|
Post by swurveman on Mar 7, 2018 7:47:30 GMT -6
I've always wondered how people differentiate a drummer's "groove" from the kick/snare/hi hat/crashes aligning with the click and the grid. Given two drummer's who are playing on the click and aligning 1/4-1/8th-/16th notes with the click and the grid, why does one drummer have a "groove" and another doesn't?
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Mar 7, 2018 8:07:06 GMT -6
I've always wondered how people differentiate a drummer's "groove" from the kick/snare/hi hat/crashes aligning with the click and the grid. Given two drummer's who are playing on the click and aligning 1/4-1/8th-/16th notes with the click and the grid, why does one drummer have a "groove" and another doesn't?
|
|
|
Post by matt on Mar 7, 2018 8:14:07 GMT -6
why does one drummer have a "groove" and another doesn't? This is one of the great mysteries of life. And I'm not sure it can be taught. My drummer plays well to click. However, we made the decision a long time ago to judiciously align to the grid. I edit manually after we are satisfied with the performance itself and don't overdo it to keep the "vibe" intact. Whatever that means. We lay down the basic track as a three piece and replace bass and guitar, which are both scratch recorded as DIs. A pretty standard approach. Of course, Pro Tools has beat detective and tempo mapping, but I haven't really gotten into using these features. We just talked about it though, so our next round of songs will likely see their use.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Mar 7, 2018 8:32:44 GMT -6
Or do you really want your music to sound like a military band ?
I think for most music the answer is no, so the simple answer is most music is not played or performed naturally to strict tempo. This was introduced largely due to midi and computer's inability to have timing nuance which we humans do so very naturally.
I would bet that if we all listed our top ten songs, a large portion of those would not have been recorded to click ?
Logic's new flexible tempo mapping is an interesting innovation.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Mar 7, 2018 8:34:55 GMT -6
Human beings are not perfect metronomes and different people are imperfect in different ways. All drummers tend to play in patterns around the beat (like, in front, in front, in front, behind on a 4 beat pattern). This can feel on beat even if they're not, as long as the pattern is consistent. This deviation is "groove".
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Mar 7, 2018 8:52:42 GMT -6
It’s all genre based for me. If I’m working on a modern rock record, it gets snapped to the grid. Mostly because the drummers (80% of them) can’t play what the genre dictates or what they “think” they are capable of playing. I don’t think of most current rock records as having groove.
For a pop record - it gets snapped to the grid because lots of things are sample based and half the time it’s all getting replaced anyway, there are loops that need to line up, etc. The groove in that instance would come from a Tambo or perc part that is played and layed back in a certain way.
How the bass is played off of any given drum part adds the most groove in my mind for those styles of music.
When there is no need for any of this and things are done in a more organic way, the relationship of where the drummer plays can be a thing of beauty and can change a song from a dud to a total masterpiece. Sterling is a master of this along with a bunch of other dudes, but his name always comes to mind first when I think of groove masters that are currently working.
|
|
mhep
Full Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by mhep on Mar 7, 2018 9:39:42 GMT -6
Good drummers know what they need to work with the click and make it work for them. I had a project recently where we were going to a click and the drummer stopped and called out the need for whole notes, not quarter notes on the click (160BPM track). That gave him all the ability to set the groove while keeping in tempo. Worked brilliantly. Sometimes you have to give drummers the space between the clicks to groove to. Try half notes if you're not feeling the groove. Sometimes the click becomes a part of the groove so much to the music that you'll end up adding a tambourine part in there in the end to have the same affect.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Mar 7, 2018 10:07:29 GMT -6
why does one drummer have a "groove" and another doesn't? This is one of the great mysteries of life. And I'm not sure it can be taught. My drummer plays well to click. However, we made the decision a long time ago to judiciously align to the grid. I edit manually after we are satisfied with the performance itself and don't overdo it to keep the "vibe" intact. Whatever that means. We lay down the basic track as a three piece and replace bass and guitar, which are both scratch recorded as DIs. A pretty standard approach. Of course, Pro Tools has beat detective and tempo mapping, but I haven't really gotten into using these features. We just talked about it though, so our next round of songs will likely see their use. Thanks for your reply. I really don't know how anything a drummer plays could be considered a "groove" if all the hit are perfectly grid aligned. I suspect "groove" in drumming is the human elements of playing. For example, I watch the video of Ringo below explaining his drumming. He talks about how he used his shoulders when hitting toms and the high hat and how as a result his "shoulder" hits were a bit late. This is a part of Ringo's groove imo.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Mar 7, 2018 10:20:11 GMT -6
It’s all genre based for me. If I’m working on a modern rock record, it gets snapped to the grid. Mostly because the drummers (80% of them) can’t play what the genre dictates or what they “think” they are capable of playing. I don’t think of most current rock records as having groove. This kind of surprises me since you're in a bigger market recording musicians who can rehearse a lot. Correct? I understand it in my small market where the bands work full time jobs and rehearse maybe once a week. The drummer and the band simply can't practice enough to be really tight. Of course, in both your market and mine bands know they can play sloppy and get it fixed. So, I wonder how much that has to do with the problem.
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Mar 7, 2018 11:18:57 GMT -6
I think for the most part they don't care. Its amazing how many bands get signed to a label deal and then think they don't have to work anymore. Drives me nuts.
The last major label record I worked on, the drummer in the band showed up for 1 day at the studio. Played each song once and then flew home. He thought he killed it. The next 4 days were spent tracking the drums with a session player. I still think to this day he has no clue what we did. The bass player also didn't play a single note on the record.
Its astounding...
|
|
|
Post by donr on Mar 7, 2018 15:43:32 GMT -6
It's entirely possible to groove to a click. The click will just prevent pushing or pulling the tempo itself, making the groove metronomic and static. Pop and dance consumers like that, look how many records Fleetwood Mac sold using tape loops of the main groove. But within the click, all kinds of feels exist. I like to play to eighth note clicks, it's liberating to me, rather than further confining compared to a quarter note. Aligning all drum hits to a grid, even if they don't sound out of time, makes music sound sterile and less interesting, (less funky) like much of today's pop is, even as other aspects of modern production can be spectacular. I think rock music has suffered especially in the Beat Detective era. You expect grid locked grooves with pop or dance music. What passes for rock recorded that way has most of the soul ironed out of it. Someone with ProTools should take a John Bonham groove and Beat Detect it. Here's some Bonham: www.openculture.com/2013/04/john_bonhams_isolated_drum_track_for_led_zeppelins_fool_in_the_rain.htmlPost the results. I can't wait to hear how lame it is.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Mar 7, 2018 17:07:09 GMT -6
There's a thread that is more or less parallel to this running over at Terry Manning's site. I was surprised by the number of (mostly seasoned pro) people who spoke out to some degree against the use of click tracks for music that doesn't absolutely require them for technical reasons, like movie soundtracks or other things that require syncing to a outside source.
Me, I don't like clicks. I have the drummer play while I lay down a scratch vocal and rhythm guitar part. I was surprised in that other thread by several people noting that a lot of singers on well known commercial recordings frequently speed up a bit as the song proceeds - it's part of naturally building involvement or excitement in the song arrangement.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Mar 7, 2018 17:42:06 GMT -6
Worth noting that with electronic/midi music these days timing is often only partially quantized (like a percentage) after being live recorded. Likewise some of the most interesting music is modular where a sequencer clock itself can be influenced by random control voltages or other modulations.
Personally I hate click tracks, they are just boring. No one really gives a shit if the drummer is losing control on any 70s glam or 80s punk rock record, people like it. For that matter some of those records would sound worse if the toms didn’t sound like cardboard.
I’d rather one song or section sound a little off than sap the life of the rhythm section.
Listen to Furtwängler, Jesus the beat is all over the place, very expressive. Sometimes it works, sometimes not, but if you play it safe you never are in the running.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Mar 7, 2018 20:30:11 GMT -6
I almost never work to a click, and often I find when bands want to use one it's a disaster. I use them for dropping people back in (pre-record count in) sometimes, but that's about it.
If you wanted to groove on it, I guess my advice would be the old jazz trick. Use the metronome at half time and treat it as beats 2 and 4.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Mar 7, 2018 20:43:30 GMT -6
Playing to a click is different than snapping to a grid after the fact. Things "can" still have a groove when played to a click. It depends on the song and the players involved. There will still be human timing inaccuracies when played to a click, at least to a point. If a song has periods where the drums aren't playing, sometimes it's necessary to have a click just to keep everything moving along.
Playing to a click can still kill a groove too though. I don't see Led Zeppelin sounding the same if they tracked to a click. As a drummer, I prefer to track without a click unless there is a good reason to do so.
Snapping to a grid after the fact? Gross....
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Mar 7, 2018 20:51:10 GMT -6
I recently returned to a track where we recorded an actual metronome and then overdubbed from there. I went back and added a bunch of stuff to the track and, although I'm no great drummer, I have to say playing to the recording of the metronome felt more musical than your average click track. Waiting to see what the client thinks of my efforts, I just took it upon myself to try and save the take because I knew I had the leeway with this client.
Edit: On the other hand, this song we're trying to save is the ONLY thing we did on the record that did use a kind of click. The artist hired a great rhythm section and this was an after thought in the overdub stage.
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Mar 8, 2018 17:40:13 GMT -6
Very interesting topic. Below are a few of my observations using Cubase (which has a killer beat detection feature), to discern a few truths.
- Brad Paisley... NEVER records anything to a click or grid. His recordings start out and get faster or visa versa. Doesn't matter. His recordings are still my benchmark.
- John Mayer... Records to a click yet ignores it in places. Leans toward the feel of a groove. Always more than listenable.
- Timberlake... Of coarse always to a grid yet still manages a sense of musicianship somehow.
And on and on. I've noticed one constant from all the music I've analyzed... Great music is great music. Something happens in a recording, or in a lyric, or in a lick that I MUST listen to over and over that captures my attention, grid or no grid.
Now I will say that I lean toward loving human feel, but I've also loved music made on a grid. I play to a click myself because I'm mostly a one man deal. But I never go back and nudge things unnessesarily. I like variation in a song. I like mistakes made in the moment, sometimes "happy mistakes". It's all good.
|
|
|
Post by donr on Mar 8, 2018 22:16:53 GMT -6
I recently returned to a track where we recorded an actual metronome and then overdubbed from there. I went back and added a bunch of stuff to the track and, although I'm no great drummer, I have to say playing to the recording of the metronome felt more musical than your average click track. Waiting to see what the client thinks of my efforts, I just took it upon myself to try and save the take because I knew I had the leeway with this client. Edit: On the other hand, this song we're trying to save is the ONLY thing we did on the record that did use a kind of click. The artist hired a great rhythm section and this was an after thought in the overdub stage. notneeson, don't know what metronome you used, but mechanical metronomes actually have a swing, at least they do when I watch/hear them. Much in the way I thought the Roland 808 drum machines grooved compared to later 808 sample libraries placed on a DAW grid did. My point, earilier in this conversation, is that steady tempo is not the culprit for soulless grooves. Steady tempo is just one parameter modern consumers of music expect to hear. Every musician in whatever ensemble, band, orchestra, whatever, should be able to groove to a rigid click tempo, if that's what is the desired outcome. What makes that tempo musical, is how all the musicians, incuding the drummer and percussion instruments, groove to the metronomic steady tempo. Fluid tempos add another emotional element to music. In my life, for the last 30 years or so, fluid tempos lately in pop music are not popular, in fact are rare if not extinct, with the exception of live recordings.
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Mar 8, 2018 22:57:02 GMT -6
I recently returned to a track where we recorded an actual metronome and then overdubbed from there. I went back and added a bunch of stuff to the track and, although I'm no great drummer, I have to say playing to the recording of the metronome felt more musical than your average click track. Waiting to see what the client thinks of my efforts, I just took it upon myself to try and save the take because I knew I had the leeway with this client. Edit: On the other hand, this song we're trying to save is the ONLY thing we did on the record that did use a kind of click. The artist hired a great rhythm section and this was an after thought in the overdub stage. notneeson, don't know what metronome you used, but mechanical metronomes actually have a swing, at least they do when I watch/hear them. Much in the way I thought the Roland 808 drum machines grooved compared to later 808 sample libraries placed on a DAW grid did. My point, earilier in this conversation, is that steady tempo is not the culprit for soulless grooves. Steady tempo is just one parameter modern consumers of music expect to hear. Every musician in whatever ensemble, band, orchestra, whatever, should be able to groove to a rigid click tempo, if that's what is the desired outcome. What makes that tempo musical, is how all the musicians, incuding the drummer and percussion instruments, groove to the metronomic steady tempo. Fluid tempos add another emotional element to music. In my life, for the last 30 years or so, fluid tempos lately in pop music are not popular, in fact are rare if not extinct, with the exception of live recordings. I can agree with that, especially if visual cues associated with watching a metronome add in extra "slop". "Slop" being a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Mar 9, 2018 2:38:35 GMT -6
I recently returned to a track where we recorded an actual metronome and then overdubbed from there. I went back and added a bunch of stuff to the track and, although I'm no great drummer, I have to say playing to the recording of the metronome felt more musical than your average click track. Waiting to see what the client thinks of my efforts, I just took it upon myself to try and save the take because I knew I had the leeway with this client. Edit: On the other hand, this song we're trying to save is the ONLY thing we did on the record that did use a kind of click. The artist hired a great rhythm section and this was an after thought in the overdub stage. notneeson, don't know what metronome you used, but mechanical metronomes actually have a swing, at least they do when I watch/hear them. Much in the way I thought the Roland 808 drum machines grooved compared to later 808 sample libraries placed on a DAW grid did. My point, earilier in this conversation, is that steady tempo is not the culprit for soulless grooves. Steady tempo is just one parameter modern consumers of music expect to hear. Every musician in whatever ensemble, band, orchestra, whatever, should be able to groove to a rigid click tempo, if that's what is the desired outcome. What makes that tempo musical, is how all the musicians, incuding the drummer and percussion instruments, groove to the metronomic steady tempo. Fluid tempos add another emotional element to music. In my life, for the last 30 years or so, fluid tempos lately in pop music are not popular, in fact are rare if not extinct, with the exception of live recordings. I personally do not believe that the audience gives a damn about a rigid tempo. In fact I don't think they even notice - if the song is good. (It certainly hasn't hurt Brad Paisley or many others.) The only ones who really care are non-musical gatekeepers who, having no real musical taste, tend to focus in on details of artificial perfection.
|
|
|
Post by iamasound on Mar 9, 2018 8:27:51 GMT -6
There is groove, and then there is tempo. A rock solid tempo does not inform the groove. I have played with groovy groove monsters that were eerily uncanny about hitting the timing dead on when listening back and superimposing a click over their work.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Mar 9, 2018 8:42:11 GMT -6
I recently returned to a track where we recorded an actual metronome and then overdubbed from there. I went back and added a bunch of stuff to the track and, although I'm no great drummer, I have to say playing to the recording of the metronome felt more musical than your average click track. Waiting to see what the client thinks of my efforts, I just took it upon myself to try and save the take because I knew I had the leeway with this client. Edit: On the other hand, this song we're trying to save is the ONLY thing we did on the record that did use a kind of click. The artist hired a great rhythm section and this was an after thought in the overdub stage. Every musician in whatever ensemble, band, orchestra, whatever, should be able to groove to a rigid click tempo, if that's what is the desired outcome. The problem is snare and tom fills. I agree that most drummers can stay around the click when hitting kick/snare/hi hat, but when the fill comes the entry back into the click/groove is awkward. I haven't had one drummer in my studio that can do it consistently well, which may say more about the state of the music business-nobody can make a living being a musician full time where I live and all have full time jobs to make ends meet- than it does about how good a musician they possibly could become. The other thing is that in the old days bands would record a song 20 times to get it right. Today, the bands rarely play more than two takes after an initial run through. I think this is a matter of budget limitations and knowing that things like sloppy fills can be fixed by technology.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Mar 9, 2018 9:09:00 GMT -6
I recently returned to a track where we recorded an actual metronome and then overdubbed from there. I went back and added a bunch of stuff to the track and, although I'm no great drummer, I have to say playing to the recording of the metronome felt more musical than your average click track. Waiting to see what the client thinks of my efforts, I just took it upon myself to try and save the take because I knew I had the leeway with this client. Edit: On the other hand, this song we're trying to save is the ONLY thing we did on the record that did use a kind of click. The artist hired a great rhythm section and this was an after thought in the overdub stage. notneeson, don't know what metronome you used, but mechanical metronomes actually have a swing, at least they do when I watch/hear them. Much in the way I thought the Roland 808 drum machines grooved compared to later 808 sample libraries placed on a DAW grid did. My point, earilier in this conversation, is that steady tempo is not the culprit for soulless grooves. Steady tempo is just one parameter modern consumers of music expect to hear. Every musician in whatever ensemble, band, orchestra, whatever, should be able to groove to a rigid click tempo, if that's what is the desired outcome. What makes that tempo musical, is how all the musicians, incuding the drummer and percussion instruments, groove to the metronomic steady tempo. Fluid tempos add another emotional element to music. In my life, for the last 30 years or so, fluid tempos lately in pop music are not popular, in fact are rare if not extinct, with the exception of live recordings. Yes, I think you’re on to something! I’ve had the experience of printing drum machines to Pro Tools and then trying to align w/ the grid. Doesn’t quite line up. This was the classic mechanical metronome you might see at a piano teacher’s.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Mar 9, 2018 12:53:39 GMT -6
Every musician in whatever ensemble, band, orchestra, whatever, should be able to groove to a rigid click tempo, if that's what is the desired outcome. The problem is snare and tom fills. I agree that most drummers can stay around the click when hitting kick/snare/hi hat, but when the fill comes the entry back into the click/groove is awkward. I haven't had one drummer in my studio that can do it consistently well, which may say more about the state of the music business-nobody can make a living being a musician full time where I live and all have full time jobs to make ends meet- than it does about how good a musician they possibly could become. The other thing is that in the old days bands would record a song 20 times to get it right. Today, the bands rarely play more than two takes after an initial run through. I think this is a matter of budget limitations and knowing that things like sloppy fills can be fixed by technology. That's just called practice. A good drummer should be able to hit the one every time if that's all you give him. I have a friend who is a drum teacher who usually practices with a metronome giving himself only every 4th "one". Ask the drummers that have problem timing fills whether or not they practice with a metronome (assumes they practice...). In my opinion the single best thing any drummer can do is practice with a metronome and then NOT use it during tracking!
|
|