all over? I’d like to see how they decide what approach they decided to keep and why they stopped there. I haven’t bought any vids yet because all the free ones I’ve seen I’m like “oh that’s nice” and they are not happy.. then they tweak more and I’m like “oh that sucks, they ruined it” and they stop and say “it’s perfect now”. But it gets done, they are 100% confident it’s exactly right, I’m thinking.. actually I liked it the other way? Because a good deal of successful music is still made outside of the laptop (even thought some won’t admit it) a lot of times they are actually re-creating mixes. They aren’t necessarily making the track you hear on the radio, but going through the decisions and thought processes involved. Many times people will say things like ‘oh I would never make that decision now’ or ‘I no longer have that plugin or piece of gear’ etc. Imagine having a camera crew in the studio watching you on the spot. Of course it isn’t going to be completely natural and work the first time, but it’s about the overall process and tries to capture the main points. I always find it interesting how many of these super eel known mixers still have Many Many revisions and feedback and don’t get it right the first time. We live in a world of revisions and mix perfectionism that effects even the best.
|
|
|
Post by theshea on Dec 31, 2019 13:08:15 GMT -6
so elmhirst mixing of adele ain't t a good video? i was interested in seeing that. and a chad blake one.
|
|
|
Post by reddirt on Dec 31, 2019 18:04:41 GMT -6
I wish to say this and in saying it I also respect everybody's right to have a point of view .
To anyone thinking about these sites, don't be dissuaded by what may appear to be a prevailing wisdom re any of these sites. I'm no novice at this game but admittedly haven't worked at big studios however my Puremix pro sub has helped fill many gaps and thus has been well and truly worth it.
People such as Fab Dupont, Andrew Scheps, Ryann Hewitt etc are intelligent good people with great ears and absolutely valid and useful P.O.Vs. who take the time to share their way of working without obvious fear of giving away their "secrets." Amazing stuff IMO.- such a resource available to us in the comfort of our own home!
Not sure why their nous could not be at least some use to most of us and a lot of use to many, particularly those not working in pro environments.
Not wanting to start a ruckus cause it is only my opinion after all,just encouraging anyone to check out the free vids first, form their own thoughts based on experience.
Cheers, Ross
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Dec 31, 2019 20:25:50 GMT -6
Sorry if I sounded overly negative,.. It’s great and enlightening to hear their thought process and see how they build stuff up. I should probably buy in. as I’m sure I’d learn a lot of new stuff. Everyone seems to find what works for them and it’s very interesting sometimes! What I meant in my earlier comment was.. I think for a lot of folks like us, it would be especially cool to see them take on a mix from scratch, go on adventure to a sound that doesn’t work.. finish it up to their liking and explain why it won’t fly with the artist/record labels. And then explain where the problem areas are and what the next revision will have to chase after. I think we see them re-create what worked, and excellent tricks are great to know we are using the right tools, ...maybe they work/maybe not. It makes a lot of sense to me they have to remix and remix over and over for today’s instant gratification consumer. So when they show ‘I did x because of y’, that’s great to know but I sometimes wonder was there 20 revisions before that slowly taught them that was the best path? I figure it probably was in most cases
|
|
|
Post by stormymondays on Jan 1, 2020 9:34:39 GMT -6
I think Puremix is pretty good. I did get some kind of deal price, not sure what’s the current cost. I think there’s a trial? Ryan Hewitt was fantastic, Al Schmitt too. There’s still plenty I want to watch, but I have very little time to watch videos though
|
|