|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 19, 2022 10:53:13 GMT -6
I think I’ve only used a vintage one once and thought it was amazing. Are the new ones really not as good? Same capsule, right?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2022 11:03:07 GMT -6
It's a bit brighter which you can easily notch out with a bit of EQ, never understood what all the fuss was about.
|
|
|
Post by 79sg on Feb 19, 2022 11:05:19 GMT -6
I have a 2014 U87AI and think it's a great mic. Usually run it through a Tube Tech MP2a mic pre and either a CL1b or Retro 176. Don't understand all the hate. Don't really care.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Feb 19, 2022 11:08:09 GMT -6
AI's are designed somewhat brighter. They are not the same capsule, either. The new ones are same capsule as the U67 has always had.....and TLM67. Capsule not interchangeable with an 87A. It's been said they are essentially the same capsule in behavior, though they won't work in the opposite circuit.
|
|
|
Post by timcampbell on Feb 19, 2022 11:34:19 GMT -6
They use the same capsule but some models use seperate backplates. The Ai's use a higher polarization voltage making them have a higher output/lower self noise. The higher voltage might account for slightly "brighter" sound. I have a very early U87ai and it sounds like my late model vintage U87. The real determining factor may be that Neumann later added a piggyback pcb in the preamp and those seem to be everyones least favorite.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Feb 19, 2022 11:43:36 GMT -6
Didn't Chad own like eleven 87's of various vintages at one point?
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Feb 19, 2022 13:06:38 GMT -6
I think I’ve only used a vintage one once and thought it was amazing. Are the new ones really not as good? Same capsule, right? John, have you listened to seawell 's excellent head-to-head comparisons of U87s and clones? I don't remember seeing you on that thread, but that's an excellent place to dig in. You might like one of the clones enough to simply go that direction to sate your U87 tastes...
|
|
|
Post by Chad on Feb 19, 2022 13:07:49 GMT -6
Didn't Chad own like eleven 87's of various vintages at one point? I’ve had 13 total (he says, sheepishly), but only 6 at the same time. I’m down to 3 I’m keeping forever: • 1977 • 1985 (Klaus installed / loosened up a new capsule for me) • 2017 U87Ai (I also have a TLM 67 circuit and Max Kircher U67 circuit for this one for versatility)
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 19, 2022 14:42:50 GMT -6
I think I’ve only used a vintage one once and thought it was amazing. Are the new ones really not as good? Same capsule, right? John, have you listened to seawell 's excellent head-to-head comparisons of U87s and clones? I don't remember seeing you on that thread, but that's an excellent place to dig in. You might like one of the clones enough to simply go that direction to sate your U87 tastes... Oooo. No but I will
|
|
|
Post by dok on Feb 19, 2022 18:11:01 GMT -6
I found the AI *frustratingly* sibilant on my voice (piggyback pcb 04 that was mentioned upthread) and nothing I did could really tame it. I swapped the circuit with a TLM67 circuit and now legitimately want for nothing. It's good enough for my purposes that I really haven't been able to justify spending any more money on a microphone, as much as I might want to do that Kircher U67 mod. I'm satisfied enough by it that it remains quite surprising that the TLM67 never seems to be presented as a first option in that category. It's a lovely sounding mic.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 19, 2022 18:31:17 GMT -6
I found the AI *frustratingly* sibilant on my voice (piggyback pcb 04 that was mentioned upthread) and nothing I did could really tame it. I swapped the circuit with a TLM67 circuit and now legitimately want for nothing. It's good enough for my purposes that I really haven't been able to justify spending any more money on a microphone, as much as I might want to do that Kircher U67 mod. I'm satisfied enough by it that it remains quite surprising that the TLM67 never seems to be presented as a first option in that category. It's a lovely sounding mic. Sibilance is something I’m struggling with on the Heiserman. Could just be me.
|
|
|
Post by longscale on Feb 19, 2022 18:41:28 GMT -6
My sample size is small (one ai, one i). The u87i was fantastic. Easy. Sounded right on my voice and acoustic guitar, mandolins, electric guitars. Was a great all around mic - put it up on anything and it would sound great. The top sounded natural.
The u87ai was not for me. Spitty. Top was just not right. Sounded rather hard to me. Was a struggle to use on anything. Hated it on my voice. Hated it on acoustic guitars. "frustrating" is actually a good way to describe it - as I wanted it to be like the u87i I had. Could be my u87ai was just not right in some way - I got it new, seems slim but possible.
I know this topic creates lots of internet fights. All I know is for me I'd take a u87i any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I have the same opinion about a 184 vs an 84. Hate the 184, find the 84 to be fantastic (for largely the same reasons). So at least you get some idea which way my ears point.
I know people that make both (u87ai, 184) sound drool worthy in their recordings. My skill could be the problem, but it does not matter to me really. I just know I'll smile when I put up a u87i, or an 84. I learned the preferences, that work for me and make capturing the sounds I'm after easy.
|
|
|
Post by tkaitkai on Feb 19, 2022 19:27:31 GMT -6
Haven't ever used a vintage, but I've recorded a few full songs with an AI.
It's an awesome mic, although not a great fit my voice specifically. It really pushes the 1 kHz range in a way that works for the vast majority of singers and instruments. For me, though, that's exactly where my voice is most resonant, so it ends up bringing out the honk in my voice more than I'd like.
I'm probably in a tiny minority, though — it sounds killer on just about everyone else. Maybe not the best mic, but it almost always works. Even in my case, I'd still happily take one over something like a TLM 49 or 102.
And even when it doesn't sound perfect, it still has a way of cutting through dense mixes without much effort.
I'm already happy with my Upton for vocals, but I would really love a Warm or Serrano at some point for acoustic guitars.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Feb 19, 2022 20:19:50 GMT -6
Another idea might be to swap the M7 style Heiserman head, on your mic. If/when I ever get a Heiserman 47, it'd be that for sure (on my bright voice). Right now, the U195 on FAT, does a similar effect. Chris
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Feb 19, 2022 23:28:26 GMT -6
I've never minded the 87ai i've used, but its an older one. Haven't tried the pcb piggy backed one I think. I think the older ones are good though. Especially though a Neve type preamp.
I also really think the TLM67 gets overlooked. Maybe its just too expensive. But I think it's a great mic.
|
|
|
Post by reddirt on Feb 20, 2022 4:23:30 GMT -6
If they dont suit , they dont suit. can be a little nasal and pinched when pushed - you'll never really eq it out.. Klaus has made comments somewhere re the variability of newer Neumann caps. Cheers, Ross
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 20, 2022 9:37:12 GMT -6
Another idea might be to swap the M7 style Heiserman head, on your mic. If/when I ever get a Heiserman 47, it'd be that for sure (on my bright voice). Right now, the U195 on FAT, does a similar effect. Chris I have the k47. I thought the M7 while more vintage sounding - was more mid forward.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Feb 20, 2022 9:51:09 GMT -6
Another idea might be to swap the M7 style Heiserman head, on your mic. If/when I ever get a Heiserman 47, it'd be that for sure (on my bright voice). Right now, the U195 on FAT, does a similar effect. Chris I have the k47. I thought the M7 while more vintage sounding - was more mid forward. You want me to loan you my beezneez for a week to try it out?
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Feb 20, 2022 10:11:43 GMT -6
FWIW I still think the Soyuz 017 FET, is an excellent candidate here. Also the Bomblet is worth a try.
Maybe it's "just me", but I also consider the Heiserman H7 capsule...
To sound more "Ribbon-ish", with a more rolled off top end. Chris P.S. There's always a 44 Ribbon style too. Including a R84, if the room is good enough. (44 if it's great 😀 )
|
|
|
Post by Vincent R. on Feb 23, 2022 10:45:34 GMT -6
I have a U87ai. From what I've read, I have one with the daughter box, which is the most disliked version. I know this microphone pretty well at this point. It has a certain sound on a vocal that is either what you are looking for or not. I've had issues with it on a slightly nasal female jazz/pop voice. It seemed to bring out the nasality in an almost obnoxious way. Yes, the nasality was there on that vocalist, but in person it didn't seem to stand out as much and didn't bother me through the CM49 or MK67 which we used instead. On a bright coloratura soprano (I know most of you don't work with these kinds of voices, but I do) It was horribly sibilant and peaky up top. I ended up using IK Mic Locker's TLM170 emulation to tame it, and the record was so much better for it. Those were the times the mic really failed me. On male vocals its a give and take. I've liked it on male pop & R&B vocals. I've never quite loved it on my vocals or other more theatrical male vocals. I used it for years doing session vocals when I used to actually go to pro studios for that work and always felt there was a tinny quality on it. My wife sounds fantastic on it. I like it on full voiced sopranos and mezzos and I've tried it on quite a few of those.
A big key to getting the right sound with the U87ai is the preamp. The microphone is a bit of a chameleon. It can sound really good through a Neve preamp, but with the right tube preamp it can sound almost U67 like. I've loved it through a Demeter VTMP-2B as well. I have to pick up that preamp again. It's not my favorite on tube mics, but it's magical on FET mics. It was a very tough call for a session Emily did between our MK U67 through my Dan Alexander and the U87ai through the Demeter. It was darn close. On my first album I used it through a Summit MPC-100A. Now maybe it was the gorgeous hall, maybe it was the preamp or some combination, but that sound worked beautifully... we also used a Royer SF12 in the hall and may have blended a little of a Blue Woodpecker into the sound. So that probably helped.
|
|
|
Post by crillemannen on Feb 23, 2022 11:57:23 GMT -6
I've owned two vintage U87s also used the Ai on several occasions. I'd love to do a proper a/b though but here is my thoughts..
The Ai has more capsule resonance which can be quite prominent as above poster said. The lowmids also seem to have a lower resolution. And what I mean with that is on the vintage you can cut some 400hz and it sounds fine and balanced while on the Ai you either get to thick lowmids or to scooped.
The vintage ones that I owned where very natural and open in that vintage Neumann way. I wouldn't recommend anyone buying one though for what they're going for now...
|
|
|
Post by enlav on Feb 23, 2022 12:33:07 GMT -6
The Ai has more capsule resonance which can be quite prominent as above poster said. While I certainly don't have the knowledge or ability to hear capsule resonance (consciously or knowingly), this strikes me as very interesting. The VO we cut on the 87AI has never really suffered as a result of it being an AI vs. vintage.
But for some talent, especially for high-energy reads, we would generally get a second microphone up in case the U87AI came off as a bit too pointed.
I don't personally own a U87AI though, even for how much vintage 87's go for, the brand new price for a U87AI is hard to justify when you could just rent one or book a space that has it if needed.
|
|