|
|
Post by porkyman on Mar 15, 2015 19:20:06 GMT -6
would it be better to send a signal out to hardware using the rme aio converters and monitor with RM Bare Beast, or send the signal out with the Bare Beast and monitor with the rme? which is more important? preserving the original sound before it gets tweaked otb, or being able to more accurately hear how your tweaking a degraded signal?
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 15, 2015 22:18:43 GMT -6
I would say send out with the rme.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,959 
|
Post by ericn on Mar 16, 2015 3:05:00 GMT -6
This is something you have to decide but iMHO it would be best to use the same signal for both, that way you actually hear what your printing!
|
|
|
|
Post by porkyman on Mar 16, 2015 18:23:01 GMT -6
This is something you have to decide but iMHO it would be best to use the same signal for both, that way you actually hear what your printing! i dont understand what youre saying. if i monitor through the same output post processing, wont it create a never ending loop? |
|
|
|
Post by mulmany on Mar 16, 2015 20:02:41 GMT -6
This is something you have to decide but iMHO it would be best to use the same signal for both, that way you actually hear what your printing! i dont understand what youre saying. if i monitor through the same output post processing, wont it create a never ending loop? I think ericn means to use the same converter for I/O and your better converter to hear what is actually happening in the round trip. That's how I read it and would do it. You can't compensate for something you can't hear. |
|
|
|
Post by porkyman on Mar 17, 2015 19:04:38 GMT -6
ok. thats how ive been doing it. thanks for the input
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 18, 2015 13:55:43 GMT -6
That's what was saying too
|
|
