|
Post by viciousbliss on Jul 24, 2022 18:15:40 GMT -6
The other day my dad was talking to me about getting into video stuff with Resolve. So, I did some research and it seems like it'd make more sense just to get into HDX instead. He seems to want to invest in something productive before rates hikes and/or inflation hit bad. I see these 10k systems at Vintage King and places like that. Another article I read on Pro Tools Expert talked about this new HDX hybrid engine and how great it was for people who worked on Atmos sessions. I've got no experience with post, but if I had the right system, I'd be willing to give it a try. Though I am guessing it'd take possibly years to learn. Sounds like I would probably have to buy separate AAX-DSP versions of plug-ins by companies such as Sonnox or PA. Is there a good list of AAX-DSP stuff nowadays? I haven't been able to find one.
Is Media Composer the main video editor for use with PT?
If you guys think there's better things to get into for video than PT, I'm definitely interested in hearing about them.
The capabilities of HDX intrigue me quite a bit. It would allow me to do a lot more than I can now. Are there better interfaces to use with HDX than what's made by Avid? Looks like Carbon is another possibility. I've been reading the product descriptions, reviews, and all this, but I knew you guys would have some better insights. Thanks for any advice.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,953
Member is Online
|
Post by ericn on Jul 24, 2022 19:26:47 GMT -6
Avid is dominant in most upper end post, but I have to say every single audio post house I have dealt with that didn’t have a principle who wasn’t already experienced in post and video has failed. Someone has to understand the local market. Video can be very, very political. In smaller markets the most successful post houses usually have a longstanding relationship with a local network affiliate. If you get into the video side of post you will find that in many markets your going to need to invest in at least a couple of legacy formats to import. Atmos is great and Dolby really has brought the cost down, but the room and all the speakers add up quickly! The other thing is you have to have a tech to keep things running, corporate and broadcast clients don’t like delays. While it’s not like in the old days where that meant someone who could rebuild a VTR today your looking for a very specialized IT guy. Right now the money is in Political ads, but you will learn very quickly that if you pic the wrong guys to align with it disappears. Good luck, but before you spend a penny on any gear find the people first.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jul 24, 2022 20:40:51 GMT -6
Audio for post is a very different animal. I'm not sure really how to advise you. Your best. bet might be to hire someone on with a lot of experience, pay them well, and learn from them.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jul 24, 2022 22:43:45 GMT -6
HDX in Post work is not important. The important thing is to be running ProTools Ulitmate to get all the features and voices. Depending on the film you mix you can have Hundreds of tracks and even more busses. IF you do it right you are using dense templates with internal routing for each bus. Dx, Fx, Mx, Mix, Mix-Mx, ext. Plus pending what you're doing you are doing 5.1 and stereo at the same time. Atmos usutally get's it's own thing due to being objected based.
I'm not sure what kind of video work your dad is getting interested in. But either way, HDX isn't really needed. HDX is about low latency while using hardware/recording live. Otherwise, in post, you need horse power. And in post you'll be using LOTs of plugins to polish all kinds of things to make it fit the needs of the film. You will also want to know a lot of in's and out's of Protools and how to do automation quickly. Which that can take a while to learn and master.
Rerecording mixing is no joke. BUT it also depends on what you're making. If you're one man banding it all though(Sound design, Dialog editing, Music mixing, Music editing, Foley, ADR, VO, mixing) it's a ton of work. Not to mention if you aren't working with a video team/crew that knows what they are doing, you are in for a WORLD of pain. NOTHING fucks you over and costs you more time then video not doing their job right.
I do post work on a few films a year, but by no means a full time post guy. I love it. Would do more of it if I could. It is super fun and very challenging.
So first things first. What kind of videos "my dad was talking to me about getting into video stuff" does that mean? Or are you just wanting to dip your toes into post work??
|
|
|
Post by viciousbliss on Jul 25, 2022 0:07:23 GMT -6
Thanks for all the insights, everyone.
Well, I was just planning on getting the equipment, maybe doing a Pro Tools certification, and then seeing what kind of jobs I can get. I’ve read a lot of stories about how post work can be really complicated and have really tight deadlines. I’m not expecting anyone to hire me to work on a film or anything unless their budget is so low that they can’t afford a more experienced person. If we do see a serious economic decline, I suspect more and more people are going to want to create video content to sell.
Someone I know used to know someone who would do simple projects like recording a dance troupe at a park and editing the footage into a long music video. He claimed he got paid 5k for that type of job. He used a drone if I recall. My dad wanted to buy one of those too.
My preference would be to get another interface with a lot more I/O than an Apollo Twin and then get a Silver Bullet, Bricasti, good hardware 1176, and maybe Zulu Tape.
Does HDX have any advantage over Carbon? I see that the top cpu processors out nowadays have about double the single core power of my Ryzen 1700 and triple the multicore capabilities. I wonder if HDX or Carbon running lots of plugins would be much better than a new computer build.
PA lists AAX-DSP compatibility under most all their plugins. They aren’t selling separate versions that I know of. If I can use all the PA stuff in AAX-DSP, that’d be really useful.
I’ve already got a UAD octo for some extra things too.
Guess the big question is what I really need if I want to do some simpler video projects with Pro Tools but want the capacity to do do large sessions, either in post or not, in the event that I ever learn how to do them.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jul 25, 2022 2:03:30 GMT -6
Thanks for all the insights, everyone. Well, I was just planning on getting the equipment, maybe doing a Pro Tools certification, and then seeing what kind of jobs I can get. I’ve read a lot of stories about how post work can be really complicated and have really tight deadlines. I’m not expecting anyone to hire me to work on a film or anything unless their budget is so low that they can’t afford a more experienced person. If we do see a serious economic decline, I suspect more and more people are going to want to create video content to sell. Someone I know used to know someone who would do simple projects like recording a dance troupe at a park and editing the footage into a long music video. He claimed he got paid 5k for that type of job. He used a drone if I recall. My dad wanted to buy one of those too. My preference would be to get another interface with a lot more I/O than an Apollo Twin and then get a Silver Bullet, Bricasti, good hardware 1176, and maybe Zulu Tape. Does HDX have any advantage over Carbon? I see that the top cpu processors out nowadays have about double the single core power of my Ryzen 1700 and triple the multicore capabilities. I wonder if HDX or Carbon running lots of plugins would be much better than a new computer build. PA lists AAX-DSP compatibility under most all their plugins. They aren’t selling separate versions that I know of. If I can use all the PA stuff in AAX-DSP, that’d be really useful. I’ve already got a UAD octo for some extra things too. Guess the big question is what I really need if I want to do some simpler video projects with Pro Tools but want the capacity to do do large sessions, either in post or not, in the event that I ever learn how to do them. Okay so you are wanting to try and break into film post work? Alright, yeah that's not super easy especially working in lower tier productions. And honestly HDX isn't going to give you a massive "edge" into over just running ProTools Ultimate with your current hardware. Save your money. AAX-DSP has limits. You can only run so many plugins before you are out of DSP power, that goes for native ones too. Because technically in HDX you have to port it out form the DSP to the CPU then back. Which costs you mixer lanes in the back end of the HDX DSP. So you can run out of plugins. Which is why big stuiod have 3 card HDX systems. Which is a LOT of money. Also hardware in Post work is rarely used. Why? Revisions, revisions, revisions....revisions. Most of the time ones that you aren't even expecting, like if the video crew sends you picture lock...only for it not to be and they tweaked it. now you have to swap your session to the new on and make your adjustments and then reprint your mix and stems. Which doesn't sound like a big deal until you are working on a film that is 20-120minutes long. You'd have to print that LIVE with hardware. Which I have done, it sucks. Stay ITB as much as possible. Post work is all about working FAST with the client having no budget. ha Seriously..Hardware will only make you more expensive purely just based on rendering your deliverables. Plus, and this is experience speaking, if you are starting out. You're going to be working with a LOT of people that have never used a or rarely use a dedicated post audio mixer. Why? because they are used to just doing it themselves. Which to them is easier and gets them what they need. Now they have to do a lot of extra work(rendering AAFs, they can't make adjustments after sent off to sound and color which they don't like, and they might not feel as in control if you don't get to mix it live with them to make tweaks in the studio and it'll take longer then they are used to). So the cost to benefit ratio for them as a client is very small. And you have to work very very efficiently to make it worth it for them to come back. On top of that most the projects you'll get, because they also likely didn't use a production audio person/crew, the audio will not be good. And it'll take a lot of time to polish the turds you are sent. So get to know RX and other denoising software VERY well as it'll be your life blood and also be one of the ways you can make a huge impact on the film sound that the client will notice. So basically, no you do not need HDX. You do need Protools Ultimate software though IMO, which will run with your Apollo no problem. Start learning the advanced automation of Protools very well, importing session data types, and lots of internal routing. Then go to town. I'd study up on film production in general and all the major video editing softwares(Davinci, Adobe, Final cut) so you know how to communicate with filmmakers to make sure you get what you need. Either way, film is cool to work in. But very fast paced, it's rare to work with a director that totally wants the audio to be perfect or has the budge left for it. And you know lots of low production films don't have a lot going on. But if you invest in some sound libraries so that you can expand the sound of the film and learn to push and pull FX and Music with the Dialog and connect with the director to get the message they want across. Then it's awesome. You don't need more than just software and sound libraries(maybe a library manager) to do great work.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,953
Member is Online
|
Post by ericn on Jul 25, 2022 4:46:13 GMT -6
In order to understand Audio for video, you must first understand video. Take a class, do an internship before you invest. Most learn on someone else’s gear. There always is Nuendo as a PT alternative but it’s really not any cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Jul 25, 2022 11:10:34 GMT -6
Way back when I first got a loan to start a studio I was figuring post would be a nice secondary way to subsidize the stuff I bought. What a hilarious joke! It took a few weeks to realize only the top film budgets are going to even acknowledge sound quality matters, and they have their *teams*- because that’s what it takes to compete at the Oscar level. Or you’ll get the zero budget students with high brow Oscar expectations and no money.
You’ll learn that if someone can operate a camera and do run final cut or iMovie, they can also do the sound, they don’t need help. They can charge a weekend party $5k, do the sound themselves, clip the master bus since louder is better everyone happy vs spending their profits for a helper .
I think there is still a market for a nice side business on the camera side of things. Weddings, events, etc can make thousands per gig— however the post side will be time consuming.
Also consider these days that so many People have zoom tricks down, it’s gonna be a little harder to impress with fades and remote cameras. Basically.. got to do it because you love it.
A story it reminds me of, my friend’s dad was a camera operator at NBC news LA. He told me how they used to have a team of production crew, multiple camera operators, someone calling shots, the whole show was tight and thrilling! As the years went by they replaced everyone until it was just him running all the cameras, and the whole show, sound and video from his remote. Just him! All those jobs gone.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jul 25, 2022 11:36:34 GMT -6
It's probably also wise to note, the the closer to the beginning of the film/video production, the more money there is....(actors, director, location, etc.) and the closer to the end of the production, the less money there is left. And audio post is essentially the last link in the chain. There's money, but it's always tight, there are always compromises, and there is always serious grinding, and INSANE time schedules to boot....
|
|
|
Post by sirthought on Jul 25, 2022 14:17:18 GMT -6
If you are starting out with doing videos in the park with a drone and some handhelds, you can use other DAWs such as Logic to make the audio edits. Not nearly the depth that Avid Pro Tools or Steinberg Nuendo have in the post production industry. But you can get your feet wet and do professional work, just to see if you like it.
Nuendo isn't cheap, but it will more affordable in the long run compared to paying up yearly for PT Ultimate. I also have a friend that does audio work for local film makers and she works solely with Digital Performer. I've never really worked with it myself, but watching someone using it in a video it seems to have some nice features.
Nuendo is designed specifically for post production work, but if you get into ADR stuff you can use things like Revoice Pro, and DAWs like Logic are getting more into Atmos mixing.
|
|
|
Post by viciousbliss on Jul 25, 2022 16:31:48 GMT -6
Thanks again for the replies, everyone.
I bought Revoice about 7 and a half years ago. Haven't upgraded it. Often found it easier to just align vocals millisecond by millisecond.
Then the Softube and Sonnox doublers came out.
It'll probably be a couple months before I can go do any of this video stuff.
I'm still considering getting other hardware and an interface with more I/O. Maybe Bus + or some Dangerous gear.
|
|
|
Post by nudwig on Jul 25, 2022 19:25:37 GMT -6
I've done a fair bit of production sound as well as post (also have HDX, a Silver Bullet, Bricasti, and 1176's to give you a reference to what you said you'd like to get). I use none of it during most post jobs tho HDX does help with the bigger sessions. I do use my Pro Tools Ultimate license and RX9 Advanced (a lot!). Like others mentioned you're basically going to be turd polishing and pulling a thousand or so sonic miracles per project. I think it was Izotope themselves that put out some great how-to videos on their post products, you'll want to know those inside out. You may also want to start collecting a vast and properly named/metadata encoded SFX library as even if you think you're not going to be doing sound design it'll make your life easier when you have production audio with generators and crew noises all though a delicate scene with whispering actors. To be fair to production sound, most of the time it's a battle on set with the low budget and or less experienced crews as it's usually one guy doing everything in tough conditions.
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Jul 31, 2022 19:48:54 GMT -6
I'm looking at a Carbon right now, just wished it had AES/EBU ports. Does anything come
with 2 AES/EBU ports? That's why I'm still on my Apogee 16X converters. I just can't seem to find a solution without changing my setup entirely
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jul 31, 2022 19:56:11 GMT -6
I'm looking at a Carbon right now, just wished it had AES/EBU ports. Does anything come with 2 AES/EBU ports? That's why I'm still on my Apogee 16X converters. I just can't seem to find a solution without changing my setup entirely The avid I/O units do. Plus can add db25 AES to it. But worth pointing out that the built in XLR AES ports mirror ch 1&2.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,953
Member is Online
|
Post by ericn on Jul 31, 2022 20:21:27 GMT -6
You can always add an old Digidesign 192 Digital. 16 ch of a combo of AES ADAT and TDIF.
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Jul 31, 2022 21:49:56 GMT -6
I like the Bricasti hooked up to the AES/EBU port, not sure what you mean by add? I can add that to the Carbon? or my Apogee system? I use the other AES/EBU port for my dedicated D/A for my monitoring. It sounds as if the conversion is so good on the Carbon I might not need my dedicated D/A anymore. Trying to downsize my setup and get more power in a smaller footprint.
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Jul 31, 2022 22:34:35 GMT -6
I like the Bricasti hooked up to the AES/EBU port, not sure what you mean by add? I can add that to the Carbon? or my Apogee system? I use the other AES/EBU port for my dedicated D/A for my monitoring. It sounds as if the conversion is so good on the Carbon I might not need my dedicated D/A anymore. Trying to downsize my setup and get more power in a smaller footprint. you could add it via the second HDX port assuming you are using the HDX ports and not just the ethernet. To use the HDX ports, you need an HDX PCIe card. although if I remember right the Carbon as ADAT ports so you could attach anything to those to expand you I/O
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Aug 1, 2022 9:30:11 GMT -6
If you want to get a job, it's very important to know Media Composer and Pro Tools. The next step is to become an assistant to a professional. Both are rental subscriptions.
Gear-wise, Avid's hardware recommendations are a good place to start.
The DIY crowd hates Avid but the established pros aren't remotely interested in learning new software. If you watch the speed they operate at, you'll see why. Avid was first and everything that came after was only cheaper but not better.
|
|