|
Post by jacobamerritt on Aug 28, 2018 15:05:04 GMT -6
Hey guys!
Ive started to notice a disappointing trend with my studio gear. Many of the 'hand made', boutique type pieces (which usually means not inexpensive) have had problems, often in the middle of sessions. Meanwhile the made in China (expensive or not) or 'prosumer' pieces chug along with no issues. Its kind of discouraging- I almost always try to support the little guys making and doing cool stuff with care and integrity - Some of these are made in China too, of course. Its making it difficult to feel confident in continuing to make purchases from boutique type or smaller brands, when they are the ones that seem to give me the most problems. Hopefully I have just been hitting a year long run of bad luck... And Im choosing to not call out any of these manufacturers/builders because I know they have much at stake.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Aug 28, 2018 15:13:06 GMT -6
Hand made has never meant better quality. it's only ever meant smaller quantities and more rarity for increased desirability as a status symbol.
The production line was invented for increased throughput, higher yields, and lower prices..
It's just that China had always tried to use the cheapest materials, but has been getting better as their revenues increased.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2018 15:26:45 GMT -6
The quality of very cheap Chinese made electric guitars these days is out of this world, really, it's kinda unbelievable. Rock on CNC machines and great QC. You could buy a brand new guitar, quality replacement pups and electrics, and have a professional luthier install them and do a full setup (including fret dress and new nut) for around £500.
Been fairly lucky with my "boutique", made in UK, Germany and US pieces. They have all had a single problem over the years, but I've had them a decade and don't think that's unreasonable. All were fixed by the relevant manufacturer in a timely and not too expensive fashion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2018 15:50:30 GMT -6
Hey guys! Ive started to notice a disappointing trend with my studio gear. Many of the 'hand made', boutique type pieces (which usually means not inexpensive) have had problems, often in the middle of sessions. Meanwhile the made in China (expensive or not) or 'prosumer' pieces chug along with no issues. Its kind of discouraging- I almost always try to support the little guys making and doing cool stuff with care and integrity - Some of these are made in China too, of course. Its making it difficult to feel confident in continuing to make purchases from boutique type or smaller brands, when they are the ones that seem to give me the most problems. Hopefully I have just been hitting a year long run of bad luck... And Im choosing to not call out any of these manufacturers/builders because I know they have much at stake.
You're not the only one, I've had several pieces of "boutique" equipment that bit the dust in the first 18 months.. I've got a decade old ART Tube MP/C that sounds the exact same as the day I bought it.
As oversea's brands like Behringer continue to improve quality and components whilst keeping the fiscal cost in prosumer territory, on top of distribution margins increasing due to mass inventory sales so they favour said brands and dump the others it's not surprising the way things are going.
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Aug 28, 2018 16:04:12 GMT -6
Hey guys! Ive started to notice a disappointing trend with my studio gear. Many of the 'hand made', boutique type pieces (which usually means not inexpensive) have had problems, often in the middle of sessions. Meanwhile the made in China (expensive or not) or 'prosumer' pieces chug along with no issues. Its kind of discouraging- I almost always try to support the little guys making and doing cool stuff with care and integrity - Some of these are made in China too, of course. Its making it difficult to feel confident in continuing to make purchases from boutique type or smaller brands, when they are the ones that seem to give me the most problems. Hopefully I have just been hitting a year long run of bad luck... And Im choosing to not call out any of these manufacturers/builders because I know they have much at stake. How are they going to know customers aren’t happy with the quality if nobody calls them out? Shouldn’t others know of any known problems before spending their money as well?
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 28, 2018 16:06:48 GMT -6
svart said, "Hand made has never meant better quality."
You must be speaking specifically about gear. Because handmade has often and almost always meant much higher quality. Why are bespoke suits expensive, fine tailoring and better materials. My buddy Mike DiLalla makes guitars. They're one off, one of a kind, and sell for around $2,200-$2,500. Less than the better Les Paul or PRS guitars. You can customize, choose pickups, color, and other specs. Is it better, yes, if having those choices is important to you. Is it as good as the mass manufacture brands like Gibson, Fender, hell yeah. Are the fruit and vegetables I get from the farmers market from farmers I've come to know better than the same at supermarkets, you bet, and their hands were on it fro concept to completion. There are hundred of similar examples. Neumann's still have hands on I believe and Soyuz is completely hand made, and they are in fact better than any Chinese parts mics I've heard yet, as nice as some are.
As for gear, I haven't had many of the higher end boutique pieces, only some of the very nice part Chinese/part American clones of vintage compressors, preamps and EQ's. They've all held up well, but then so has my Stam SA73, which was put together by hand, so I can't truly speak to the issue comprehensively. When it comes to mics though, I've experienced far more issues with the less expensive brands and clone guys than the hands on higher end name brands. Hopefully the Stam SA67 should put an end to that trend for me.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Aug 28, 2018 16:22:29 GMT -6
With boutique you are buying the acumen/ability of the builder, with a manufactured item, the integrity of the q.c..
The latter is more defineable, measurable and correctable ?
|
|
|
Post by jacobamerritt on Aug 28, 2018 16:29:39 GMT -6
How are they going to know customers aren’t happy with the quality if nobody calls them out? Shouldn’t others know of any known problems before spending their money as well?
I talk to the companies directly to get the issues resolved. Just a pain having stuff go out of commission for weeks or months at a time.
|
|
|
Post by ragan on Aug 28, 2018 16:44:36 GMT -6
svart said, "Hand made has never meant better quality."
You must be speaking specifically about gear. Because handmade has often and almost always meant much higher quality. Why are bespoke suits expensive, fine tailoring and better materials. My buddy Mike DiLalla makes guitars. They're one off, one of a kind, and sell for around $2,200-$2,500. Less than the better Les Paul or PRS guitars. You can customize, choose pickups, color, and other specs. Is it better, yes, if having those choices is important to you. Is it as good as the mass manufacture brands like Gibson, Fender, hell yeah. Are the fruit and vegetables I get from the farmers market from farmers I've come to know better than the same at supermarkets, you bet, and their hands were on it fro concept to completion. There are hundred of similar examples. Neumann's still have hands on I believe and Soyuz is completely hand made, and they are in fact better than any Chinese parts mics I've heard yet, as nice as some are. As for gear, I haven't had many of the higher end boutique pieces, only some of the very nice part Chinese/part American clones of vintage compressors, preamps and EQ's. They've all held up well, but then so has my Stam SA73, which was handmade, so I can't truly speak to the issue comprehensively. When it comes to mics though, I've experienced far more issues with the less expensive brands and clone guys than the hands on higher end name brands. Hopefully the Stam SA67 should put an end to that trend for me. Your SA73 is mostly made in China. Which is no knock, I’m waiting on the 2-channel version myself because I’ve loved the clips I’ve heard.
|
|
|
Post by jacobamerritt on Aug 28, 2018 17:33:10 GMT -6
FWIW- Several months ago I purchased a Weight Tank from Eric at Locomotive Audio Within an hour or so of this post, he emailed me personally to let me know he saw this thread and wanted to make sure my unit was still in good order. I informed him my unit is working flawlessly. Outstanding service, especially for a smaller operation where someone has to wear many hats! By the way, get a Weight Tank. Well worth the investment.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 28, 2018 17:34:15 GMT -6
Thanks Ragan. I figured there might be some Chinese made parts, but I know Stam puts them together by hand. I should correct that in my post.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Aug 28, 2018 18:29:11 GMT -6
It’s a funny business. Warm handwires it’s 73 and gets criticized for that. Heritage completely changes the way it’s 73 is manufactured and talks about authenticity? All , I know , sort of , is Stam stuff arrives through immaculate gear conception somewhere west of China and east of Chile ? Turn it on, if it sounds good: it is good, is as far as I will go !
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 28, 2018 18:44:36 GMT -6
Thanks Ragan. I figured there might be some Chinese made parts, but I know Stam puts them together by hand. I should correct that in my post. Nah. I’m pretty sure they’re made in China and finished / QC by Stam. No idea what the split is.
|
|
|
Post by ragan on Aug 28, 2018 18:54:48 GMT -6
Thanks Ragan. I figured there might be some Chinese made parts, but I know Stam puts them together by hand. I should correct that in my post. The outboard gear is actually mostly assembled in China but they do final QC and sometimes some final assembly like knobs or other things there in Chile. As per Joshua. The mics they assemble in Chile.
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Aug 28, 2018 19:56:43 GMT -6
FWIW- Several months ago I purchased a Weight Tank from Eric at Locomotive Audio Within an hour or so of this post, he emailed me personally to let me know he saw this thread and wanted to make sure my unit was still in good order. I informed him my unit is working flawlessly. Outstanding service, especially for a smaller operation where someone has to wear many hats! By the way, get a Weight Tank. Well worth the investment. Eric is literally the best. 10/10.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 28, 2018 21:12:08 GMT -6
Thanks Ragan, I wasn't aware of all the Stam details.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,988
|
Post by ericn on Aug 28, 2018 21:17:19 GMT -6
svart said, "Hand made has never meant better quality."
You must be speaking specifically about gear. Because handmade has often and almost always meant much higher quality. Why are bespoke suits expensive, fine tailoring and better materials. My buddy Mike DiLalla makes guitars. They're one off, one of a kind, and sell for around $2,200-$2,500. Less than the better Les Paul or PRS guitars. You can customize, choose pickups, color, and other specs. Is it better, yes, if having those choices is important to you. Is it as good as the mass manufacture brands like Gibson, Fender, hell yeah. Are the fruit and vegetables I get from the farmers market from farmers I've come to know better than the same at supermarkets, you bet, and their hands were on it fro concept to completion. There are hundred of similar examples. Neumann's still have hands on I believe and Soyuz is completely hand made, and they are in fact better than any Chinese parts mics I've heard yet, as nice as some are. As for gear, I haven't had many of the higher end boutique pieces, only some of the very nice part Chinese/part American clones of vintage compressors, preamps and EQ's. They've all held up well, but then so has my Stam SA73, which was put together by hand, so I can't truly speak to the issue comprehensively. When it comes to mics though, I've experienced far more issues with the less expensive brands and clone guys than the hands on higher end name brands. Hopefully the Stam SA67 should put an end to that trend for me. Depends on how you define quality, a hand made suit is about custom personal fit ( what not everybody is a perfect Italian 52?), a mass produced CNC’ed guitar is probably going to match every other guitar off the line better than a handmade guitar. With gear, a Mass producer is going to pay more attention and have budget to packaging and do revisions because of things like shipping issues. Some of the big companies can afford to pull every X number piece and then run it for a long term QC to see if there are parts that have issues in long term use. They also have gear wharehoused and stocked on dealers shelves that they can pull back if a problem shows up. This all costs big big big money and small boutique manufacturers just don’t have it, you want to pay even more? Also consider if your going to ship something from China, as tight as containers are packed your stil going to build it and pack it to make it to the distributor, no less the dealer and the consumer.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Aug 29, 2018 7:57:27 GMT -6
svart said, "Hand made has never meant better quality."
You must be speaking specifically about gear. Because handmade has often and almost always meant much higher quality. Why are bespoke suits expensive, fine tailoring and better materials. My buddy Mike DiLalla makes guitars. They're one off, one of a kind, and sell for around $2,200-$2,500. Less than the better Les Paul or PRS guitars. You can customize, choose pickups, color, and other specs. Is it better, yes, if having those choices is important to you. Is it as good as the mass manufacture brands like Gibson, Fender, hell yeah. Are the fruit and vegetables I get from the farmers market from farmers I've come to know better than the same at supermarkets, you bet, and their hands were on it fro concept to completion. There are hundred of similar examples. Neumann's still have hands on I believe and Soyuz is completely hand made, and they are in fact better than any Chinese parts mics I've heard yet, as nice as some are. As for gear, I haven't had many of the higher end boutique pieces, only some of the very nice part Chinese/part American clones of vintage compressors, preamps and EQ's. They've all held up well, but then so has my Stam SA73, which was put together by hand, so I can't truly speak to the issue comprehensively. When it comes to mics though, I've experienced far more issues with the less expensive brands and clone guys than the hands on higher end name brands. Hopefully the Stam SA67 should put an end to that trend for me. No I mean everything. Machines have and can manufacture items with much higher precision/accuracy, are perfectly repeatable, and much faster. Once set up and debugged, they take human-based mistakes out of the equation. "Hand made" still contains the problems of the human condition. Things don't align perfectly, aren't perfectly square, aren't repeatable to any significant precision, etc. There is artistry in the mastercraftsman that might build one-off guitars, but if you were to quantify the attributes that people like about them and put them in a CAD file, you'd get perfect guitars every single time from a CNC machine, and then be able to modify them quickly with a mouse and have the machine spit out perfection. Farmers vs. supermarkets.. Farmers supply supermarkets. The only difference is the type of genetically altered produce they choose to grow. Farmers that grow for supermarkets choose more hardy plants with attributes like "roundup ready", larger fruit/vegetable size, or simply more slowly ripening so the produce doesn't spoil in a truck on the way to the supermarket. A gardener who grows enough produce to sell on a roadside stand might choose a different variety that grows more quickly, is a smaller size but generates more individual pieces, and doesn't need to be resistant to herbicides or regional diseases. It's a simple as needs. The supermarket has a specific need to fill, as does the roadside seller. The produce to fill those needs doesn't necessarily have to align at all, so no comparison can be accurately made here. You're comparing guitars to tomatoes without looking at the details. The details are where the argument is fought, and the details are where the reasons come from, not the other way around. I saw something about a suit from Eric.. Once a pattern is made, a machine can cut and stitch with higher precision/accuracy and ultimately with stronger and more complex sewing techniques than a person can do. I mean you don't see people hand stitching anything on a 2K$ suit.. No, you see them use a sewing MACHINE, because they have become ubiquitous enough that the average person could afford one. At one time, they cost too much and people still sewed by hand, but not anymore because the machine can do the stitching is faster, more accurate and does things that humans can't do. I know some folks will say "but if machines were better, everyone would use them!". Machines are better. They're also ridiculously expensive. You think that guy who's building 10 guitars a year is going to be able to afford a 100K$ CNC/EDM/Waterjet/Laser machine to cut out guitar bodies, necks, fingerboards and pickguards? Not yet, but things like waterjets and 2D laser cutters are getting a LOT cheaper and some folks who make things like custom pickguards are already using those. But for our guitar guy, of course he can't afford the big CNC for cutting guitar bodies out. But if he did, and became proficient with some sort of CAD, he could design things that would make even the most learned master woodworker cry. The issue is that machines are completely able to do the manual labor much quicker, easier and more reliably than humans, but they cost a LOT to get going, which is why they've always been used for mass production. You can make your money back with mass production fairly quickly, but you can't with onesy-twosey products. Also, mass machine production has been seen as sub-quality for some time, but you also have to remember that even though these machines are much quicker than humans, they still take time. Someone makes the tradeoff between precision and speed to meet the market demands. You don't need widgets from wal-mart to have 1/10000th of an inch accuracy. Hell, probably 1/10" is probably still better than you need.. So they program the machines to be faster but more sloppy. You get more manufacturing throughput that way. Machines needing to change cutters or angles to increase precision takes time, and time is money. In fact, during my time working with CNC machines, they often charged increasing premiums for higher precision. +/-0.01" was a standard rate, which orders of magnitude higher precision added 10-50% to the costs per part depending on the complexity and materials. Mark my words though, we're going to see a renaissance with "printing" materials soon. They're on the cusp of mass metal printing and it'll revolutionize machine work. Places like NASA and car manufacturers already use additive metal printing or powdered metal forging for parts instead of CNC. In 25 years nothing will be CNC'd except the odd part. One more thing.. 3D scanning. We're already scanning objects with 3D laser capture devices. We can scan something, like a guitar, and then input it into CAD as a perfect digital copy, then export to a CNC for a perfect real copy. Now imagine if tailors started scanning human bodies to make their suits. You stand up in a booth, get scanned, and now your perfect suit dimensions are known. Human error is taken out of the equation as a CNC machine cuts out the cloth in your exact dimensions.. But I digress. "Hand made" does not equal quality. The attributes that define quality transcend artistry, which is what I think you're really equating as "quality".
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 29, 2018 8:24:49 GMT -6
Well, at one time, one of my hobbies was studying architecture and interior design. That led me to learn about some unusual things, like the history of rug designs from the near and far east. There has never been one single machine rug made that could compare to the energy and look of a high end end handmade rug. I've looked at thousands of them, not one machine made rug ever looked better. They just don't. Anyone can see and more importantly, feel the difference.
So, I wouldn't argue your points about machine accuracy being more desirable in many or even most situations, but to say across the board that "hand made" is inherently inferior to me misses the point of handmade completely. The love and energy people put into things they make becomes part of it, and people intuitively feel that. That's getting into metaphysics though, so I'll leave it there, and just say for me, the vibe of a thing is important.
My mother used to design and make clothing. She usually only made women clothes, but she made almost all of Rudolf Nureyev's costumes for the ballet. I asked her once to make me a velvet jacket, which she did. Was it as perfect as a machine made jacket might be using today's technology, probably not. But having my choice of materials and design was way better than a store bought piece, and I felt great wearing it.
That's not to say the "vibe" of say.. a great Gibson guitar, made perfectly by expensive machines isn't good, and likely even better than a completely handmade one, but sometimes the hand made one is more unique and pleasing.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,988
|
Post by ericn on Aug 29, 2018 10:42:17 GMT -6
Well, at one time, one of my hobbies was studying architecture and interior design. That led me to learn about some unusual things, like the history of rug designs from the near and far east. There has never been one single machine rug made that could compare to the energy and look of a high end end handmade rug. I've looked at thousands of them, not one machine made rug ever looked better. They just don't. Anyone can see and more importantly, feel the difference. So, I wouldn't argue your points about machine accuracy being more desirable in many or even most situations, but to say across the board that "hand made" is inherently inferior to me misses the point of handmade completely. The love and energy people put into things they make becomes part of it, and people intuitively feel that. That's getting into metaphysics though, so I'll leave it there, and just say for me, the vibe of a thing is important. My mother used to design and make clothing. She usually only made women clothes, but she made almost all of Rudolf Nureyev's costumes for the ballet. I asked her once to make me a velvet jacket, which she did. Was it as perfect as a machine made jacket might be using today's technology, probably not. But having my choice of materials and design was way better than a store bought piece, and I felt great wearing it. That's not to say the "vibe" of say.. a great Gibson guitar, made perfectly by expensive machines isn't good, and likely even better than a completely handmade one, but sometimes the hand made one is more unique and pleasing. I’m going to tell you a dirty secret, a lot of what you might think is hand built boutique gear isn’t hand made. The manufacturer uses a sub contractor who uses a parts loader and wave solder machine, it’s still expensive because they can’t meet the quantity for big economies of scale and might do more hand assembly but a lot is far from hand made. Labor isn’t cheap, it just requires less intitial investment, but renting somebody else’s huge investment can sure save money. You would be surprised by how much of a Gibson Fender or Even smaller company uses CNC machines, hell I can’t say who but I know of at least 3 highend boutique solid body manufacturers who have their body’s CNCed in KC to their specs ( I have a NDA with the company doing the work so can’t say or hint). Sure they are hand finished but again it’s about the repeatability and presicion. I’ll bet in this day in age many of the custom suits are made using a CNC cutter, I know a small yacht maker who found using CNC for cutting hard and soft goods cut their waste by 20% in these areas.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Aug 29, 2018 10:54:53 GMT -6
I still think there is a misunderstanding in the world between the meaning behind "artistry" and "quality". I think some people believe that since it took someone a lot of work to produce something beautiful that it's somehow higher "quality".
I don't think those two are automatically locked together. Lot of handmade items are very artistic and pleasing to humans, but are of both high and low quality. Sometimes it's the imperfections that draw us to products and those imperfections may, or may not, affect the longevity and performance of this product. Some very high quality objects are bland and boring as well.
I think my point is being lost in the effort to defend a viewpoint. I just disagree with the notion that something hand-made is somehow automatically higher quality. Most of the time in mechanical and electronic devices it leads to increased failures due to human-induced mistakes that machines don't make.
I know someone who was selling VOX AC30 amps. They sold a lot more of the machine made units, and a handful of the hand-made ones. The handmade ones had something like a 50% return rate due to failures. The machine made ones had something like 10%. The hand-made ones were something like 1.5X more expensive too..
take something made by humans, program a machine to make it the same way and remove all the human error introduced into the original object, and that machine will duplicate it with higher precision and no mistakes (AKA higher quality).
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Aug 29, 2018 11:07:09 GMT -6
I have built a lot of custom one-offs for people, and custom rackups. I'd like to think given the difficulty of offering service after the fact that it makes me pay more attention to getting it right, but it's inevitable that something will go wrong sometime. I've built more than one thing for myself that had a new off the shelf part fail within weeks; it's gonna happen. If I ever do that for a customer, then my failure rate looks like 100% because there's only one. With a lot of rack-up jobs, any tech should be able to sort a repair down the line, but....find a tech.....is that better or worse than having a mass produced thing from a company that's gone?
A lot of Chinese cheap product may not get QC at all, other than making sure it doesn't immediately let the smoke out, but then they may give better service in that when one fails, they just immediately send you a replacement.
I've had a couple small boutique branded companies replace a piece with the new version when I had a repair issue 15+ years later, on the basis they couldn't get exact parts to repair the original. I got a new one at a cost similar to the repair rate.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 29, 2018 11:56:13 GMT -6
The equating of higher precision with less mistakes with higher quality is not 100% true. I mentioned Persian rugs earlier, the machines makes perfect designs every time, and yet, they just don't look as good as the handmade ones. Perhaps the minor imperfections simply are more pleasing, who knows why exactly. If by "better" you mean more exact, I agree, but if by "better" we include aesthetics, I don't completely agree. Also, hand made rugs last way longer than machine made rugs of the same material.
So, I do see everyone's point when it comes to machining parts, and I understand how there's more room for error with hand made electronics, but in certain other fields, hand made is unquestionably more preferable at this time, therefore "better".
All I was trying to say is that saying "hand made has never meant better quality" is not true in many situations, even if it is in most. My definition of better might be a little different, that's all.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Aug 29, 2018 13:48:24 GMT -6
There is a somewhat quaint beauty to hand made items that many - myself included - find attractive and worth paying for. So much so that many mass produced items seek to "humanize" their final output in a somewhat obvious attempt at "hand made". I have no problems with either method and have lots of gear that falls into both categories.
I will say that if I've had a personally commissioned piece of technically complex gear made - not a guitar or the like - I sure like the builder to be located close to me. There's no doubt that components fail, solder points get wanky, etc.. If you're not tech savvy (I'm not very savvy), then being able to easily "return to builder" is pretty important.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 31, 2018 12:57:25 GMT -6
svart said, "Hand made has never meant better quality."
You must be speaking specifically about gear. Because handmade has often and almost always meant much higher quality. Why are bespoke suits expensive, fine tailoring and better materials. My buddy Mike DiLalla makes guitars. They're one off, one of a kind, and sell for around $2,200-$2,500. Less than the better Les Paul or PRS guitars. You can customize, choose pickups, color, and other specs. Is it better, yes, if having those choices is important to you. Is it as good as the mass manufacture brands like Gibson, Fender, hell yeah. Are the fruit and vegetables I get from the farmers market from farmers I've come to know better than the same at supermarkets, you bet, and their hands were on it fro concept to completion. There are hundred of similar examples. Neumann's still have hands on I believe and Soyuz is completely hand made, and they are in fact better than any Chinese parts mics I've heard yet, as nice as some are. As for gear, I haven't had many of the higher end boutique pieces, only some of the very nice part Chinese/part American clones of vintage compressors, preamps and EQ's. They've all held up well, but then so has my Stam SA73, which was put together by hand, so I can't truly speak to the issue comprehensively. When it comes to mics though, I've experienced far more issues with the less expensive brands and clone guys than the hands on higher end name brands. Hopefully the Stam SA67 should put an end to that trend for me. No I mean everything. Machines have and can manufacture items with much higher precision/accuracy, are perfectly repeatable, and much faster. Once set up and debugged, they take human-based mistakes out of the equation. "Hand made" still contains the problems of the human condition. Things don't align perfectly, aren't perfectly square, aren't repeatable to any significant precision, etc. There is artistry in the mastercraftsman that might build one-off guitars, but if you were to quantify the attributes that people like about them and put them in a CAD file, you'd get perfect guitars every single time from a CNC machine, and then be able to modify them quickly with a mouse and have the machine spit out perfection. Farmers vs. supermarkets.. Farmers supply supermarkets. The only difference is the type of genetically altered produce they choose to grow. Farmers that grow for supermarkets choose more hardy plants with attributes like "roundup ready", larger fruit/vegetable size, or simply more slowly ripening so the produce doesn't spoil in a truck on the way to the supermarket. A gardener who grows enough produce to sell on a roadside stand might choose a different variety that grows more quickly, is a smaller size but generates more individual pieces, and doesn't need to be resistant to herbicides or regional diseases. It's a simple as needs. The supermarket has a specific need to fill, as does the roadside seller. The produce to fill those needs doesn't necessarily have to align at all, so no comparison can be accurately made here. You're comparing guitars to tomatoes without looking at the details. The details are where the argument is fought, and the details are where the reasons come from, not the other way around. I saw something about a suit from Eric.. Once a pattern is made, a machine can cut and stitch with higher precision/accuracy and ultimately with stronger and more complex sewing techniques than a person can do. I mean you don't see people hand stitching anything on a 2K$ suit.. No, you see them use a sewing MACHINE, because they have become ubiquitous enough that the average person could afford one. At one time, they cost too much and people still sewed by hand, but not anymore because the machine can do the stitching is faster, more accurate and does things that humans can't do. I know some folks will say "but if machines were better, everyone would use them!". Machines are better. They're also ridiculously expensive. You think that guy who's building 10 guitars a year is going to be able to afford a 100K$ CNC/EDM/Waterjet/Laser machine to cut out guitar bodies, necks, fingerboards and pickguards? Not yet, but things like waterjets and 2D laser cutters are getting a LOT cheaper and some folks who make things like custom pickguards are already using those. But for our guitar guy, of course he can't afford the big CNC for cutting guitar bodies out. But if he did, and became proficient with some sort of CAD, he could design things that would make even the most learned master woodworker cry. The issue is that machines are completely able to do the manual labor much quicker, easier and more reliably than humans, but they cost a LOT to get going, which is why they've always been used for mass production. You can make your money back with mass production fairly quickly, but you can't with onesy-twosey products. Also, mass machine production has been seen as sub-quality for some time, but you also have to remember that even though these machines are much quicker than humans, they still take time. Someone makes the tradeoff between precision and speed to meet the market demands. You don't need widgets from wal-mart to have 1/10000th of an inch accuracy. Hell, probably 1/10" is probably still better than you need.. So they program the machines to be faster but more sloppy. You get more manufacturing throughput that way. Machines needing to change cutters or angles to increase precision takes time, and time is money. In fact, during my time working with CNC machines, they often charged increasing premiums for higher precision. +/-0.01" was a standard rate, which orders of magnitude higher precision added 10-50% to the costs per part depending on the complexity and materials. Mark my words though, we're going to see a renaissance with "printing" materials soon. They're on the cusp of mass metal printing and it'll revolutionize machine work. Places like NASA and car manufacturers already use additive metal printing or powdered metal forging for parts instead of CNC. In 25 years nothing will be CNC'd except the odd part. One more thing.. 3D scanning. We're already scanning objects with 3D laser capture devices. We can scan something, like a guitar, and then input it into CAD as a perfect digital copy, then export to a CNC for a perfect real copy. Now imagine if tailors started scanning human bodies to make their suits. You stand up in a booth, get scanned, and now your perfect suit dimensions are known. Human error is taken out of the equation as a CNC machine cuts out the cloth in your exact dimensions.. But I digress. "Hand made" does not equal quality. The attributes that define quality transcend artistry, which is what I think you're really equating as "quality".
I was going to do one of those tiresome, point by point critiques of the above but I'm just not up to it at the moment, so I'll try to make this brief.
Essentially, there's a basic fallacy here, which is that machines are "perfect", or at least closer to perfect than people. In reality, though, they're not. They're only as good as the people running them.
Machines have tolerances. Their output is only accurate within ther tolerances of the machine, which are not necessarily better than thoser of a really painstaking, perfectionist craftsman. It might take the craftsman a lopt longer to achieve a satisfactory result (by his standards) but, given adequate tools, the final output of the craftsman may be better than that of the machine. More expensive, due to the time and labor invested, but better.
Second, machines are programmed by people, and the tolerances of the machine can never be better than the tolerances programmed into it, compounded by the inherent tolerances of the machine itself. So if the tolerances are determined by som,e "producion efficiency expert" who is not himself a craftsman in the actual field of manufacture involved and who is answerable primarily to a board of directors and stockholders who demand a certain return on investment, the quality of the product may not be as high as that produced "the old fashioned way."
So, while it may be possible for machines to do very high quality work, it still comes down to the standsards fetermined by people, and it's still quite likely that the quality of products produced in a modern automated factory are not going to be up to the standards of highly skilled, painstakingly perfectionist craftsmen. If you take the craftsmen out of the picture then control defaults to bean counters, pen pushers, andf marketing "experts".
(I was going to go into a lengthy explanation on the subject of tomatos, but I'll resist the temptation, at least for now.)
And the bit on scanning is also based on fallacies.
Now, in all fairness, some areas of manufacture aree more vulnerable than others. It's not difficult to use machine techniques to reproduce an electronic circuit. It's a very different thing to use machine techniques to craft something dependent on mechanical skills like a fine guitar or microphone capsule. And it's proving to be the downfall of a number of companies whose reputations are based on hand craftsmanship, such as Gibson, which is living (barely) proof that you can't built a top quality acoustic guitar entirely via CNC machine. You cannot build a top quality instrument by relying on perfectly repeatable machine operations when the materials the instruments is constructed from are not "perfectly" repeatable. (This actually even holds in electronics in some cases, but to go farther into that would involve typing a long and somewhat involved anecdote that I'm not up to doing right now.)
|
|