|
Post by chessparov on Sept 8, 2018 14:16:54 GMT -6
I've usually seen this as "de-ess" first, then other vocal compression/processing later.
General thoughts?
Thanks, Chris
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Sept 8, 2018 14:25:36 GMT -6
I de-ess first: makes sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by c0rtland on Sept 8, 2018 15:15:53 GMT -6
First
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Sept 8, 2018 15:30:19 GMT -6
I do it when it’s an issue....on me , post compression.
Cheers
Wiz
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Sept 8, 2018 17:10:10 GMT -6
First, if possible, so that the compressor doesn't "grab" the objectionable sibilant. What's ideal, but often not possible, is for the singer to be aware of the problem and take care of it instinctively (or at least minimize it) with mic technique.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Sept 8, 2018 17:18:39 GMT -6
Thanks guys. Is it usually OK to roll off a couple 2db, around 12Khz, to reduce the degree of de-essing? My main "offending frequency", is 6.5 KHz, secondary is 12KHz AKA "the whistle".
Even on an Oktava 219/319, I'm ready to reach out and de-ess! BTW a good buddy of mine, wants to occasionally record me, so hopefully I'll create some pro sounding clips, within a month or so. Chris
P.S. Your comment was of value too Wiz, but my voice is unusually bright, by nature.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Sept 9, 2018 4:05:02 GMT -6
Sibilance has a few factors - dynamics, quiet singers are inherently sibilant and then control and technique can help. Some rappers and punks tend to over do them for emphasis.
I would use dynamic eq rather than low pass to avoid losing brightness. 12k is a bit low for me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2018 8:08:41 GMT -6
First fix, second shape.
I de-ess using brainworx dyn eq, then compress. If compressor tames tone means I went too far compressing. May be a little broad stroke eq after but not corrective
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Sept 9, 2018 8:21:17 GMT -6
One time I was mixing this record tracked over at Different Fur. I was like, damn they really de-essed the heck out of this poor guy's vocal. I started to get on my high horse talking to a fellow engineer I bumped into in the hall. But then...
Turned out, the singer had a lisp.
|
|
|
Post by drsax on Sept 9, 2018 8:53:08 GMT -6
I usually de-ess first - but sometimes a second de-esser after compression, if needed - with both instances being used sparingly.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Sept 9, 2018 12:18:43 GMT -6
Thanks again. Jazz, how is 12KHz "too low"? Grasshopper asks... Chris
|
|
|
Post by schmalzy on Sept 9, 2018 12:39:56 GMT -6
I'm often de-essing early in the vocal chain.
Then, if the vocal goes to a group (like I often have them do) I'll de-ess near the end of the group as well.
I find different amounts in different parts of the signal chain do a better job with my particular mix methods than just doing it all in one instance.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Sept 9, 2018 14:26:13 GMT -6
Thanks again. Jazz, how is 12KHz "too low"? Grasshopper asks... Chris Well because you're losing a lot of the air of the rest of the vocal, loop a held note for instance and move the low pass. It'll pull the vocal back in the mix, too! Multibanding or Dynamic EQ has the advantage of just ducking the high frequencies when they're over the threshold - like sibilences. You can do it, but something around 15Khz would be better. I often do that after distorting Vox. Fwiw these days I usually do maybe 2-3dB of dynamic eq and 1-2dB of de-essing on notably compressed vocal sounds.
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Sept 9, 2018 14:36:24 GMT -6
I only use a de-esser if it’s an unruly vocal throughout. Seldom use one on my own recordings because I try very hard to get good takes to print. If I do need to hit a few spots here or there, I’ll cut the wave file on either side of the offensive spot and pull the volume down about 3 dB .
I’ve yet to find one better than the Eloise in split mode for what it’s worth if heavy de-essing is needed.
So to answer your direct question, de-essing after everything as a last resort if their is no other option is my theory.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Sept 9, 2018 16:59:29 GMT -6
I'll have to try out these different methods-good stuff! I like the challenge of learning this, versus usually using just a dynamic microphone. Chris
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Sept 9, 2018 20:22:25 GMT -6
I know. Although my primary sibilance issue is 6.5KHz... I was amazed to realize around 12KHz, could also be one on a male singer-namely me! Chris
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 2:15:55 GMT -6
The most transparent (although also the most work) way I have found is using a good spectral editor. RX5 Advanced here. Can zoom in and lasso those individual fuckers, reduce 3-6dB, and voilà. Can do this at any stage during mixing or mastering.
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Sept 10, 2018 8:59:51 GMT -6
Since you asked what I do....sibilance is a failure of the tradking engineer. Thus I “fix it” at the same time i remove plosives and rumbles and extraneous noises from tracks. BEFORE I mix.
But, the thing is...so often that failure is poor vocal compressor settings....so, if YOU are tracking engineer who failed with whatever compressor during tracking, theres no need to fix it becuase youll likely fail again with the mix context compression. Put it last on the vocal chain so you can keep playing whack a mole as you keep manipulating it.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Sept 10, 2018 9:35:55 GMT -6
Holy guaca-mole Batman-ahem-Popmann, I resemble your remark! Chris
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Sept 11, 2018 11:26:56 GMT -6
Nothing wrong with that....the only way to get better is to admit "man, I F'd that up.....how do I do it better?"
....if people will stop printing compression who think deEssers are mandatory/standard issue for vocal production....work with the ITB compressors--and don't start with the typical 76/LAxa....they are huge offenders if you need a certain compression level. Once you wrap your ear around how to adjust a full control VCA style compressor....you can start to use the "old school vibe" ones for the vibe and HEAR when they start to pooch things...one of my compressors on a vocal is nearly always a clean VCA style (like comes with your DAW). The other usually isn't. Whether I'm doing the slow and low leveling with an analog Aphex or a FabFilter ProC2 or Cubase or Logic's built in comps (in Logic I do the Focusrite Red looking variation)... less relevant....whether the vibey limiting from from my old La3a, a BlueStripe 76, or Fairchild 660 plug in....that's all contextual. Aphex661 leveling on the way in and the 660 is kind my fave....but, I also can't deny that the La3a limiting on the way in (it's a slow limiter fwiw) and a slow and low ProC2 makes for a delicious sound, too.
You can also bump the highs in the detector of most modern comps....so, using it like Clearmountian does his SSL compressors....or like the La3a does right out of the box--tilting the sidechain toward higher frequencies. Which is far more natural sounding--but, it's not a deEsser--meaning it doesn't CURE a problem that exists--it just helps the compressor not make that problem worse or cause a new one.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Sept 11, 2018 12:14:13 GMT -6
Excellent food for thought. I deliberately limited my processing options-due to my limited skill level. Primarily am using Bremmer's Multitrackstudio DAW, then further editing with Audacity. IMHO Multitrackstudio has excellent effects, etc...And MTS is MUCH simpler than the mainstream pro DAW's like PT/Studio One/Reaper etc. I'd be happy to consistently make "nice demos" ala we thought about them 20+ years ago.
An unexpected by-product of my rudimentary attempts, at making good sounding vocal demos, was that the live performances improved! And boy have I learned the pitfalls of using way too much reverb.
BTW MTS has a very good de-esser, and the "saturation" effect (tape & tube option) is pretty cool too.
Thanks, Chris
|
|
|
Post by stormymondays on Sept 11, 2018 13:55:32 GMT -6
Usually first in line, if needed. By the way, I want to encourage y'all to try the Hornet Sybilla deesser. I think it's incredible! It costs less than 8 bucks, I would gladly pay 50: www.hornetplugins.com/plugins/hornet-sybilla/I'm also a big fan of Sonnox Dynamic EQ. That thing is a magical problem solver.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Sept 11, 2018 14:13:14 GMT -6
Depends.
If you do it first, the compressor might push down the other frequencies more, depending on the bandwidth of the sidechain, and bring that siblance right back up..
If you do it after, the compressor might act upon the siblance more than the other frequencies..
I think in the second case, the offending frequencies are going to be so narrow that it's not a big deal.
If I had to choose only one, I'd say do the de-essing afterward compression, so you know what you're getting.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Sept 13, 2018 1:35:57 GMT -6
I'll have to try it more that way too svart, interesting points.
All this reinforces for me, the whole "avoid/minimize sibilance" thang, in the first place. Chris
|
|