|
Post by studio54 on Jan 16, 2022 12:47:34 GMT -6
I'm hoping those of you using SonarWorks Reference ID would be willing to share your experience with the "translation check" feature. I just started using the software a few weeks ago. This is my first experience with room correction and with applying EQ curves to the master bus output to simulate different listening environments, so I'm hoping others might share their perspective.
I've been using the "translation check" feature quite a bit. I apply the various EQ curves to a reference mix and then compare it to my own. This seems to be giving me a deeper insight into areas in my own mix that need attention.
I only have 1 set of monitors in my studio and I cross-check mixes on a pair of consumer earbuds. This new tool I have available seems sort of magical to me since it, in theory, gives me this super power of hearing what my mix might sounds like on other playback systems.
I'm not sure how accurate these various EQ curves are at simulating other monitor systems or helping with translation out in the real world. I mean, obviously I can hear that the various EQ simulations do what they are supposed to. What I'm wondering is if this feature is something I can rely on to get my mixes closer to finished before checking on other playback systems.
I'd be interested in hearing of others' experiences with this feature (or other, similar software), how you use it, and any pearls/pitfalls you might be willing to share.
Thanks in advance!!
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 16, 2022 13:02:35 GMT -6
I really don’t use them at all. Not sure I’d trust them. If it sounds good in the room, it should sound good everywhere else.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Jan 16, 2022 13:20:04 GMT -6
I read mixed reviews on line. I am with Johnken, get to know how your monitors and room translate, everything else I think just messes up your actual calibration to your room.
|
|
|
Post by mcirish on Jan 17, 2022 8:42:18 GMT -6
I find the translation tests to be worthless. I use Sonarworks all the time, but the extra EQ curves for various environments seems like a gimmick and doesn't help me in any way.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Jan 17, 2022 10:34:51 GMT -6
An added “feature” to support the price increase, whether it truly adds value is another question; kind of thing I would never use.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Jan 17, 2022 11:21:43 GMT -6
I don't use it I switch real monitors NS 10 vs MEG 906 vs other grot-boxes and final AKG K 701 HP ... with and without sonar works... The mix should translate OK I am not a professional AE OK is good enough...
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,984
|
Post by ericn on Jan 17, 2022 15:41:50 GMT -6
I find the translation tests to be worthless. I use Sonarworks all the time, but the extra EQ curves for various environments seems like a gimmick and doesn't help me in any way. A lot of this is quite simple; there is more to skinning this cat, the sound of a speaker than phase and EQ. You have the distortion of the drivers, polar patterns and even driver spacing and cabinet created issues.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Jan 18, 2022 1:42:29 GMT -6
I find the translation tests to be worthless. I use Sonarworks all the time, but the extra EQ curves for various environments seems like a gimmick and doesn't help me in any way. A lot of this is quite simple; there is more to skinning this cat, the sound of a speaker than phase and EQ. You have the distortion of the drivers, polar patterns and even driver spacing and cabinet created issues. That kind of posts are the reason why I like your comments. Right to the point getting rid of all useless information. Yes the NS10s sound ugly but the saying is true. When the mix translates on them and you do not have the feeling it sounds ugly you know you are close to the end of your mix. When it still sounds uncomfortable, like a cold shower at 6 in the morning.... back to work. Or to put it another way the NS 10s take me out of my comfort zone. Comfort Zone is nice but not place forever... the war of art is out of this zone.
|
|