|
Post by mrholmes on Dec 8, 2019 11:45:44 GMT -6
I posted it already on Instagram...
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Dec 8, 2019 12:09:40 GMT -6
When you say Mixbuss - you're talking about the 2-buss master track (stereo output) in Logic, right? Not the Harrison Mixbuss. I'm not saying it's not true, but I haven't personally noticed that plugins on the 2-buss put any more strain on my CPU than they do on an individual track, and I'm pretty sure I've done an ad hoc experiment or two to confirm that when I've gotten myself in CPU trouble.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Dec 8, 2019 12:12:25 GMT -6
Wait....I thought Pro Tools was the only DAW with "issues"?? . LOL Congrats on the solution mrholmes!! I use VEP on and off as well. Personally, I like having the VSTi's directly inside PT for a more streamlined approach, but when the lifting gets really heavy, VEP to the rescue!! Cheers, bp
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Dec 8, 2019 14:56:43 GMT -6
When you say Mixbuss - you're talking about the 2-buss master track (stereo output) in Logic, right? Not the Harrison Mixbuss. I'm not saying it's not true, but I haven't personally noticed that plugins on the 2-buss put any more strain on my CPU than they do on an individual track, and I'm pretty sure I've done an ad hoc experiment or two to confirm that when I've gotten myself in CPU trouble. Jupp I talk about the 2bus stereo output. The 2 bus plug ins in Logic do not put more strain to the CPU as they do on other channels.
They are calculated on a single core which starts to overload the more the project grows.
Vienna Ensemble pro also does this calculation on single core the difference is it's no longer colliding with the other calculation and logic.
That peak/spike thing is a big problem with Logic ever since I know LogicX, and this is 15 years by now.
I now also run Vienna Pro on a second Mac for virtual instruments which also helps the CPU....
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Dec 8, 2019 15:10:35 GMT -6
The 2 bus plug ins in Logic do not put more strain to the CPU as they do on other channels.
I'm having trouble understanding because you appear to be saying two different things.. in the quote above you say 2 bus plug ins in Logic do not put more strain on the CPU but in your instagram post (quoted below) you say that the Mixbuss (2-buss) uses more CPU.. Are you perhaps saying that all plugins use the same core, regardless of where you put them?
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Dec 8, 2019 15:25:12 GMT -6
The 2 bus plug ins in Logic do not put more strain to the CPU as they do on other channels.
I'm having trouble understanding because you appear to be saying two different things.. in the quote above you say 2 bus plug ins in Logic do not put more strain on the CPU but in your instagram post (quoted below) you say that the Mixbuss (2-buss) uses more CPU.. Are you perhaps saying that all plugins use the same core, regardless of where you put them?
I do not say that they use more CPU I say: The 2 bus plug ins are calculated on ONE SINGLE CORE in LOGIC. This runs flawless for long time, but at certain point your project grows and other plugs use that core as well = BS starts = Dropouts, Sample Rate Errors.... etc.
|
|